Working together for quality mental health services General Practitioners Perspective Mental Health Act 2001.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ARREST.
Advertisements

Discussion topics Dr Layth Delaimy. Assessing suicide risk Why do we assess? How could we intervene? Should we prevent suicide? Ethical Dilemmas.
2005. Why is it necessary When person lacks capacity physicians have power and influence over them which could be abused 30% pts on acute medical wards.
THE DEPRIVATION OF LIBERTY SAFEGUARDS
Medical Consent Guardianship Board. Consent to Medical or Dental Treatment A patient cannot receive medical treatment without consentA patient cannot.
1 Patients’ Rights and Responsibilities. PATIENT RIGHTS 2 Every healthcare facility is mandated to display the following Rights and Responsibilities:
How to Find Your Way Around
302 Involuntary Commitment
Interface of legal and clinical issues in emergency settings Kathleen Crapanzano, M.D. Office of Mental Health Medical Director.
Outpatient Services Programs Workgroup: Laura’s Law May 29, 2014.
Safeguarding Adults Briefing 31 st March 2014 Kate Spreadbury Service Manager.
Assessment The registered medical practitioner (RMP) employed by an approved mental health service or the ‘mental health practitioner’ (MHP) assesses the.
Responsible Clinician and Approved Clinician Roles
Dr Ruth Yates GP ST2 in Psychiatry. Aims and Objectives To learn about the Mental Health Act 1983 and different sections of it To learn how to detain.
Supporting and Protecting Adults From Harm Community Planning Board 10 th November 2011 Wendy Hinnie.
© Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario, 2006 Circle of Care Ontario University & College Health Association - May 24, Manuela Di Re Associate.
Chapter 45 of the Laws of Barbados
Mental Health Act 2001 Meeting the Challenge of Building a person-centred mental health service for people with intellectual disabilities 25th October.
The Adult Support and Protection (Scotland) Act 2007 (“the Act”) Level 1.
PILOT INVOLUNTARY TREATMENT PROGRAM Kevin Hedge Sydney West Area Health Service Centre for Addiction Medicine Nepean Hospital.
Restraint and deprivation of liberty: ethical considerations Anne Slowther.
Treatment for Mental Disorders and Protection of Patients’ Rights Mary Donnelly Law Faculty, University College Cork Centre for Criminal Justice and Human.
The Mental Health Act 2001 in Practice: a Legal Representative’s Viewpoint Áine Hynes Roger Greene & Sons.
Child Care (Pre-School Services) Regulations 2006 Breda McCarthy Project Leader Pre-School services HSE West
Private Fostering “Someone else’s Child”
Jill Malat Office of Civil Legal Aid Children’s Representation Program
Áine Hynes St. John Solicitors Mental Health Law Written by Áine Hynes for the Public Interest Law Alliance, a project of FLAC - 9 March 2011.
MENTAL HEALTH (AMENDMENT) ACT 2003 Given Royal Assent on 21 October Except for Part 2, the Act came into operation the day after it was given Royal.
Minors and Mental Health Treatment: Who Gets to Decide? Center for Children’s Advocacy KidsCounsel Seminar September 29, 2009 Jay E. Sicklick, Esq. Deputy.
Updated 12/02/2007 Relevant Laws Relevant Laws ContraceptionContraception, Sterilisation and Abortion Act 1977 (CS&A Act) CS & A Amendment 1978, 1990 AbortionCare.
REGULATION OF HEALTH PRACTICE Prof Ames Dhai. Introduction Constitution Statutes (Acts of Parliament) Common Law Criminal.
THE MENTAL HEALTH ACT 2007 Implications for the medical treatment of patients in the community Richard Jones Consultant in Mental Health and Community.
1 APPEARING BEFORE THE MENTAL HEALTH TRIBUNAL. 2 Index The Provisions of the Act relating to Tribunal hearings3 – 6 What is Evidence 7 Section 24 Continuing.
Assessment & treatment Least restrictions on rights and dignity Support persons to make/participate in decisions Provide oversight & safeguard Role of.
The Adult Support and Protection (Scotland) Act 2007
Understanding decision making - Prosecuting complaints Karen Mobbs Director of Proceedings Health Care Complaints Commission Patrick Griffin Barrister.
Section 97(5) of the Act The National Commissioner must, after consultation with DG’s of Social Development, Justice, Education and Correctional Services,
The Mental Capacity Act 2005
Dr Mike Ewart Smith Division of Psychiatry, University of Witwatersrand The Ethics of Informed Consent: Revisiting the Doctor Patient Relationship.
Implementation of the Mental Health Act 2007 Section 12(2) Approved Doctors.
Capacity Issues in the Context of Mental Health Act 2001 NATIONAL FEDERATION OF VOLULNTARY BODIES “Meeting the Challenge – Of Building a Person Centred.
GUARDIANSHIP ORDERS WHAT THE BENCH LOOKS FOR AND NEEDS IN ORDER TO MAKE A GUARDIANSHIP ORDER UNDER S79A.
THE MENTAL HEALTH ACT The Mental Health Act 2007 Amends the mental Health Act 1983 Does not replace the 1983 Act.
1 Understanding and Managing Huntingdon’s Disease Mental Capacity Act 2005 Julia Barrell MCA Manager Cardiff and Vale UHB.
Mandatory Outpatient Treatment Following Involuntary Inpatient Admission Allyson K. Tysinger Office of the Attorney General May 2010.
Supervised Community Treatment Sue Browning –Social work team manager.
NHS North Yorkshire and York1 The MCA & The MHA The main features GP Registrars 12 December 2012 Chris Brace.
Amy Groh, MA Director of Crisis Intervention Services 19 N. 6 th Street. Reading, PA (610) Crisis Intervention & Emergency Services.
Mental Health Ordinance 2001 Assessment and Treatment of Mentally Disorder persons.
MEDICAL TREATMENT OF MENTAL ILLNESS Mentally sick persons (insane) have no insight into their illness. They neither have the ability to consent nor to.
Westminster Homeless Health Co-ordination project 02/02/2016
1 REFUGEES AMENDMENT BILL, 2008 Presentation to the Select Committee on Social Services 17 June 2008 Caring, compassionate and responsive.
Mental Capacity Act and DoLS. Aim – Mental Capacity Act You will: Know what is covered by the MCA Understand the principles of the Act Understand what.
What are Advance Statements?. What is a Nominated Person?
The Mental Health Act 2009 An Overview Jacob Alexander The Adelaide Pre-Vocational Psychiatry Program 2016.
© Care Act 2014 Joanna Burton, Solicitor Clarke Willmott LLP T: E: W:
The Mental Health Act & Mental Capacity act Dr Faye Tarrant ST5 Substance Misuse.
7 th Child Welfare Information Seminar 23 rd April 2016 National Vetting Bureau (Children and Vulnerable Persons) Acts 2012 to 2016.
Dennis is 90 years old, he has fallen over and needs an operation, the medical team states that his wife can consent on his behalf, if he is unable to.
MHA Receipt & Scrutiny Training for Qualified Nurses & MHPs Presented by: Sharon Long Deputy MHA Manager Version 1.
Health and Social Care Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards.
1. 2 Learning Outcomes Gain awareness and understanding of the definition of mental disorder contained within the MHA; Understand the criteria for detention.
Sophie Honohan Barrister-at-Law, Accredited Mediator 21 st April, 2016 Health Identifiers Act Conference.
Substance Addiction(Compulsory Assessment and Treatment) Act 2017 Processes
Managing Behavioral Health Crisis Patients
Substance Addiction(Compulsory Assessment and Treatment) Act 2017 Processes relevant to Children and Young People
Safeguarding training
Mental health Act, 1987.
The Mental Health Care and Treatment (Scotland Act) 2003 – A short guide to detention June 2017.
SAR Conference Presentation
Presentation transcript:

Working together for quality mental health services General Practitioners Perspective Mental Health Act 2001

Working together for quality mental health services Principles underpinning the Mental Health Act 2001 Best interests of the person. Quality and best practice. Transparency and openness. Right to information and representation. Second opinion and review systems.

Working together for quality mental health services General Practitioner Perspective

Working together for quality mental health services Mental Health Act 2001 : Involuntary admission process. – Application – Recommendation – Admission Order Role of the Garda Síochána.

Working together for quality mental health services Voluntary admission process Mental Health Act 2001 does not impose any obligations or restrictions on persons wishing to be admitted voluntarily to an Approved Centre. The Act does not prevent a person remaining as a voluntary patient after he/she has ceased to be detained.

Working together for quality mental health services Involuntary admission process Criteria S.8 – Person may be involuntarily admitted to an Approved Centre pursuant to an application under S9 or S12 and detained there on the grounds that he or she is suffering from a mental disorder.

Working together for quality mental health services Mental Disorder: Definition (Section 3)

Working together for quality mental health services Mental illness, severe dementia or significant intellectual disability WHERE A. Because of the illness, dementia or disability: there is a serious likelihood of the person concerned causing immediate & serious harm to himself or herself or other persons B. Because of the illness, dementia or disability: The judgement of the person concerned is so impaired that failure to admit the person to an approved centre would be likely to lead to a serious deterioration of his or her condition or would prevent the administration of appropriate treatment and reception, detention and treatment of the person would be likely to benefit or alleviate the condition of that person to a material extent. Mental Disorder (MHA 2001) means: OR

Working together for quality mental health services Mental Disorder: exclusion criteria Exclusion criteria – Behaviour, conditions or circumstances that cannot on their own be considered mental disorder S. 8 (2) – It is not lawful to detain a person as an involuntary patient in an Approved Centre solely because that person is: - a) Suffering from a personality disorder b) Socially deviant c) Addicted to drugs or intoxicants

Working together for quality mental health services Involuntary Admission Process (Adult)

Working together for quality mental health services Stage 1:Application for Recommendation Who may apply? a) Spouse or a relative of the person (does not include a spouse of a person who is living separately and apart from the person or in respect of whom an application or order has been made under the Domestic Violence Act, 1996). b) Authorised Officer (an officer of the Health Service Executive who is of a prescribed rank (prescribed by the Minister) or grade and who is authorised by the Chief Executive Officer to exercise the powers conferred on Authorised Officers by S9). c) A member of the Garda Síochána. d) Any other person – provided they are not a person disqualified by law.

Working together for quality mental health services Stage 1: Application for Recommendation Process – The applicant must have observed the person the subject of the application not more than 48 hours before the date of making the application – The applicant completes the relevant form Form 1 :Spouse or Relative Form 2:Authorised Officer Form 3:Garda Síochána Form 4:Any other person

Working together for quality mental health services Stage 1: Application for Recommendation Where the application is made by any other person (S9(1)(d)) the application shall contain a statement of: – The reasons why it is so made – The connection of the applicant with the person to whom the application relates – The circumstances in which the application is made Any person that makes any statement which to his or her knowledge is false or misleading in any material particular shall be guilty of an offence (S9(6)).

Working together for quality mental health services Persons disqualified from making applications A person under the age of 18 years. An authorised officer or a member of the Garda Síochána who is a relative or a spouse of the person. A member of the governing body (does not include a member of the HSE), or the staff, or the person in charge of the Approved Centre. Any person with an interest in any payment to be made in respect of the admission and detention of the person in the Approved Centre concerned.

Working together for quality mental health services Persons disqualified from making applications Any registered medical practitioner who provides a regular medical service at the Approved Centre concerned. The spouse, parent, grandparent, brother, sister, uncle or aunt of any of the disqualified persons are also deemed to be disqualified. Such relationships may be: – Whole blood relationships – Half blood relationshipsor – Relationships based on affinity (relationships arising by virtue of marriage).

Working together for quality mental health services Stage 2: Making of a recommendation for Involuntary Admission (S10)

Working together for quality mental health services Stage 2: Making of a recommendation for Involuntary Admission (S10) Who may make such recommendation? A Registered Medical Practitioner (a person whose name is entered in the General Register of Medical Practitioners – Section 2)

Working together for quality mental health services Stage 2:Process – Registered Medical Practitioner receives an application on one of the statutory forms numbered 1 – 4 – Within 24 hours of the receipt of the application the Registered Medical Practitioner (RMP):- Examines the person (a personal examination of the process and content of thought, the mood and the behaviour of the person concerned (S.2) Informs the person of the purpose of the examination, unless in her/his view the provision of such information might be prejudicial to the person’s mental health, well-being or emotional condition.

Working together for quality mental health services Stage 2:Process If the RMP is satisfied following the examination of the person that he/she is suffering from a mental disorder: – he/she shall make a recommendation on Form 5 (Recommendation (by a registered medical practitioner) for involuntary admission of an Adult to an Approved Centre) that the person can be involuntarily admitted to an Approved Centre (other than the Central Mental Hospital).

Working together for quality mental health services Stage 2:Process The RMP sends the recommendation to the Clinical Director of the Approved Centre concerned, The RMP gives a copy of the recommendation to the applicant, A recommendation is valid for a period of 7 days from the date of its making after which it expires, If the RMP is not satisfied following the examination of the person that he/she is suffering from a mental disorder he/she does not make a recommendation.

Working together for quality mental health services Stage 2:Process Where following a refusal of an application, any further application is made in respect of the same person, the applicant is obliged by law to inform the RMP of: – the facts relating to the previous application in so far as they are aware of them, as well as, – the facts relating to any other application and its refusal made previously in relation to that person, as far as they are aware of them. Failure to do this is an offence.

Working together for quality mental health services Registered Medical Practitioners disqualified from making a recommendation A RMP is disqualified from making a recommendation if he or she:- – has an interest in the payments (if any) to be made in respect of the care of the person in the Approved Centre concerned, – is a member of staff in the Approved Centre concerned, – is a spouse or a relative of the person, or, – is the applicant.

Working together for quality mental health services Powers of the Garda Síochána

Working together for quality mental health services Powers of the Garda Síochána – A member may make an application (Form 3) to a Registered Medical Practitioner (RMP) for a recommendation for involuntary admission of an adult, – If such application is refused (pursuant to the provisions of S.10) the person the subject of the application shall be released from custody immediately, – Where a recommendation is made by the RMP a member of the Garda Síochána shall remove the person concerned to the specified Approved Centre.

Working together for quality mental health services How is the person brought to the Approved Centre?

Working together for quality mental health services How is the person brought to the Approved Centre? Applicant is responsible for arranging for the removal of the person the subject of the recommendation to the Approved Centre. Where the applicant is unable to make such arrangements the Clinical Director of the Approved Centre (or a consultant psychiatrist acting on his/her behalf) at the request of the RMP shall arrange for removal of the person to the Approved Centre by members of staff of the Approved Centre.

Working together for quality mental health services How is the person brought to the Approved Centre? Where the Clinical Director (or consultant psychiatrist acting on his/her behalf) And The RMP who made the recommendation, are of the opinion that there is a serious likelihood of the person concerned causing: – Immediate and serious harm to himself or herself, or to other persons The Clinical Director may request the Garda Síochána to assist the members of staff in the removal by the staff of the person to that centre and the Garda Síochána shall comply with any such request.

Working together for quality mental health services Step 3: Involuntary Admission Process Admission Order

Working together for quality mental health services Involuntary Admission Process Step 3: Admission Order Clinical Director of Approved Centre receives a recommendation, A consultant psychiatrist (on the staff of the approved centre) examines the person as soon as practicable, and in any event within 24 hours. Consultant psychiatrist must examine – Process and content of thought, and – Mood and behaviour of the person concerned AND If consultant psychiatrist is satisfied that the person has a mental disorder he/she makes an admission order by completing Form 6. Within 24 hours of making the order the Consultant psychiatrist must: – Send a copy of the order to the Mental Health Commission, – Give the patient notice in writing that the admission order has been made.

Working together for quality mental health services Sources of Information

Working together for quality mental health services Sources of Information Reference Guide: Mental Health Act 2001 – 2 parts Part 1 – Adults Part 2 – Children – A4 Ring-binder folder – Distributed to General Practitioners Leaflet – Registered Medical Practitioners E – Learning programme – Accessed from Mental Health Commission website –

Working together for quality mental health services Considerations: From examination is there a presence of a mental disorder? Is there a likelihood of risk to self or others? Will admission to an approved centre provide appropriate treatment that will be of benefit to the person concerned? Has a least restrictive option been considered, ie voluntary admission? What other options are available other than involuntary admission to an approved centre? Transporting the person to the approved centre

Working together for quality mental health services Discussion Questions Thank you