European Criminal Law: What’s New for 2013? Professor John Spencer President 17 February 2013, 4.30.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Great British Opt-out: timeline December 2007: Lisbon Treaty signed, Tonys Time-bomb planted December 2009: Treaty in force January 2011: Ticking.
Advertisements

Purpose MLA and extradition (and other forms of international judicial cooperation) with 3rd countries is part of the external policy of the Union Purpose.
European Criminal Law: What’s New for 2015? Professor John Spencer President 2 March 2015,
The Law of the Lisbon Treaty. Our emerging European Criminal Process ? Professor Dermot P.J. Walsh School of Law University of Limerick.
The Area of Liberty, Security and Justice. Objectives Free movement for EU citizens Security and safety in a Europe without borders Figth against international.
The Institution of the Prefect of the Brasov County.
The European Public Prosecutor: Coming soon to a country near you? An EPP working with UK authorities Practical issues Mike Kennedy President of Eurojust.
New Rights in 2015 for Victims of Crime in Europe! “Together for the Victims ” Good Morning Hungary David McKenna, President, Victim Support Europe.
Eurojust The European Union’s Judicial Cooperation Unit.
TAMARA ĆAPETA Powers of the EU in international relations.
From Rome, 1957 to Nice, 2000 The Treaties of the European Union - is it time for a single constitution?
Welcome. Eurojust: co-operation or integration in cross-border prosecutions? Implementation of Articles 85 and 86 TFEU IALS 12 December 2011 Aled Williams.
EU Criminal Law Introduction, Lisbon Treaty. EU criminal legislation EU cannot adopt a general EU criminal code EU cannot adopt a general EU criminal.
Under Maastricht … The “Maastricht Measures” New agencies Police co-operation measures Mutual recognition Harmonising criminal law Harmonising criminal.
6 December 2010 Judicial cooperation in the EU From mutual legal assistance to mutual recognition Adrienne Boerwinkel Senior Legal Adviser Dutch Ministry.
7 December 2010 Procedural rights of suspects and accused in the EU The Roadmap and its implementation Adrienne Boerwinkel Senior Legal Adviser Dutch Ministry.
Libby McVeigh Fair
The Roadmap: Where do things stand with the UK? And what will happen next? Professor John Spencer 29 July 2015,
Ed Cape Professor of Criminal Law and Practice. Early access to legal aid means access to legal aid from the time that a person is suspected of, arrested.
Response to Trafficking for forced criminal exploitation and begging
Course: European Criminal Law SS 2009 Hubert Hinterhofer.
Tackling IT crime in a global context: the Convention on Cybercrime 3 years after Julio Pérez Gil University of Burgos, Spain.
M O D U L O IV M O D U L E IV. THE PRINCIPLE OF MUTUAL RECOGNITION AND ITS IMPLEMENTATION.
Do we need the EPPO? by Prof. Katalin Ligeti. 1.The reasons: non-investigation and non-prosecution of EU fraud Art 86 TFEU is a recognition of the fact.
Comparative Law Spring 2003 The Last Class! English Criminal Procedure Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Professor Fischer April.
Welcome to Maastricht University. Faculty of Law Oral v. written evidence in the European Union Prof. André Klip Maastricht University, Ravenna 14 May.
European civil procedure law Judicial cooperation in civil matters.
Europol Police Directorate International Operational Police Cooperation Department INTERPOL EUROPOL SELEC THURSDAY 12 DECEMBER 2013.
16/10/ THE GREAT BRITISH OPT-OUT Aled Williams.
EUROJUST EUROJUST Veronika Keller Seconded National Expert for the National Member for Germany (Eurojust)
Documentary holdings of the European Union law AL.
Treaties and Courts. Council of Europe: Intro Founded 1949 “Seeks to develop throughout Europe common and democratic principles based on the European.
Course: European Criminal Law SS 2009 Hubert Hinterhofer.
Executing Environmental Judgments in Criminal Proceedings.
The acquis Council Framework Decision of 19 July 2002 on combating trafficking in human beings (2002/629/JHA). Council Directive 2004/81/EC of 24 April.
1 Criminal law and the Lisbon Treaty: a real revolution. An overview of the development of criminal law within the EU Hans G. NILSSON Head of Division.
Professor J.R. Spencer, QC. What is the EU competent to do? TFEU Article 82 1.[Mutual recognition is just great!] 2.“To the extent necessary to facilitate.
Cje Wojciech Jasiński, Ph.D. Department of Criminal Procedure Faculty of Law, Administration and Economics University of Wrocław Lecture Harmonisation.
European Investigation Order: Update ECLA Seminar 5 th October 2015 Jodie Blackstock Director of Criminal Justice JUSTICE.
ARMED DRONES Tim Harman QCEA Programme Assistant.
The EU Fight against Environmental Crime – Directive 2008/99 Helge Elisabeth Zeitler DG Justice, Criminal Law.
Course: European Criminal Law SS 2009 Hubert Hinterhofer.
CRIMINAL LAW OF THE EUROPEAN UNION 1 April 2015 THE LISBON TREATY AND CRIMINAL LAW Dr. sc. Zoran Burić Department of Criminal Procedural Law University.
European Criminal Law: What’s New for 2016? Professor John Spencer President February 2016,
Course: European Criminal Law SS 2009 Hubert Hinterhofer.
European Union. Principal Objectives Establish European citizenship Ensure freedom, security & justice Promote economic and social progress Assert Europe’s.
European Committe for Social Rights. The Council of Europe was established in 1949 by 10 Countries. It has now 47 member States. The European Convention.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 31 – Common Foreign, Security and.
European Criminal Law after Lisbon EUSCLPV doc.dr.sc. Sunčana Roksandić Vidlička March 17, 2016.
UK and EU Criminal & Policing Law: What Effect of Brexit?
Eurojust The European Union’s Judicial Cooperation Unit.
MOSCOW, NOVEMBER 2007 JUSTICE AND HOME AFFAIRS AND EUROPEAN INTEGRATION PROF DR JAAP W. DE ZWAAN DIRECTOR ‘CLINGENDAEL’ AND PROFESSOR OF EU LAW THE NETHERLANDS.
Michelle Forrest JD Candidate, Santa Clara University School of Law
Lost in Translations – An Examination of the Legal & Practical Problems Associated with the Implementation (or Non-Implementation) of Directive 2010/64/EU.
The Criminal Justice Implications of a Brexit Professor John Spencer May
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 32 – Financial control Bilateral screening:
Procedural Safeguards in Criminal Proceedings in the European Union in Practice Estella Baker Professor of European Criminal Law & Justice
A New Settlement for the UK within the EU
EU Sanctions on Individuals
New Customs Legislation of the Eurasian Economic Union
DIRECTOR ‘CLINGENDAEL’ AND PROFESSOR OF EU LAW
The Legal Foundation of the EU
EUROPEAN PUBLIC PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE
Directive 2016/800 on procedural safeguards for children suspected or accused in criminal proceedings Steven Cras Political Administrator, General Secretariat.
Business Law: An Introduction Summary Notes 1
European Committe for Social Rights
2nd Biennial conference on the STOP program
EUROPEAN UNION CITIZENSHIP
BREXIT SOME CONSIDERATIONS Presented by David Mundy Partner
Miroslava Vozáryová Comenius University Bratislava, MFA SR
Presentation transcript:

European Criminal Law: What’s New for 2013? Professor John Spencer President 17 February 2013, 4.30

EU Criminal Law: what is it? Organisations: OLAF, Europol, Eurojust Police and Customs co-operation Prosecutors and Courts co-operation: mutual assistance/ mutual recognition (e.g. European Arrest Warrant) “Approximation” : substantive criminal law “Approximation”: criminal procedure

After Lisbon: the legal basis 82 TFEU “approximation” of criminal procedure, so far as “necessary to facilitate mutual recognition” 83 TFEU “approximation” of substantive criminal law ona range of specified topics, to which the Council can add, by unanimous decision.

The UK opt-outs: Protocol 21 – out of new criminal justice measures, unless we opt in, within three months of the balloon going up Protocol 36 – if we want to, we have five years to pull out the entire pre-Lisbon package, too (!)

Coalition policy: “is there anything in it for us?” “We will approach forthcoming legislation in the area of criminal justice on a case- by-case basis, with a view to maximising our country’s security, protecting Britain’s civil liberties and preserving the integrity of our criminal justice system. Britain will not participate in the establishment of any European Public Prosecutor.”

Some measures the UK has opted into after Lisbon Directive for a European Protection Order - in New Child Pornography Directive - in New Directive on People Trafficking – out, then eventually in New Directive on Rights of Victims – out, then eventually in Two Directives on Defence Rights - in Proposed new Directive on Cybercrime - in Proposed new Directive on a European Investigation Order - in

European Investigation Order

Some measures the UK has said “No thanks!” to Proposed new Directive on legal advice to suspects Proposed new Directive on confiscation orders

New measures on the horizon New Europol Regulation New Eurojust Regulation Proposal for an EPPO

“Corpus Juris Project” Corpus Juris Introducing penal provisions for the purpose of the financial interests of the European Union Sous la direction de Mireille DELMAS-MARTY Ec. Economica, 1997

European Union Act 2011 The “Referendum Lock” No UK participation in a European Public Prosecutor unless a national referendum votes in favour (!)

The Protocol 36 Opt-out – what it does not include: Measures, done and dusted, that the UK has already opted-into since Lisbon Measures in the process of manufacture, which the UK has already agreed it will opt into Future EU criminal justice measures adopted outside the parts of the Lisbon Treaty to which the UK’s right to stand aside does not apply

The Protocol 36 Opt-out: timeline December 2007: Lisbon Treaty signed, “Tony’s Time-bomb” planted December 2009: Treaty in force January 2011: Ticking noticed; votes in both Houses promised January 2012: Open Europe document February 2012: letter to theTelegraph 14 May 2012: Cambridge seminar 15 September 2012: CELS report

Time-line (continued) Late September: David Cameron in Brazil, “We’re doing it!” 15 October: Teresa May – “We’re minded to do it.” Daily Express “First Step to Britain’s EU Exit” 30 October: Raab report (Open Europe) 1 November: speech by Nick Clegg 1 November: HL EU Committee calls for evidence

Timeline (continued further) January 2013, HL Committee begins to take evidence January 2013, Government says “no decision until after Parliamentary debates; and no debates until after your report” January 2013: David Cameron’s “Europe” speech – “We’re doing it!” January 2013: Ken Clarke’s “30 measures”

Contrasting views on the EAW: The Hussein Osman case, 2005

Compare views on the Symeou Case

Developments with the EAW SC case-law: H. (H) v Deputy Prosecutor of Italian Republic, Genoa [2012] UKSC 25; [2012] 3 WLR 90 DC case-law: Krolik et al v Several Judicial Authorities of Poland [2012] EWHC (Admin) CJEU case-law: Radu, C-396/11 European Judicial Network Project Government response to Scott Baker Review Government attempts to negotiate in Europe

So what is behind the UK’s hostility to EU criminal law? “Because in Europe they have the inquisitorial system” “The moral superiority of the Common Law” (And widespread misunderstandings about the Continental systems)

Euromyths EU to ban corgis EU to ban double-decker buses Under EU law, it is illegal to bury dead pets unless you have pressure-cooked them first EU to ban barristers wigs Brussels has a secret plan to abolish the Common Law and make us have “the Napoleonic System”

“The Roadmap” Measure A: Translation and Interpretation Measure B: Information on Rights and Information about the Charges Measure C: Legal Advice and Legal Aid Measure D: Communication with Relatives, Employers and Consular Officials Measure E: Special Safeguards for Suspected or Accused Persons who are Vulnerable Measure F: A Green Paper on Pre-Trial Detention

What the UK has done about the Roadmap… Translation and interpretation: we’re in! Information: we’re in Legal advice and communication: we’ve declined to join Green Paper on Pre-trial Detention? Governmental response: “no legislation”

What English criminal procedure has to offer Europe Controlling police interviews with suspects Limiting pre-trial detention

The PACE safeguards the right to a solicitor: s.58 rules about the duration of interrogations: Code C 12 (especially12.8) the duty to make contemporaneous notes, and to give the suspect the chance to verify them: Code C.11 duty to caution: Code C.10 tape-recording: PACE s.60; Code E