“The Dark Side of the SDSS” Bob Nichol ICG, Portsmouth Chris Miller, David Wake, Brice Menard, Idit Zehavi, Ryan Scranton, Gordon Richards, Daniel Eisenstein,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Seeing Dark Energy (or the cosmological constant which is the simplest form of DE) Professor Bob Nichol (ICG, Portsmouth)
Advertisements

Observing Dark Energy SDSS, DES, WFMOS teams. Understanding Dark Energy No compelling theory, must be observational driven We can make progress on questions:
Dark Energy BAO Intensity Mapping T. Chang, UP, J. Peterson, P. McDonald PRL 100, (March 5, 2008) UP, L. Staveley-Smith, J. Peterson, T. Chang arXiv:
Weighing Neutrinos including the Largest Photometric Galaxy Survey: MegaZ DR7 Moriond 2010Shaun Thomas: UCL “A combined constraint on the Neutrinos” Arxiv:
Cosmological Constraints from Baryonic Acoustic Oscillations
Daniel Eisenstein – Univ. of Arizona Dark Energy and Cosmic Sound Bob Nichol on behalf of the SDSS Collaboration Copy of presentation to be given by Daniel.
Optimization of large-scale surveys to probe the DE David Parkinson University of Sussex Prospects and Principles for Probing the Problematic Propulsion.
CMB: Sound Waves in the Early Universe Before recombination: Universe is ionized. Photons provide enormous pressure and restoring force. Photon-baryon.
SDSS-II SN survey: Constraining Dark Energy with intermediate- redshift probes Hubert Lampeitl University Portsmouth, ICG In collaboration with: H.J. Seo,
Observational Cosmology - a laboratory for fundamental physics MPI-K, Heidelberg Marek Kowalski.
Observational Cosmology - a unique laboratory for fundamental physics Marek Kowalski Physikalisches Institut Universität Bonn.
The National Science Foundation The Dark Energy Survey J. Frieman, M. Becker, J. Carlstrom, M. Gladders, W. Hu, R. Kessler, B. Koester, A. Kravtsov, for.
Lecture 2: Observational constraints on dark energy Shinji Tsujikawa (Tokyo University of Science)
Nikolaos Nikoloudakis Friday lunch talk 12/6/09 Supported by a Marie Curie Early Stage Training Fellowship.
Universe in a box: simulating formation of cosmic structures Andrey Kravtsov Department of Astronomy & Astrophysics Center for Cosmological Physics (CfCP)
AGN and Quasar Clustering at z= : Results from the DEEP2 + AEGIS Surveys Alison Coil Hubble Fellow University of Arizona Chandra Science Workshop.
The Structure Formation Cookbook 1. Initial Conditions: A Theory for the Origin of Density Perturbations in the Early Universe Primordial Inflation: initial.
Nikos Nikoloudakis and T.Shanks, R.Sharples 9 th Hellenic Astronomical Conference Athens, Greece September 20-24, 2009.
Survey Science Group Workshop 박명구, 한두환 ( 경북대 )
Dark Energy and Cosmic Sound Daniel Eisenstein (University of Arizona) Michael Blanton, David Hogg, Bob Nichol, Nikhil Padmanabhan, Will Percival, David.
Clustering of Luminous Red Galaxies and Applications to Cosmology NicRoss (Penn State) Research Progress Meeting LBNL 8th November 2007 Ross et al., 2007,
Playing in High Dimensions Bob Nichol ICG, Portsmouth Thanks to all my colleagues in SDSS, GRIST & PiCA Special thanks to Chris Miller, Alex Gray, Gordon.
The Science Case for the Dark Energy Survey James Annis For the DES Collaboration.
Daniel Eisenstein – Univ. of Arizona WFMOS Bob Nichol on behalf of the WFMOS/KAOS collaborations (see Thanks to Matthew Colless,
Cosmological Tests using Redshift Space Clustering in BOSS DR11 (Y. -S. Song, C. G. Sabiu, T. Okumura, M. Oh, E. V. Linder) following Cosmological Constraints.
Eric V. Linder (arXiv: v1). Contents I. Introduction II. Measuring time delay distances III. Optimizing Spectroscopic followup IV. Influence.
“Observing Dark Energy” Bob Nichol ICG, Portsmouth Special thanks to Masao Sako, David Weinberg, Andy Connolly, Albert Stebbins, Rob Crittenden, Daniel.
Polarization-assisted WMAP-NVSS Cross Correlation Collaborators: K-W Ng(IoP, AS) Ue-Li Pen (CITA) Guo Chin Liu (ASIAA)
WFMOS Feasibility Study Value-added Science Bob Nichol, ICG Portsmouth.
Making the most of the ISW effect Robert Crittenden Work with S. Boughn, T. Giannantonio, L. Pogosian, N. Turok, R. Nichol, P.S. Corasaniti, C. Stephan-Otto.
Dark energy I : Observational constraints Shinji Tsujikawa (Tokyo University of Science)
What can we learn from galaxy clustering? David Weinberg, Ohio State University Berlind & Weinberg 2002, ApJ, 575, 587 Zheng, Tinker, Weinberg, & Berlind.
“The Dark Side of the SDSS” Bob Nichol ICG, Portsmouth Thanks to all my collaborators on SDSS and other teams.
Constraints on Dark Energy from CMB Eiichiro Komatsu University of Texas at Austin Dark Energy February 27, 2006.
Clustering in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Bob Nichol (ICG, Portsmouth) Many SDSS Colleagues.
Dark Energy Probes with DES (focus on cosmology) Seokcheon Lee (KIAS) Feb Section : Survey Science III.
Dark Energy & LSS SDSS & DES teams (Bob Nichol, ICG Portsmouth) Marie Curie (EC)
DARK ENERGY RICHARD BATTYE JODRELL BANK OBSERVATORY SCHOOL OF PHYSICS AND ASTRONOMY UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER PHENOMENOLOGY & PRESENT/FUTURE OBSERVATIONS.
SUNYAEV-ZELDOVICH EFFECT. OUTLINE  What is SZE  What Can we learn from SZE  SZE Cluster Surveys  Experimental Issues  SZ Surveys are coming: What.
WFMOS KAOS concept identified via the Gemini Aspen Process and completed a Feasibility Study (Barden et al.) Proposed MOS on Subaru via an international.
The Structure Formation Cookbook 1. Initial Conditions: A Theory for the Origin of Density Perturbations in the Early Universe Primordial Inflation: initial.
Refining Photometric Redshift Distributions with Cross-Correlations Alexia Schulz Institute for Advanced Study Collaborators: Martin White.
Using Baryon Acoustic Oscillations to test Dark Energy Will Percival The University of Portsmouth (including work as part of 2dFGRS and SDSS collaborations)
Wiggles and Bangs SDSS, DES, WFMOS teams. Understanding Dark Energy No compelling theory, must be observational driven We can make progress on questions:
Dark Energy and Cosmic Sound Daniel Eisenstein Steward Observatory Eisenstein 2003 (astro-ph/ ) Seo & Eisenstein, ApJ, 598, 720 (2003) Blake & Glazebrook.
“The Dark SDSS” Bob Nichol ICG, Portsmouth Special thanks to Masao Sako, David Weinberg, Andy Connolly, Albert Stebbins, Rob Crittenden, Daniel Eisenstein,
BAOs SDSS, DES, WFMOS teams (Bob Nichol, ICG Portsmouth)
Dark energy and the CMB Robert Crittenden Work with S. Boughn, T. Giannantonio, L. Pogosian, N. Turok, R. Nichol, P.S. Corasaniti, C. Stephan-Otto.
Cosmic shear and intrinsic alignments Rachel Mandelbaum April 2, 2007 Collaborators: Christopher Hirata (IAS), Mustapha Ishak (UT Dallas), Uros Seljak.
The Feasibility of Constraining Dark Energy Using LAMOST Redshift Survey L.Sun.
Latest Results from LSS & BAO Observations Will Percival University of Portsmouth StSci Spring Symposium: A Decade of Dark Energy, May 7 th 2008.
1 Baryon Acoustic Oscillations Prospects of Measuring Dark Energy Equation of State with LAMOST Xuelei Chen ( 陳學雷 ) National Astronomical Observatory of.
Luminous Red Galaxies in the SDSS Daniel Eisenstein ( University of Arizona) with Blanton, Hogg, Nichol, Tegmark, Wake, Zehavi, Zheng, and the rest of.
Dark Energy and baryon oscillations Domenico Sapone Université de Genève, Département de Physique théorique In collaboration with: Luca Amendola (INAF,
The XMM Cluster Survey: Project summary and Cosmology Forecasts Kathy Romer University of Sussex.
Future observational prospects for dark energy Roberto Trotta Oxford Astrophysics & Royal Astronomical Society.
Brenna Flaugher for the DES Collaboration; DPF Meeting August 27, 2004 Riverside,CA Fermilab, U Illinois, U Chicago, LBNL, CTIO/NOAO 1 Dark Energy and.
Probing Dark Energy with Cosmological Observations Fan, Zuhui ( 范祖辉 ) Dept. of Astronomy Peking University.
“The Dark Side of the SDSS” Bob Nichol ICG, Portsmouth Thanks to all my collaborators on SDSS and other teams.
Carlos Hernández-Monteagudo CE F CA 1 CENTRO DE ESTUDIOS DE FÍSICA DEL COSMOS DE ARAGÓN (CE F CA) J-PAS 10th Collaboration Meeting March 11th 2015 Cosmology.
CTIO Camera Mtg - Dec ‘03 Studies of Dark Energy with Galaxy Clusters Joe Mohr Department of Astronomy Department of Physics University of Illinois.
Cheng Zhao Supervisor: Charling Tao
Inh Jee University of Texas at Austin Eiichiro Komatsu & Karl Gebhardt
The Mystery of Dark Energy Prof Shaun Cole ICC, Durham Photo: Malcolm Crowthers Ogden at 5.
BAO Damping and Reconstruction Cheng Zhao
Princeton University & APC
Shintaro Nakamura (Tokyo University of Science)
Images: M. Blanton. Images: M. Blanton Figures: M. Blanton & SDSS.
Combining Different Measurements
6-band Survey: ugrizy 320–1050 nm
Presentation transcript:

“The Dark Side of the SDSS” Bob Nichol ICG, Portsmouth Chris Miller, David Wake, Brice Menard, Idit Zehavi, Ryan Scranton, Gordon Richards, Daniel Eisenstein, all my SDSS colleagues

Outline Brief overview of the SDSS Brief overview of the SDSS New paths to the “Dark Side” New paths to the “Dark Side”  ISW effect  Cosmic magnification  Baryon Acoustic Oscillations WFMOS WFMOS

SDSS DR4: 849,920 spectra, 6670 sq degs Extension ( ): Legacy, SNe, Galaxy

Late-time Integrated Sachs Wolfe (ISW) Effect DE also effects the growth of structure i.e. Poisson equation with dark energy: DE also effects the growth of structure i.e. Poisson equation with dark energy: In a flat, matter-dominated universe (CMB tells us this), then density fluctuations grow as: In a flat, matter-dominated universe (CMB tells us this), then density fluctuations grow as: Therefore, for a flat geometry, changes in the gravitational potential are a direct physical measurement of Dark Energy Therefore, for a flat geometry, changes in the gravitational potential are a direct physical measurement of Dark Energy

Experimental Set-up See also: Nolta et al, Boughn and Crittenden, Myers et al, Ashfordi et al

ISW and the SDSS Searching for a detection Searching for a detection LRG selection to z~0.8 (Eisenstein et al. 2001) LRG selection to z~0.8 (Eisenstein et al. 2001) 5300 sq degrees 5300 sq degrees Achromatic (no contamination) Achromatic (no contamination) Errors from 5000 CMB skies Errors from 5000 CMB skies Compared to a null result Compared to a null result >95% for all samples Data prefers DE model over null hypothesis at the >99% confidence for all combinations Data prefers DE model over null hypothesis at the >99% confidence for all combinations Yellow: “smoothed clean”, Black: “Clean”, Red: Q, Blue: W, Green: V

Future ISW directions Probe of DE sound speed (Hu & Scranton 2004; Pogosian 2004) and highly complementary to geometrical measures of DE Probe of DE sound speed (Hu & Scranton 2004; Pogosian 2004) and highly complementary to geometrical measures of DE Circa 2006 (SDSS) Circa 2006 (SDSS)  8000 sq degrees (≥3  per redshift)  Tighter redshift intervals (> 5 bins) Beyond Beyond  ASTRO-F all-sky out to z~1.5  UKIDSS+VISTA all-sky (LRG selection to z>1)  QSO catalogs (z out to 3)  DES & LSST will provide competitive DE constraints from ISW for Kink models of DE (Pogosian et al. 2005)

Cosmic Magnification Gravitational magnification increases flux received from galaxies and hence allows us to see fainter galaxies, resulting in an increased apparent galaxy number density. But, it also magnifies the solid angle of the projected lensed sky which results in a decrease in the apparent galaxy number density. Therefore a competition between the two! more flux more solid angle

positive correlation more sources come in than area diluted: positive correlation negative correlation less sources come in than area diluted: negative correlation Effects cancel

Hunting for quasars Traditional UVX approach to finding quasars uses hyper- planes (Richards et al. 2002). However, significant contamination (~40%), thus demanding spectroscopic follow-up. New bayesian technique provides <5% contamination (Richards et al. 2004): photometric QSO catalogs

Blue points = data Black line = best fit Red line = best fit + alpha Grey shading = 1sigma 195,000 quasars 13.5 million galaxies 8  detection Now fully consistent with  CDM model Ideal for next generation imaging surveys like DES

Baryon Acoustic Oscillation Gravity squeezes the gas, pressure pushes back. They oscillate Gravity squeezes the gas, pressure pushes back. They oscillate When the Universe cools below 3000K, these baryonic acoustic oscillations are frozen in When the Universe cools below 3000K, these baryonic acoustic oscillations are frozen in Courtesy of Wayne Hu

BAO observations   Effect of these oscillations already seen in the CMB   Can we see them today in the distribution of galaxies? LRG

LRG Correlation Function The correlation function is the probability of finding pairs at a given separation, above that of a random distribution. Excess of galaxies separated by 500 million light years

What does it mean?   We have detected the BAO at two different epochs consistent with our theory of gravitational structure formation   BAO provide a fixed scale, or “standard ruler”   BAO are consistent with LCDM model   Assuming LCDM model, then BAO constrain flatness of universe to 1% - break the degeneracy between w & curvature

WFMOS 3000 thousands of fibers over a 1.5 degree field- of-view on an 8-meter class telescope (Subaru/Gemini) z~1 survey with 2 million galaxies with twice LRG volume 1% accuracy Taken from WFMOS Feasibility Study by NOAO, JHU, AAO, Oxford, Durham, Portsmouth, UA w ~ 5% dw/dz ~ 20%

WFMOS will also be a user instrument and have significant archival value-added science eg. Baldry et al. (2004) SDSS color bimodality as fn(L,  at z~1  mod =  5 + L/L -20 Red Fraction