ARCGICE WP 4.3 Recommendations for inclusion of GOCE data C.C.Tscherning & S.Laxon C.C.Tscherning, UCPH, S.Laxon, UCLA, 2006-10-20 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The OCTAS Project, the geoid, the mean sea surface and and the mean dynamic topography By Dag Solheim Norwegian Mapping Authority Co-authors A. Hunegnaw,
Advertisements

SMOS L2 Ocean Salinity Level 2 Ocean Salinity Using TEC estimated from Stokes 3 24 October 2012 ACRI-st, LOCEAN & ARGANS SMOS+polarimetry.
Repeat station crustal biases and accuracy determined from regional field models M. Korte, E. Thébault* and M. Mandea, GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam (*now.
GRACE GRAVITY FIELD SOLUTIONS USING THE DIFFERENTIAL GRAVIMETRY APPROACH M. Weigelt, W. Keller.
Satellite geodesy. Basic concepts. I1.1a = geocentric latitude φ = geodetic latitude r = radial distance, h = ellipsoidal height a = semi-major axis, b.
ARCGICE WP 2.2 ERROR ESTIMATION OF NEW GEOID C.C.Tscherning, University of Copenhagen,
Datum-shift, error-estimation and gross-error detection when using least-squares collocation for geoid determination. by C.C.Tscherning Department of Geophysics,
CHAMP Gravity Field Models using Precise Orbits by C.C.Tscherning & E.Howe Department of Geophysics University of Copenhagen, Denmark 2. CHAMP Science.
ARCGICE WP 2.1 Leader: DSPC Make new geoid of afrctic region based on GRACE C.C.Tscherning, University of Copenhagen,
The Four Candidate Earth Explorer Core Missions Consultative Workshop October 1999, Granada, Spain, Revised by CCT GOCE S 59 Performance.
COMBINED MODELING OF THE EARTH’S GRAVITY FIELD FROM GOCE AND GRACE SATELLITE OBSERVATIONS Robert Tenzer 1, Pavel Ditmar 2, Xianglin Liu 2, Philip Moore.
Geoid determination by least-squares collocation using
C.C.Tscherning & M.Veicherts, University of Copenhagen, Jan Accelerating generalized Cholesky decomposition using multiple processors.
CHAMP Satellite Gravity Field Determination Satellite geodesy Eva Howe January
ARCGICE WP 1.4 ERROR ESTIMATES IN SPATIAL AND SPECTRAL DOMAINS C.C.Tscherning, University of Copenhagen,
Geoid determination by 3D least-squares collocation
ARCGICE WP 5.2 Plan for development of Atctic geoid using GOCE C.C.Tscherning, University of Copenhagen,
Satellite geodesy: Kepler orbits, Kaula Ch. 2+3.I1.2a Basic equation: Acceleration Connects potential, V, and geometry. (We disregard disturbing forces.
RESEARCH POSTER PRESENTATION DESIGN © This research is based on the estimation of the spherical harmonic geopotential.
ARCGICE WP 5.1 Leader: UCL Synthesis report on benefit of combining data C.C.Tscherning, University of Copenhagen,
Modeling Airborne Gravimetry with High-Degree Harmonic Expansions Holmes SA, YM Wang, XP Li and DR Roman National Geodetic Survey/NOAA Vienna, Austria,
ESPACE Porto, June 2009 MODELLING OF EARTH’S RADIATION FOR GPS SATELLITE ORBITS Carlos Javier Rodriguez Solano Technische Universität München
Use of G99SSS to evaluate the static gravity geopotential derived from the GRACE, CHAMP, and GOCE missions Daniel R. Roman and Dru A. Smith Session: GP52A-02Decade.
Multi-Processing Least Squares Collocation: Applications to Gravity Field Analysis. Kaas. E., B. Sørensen, C. C. Tscherning, M. Veicherts.
Error Analysis of the NGS Gravity Database Jarir Saleh, Xiaopeng Li, Yan Ming Wang, Dan Roman and Dru Smith, NOAA/NGS/ERT Paper: G , 04 July 2011,
ESA Living Planet Symposium, Bergen, T. Gruber, C. Ackermann, T. Fecher, M. Heinze Institut für Astronomische und Physikalische Geodäsie (IAPG)
A spherical Fourier approach to estimate the Moho from GOCE data Mirko Reguzzoni 1, Daniele Sampietro 2 2 POLITECNICO DI MILANO, POLO REGIONALE DI COMO.
Chapter 8: The future geodetic reference frames Thomas Herring, Hans-Peter Plag, Jim Ray, Zuheir Altamimi.
Outline  Construction of gravity and magnetic models  Principle of superposition (mentioned on week 1 )  Anomalies  Reference models  Geoid  Figure.
ESA living planet symposium 2010 ESA living planet symposium 28 June – 2 July 2010, Bergen, Norway GOCE data analysis: realization of the invariants approach.
Sea Level Change Measurements: Estimates from Altimeters Understanding Sea Level Rise and Variability June 6-9, 2006 Paris, France R. S. Nerem, University.
GOCE ITALY scientific tasks and first results Fernando Sansò and the GOCE Italy group.
Secular variation in Germany from repeat station data and a recent global field model Monika Korte and Vincent Lesur Helmholtz Centre Potsdam, German Research.
Modern Navigation Thomas Herring
C.C.Tscherning, University of Copenhagen, Denmark. Developments in the implementation and use of Least-Squares Collocation. IAG Scientific Assembly, Potsdam,
Satellite geophysics. Basic concepts. I1.1a = geocentric latitude φ = geodetic latitude r = radial distance, h = ellipsoidal height a = semi-major axis,
Numerical aspects of the omission errors due to limited grid size in geoid computations Yan Ming Wang National Geodetic Survey, USA VII Hotine-Marussi.
M. Herceg and C.C.Tscherning, University of Copenhagen Evaluation of Least-Squares Collocation and the Reduced Point Mass method using the International.
Case study on heterogeneous geoid/ quasigeoid based on space borne and terrestrial data combination with special consideration of GOCE mission data impact.
Regional Enhancement of the Mean Dynamic Topography using GOCE Gravity Gradients Matija Herceg 1 and Per Knudsen 1 1 DTU Space, National Space Institute,
International Symposium on Gravity, Geoid and Height Systems GGHS 2012, Venice, Italy 1 GOCE data for local geoid enhancement Matija Herceg Per Knudsen.
IAG Scientific Assembly – Cairns, Australia, August 2005 The GOCE Mission GOCE (Gravity field and steady-state Ocean Circulation Explorer) will be.
Full Resolution Geoid from GOCE Gradients for Ocean Modeling Matija Herceg & Per Knudsen Department of Geodesy DTU Space living planet symposium 28 June.
C.C.Tscherning, Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen. Improvement of Least-Squares Collocation error estimates using local GOCE Tzz signal standard.
Recent Investigations Towards Achieving a One Centimeter Geoid Daniel R. Roman & Dru A. Smith U.S. National Geodetic Survey GGG 2000, Session 9 The Challenge.
A comparison of different geoid computation procedures in the US Rocky Mountains YM Wang 1, H Denker 2, J Saleh 3, XP Li 3, DR Roman 1, D Smith 1 1 National.
Bouman et al, GOCE Gravity Gradients, ESA Living Planet Symposium 2010 GOCE Gravity Gradients in Instrument and Terrestrial Frames J. Bouman, Th. Gruber,
Investigation of the use of deflections of vertical measured by DIADEM camera in the GSVS11 Survey YM Wang 1, X Li 2, S Holmes 3, DR Roman 1, DA Smith.
Improving Regional Geoid by optimal Combination of GRACE Gravity Model and Surface Gravity Data YM Wang, DR Roman and J Saleh National Geodetic Survey.
Mayer-Gürr et al.ESA Living Planet, Bergen Torsten Mayer-Gürr, Annette Eicker, Judith Schall Institute of Geodesy and Geoinformation University.
ESA Living Planet Symposium 28 June - 2 July 2010, Bergen, Norway A. Albertella, R. Rummel, R. Savcenko, W. Bosch, T. Janjic, J.Schroeter, T. Gruber, J.
4.Results (1)Potential coefficients comparisons Fig.3 FIR filtering(Passband:0.005~0.1HZ) Fig.4 Comparison with ESA’s models (filter passband:0.015~0.1HZ)
The OC in GOCE: A review The Gravity field and Steady-state Ocean Circulation Experiment Marie-Hélène RIO.
An oceanographic assessment of the GOCE geoid models accuracy S. Mulet 1, M-H. Rio 1, P. Knudsen 2, F. Siegesmund 3, R. Bingham 4, O. Andersen 2, D. Stammer.
How Do we Estimate Gravity Field? Terrestrial data –Measurements of surface gravity –Fit spherical harmonic coefficients Satellite data –Integrate equations.
D.N. Arabelos, M. Reguzzoni and C.C.Tscherning HPF Progress Meeting # 26, München, Feb , Global grids of gravity anomalies and vertical gravity.
Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and Geography West Virginia University Morgantown, WV.
GOCE geoids and derived Mean Dynamic Topography in the Arctic Ocean Ole B. Andersen & Per Knudsen. DTU Space – Copenhagen, Denmark.
ESA Living Planet Symposium, 29 June 2010, Bergen (Norway) GOCE data analysis: the space-wise approach and the space-wise approach and the first space-wise.
Astronomical Institute University of Bern 1 Astronomical Institute, University of Bern, Switzerland * now at PosiTim, Germany 5th International GOCE User.
1 UPWARD CONTINUATION OF DOME-C AIRBORNE GRAVITY AND COMPARISON TO GOCE GRADIENTS AT ORBIT ALTITUDE IN ANTARCTICA Hasan Yildiz (1), Rene Forsberg (2),
ASEN 5070: Statistical Orbit Determination I Fall 2014
Satellite Altimetry for Gravity, geoid and marine applications (MSS + LAT) Dr Ole B. Andersen, DTU Space, Denmark,
Dynamic Planet 2005 Cairns, Australia August 2005
ASEN 5070: Statistical Orbit Determination I Fall 2015
Chairs: H. Sünkel, P. Visser
D. Rieser *, R. Pail, A. I. Sharov
Martin Pitoňák1, Michal Šprlák2 and Pavel Novák1
Daniel Rieser, Christian Pock, Torsten Mayer-Guerr
Geoid Enhancement in the Gulf Coast Region
Presentation transcript:

ARCGICE WP 4.3 Recommendations for inclusion of GOCE data C.C.Tscherning & S.Laxon C.C.Tscherning, UCPH, S.Laxon, UCLA,

The GOCE satellite level 2 products will be produced of the High Level processing Facility, (HPF). The main products of importance for ARCGICE are: EGM_GCF_2 the spherical harmonic series EGM_GVC_2 the associated error-covariance matrix, EGG_NOM_2 gravity gradients in the gradiometer reference frame (GRF). EGG_TRF_2 gravity gradients in a local North- oriented frame. SST_PSO_2 precise science orbit, including rotation matrix information. DATA C.C.Tscherning, UCPH, S.Laxon, UCL,

All these data may contribute to the determination of an enhanced geoid enhanced estimates of associated error-estimates error correlations. Enhanced Arctic products C.C.Tscherning, UCPH, S.Laxon, UCL,

Directly used in the geoid computation in the remove-restore step. The variance-covariance matrix must be used so that the error information is correctly propagated into the geoid error-estimates and error-covariances. Use of spherical harmonic coefficients C.C.Tscherning, UCPH, S.Laxon, UCL,

At the moment only the error-variances of the estimated coefficients are used in order to produce so-called error-degree-variances. The use of the full variance-covariance matrix is complicated, and its integration into the geoid-estimation process is difficult. Use of error-covariances C.C.Tscherning, UCPH, S.Laxon, UCL,

The covariance function of the residual gravity anomalies (obtained in the remove- restore process) will include some information related to the coefficient errors. Use of error-covariances C.C.Tscherning, UCPH, S.Laxon, UCL,

The coefficients may also be used to improve the identification of biases in individual gravity surveys. Identification of Biases in surveys C.C.Tscherning, UCPH, S.Laxon, UCL,

The gravity gradients include the same information as the spherical harmonic coefficients in areas of moderately varying gravity. In areas with larger gravity variations (such as over trenches) they may include extra information. (Better signal-to-noise ratio). Use of the gravity gradients. C.C.Tscherning, UCPH, S.Laxon, UCL,

Directly used in the geoid computation in the remove-restore step. The variance-covariance matrix must be used so that the error information is correctly propagated into the geoid error-estimates and error-covariances. Areas identified by computing the difference between observed values and values of the gradients computed from the spherical harmonic series. Use of spherical harmonic coefficients C.C.Tscherning, UCPH, S.Laxon, UCL,

The gravity gradients may directly be used in the geoid estimation using such methods as Least- Squares-Collocation (LSC). The use may require changes in existing software, where spherical approximation is used. Availability of ground gravity data is important for “tuning” the “down-ward” continuation inherent in the regularisation process (where data at satellite altitude is combined with data on the ground). Direct use of Gradients C.C.Tscherning, UCPH, S.Laxon, UCL,

GOCE products may be used to compute an improved geoid in the Arctic Ocean. Spherical harmonic coefficients and gravity gradients may be used. The use of the gravity gradients will primarily help in reducing the error in the region south of 84o latitude. Require improvements in existing software so that the variance-covariance information of the coefficients may be properly propagated into the geoid estimation process. Conclusion C.C.Tscherning, UCPH, S.Laxon, UCL,