CLEAR 2008 Annual Conference Anchorage, Alaska Bear Traps and Treasure Maps Developing Consistency in Discipline Processes Elizabeth Cowie Institute of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Transparency and Domestic Regulation Mina Mashayekhi Division on International Trade UNCTAD.
Advertisements

Academic Misconduct Panels Student Governance December 2013 AMP DEC13.
Regulators’ Code July Regulators’ Code A statutory Code Came into effect in April 2014, replacing the Regulators’ Compliance Code All local authorities.
Auditing, Assurance and Governance in Local Government
OVERVIEW OF THE FLORIDA BAR DISCIPLINE SYSTEM November 30, 2006.
CLEAR 2008 Annual Conference Anchorage, Alaska Ensuring Fair Registration Practices: A Unique Approach Part 1 Hon. Jean Augustine Fairness Commissioner.
2007 Annual Conference Professional Discipline Ruby E. Brice, J.D. S.C. Department of Labor, Licensing and Regulation.
The 10 Golden Rules in Managing Complaints & Discipline.
Core principles in the ASX CGC document. Which one do you think is the most important and least important? Presented by Casey Chan Ethics Governance &
The Disciplinary Procedure Presented by Paula Fisher Practical HR Ltd.
CLEAR 2008 Annual Conference Anchorage, Alaska Consistent Decision Making Robert Chambers AssetRisk Advisory Inc.
The Adjudication Process Virginia Department of Health Professions New Board Member Training October 2008.
A Snapshot of TEQSA Dr Carol Nicoll Chief Commissioner Festival of Learning and Teaching University of Adelaide Tuesday 6 November 2012.
Cross-Border Infrastructure: A Toolkit Governance and Accountability Session on Regulation & Accountability Max Bradford Castalia The views expressed here.
“Why Technology is Critical to the Regulatory Process” Lori Long Royal College of Dental Surgeons of Ontario 2006 Annual ConferenceAlexandria, Virginia.
Developing a Records & Information Retention & Disposition Program:
Presentation By: Chris Wade, P Eng. Finally … a best practice for selecting an engineering firm.
IS Audit Function Knowledge
EMPLOYMENT LAW CONSIDERATIONS March 16, Difference between being an employer vs. a law enforcement officer Garrity – this case involves employees’
EMPLOYMENT LAW CONSIDERATIONS JULY 13, 2004 Professor Susan Carle.
Developed by Susan Carle under NIC Cooperative Agreement 06S20GJJ1 EMPLOYMENT LAW CONSIDERATIONS Investigating Allegations of Staff Sexual Misconduct with.
Purpose of the Standards
Developing a customer service strategy to support the new regulatory model An introductory paper for the Providers Advisory Group.
Taking Steps to Protect Privacy A presentation to Hamilton-area Physiotherapy Managers by Bob Spence Communications Co-ordinator Office of the Ontario.
CLEAR 2008 Annual Conference Anchorage, Alaska Ensuring Fair Registration Practices: A Unique Approach Part 2 Linda Gough Ontario Regulators for Access.
The Sixth Annual African Consumer Protection Dialogue Conference
Internal Auditing and Outsourcing
Consumer Protection through Professional Regulation Looking Ahead: Council on Licensure, Enforcement and Regulation Toronto Symposium June 15, 2010 © CLEAR.
Compliance Presented by: Marty McNulty, ARMA Board Member.
Complaints by Older Adults against Financial Institutions Examples and Possible solutions By Conor Cashman Senior Investigator.
D-1 McGraw-Hill/Irwin ©2005 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Module D Internal, Governmental, and Fraud Audits “I predict that audit.
Please note that these slides provide a basic overview of the issues discussed within our presentation provided to CIPD members on 5 June If you.
Understanding decision making - Prosecuting complaints Karen Mobbs Director of Proceedings Health Care Complaints Commission Patrick Griffin Barrister.
John Oates Andrew Rawnsley Birgit Whitman. Plan The background to the Framework The structure of the Framework How the Framework might be implemented.
PART II – Management Audit: Basic Standards, Values and Norms Shared by Pratap Kumar Pathak.
Recommendation for Greater Transparency and Efficiency to Better Protect the Public Interest Professional Practices Institute Conference October 23 – 25.
CCAB Training Providers Event 17 November 2008 Reviews Required by QAC Heather Briers Director Chartered Accountants Regulatory Board.
Generally Accepted Recordkeeping Principles Generally Accepted Recordkeeping Principles ® Registered Trademark of ARMA International.
Excellence in IDR FOS Conference 2 nd and 3 rd June 2011 Bae Bastian and Meredith Walker.
Copyright © Education Compliance Group, Inc. All rights reserved. By Peggy A. Burns, Esq. and Mark Hinson, SPHR Internal Investigations & Decision-Making:
Principles of Local Governance: Covering local governmental legislations and compliance issues IMFO WOMEN IN LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINANCE CONFERENCE 07/02/13.
Framework for Regulation May Outline of Presentation 1.Background – Initiation of the Framework – Purpose of the Framework Framework Review.
Aligning IRBs and the Ethical Conduct of Research APS Annual Convention, May 2008 Felice J. Levine American Educational Research Association American Educational.
1 General Structure of a System Dealing with Research Misconduct - General Remarks on its diversity - Makoto Misono National Institute of Technology and.
PIPEDA and Receivables Management Robin Gould-Soil Receivables Management Association of Canada November 16, 2011.
Risk Management & Corporate Governance 1. What is Risk?  Risk arises from uncertainty; but all uncertainties do not carry risk.  Possibility of an unfavorable.
1 GAEP Study Tour An Overview of the Ombudsman for Workplace Safety May 16, 2007.
Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Oregon Administrative Sanctions for Violations of Liquor Laws Linda Ignowski Oregon Liquor Control Commission October 2008.
1 Katzman v. Ontario College of Pharmacists. 2 The Facts Complaint received about a dispensing error Information gathered related to –the error –other.
“CONSENT AGREEMENTS:LET US SHOW YOU HOW IT CAN WORK” Rhonda O’Hagan Competence Assurance Coordinator, SASKATCHEWAN REGISTERED NURSES ASSOCIATION Presented.
Disciplinary Procedures
College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario QUALITY PROFESSIONALS | HEALTHY SYSTEM | PUBLIC TRUST SOAR Annual Conference Access to Justice: Change the.
The Missing Link: Technical Standards and Solutions The EU iGaming Debate: An update Why standards are important to operators.
Key Individual Chapter 2. Purpose of FAIS Consumer protection Professionalize intermediary and advisory services in Financial Services industry Regulate.
Win Win Win: can we have regulation that protects people, supports business and costs less? Graham Russell Director Better Regulation Delivery Office.
Fred Carter Senior Policy & Technology Advisor Information and Privacy Commissioner Ontario, Canada MISA Ontario Cloud Computing Transformation Workshop.
Proactive regulation September 27, 2012 Samantha Barrass Executive Director, SRA.
Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
Challenges in Promoting RCR: Reflections from a Public Funder´s Perspective Secretariat on Responsible Conduct of Research [Canadian Institutes of Health.
Chapter 2 Corporate Ethics
BAR Independent Alternative Dispute Resolution
Principles of Administrative Law <Instructor Name>
Professional Discipline
Juliet Oliver, General Counsel
Conducting Studies of the Issue
Outline What is governance and what does it comprise?
Rosemary Smyth Interim Chief Executive Mental Health Commission
Effectiveness Working Group
Ontario’s privacy protective Philadelphia model governance framework
Presentation transcript:

CLEAR 2008 Annual Conference Anchorage, Alaska Bear Traps and Treasure Maps Developing Consistency in Discipline Processes Elizabeth Cowie Institute of Chartered Accountants of Ontario

CLEAR 2008 Annual Conference Anchorage, Alaska CONSISTENCY … Levels The Playing Field Provides A Fair and Foreseeable System Increases The Efficiency Of The System Reduces Costs Ensures Autonomy

CLEAR 2008 Annual Conference Anchorage, Alaska WHERE IS CONSISTENCY NECESSARY? Within A Single Organization, Single Jurisdiction Within A Single Organization, Multiple Jurisdictions Within Multiple Organizations, Either Single Or Multiple Jurisdictions

CLEAR 2008 Annual Conference Anchorage, Alaska CONSISISTENCY … = Predictability ≠ Inflexibility Increases Public Trust Decreases Government Intervention Enhances Reputation Of Members/ Organization Lessens Impact Of “Bad Apples”

CLEAR 2008 Annual Conference Anchorage, Alaska RECOGNIZING INCONSISTENCY System Focuses On One Element Or Principle –Member –Conduct –Public Effect –Rehabilitation –Denunciation –Deterrence

CLEAR 2008 Annual Conference Anchorage, Alaska MORE CLUES Every Case Re- invents The Wheel Similar Matters Treated Dissimilarly Lack Of Transparency Aura Of Unfairness

CLEAR 2008 Annual Conference Anchorage, Alaska NOBODY’S HAPPY Complainant Member Disciplined Other Members Public Other Organizations Government

CLEAR 2008 Annual Conference Anchorage, Alaska WHAT CAUSES INCONSISTENCY? NO Principled Approach Policy/ Guidelines Balance Planning Scrutinized Processes Resources Checks & Balances

CLEAR 2008 Annual Conference Anchorage, Alaska AND … Distrust Of Change Belief It Can’t Happen Pressure From Stakeholders Complacency

CLEAR 2008 Annual Conference Anchorage, Alaska IF YOU BUILD IT PRINCIPLES PROCESSES SYSTEM

CLEAR 2008 Annual Conference Anchorage, Alaska BUILT ON Solid Principles Supported By Processes Followed Consistently And Reviewed Continuously

CLEAR 2008 Annual Conference Anchorage, Alaska BUILDING A BETTER MOUSETRAP THINK OUTSIDE THE BOX BRAINSTORM CRADLE TO GRAVE Goal? How Does Each Step Achieve The Goal? Could It Be Done Better? Consistency In Each Step, Not Just Outcome

CLEAR 2008 Annual Conference Anchorage, Alaska BARRIERS TO CONSISTENCY Stakeholders Governing Documents Resources Misapprehension of Risk

CLEAR 2008 Annual Conference Anchorage, Alaska DON’T BE AFRAID To Question What You Do To Stop Doing What You’ve Always Done To Try What Hasn’t Been Tried Before To Change To Steal Ideas, Processes, Documents To Fail

CLEAR 2008 Annual Conference Anchorage, Alaska THE CA EXPERIENCE

CLEAR 2008 Annual Conference Anchorage, Alaska THE CHALLENGE Design a consistent and best practices discipline system for 13 different autonomous jurisdictions with differing: numbers of members; resources; governing documents; degrees of sophistication; and priorities.

CLEAR 2008 Annual Conference Anchorage, Alaska GUIDING PRINCIPLE THE CORE PURPOSE OF AN INSTITUTE IS TO REGULATE THE PROFESSION IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST

CLEAR 2008 Annual Conference Anchorage, Alaska STAGES OF THE PROCESS Intake Investigation Determination Hearing Sanction Appeal

CLEAR 2008 Annual Conference Anchorage, Alaska INTAKE - COMPLAINTS REACTIVE In writing? Must act. Protection for complainants? PROACTIVE Media, gossip, third parties May, not must, act.

CLEAR 2008 Annual Conference Anchorage, Alaska INTAKE SCHEMATIC Complaint Received Jurisdiction ? Notify Complainant And Close File Notify Complainant & Member Close File Gather Information & Documents Any Possible Misconduct? Notify Complainant & Member Close File With ADR ON YES NO YES

CLEAR 2008 Annual Conference Anchorage, Alaska INVESTIGATION WHO investigates?WHO investigates? WHAT is being investigated?WHAT is being investigated? HOW long will the investigation take?HOW long will the investigation take? WILL the investigator be paid?WILL the investigator be paid? HOW to ensure the independence and competence of the investigator.HOW to ensure the independence and competence of the investigator. WHO oversees the investigation?WHO oversees the investigation?

CLEAR 2008 Annual Conference Anchorage, Alaska DECISION IS THERE ANY EVIDENCE WHICH, IF BELIEVED, COULD RESULT IN A FINDING OF PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT?

CLEAR 2008 Annual Conference Anchorage, Alaska NO MISCONDUCT CLOSE FILE AND NOTIFY COMPLAINANT & MEMBER POSSIBLE MISCONDUCT ACCEPT ADR GROUNDS EXIST TO LAY CHARGES

CLEAR 2008 Annual Conference Anchorage, Alaska HEARING PROCESS Parties And Participants Pleas Prosecutor Counsel Hearing Tribunal Evidence Standard Of Proof Findings

CLEAR 2008 Annual Conference Anchorage, Alaska SANCTIONS REHABILITATIVE Practice supervisionPractice supervision Practice restrictionPractice restriction CoursesCourses TrainingTraining CounselingCounseling TreatmentTreatment PublicityPublicity RETRIBUTIVE ReprimandReprimand FineFine SuspensionSuspension Revocation of FCARevocation of FCA PublicityPublicity ResignationResignation ExpulsionExpulsion

CLEAR 2008 Annual Conference Anchorage, Alaska APPEAL OR REVIEW Who? What? When? Where? Effect? Result?

CLEAR 2008 Annual Conference Anchorage, Alaska RESOURCING

CLEAR 2008 Annual Conference Anchorage, Alaska COST RECOVERY InvestigationInvestigation HearingHearing PublicationPublication ExpertsExperts AppealsAppeals Compliance with ordersCompliance with orders Enforcement of ordersEnforcement of orders

CLEAR 2008 Annual Conference Anchorage, Alaska STAFFING & SAVINGS ProsecutorProsecutor Location of HearingLocation of Hearing Recording HearingRecording Hearing Counsel to TribunalCounsel to Tribunal Settlements/Agreed FactsSettlements/Agreed Facts Agreed Sanction/ RangeAgreed Sanction/ Range Having member pay for materials and copiesHaving member pay for materials and copies Size of tribunalSize of tribunal

CLEAR 2008 Annual Conference Anchorage, Alaska REGIONALIZATION AND LIFELINES

CLEAR 2008 Annual Conference Anchorage, Alaska OUTCOMES FRONT LOADING WORKS It Costs More To Do It Wrong Than To Do It Right In Money In Reputation In Effective Regulation In People

CLEAR 2008 Annual Conference Anchorage, Alaska NEXT STEPS IMPLEMENTATION IMPROVEMENT VIGILANCE

CLEAR 2008 Annual Conference Anchorage, Alaska Speaker Contact Information Elizabeth Cowie Director, Legal and Regulatory Affairs Institute of Chartered Accountants of Ontario 69 Bloor Street East Toronto, Ontario M4W 1B3 (416)