Swaminathan Sridhar Multimedia Processing Lab

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to H.264 / AVC Video Coding Standard Multimedia Systems Sharif University of Technology November 2008.
Advertisements

Chapter 5 standards for multimedia communications
MPEG4 Natural Video Coding Functionalities: –Coding of arbitrary shaped objects –Efficient compression of video and images over wide range of bit rates.
Multiplexing H.264/AVC Video with MPEG-AAC Audio Harishankar Murugan University of Texas at Arlington.
A Brief Overview of the MPEG2 Standard Dr. David Corrigan.
-1/20- MPEG 4, H.264 Compression Standards Presented by Dukhyun Chang
Internet Video By Mo Li. Video over the Internet Introduction Video & Internet: the problems Solutions & Technologies in use Discussion.
SWE 423: Multimedia Systems
SWE 423: Multimedia Systems
Ch. 6- H.264/AVC Part I (pp.160~199) Sheng-kai Lin
Multiplexing H.264 and HEAACv2 elementary streams, de-multiplexing and achieving lip synchronization during playback Naveen Siddaraju
ATSC Digital Television
BY AMRUTA KULKARNI STUDENT ID : UNDER SUPERVISION OF DR. K.R. RAO Complexity Reduction Algorithm for Intra Mode Selection in H.264/AVC Video.
H.264/AVC for Wireless Applications Thomas Stockhammer, and Thomas Wiegand Institute for Communications Engineering, Munich University of Technology, Germany.
MPEG-2 Transport streams tMyn1 MPEG-2 Transport streams The MPEG-2 Systems Standard specifies two methods for multiplexing the audio, video and other data.
HARDEEPSINH JADEJA UTA ID: What is Transcoding The operation of converting video in one format to another format. It is the ability to take.
EE 5359 H.264 to VC 1 Transcoding Vidhya Vijayakumar Multimedia Processing Lab MSEE, University of Arlington Guided.
Moving PicturestMyn1 Moving Pictures MPEG, Motion Picture Experts Group MPEG is a set of standards designed to support ”Coding of Moving Pictures and Associated.
EE 5359 TOPICS IN SIGNAL PROCESSING
IMPLEMENTATION AND PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS of Dirac VIDEO CODING STANDARD AND COMPARISON WITH AVS CHINA Under the guidance of Dr. K R. Rao Electrical Engineering.
By Sudeep Gangavati ID EE5359 Spring 2012, UT Arlington
GODIAN MABINDAH RUTHERFORD UNUSI RICHARD MWANGI.  Differential coding operates by making numbers small. This is a major goal in compression technology:
EE 5359 TOPICS IN SIGNAL PROCESSING Interim Report ANALYSIS OF AVS-M FOR LOW PICTURE RESOLUTION MOBILE APPLICATIONS Under Guidance of: Dr. K. R. Rao Dept.
CS Spring 2012 CS 414 – Multimedia Systems Design Lecture 8 – JPEG Compression (Part 3) Klara Nahrstedt Spring 2012.
Audio/Video compression More about video compression and MPEG Alain Bouffioux December, 20, 2006.
MPEG MPEG-VideoThis deals with the compression of video signals to about 1.5 Mbits/s; MPEG-AudioThis deals with the compression of digital audio signals.
Audio Video coding Standard of (AVS) China Submitted by, Swaminathan Sridhar EE 5359 Multimedia Processing Project.
MPEG: (Moving Pictures Expert Group) A Video Compression Standard for Multimedia Applications Seo Yeong Geon Dept. of Computer Science in GNU.
Multiplexing/De-multiplexing Dirac Video with AAC Audio bit-stream
Audio Compression Usha Sree CMSC 691M 10/12/04. Motivation Efficient Storage Streaming Interactive Multimedia Applications.
Profiles and levelstMyn1 Profiles and levels MPEG-2 is intended to be generic, supporting a diverse range of applications Different algorithmic elements.
Windows Media Video 9 Tarun Bhatia Multimedia Processing Lab University Of Texas at Arlington 11/05/04.
Concepts of Multimedia Processing and Transmission IT 481, Lecture 5 Dennis McCaughey, Ph.D. 19 February, 2007.
By, ( ) Low Complexity Rate Control for VC-1 to H.264 Transcoding.
Dhatchaini Rajendran Student ID: Date :
Adaptive Multi-path Prediction for Error Resilient H.264 Coding Xiaosong Zhou, C.-C. Jay Kuo University of Southern California Multimedia Signal Processing.
- By Naveen Siddaraju - Under the guidance of Dr K R Rao Study and comparison of H.264/MPEG4.
8. 1 MPEG MPEG is Moving Picture Experts Group On 1992 MPEG-1 was the standard, but was replaced only a year after by MPEG-2. Nowadays, MPEG-2 is gradually.
Video Compression Standards for High Definition Video : A Comparative Study Of H.264, Dirac pro And AVS P2 By Sudeep Gangavati EE5359 Spring 2012, UT Arlington.
EE 5359 TOPICS IN SIGNAL PROCESSING PROJECT ANALYSIS OF AVS-M FOR LOW PICTURE RESOLUTION MOBILE APPLICATIONS Under Guidance of: Dr. K. R. Rao Dept. of.
Power saving control for the mobile DVB-H receivers based on H.264/SVC standard Eugeny Belyaev, Vitaly Grinko, Ann Ukhanova Saint-Petersburg State University.
Low-Power H.264 Video Compression Architecture for Mobile Communication Student: Tai-Jung Huang Advisor: Jar-Ferr Yang Teacher: Jenn-Jier Lien.
Sub pixel motion estimation for Wyner-Ziv side information generation Subrahmanya M V (Under the guidance of Dr. Rao and Dr.Jin-soo Kim)
Directional DCT Presented by, -Shreyanka Subbarayappa, Sadaf Ahamed, Tejas Sathe, Priyadarshini Anjanappa K. R. RAO 1.
Compression video overview 演講者:林崇元. Outline Introduction Fundamentals of video compression Picture type Signal quality measure Video encoder and decoder.
Implementation and comparison study of H.264 and AVS China EE 5359 Multimedia Processing Spring 2012 Guidance : Prof K R Rao Pavan Kumar Reddy Gajjala.
- By Naveen Siddaraju - Under the guidance of Dr K R Rao Study and comparison between H.264.
Figure 1.a AVS China encoder [3] Video Bit stream.
PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF AVS-M AND ITS APPLICATION IN MOBILE ENVIRONMENT By Vidur Vajani ( ) Under the guidance of Dr.
IMPLEMENTATION OF H.264/AVC, AVS China Part 7 and Dirac VIDEO CODING STANDARDS Under the guidance of Dr. K R. Rao Electrical Engineering Department The.
Scalable Video Coding and Transport Over Broad-band wireless networks Authors: D. Wu, Y. Hou, and Y.-Q. Zhang Source: Proceedings of the IEEE, Volume:
SUBMITTED BY, SWAMINATHAN SRIDHAR MS EE, UTA EE 5359 Multimedia Processing Project Multiplexing of AVS part 2 video with.
Vamsi Krishna Vegunta University of Texas, Arlington
UNDER THE GUIDANCE DR. K. R. RAO SUBMITTED BY SHAHEER AHMED ID : Encoding H.264 by Thread Level Parallelism.
-BY KUSHAL KUNIGAL UNDER GUIDANCE OF DR. K.R.RAO. SPRING 2011, ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON FPGA Implementation.
Porting of Fast Intra Prediction in HM7.0 to HM9.2
IntroductiontMyn1 Introduction MPEG, Moving Picture Experts Group was started in 1988 as a working group within ISO/IEC with the aim of defining standards.
UNDER THE GUIDANCE DR. K. R. RAO SUBMITTED BY SHAHEER AHMED ID : Encoding H.264 by Thread Level Parallelism.
Study and Comparison of H.264, AVS- China and Dirac - by Jennie G. Abraham EE5359 – Multimedia Processing, Fall 2009 EE Dept., University of Texas at Arlington.
EE5359 Multimedia Processing Project Study and Comparison of AC3, AAC and HE-AAC Audio Codecs Dhatchaini Rajendran Student ID: Date :
Implementation and comparison study of H.264 and AVS china EE 5359 Multimedia Processing Spring 2012 Guidance : Prof K R Rao Pavan Kumar Reddy Gajjala.
Introduction to H.264 / AVC Video Coding Standard Multimedia Systems Sharif University of Technology November 2008.
JPEG Compression What is JPEG? Motivation
CSI-447: Multimedia Systems
CS644 Advanced Topics in Networking
Video Compression - MPEG
PROJECT PROPOSAL HEVC DEBLOCKING FILTER AND ITS IMPLIMENTATION RAKESH SAI SRIRAMBHATLA UTA ID: EE 5359 Under the guidance of DR. K. R. RAO.
Standards Presentation ECE 8873 – Data Compression and Modeling
MPEG4 Natural Video Coding
CUI BIN AVS team of the MPL at UTA
Presentation transcript:

Swaminathan Sridhar Multimedia Processing Lab MULTIPLEXING OF AVS CHINA PART 2 VIDEO WITH AAC BIT STREAMS AND DE-MULTIPLEXING WITH LIP SYNC DURING PLAYBACK Swaminathan Sridhar Multimedia Processing Lab University of Texas at Arlington

Thesis outline: What is multiplexing? Applications of multiplexing. The need for choosing AVS video and AAC audio codecs. Video & audio elementary stream formats. Multiplexing process. De-multiplexing process. Lip synchronization during playback. Results and conclusions. Future work. References.

What is multiplexing? A multimedia program is a combination of multiple elementary streams such as video and audio. Multiplexing is the process of converting multiple elementary streams such as video an audio streams into a single transport stream for transmission. It conserves the usage of transmission channels. It conserves the usage of tx channels by sending both the audio and video es onto a single tx channel rather than using separate tx channels for audio and video.

Applications of multiplexing Multiplexing is used in areas of applications such as ATSC DVB-T DVB-S DVB-H IPTV ATSC which is a set of standards developed by the advanced televisions system committee of north america for digital television tx which is already replacing the existing analog NTSC national television system committee in NA. ATSC supports HDTV format with a wide screen aspect ratio of 16:9 with a pixel resolution of 1920x1080 nearly six times more than the display resolution of NTSC. DVB digital television proposed by European telecommunications standards institute and European broadcasting union IPTV system which uses internet as its medium for digital television transmission.

The digital transmission/reception process adopted in the ATSC standard [22]

The need for video and audio compression With the advent of high definition television transmission schemes high quality video and audio data are transmitted which occupy a lot of bandwidth over a transmission channel. To address this issue the video and audio data are compressed using efficient compression schemes such as AVS China video codec and AAC audio codec.

Why AVS China video ? AVS (audio video coding standard) China is the latest digital video coding standard developed by the AVS work group of China. AVS video codec employs the latest video coding tools which primarily targets standard definition (SD) and high definition (HD) video compression. Compared to the previous video coding standards such as MPEG-2 and MPEG-4, AVS achieves the same quality of video with significantly lower bit rates or vice versa.

Overview of AVS China standard [5] AVS standard is a conglomeration of all parts related to coding of video and its auxiliary information in the AVS.

AVS-video profiles & their applications [4]

Coding tools of AVS part 2 video codec Intra prediction : 8x8 block based intra prediction. 5 modes for the luminance component namely the DC, horizontal, vertical, down left and down right and 4 modes for the chrominance component namely the DC, horizontal, vertical and plane mode are specified. Motion compensation : 16x16, 16x8, 8x16 and 8x8 block sizes. Motion vector resolution: ¼ pixel accuracy with 4-tap interpolation filter. Transform: 8x8 integer cosine transform. Quantization and scaling with scaling only in the encoder. Entropy coding: context based 2D-VLC De-blocking filter: performed around the 8x8 boundaries De-blocking filter is applied to macro blocks after motion compensation and residual coding to improve the visual quality and prediction performance by smoothening the edges around the macro blocks.

AVS China part 2 video encoder [2]

AVS video decoder [12]

AVS video encoded bit stream format Start code: It consists of start code prefix and start code value. Start code prefix: A string of 23 zero bits followed by a single bit with a value of ‘1’ i.e. ‘0x000001’ which are all byte aligned. This is followed by start code value. Start code value: It is an 8 bit integer that identifies the start code type.

Start code types & start code values used in the AVS-video bit stream [8]

Picture coding type used in AVS-video bit stream Pb_picture_start_code : The bit string format is ‘0x000001B6’ which indicates the start code of P or B picture. Picture_coding_type: It is a 2-bit unsigned integer which specifies the coding type of a picture as shown in Table 1. Table 1 Coding type of a picture [8] Picture_coding_type Coding type 00 Forbidden 01 Forward inter prediction (P) 10 Bidirectional inter prediction (B) 11 Reserved

NAL unit NAL unit stands for network abstraction layer unit which is a type of packetization that prefixes certain headers to the encoded video bit stream. It was designed to provide a network friendly environment for transmission of video data . It mainly addresses video related applications such as video telephony, video storage, broadcast and streaming applications, IPTV etc. The syntax for NAL unit is defined in H.264 standard but AVS part 2 standard does not define any syntax for the NAL unit.

Figure 1 NAL unit syntax [13]. NAL unit mapping with the encoded AVS video stream The basic syntax for the NAL unit is shown in figure 1. Figure 1 NAL unit syntax [13]. NAL unit consists of a 8 bit header followed by the payload. The procedure for mapping AVS video stream with NAL unit is to map the data between every start code prefixes i.e. ‘0x000001’ in the AVS video stream into a NAL unit (which includes the start code value but not the code prefixes) and then add a 1-byte header before the start code value.

NAL unit header description It is a 8 bit header consisting of the following parameters. Forbidden_zero_bit : which is a 1 bit value and it is always ‘0’. Nal_ref_idc : which is a 2-bit unsigned integer value. It indicates the priority of the type of data carried in the NAL unit based upon the start code type. This value should not be zero for I frames. Nal_unit_type : which is a 5-bit unsigned integer value and therefore 32 types of NAL units are allowed. This value indicates the type of data carried in the NAL payload.

NAL unit type according to the start code values [14].

Why AAC audio? AAC codec showed superior performance at both low and high bit rates as compared to MP3 and AC3. Supports up to 48 audio channels with a wide variety of sampling frequencies from 8 KHz to 96 KHz. The first codec to achieve ITU-R broadcast quality at a bit rate of 128 Kb/s for stereo. The encoding efficiency is nearly 30 % more than MP3 (MPEG-1/2 audio layer 3).

AAC audio Advanced audio coding is a standardized lossy compression scheme for coding the digital audio. It has been standardized under the ISO/IEC as part 7 of the MPEG-2 standard and part 3 of the MPEG-4 standard. AAC profiles: Main profile: Provides the highest audio quality and is the most complex. Low-complexity profile: Achieves nearly the same audio quality as the main profile but with significant savings on the memory and process requirements. Scalable sampling rate profile: It provides flexibility for scalable and low- complexity applications. It is more appropriate in applications where bandwidth is a constraint.

AAC audio stream format ADIF- Audio Data Interchange Format This format uses only one header in the beginning of the file followed by the raw audio data blocks. It is generally used for storage applications. ADTS- Audio Data Transport Stream This format uses separate header for each frame enabling decoding from any frame. This format is mainly used for transport applications.

ADTS header format [18]

Factors to be considered for multiplexing and transmission The audio and video coded bit streams are split into smaller data packets. The frame wise arrangement of the coded video and audio streams help in forming small data packets. While multiplexing, equal priority is given to all the elementary streams. Additional information to help synchronize the audio and video at the de-multiplexer in the form of time stamps are embedded in the packet header.

Packetization 2 layers of packetization are adopted for multiplexing that conform to MPEG 2 systems standard: PES –Packetized Elementary Stream layer TS- Transport Stream layer AVS China part 2 Encoder AAC Encoder Packetizer Multiplexer MPEG 2 Transport Stream Video Source Audio Audio & Video elementary stream Data

Packetized elementary streams (PES) Elementary streams (ES) are composed of: Encoded video (AVS) stream Encoded audio (AAC) stream Optional Data stream PES contains the access units (frames) that are sequentially separated and packetized. PES headers differentiates various ES and contains time stamp information useful for synchronizing video and audio stream at the de-multiplexer. PES packet sizes varies with the size of each access unit. Each PES can have data from only one ES.

Packetized elementary streams (PES) [22]

PES header description 3 bytes of start code – ‘0x000001’. 1 byte of stream ID (unique for each ES). 2 bytes of packet length. 2 bytes of time stamp (frame number)

Frame number as time stamp For video PES: Since the video frame rate is constant (i.e. either 25 or 30 frames per second ), the playback time of a particular frame can be calculated from the frame number as Playback time = frame number/fps For audio PES: Since the input sampling frequency is constant (i.e. between 8-96 kHz) and the No. samples per AAC frame is 1024, the playback time of a particular audio frame can be calculated from the frame number as Playback time = 1024*frame number *(1/sampling frequency)

Method adopted in MPEG 2 systems standard for time stamps Audio-video synchronization is achieved using the presentation time stamp (PTS) The encoder attaches a PTS to video and audio frame which is a 33 bit value in cycles of a 90-KHz system time clock (STC). Additional information known as program clock reference (PCR) which is the value of the STC at the encoder is periodically transmitted to achieve exact synchronization.

Less complex and is suitable for software implementation. Advantages of using frame number as time stamp over the existing method that uses clock samples as time stamp Less complex and is suitable for software implementation. No synchronization problem due to clock jitters. No propagation of delay between audio and video streams. Saves the extra over head in the PES header bytes used for sending the PCR bytes.

Transport stream packetization PES packets formed from the various elementary streams are broken into smaller packets known as the transport stream (TS) packets. Transport stream packets have a fixed length of 188 bytes. One of the reasons of the choosing the TS packet size is the interoperability with the ATM packets such that each MPEG 2 TS packets is broken down to 4 ATM packets. Constraints: Each TS packet can have data from only one PES. PES header should be the first byte of the TS payload. If the above constraints are not met, stuffing bytes are added.

Transport stream [22]

TS packet header [22, 25]

TS packet header description Sync byte: A TS packet always starts with a sync byte of 0x47. Payload unit start indicator: This bit is set to indicate that the first byte of the PES packet is present in the payload of the current TS packet. Adaptation field control (AFC): This bit is set if the data carried in the TS packet payload is other than the PES data. This can be a stretch of stuffing bytes in case the length of PES data is less than 185 bytes. Packet identifier (PID): This is a 10 bit packet identifier value. This is used to uniquely identify the video and audio ES. Some values of the PID are pre- defined such as a PID value of ‘0x1FFF’ indicates a null TS packet which is sent in regular intervals to create an overall constant bit stream. Continuity counter: This is a 4 bit counter which is incremented by one every time the data from the same PES is encapsulated into a TS packet. Payload byte offset: If AFC is set to ‘1’, byte offset value of the start of the payload is mentioned here.

Adopted multiplexing method Multiplexing method plays an important role in avoiding the buffer overflow or underflow at the de-multiplexing end. Video and audio timing counters are used to ensure effective multiplexing of the TS packets. Timing counters are incremented according to the playback time of each TS packet. A packet with the least timing counter value is always given preference during packet allocation.

Calculating playback time of each TS packet

Multiplexed transport stream [22]

De-multiplexing process

Buffer fullness at the de-multiplexer using the adopted method

Synchronization and playback The data is loaded from the buffer during playback. IDR frame searched from the starting of the video buffer. Frame number of the IDR frame is extracted. The playback time of the current IDR frame is calculated as, Video playback time=IDR frame number/fps The corresponding audio frame number is calculated as, Audio frame number= (Video playback time * sampling frequency)/1024

Synchronization and playback If a non-integer value, the audio frame number is rounded off and the corresponding audio frame is searched in the audio buffer. The audio and video contents from the corresponding frame numbers are decoded and played back. Then the audio and video buffers are refreshed and new set of data are loaded into the buffers and this process continues. If the corresponding audio frame is not found in the buffer, then next IDR frame is searched and the same process is repeated.

Results

Synchronization results

Conclusions Synchronization of audio-video is achieved by starting the de-multiplexer from any TS packet. Visually there is no lag between the video and audio. The buffer fullness at the de-multiplexer end is continuously monitored and buffer overflow or underflow is prevented using the adopted multiplexing method.

Test conditions Input raw video: YUV format. Input raw audio: WAVE format. Profiles used: AVS: Jizhun (baseline) profile. AAC: Low complexity profile with ADTS format. GOP: IBBPBB (IDR forced). Video frame rate: 25 frames per second. Audio sampling frequency: 44.1 KHz. Single program TS is generated.

Future Work The algorithm can be extended to support multiple elementary streams such as to include subtitles during playback. The proposed algorithm can also be modified to support elementary streams from different video and audio codecs depending on their NAL and ADTS formats respectively. The adopted method can also be extended to support some error resilient codes in the case of transmission of multimedia program over error prone networks.

References [1] L. Yu et al, “Overview of AVS-Video: tools, performance and complexity”, SPIE VCIP, vol. 5960, pp. 596021-1~596021-12, Beijing, China, July 2005. [2] W. Gao et al, “AVS- The Chinese next-generation video coding standard”, National Association of Broadcasters, Las Vegas, 2004. [3] X. Wang et al, “Performance comparison of AVS and H.264/AVC video coding standards”, J. Computer Science & Technology, vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 310-314, May 2006. [4] L. Yu et al. “Overview of AVS-video coding standards”, Special issue on AVS standards, Signal Processing: Image Communication, vol. 24, pp. 247-262, April 2009. [5] AVS Work Group website http://www.avs.org.cn/en/ [6] R. A. Burger et al, “A survey of digital TV standards China”, IEEE Second International Conference on Communications and Networking in China, pp. 687-696, Aug. 2007. [7] L. Fan et al, “Overview of AVS video standard”, in the proceedings of IEEE Int’l Conf. on Multimedia and Expo, ICME ’04, vol. 1, pp. 423-426, Taipei, Taiwan, June 2004.

References [8] Information Technology – Advanced coding of audio and video – Part 2: Video, The standards of People’s Republic of China, GB/T 20090.2 – 2006. [9] I. E. G. Richardson, “The H.264 advanced video compression standard”, II Edition Wiley, 2010. [10] C. X. Zhang et al, “The technique of pre-scaled transform”, IEEE Int’l Symposium on Circuits and Systems, vol.1, pp. 316-319, May 2005. [11] Q. Wang et al, “Context-based 2D-VLC entropy coder in AVS video coding standard”, J. Computer Science & Technology, vol. 21, No.3, pp. 315-322, May 2006 [12] H. Jia et al, “An AVS HDTV video decoder architecture employing efficient HW/SW partitioning”, IEEE Trans. on Consumer Electronics, vol. 52, pp. 1447- 1453, Nov. 2006. [13] T. Wiegand et al, “Overview of the H.264/AVC video coding standard”, IEEE Trans. on CSVT, vol. 13, pp. 560-576, July 2003. [14] GB 20090.2 RTP Payload Format, FG IPTV- 0512, International Telecommunications Union, May 2007. [15] Information Technology – Generic coding of moving pictures and associated audio: Systems, International Standard 13818-1, ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11 N0801, 1994.

References [16] X. Hu et al., “An efficient low complexity encoder for MPEG advanced audio coding”, in the proceedings of IEEE ICACT conference, pp. 1501-1505, Feb. 2006. [17] Information Technology – Generic coding of moving pictures and associated audio information- Part 7: Advanced Audio Coding (AAC), ISO/IEC 13818-7, 2006. [18] Information Technology – Coding of audio-visual objects- Part 3: Audio, ISO/IEC 14496-3, 2009. [19] M. A Watson et al, “Design and implementation of AAC decoders”, IEEE Trans. on consumer electronics, vol. 46, pp. 819-824, Aug. 2000. [20] K. Takagi et al., “Conversion of MP3 to AAC in the compressed domain”, IEEE 8th Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing, pp. 132-135, Oct. 2006. [21] K. Brandenburg, “Low bit rate audio coding-state-of-the-art, challenges and future directions”, in the proceedings of IEEE ICSP, vol. 1, pp. 1-4, Aug 2000. [22] B. J. Lechner et al, “The ATSC transport layer, including program and system information protocol (PSIP)”, Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 77-101, Jan. 2006. [23] J. Stott, “Design technique for multiplexing asynchronous digital video and audio signals”, IEEE Trans. on communications, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 601-610, May 1978.

References [24] Special issue on Global Digital Television: Technology and Emerging Services, Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 94, pp. 5-7, Jan. 2006. [25] Information Technology – Generic coding of moving pictures and associated audio- Part 1: Systems, ISO/IEC 13818-1:2005, International Telecommunication Union. [26] Z. Cai et al., “A RISC implementation of MPEG-2 TS packetization”, in the proceedings of IEEE HPC conference, pp. 688-691, May 2000. [27] G. A. Davidson et al, “ATSC video and audio coding”, Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 94, pp. 60-76, Jan. 2006. [28] X. Chen, “Transporting compressed digital video”, Kluwer, 2002. [29] W. Zhu, “End-to-end modeling and simulation of MPEG-2 transport streams over ATM networks with jitter”, IEEE Trans. on CSVT, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 9-12, Feb. 1998. [30] H. Murugan, “Multiplexing H.264 video with AAC audio bit stream, de- multiplexing and achieving lip synchronization during playback”, M.S.E.E thesis, University of Texas at Arlington, May 2007. [31] Reference software for AAC encoder - FAAC and AAC decoder- FAAD www.audiocoding.com

References [32]AVS China part 2 video software ftp://incoming/dropbox/video_software/P2_software/JiZhun Profile/rm52k_r2.zip [33] FFmpeg software and official web site. www.ffmpeg.org [34] Mplayer software and reference web site http://www.mplayerhq.hu [35] Reference software for aura video converter www.aura4you.com [36] Reference software for Matroska Media Container www.matroska.org [37] VLC software and source code website www.videolan.org [38] ATSC web site www.atsc.org