The German Experience: Patent litigation and nullification cases

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Court Expert System in Germany -Overview-. Who is an Expert? No definition in German law but defined in jurisprudence No definition in German law but.
Advertisements

The UPC in the European Patent Litigation landscape
Taking of evidence within the European Union Council regulation no 1206/2001 on cooperation between the courts of Member States in the taking of evidence.
Patent Enforcement in Germany Pros and Cons by Alexander Harguth Attorney at law Patent- und Rechtsanwälte Alexander Harguth - Attorney at law - Galileiplatz.
Appeal Practice Before Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences
Mr. Marquina Somerset Silver Palms Civics
Last Topic - Difference between State and Nation
The Role of Patent Attorneys
OFFICE FOR THE PROTECTION OF COMPETITION OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC1 Judicial Review in Competition Cases in the Czech Republic Robert Neruda Director of the.
IPR Litigation System & Recent Case in Korea Hee-Young JEONG Judge of Daejeon District Court, KOREA April 22, 2015.
AIPLA Annual Meeting 2014 Bifurcation before the UPC Dr. Jochen Pagenberg Attorney-at-law, Munich/Paris Past President EPLAW Prinzregentenplatz
Comparative Law Spring 2002 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS 29 GERMAN CRIMINAL PROCEDURE III FRENCH CIVIL PROCEDURE March 26, 2002.
Chapter 7: The Judicial Branch
| Intellectual Property, in particular Patent Litigation in Switzerland Dr. iur. Andri Hess April 22, 2013.
U.S. District Courts and U.S. Courts of Appeals
Meyerlustenberger Rechtsanwälte − Attorneys at Lawwww.meyerlustenberger.ch European Patent Law and Litigation Guest Lecture, Health and Intellectual Property.
Comparison of the Litigation Systems in Germany, France and the UK
Handling IP Disputes in a Global Economy Huw Evans Norton Rose Fulbright LLP.
PROTECTING INVENTIONS in the international environment Eytan Jaffe – Israeli Patent Attorney.
Chapter 7: The Judicial Branch
Get out your notebook and textbook!. Chapter 18: The Federal Court System.
Evolution of Judicial Specialization in Environmental Law – United States Asian Judges Symposium Manila, Philippines July 2010.
The American Court System A basic structural primer.
The Federal Court System According to the Constitution, Congress has the power to create inferior courts (all federal courts, other than the Supreme Court.)
The Court System. The US Federal Court System The Current Supreme Court The court has final authority on cases involving the constitution, acts of Congress,
Taking of evidence within the European Union Council regulation no 1206/2001 on cooperation between the courts of Member States in the taking of evidence.
The American Legal System
Appeals in patent examination and opposition in Germany Karin Friehe Judge, Federal Patent Court, Munich, Germany.
ENFORCEMENT OF PATENT RIGHTS IN EUROPE The Hungarian way Zsolt SZENTPÉTERI S.B.G.&K. Patent and Law Offices, Budapest International Seminar Intellectual.
Institut der beim Europäischen Patentamt zugelassenen Vertreter Institute of Professional Representatives before the European Patent Office Institut des.
Dr. Thomas Pattloch, LL.M.Eur. The new Chinese Patent Law An overview Dr. Thomas Pattloch, LL.M.Eur., German Attorney at Law Senior Counsel TaylorWessing.
© 2004 VOSSIUS & PARTNER Opposition in the Procedural System by Dr. Johann Pitz AIPPI Hungary, June 2 – 4, 2004 Kecskemét.
Institut der beim Europäischen Patentamt zugelassenen Vertreter Institute of Professional Representatives before the European Patent Office Institut des.
1 Reformatory Procedure in Administrative Cases - Sweden.
{ The Organization of the Federal Courts PowerPoint Review of the Judicial Branch.
HOW FEDERAL COURTS ARE ORGANIZED Chapter 8:2. The hierarchy of the court systems There is a hierarchy for the court system of the US. There is a hierarchy.
Judicial Branch Federal District Courts (94 Courts in 12 Districts) Federal Appeals Court (12 Appeals Courts +1 Special Appeals Court) Supreme Court (Highest.
Structure of the Federal Court System
Types of Federal Courts The Constitution created only the Supreme Court, giving Congress the power to create any lower, or “inferior,” courts as needed.
8.2 How Federal Courts Are Organized. US District Courts District Courts= federal courts where trials are held and lawsuits begin; 94 district courts.
Oppositions, Appeals and Oral Proceedings at the EPO Michael Williams.
The Organization of the Federal Courts Vocabulary: 1.Court of Appeals 2.Circuit Courts.
Trends Relating to Patent Infringement Litigation in JAPAN
Trends and Successes in Improving Access to Justice Dr. Pim Albers Special advisor.
Professor Guy Wellborn
The Organization of The Federal Courts Chapter 10 Section 2.
Chapter 7: The Judicial Branch. “The Federal Court System & How Federal Courts Are Organized”
European Patent Attorneys Chartered Patent Attorneys Trade Mark Attorneys Practical approaches to appeals before the European Patent Office Paul Chapman.
re-constituted as a federation Courts approved by the Federation Council (Article 127) 80 Subjects Regions 2 major cities Moscow, St Petersburg.
COURTS, JUDGES AND THE LAW Key Terms on Judicial Branch.
Foundations of United States Citizenship Lesson 5, Chapter 6, U.S. National Government 1 What is the function of the judicial branch? Federal courts make.
8.2 How Federal Courts Are Organized Ms. Nesbit Civics and Economics.
THE JUDICIAL BRANCH COURTS, JUDGES, AND THE LAW. MAIN ROLE Conflict Resolution! With every law, comes potential conflict Role of judicial system is to.
Judicial System in Germany for IPR Protection presented at the 2009 International Conference on Judicial Protection of IPR 10 September 2009, Chengdu,
Protection of Trade Secret in Future Japanese Patent Litigation
The Court system and The Constitutional Court system of Korea KH LEE )
16/20/11/09 – EU Civil Patent Enforcement HG Patent Rights in the EU – The Civil Enforcement Perspective Heinz Goddar Boehmert & Boehmert.
Tax Court system in Germany The role of the Federal Tax Court
ENFORCEMENT OF PATENT RIGHTS IN EUROPE The Hungarian way
The Federal Court System
The Future of Civil Procedure
Article III of the Constitution The Courts
The Role of Patent Attorneys
The Court System Street Law.
The Court System Appeals.
By: Suzi, Joel, Anna , and Xander
Each state has its own judicial system that hears nonfederal cases
How the Federal Gov’t Works: The Judicial Branch
Article III of the Constitution The Courts
LECTURE No 6 - THE EUROPEAN UNION’s JUDICIAL SYSTEM I (courts)
Presentation transcript:

The German Experience: Patent litigation and nullification cases Dr. Oliver Schön, Judge at the District Court Munich I Moscow/ Skolkovo, 1st of December 2014 Technical knowledge in IP cases The German Experience: Patent litigation and nullification cases

Introduction Overview Bifurcation system Role of patent attorneys The Federal Patent Court Infringement cases Role of patent attorneys What are technical questions? Court appointed experts Private experts Summary

German Patent and Trademark Office Bifurcation System Federal Supreme Court Higher Regional Court District Court Infringement Federal Patent Court German Patent and Trademark Office Nullification

Jurisdiction of the Federal Patent Court in Patent Cases Opposition against decisions of the German Patent and Trademark Office Refusal of patent registration Opposition of third parties Panel of four judges (one legal judge, three technical judges) Nullification of Patents (about 300 cases p.a) German patents (20 %) German part of European patents (80 %) Panel of five judges (two legal judges, three technical judges)

Proceedings Federal Patent Court and Supreme Court handle facts Concentration in one oral hearing Principle of investigation Since 2009: The Federal Patent Court is obliged to give a detailed indication concerning their understanding of the case in advance to the oral hearing Speed up proceedings Reduction of court expert appointments at the Federal Supreme Court

How to become a judge at the Federal Patent Court Technical and legally qualified judges (total: 112 in 2012) Legal judges (47 judges) Lawyers of the German Patent and Trademark Office Judges from regular courts Technical judges (65 judges) Senior patent examiners According to their field of expertise

Patent Infringement Cases 12 Courts in Germany have jurisdiction Specialized Chambers Panel with three judges (presiding judge and two judges), all with legal education Facts are handled at disctrict court and higher regional court Federal Supreme Court: Only questions of law

Relation between infringement and nullification proceedings No direct relation between proccedings Duration until first instance judgement: Infringement court: 12 – 16 month Federal Patent Court: 18 – 24 month Infringement court can stay proceedings, if: There is an infringement If there is a high possibility that the patent will be nullified (Burden of proof: defendant)

Role of patent Attorneys University degree in a technical field Two years additional legal education There are about 3.000 patent attorneys in Germany

Role of patent Attorneys Germany: Loser pays all principle: Refundable costs are based on the value of the case In patent and trademark cases the costs for the lawyer and the patent attorney are refundable

How to present facts in a court case Rule Inter parte process: Each party has to present all facts that are necessary to establish the claim Patent Attorney: Provides a technical analysis of the subject matter Lawyer: Helps the patent attorney to prepare the technical facts in a way that the (legal) judges can understand the technical problem Provides legal analysis

Questions of law/ technical questions Legal question Novelty Inventive step Scope of protection of the patent claim Infringement Theory of equivalence Technical question Technical details of the invention Knowledge of the person skilled in the art

Use of court appointed experts Possible evidence are: Documents Witnesses Inspections Court appointed experts Hearing of parties (very limited)

Use of court appointed experts Appointment of court experts is very rare in recent years In infringement cases judges get well prepared data from the parties In nullity cases the technical experience of the technical judges is sufficient In appeal cases at the Federal Supreme Court the number of court expert appointments is reduced, because of the detailed advance indication

Use of private expert opinions Private expert opinions are possible They are handled as parties opinion They should be – in general – covered in the judgement

Summary Bifurcation system speeds up infringement proceedings Technical judges ensure technical knowledge in nullification proceedings Court appointed experts rarely used in infringement proceedings, parties provide detailed technical explanations to the court

Thank your for your attention.