Submission doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0081r0 Michelle Gong, et alSlide 1 Transmission Rules for Wider Bandwidth TXOP Date: 2011-01-16 Authors: Jan. 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /412r0 Submission S. Choi, Philips Research July 2001 Slide 1 Aligning e HCF and h TPC Operations Amjad Soomro, Sunghyun.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /1355r2 11ah Submission Date: Authors: Nov 2012 James Wang, MediaTek Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /630r1a Submission S. Choi, Philips Research November 2001 Slide 1 HC Recovery and Backoff Rules Sunghyun Choi and Javier del Prado.
Doc.: IEEE /1325r0 Submission Nov PS-Poll TXOP Date: Authors: David Xun Yang, Huawei, et. al.Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /0324r0 Submission Slide 1Michelle Gong, Intel March 2010 DL MU MIMO Error Handling and Simulation Results Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0567r0 Submission Slide 1Michelle Gong, Intel May 2010 DL MU MIMO Analysis and OBSS Simulation Results Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0517r0 May 2013 Submission Slide 1 Authors: Combining Process in Virtual CS Mechanism for ah Date: Lv kaiying, ZTE.
Doc.:IEEE /0037r0 Submission Jan. 17, 2011 Yong Liu, MarvellSlide 1 BW Indication in Non-HT Frames Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1123r0 Submission September 2010 Zhu/Kim et al 1 Date: Authors: [TXOP Sharing for DL MU-MIMO Support]
Slide 1 doc.: IEEE /1092r0 Submission Simone Merlin, Qualcomm Incorporated September 2010 Slide 1 ACK Protocol and Backoff Procedure for MU-MIMO.
Doc.: IEEE /0026r0 Submission January 2011 Sameer Vermani, QualcommSlide 1 VHT Supported MCS Field Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /340r1a Submission May 2003 Zhun Zhong et al. PhilipsSlide 1 Medium Sensing Time Histogram Request and Report Zhun Zhong, Stefan Mangold,
Doc.: IEEE /0184r0 Submission January 2011 Rolf de Vegt (Qualcomm)) Slide ah Spec Development Discussion Document Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-15/0550r0 May 2015 K. Yunoki and B. Zhao, KDDI R&D Labs.Slide 1 L-Preamble Issues for UL-OFDMA Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1431r1 Submission September 2014 Issues on UL-OFDMA Transmission Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Uplink Multi-User MIMO Protocol Design
Doc.:IEEE /0370r1 Submission May 17, 2010 Sudhir Srinivasa et al.Slide 1 80MHz Tone Allocation Authors: Date:
Doc.: IEEE /1303r5 Submission November 2010 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide 1 Overlapping BSS Co-Existence Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0104r0 Submission July 2010 Alex Reznik, et. al. (InterDigital)Slide 1 Channel Selection Support in TVWS Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/0288r0 TXOP Sharing Operation for Relay Date: Slide 1Eric Wong, Broadcom Authors: March 2013.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1096r0 Sep 2015 John Son et al., WILUSSlide 1 Recovery Procedures in Cascading Sequences Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Submission doc.: IEEE /1289r2 Michelle Gong, IntelSlide 1 RTS/CTS Operation for Wider Bandwidth Date: Authors: Nov
Submission Jul 2012 doc.: IEEE 11-12/0842r0 ZTE CorporationSlide 1 Short Beamforming Report Poll Frame Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0562r0 Submission May 2009 L. Chu et alSlide 1 MCF Issues Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1064r2 Submission Channelization for 11ac Date: Youhan Kim, et al.Slide 1 Authors: September 2010.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0615r0 May 2012 Sudheer Grandhi, InterDigital CommunicationsSlide 1 Considerations for early NAV indication Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0819r1 Submission July 2012 Hongyuan Zhang, et. Al.Slide 1 Preamble Discussions Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0061r0 Submission Jan 2013 Hongyuan Zhang, et. Al.Slide 1 Receiver Sensitivity Levels Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1086r0 SubmissionSlide 1 Date: Authors: Improved Virtual Carrier Sensing Mechanism for 45GHz Sep ZTE Corp.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0098r0 January 2016 Assaf Kasher, IntelSlide 1 Channel bonding proposals Date: Authors:
Resolutions to Static RTS CTS Comments
Doc.: IEEE /1052r0 SubmissionSlide 1Young Hoon Kwon, Newracom Bandwidth for UL MU Transmission Date: Authors: September 2015.
Doc.: IEEE /0787r1 Submission MU with Frequency Domain Multiplexing July 2010 ChaoChun Wang et al, MediaTekSlide 1 Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1116r1 September 2015 Jinsoo Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 Trigger Frame Channel Access Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1359r0 November 2015 Yu Wang, Ericsson et al.Slide 1 System Performance Evaluation of ae Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0353r1 March 2016 Hanseul Hong, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 MU-RTS/CTS for TWT Protection Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0087r1 January 2016 Jinsoo Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 NAV cancellation issues on MU protection Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0107r2 SubmissionLiwen Chu Etc.Slide 1 Channel Bandwidth Indication and Negotiation Date: Authors: Date: Jan, 2012.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0674r0 May 2016 Hanseul Hong, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 EIFS excess problem of Acknowledgement for UL MU procedure Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0048r0 SubmissionSlide 1Young Hoon Kwon, Newracom Protection using MU-RTS/CTS Date: Authors: January 2016.
Doc.: IEEE /0333r0 March 2016 SubmissionStéphane Baron et al., Canon Issue related to unused UL OFDMA RUs Date: Slide 1 Authors: NameAffiliationAddress .
Secondary Channel CCA of HE STA
Channel Width Selection Within TXOP
Wide Scanning Requests and Responses
Virtual CS during UL MU Date: Authors: March 2017
Flexible Wider Bandwidth Transmission
Overlapping BSS Co-Existence
Overlapping BSS Co-Existence
RTS CTS Rule Amendment Date: Authors: Date: January 2011
Peer Power Save Mode for TDLS
80MHz/160MHz Protection Date: Authors: Date: September 2010
Overlapping BSS Co-Existence
Increased Network Throughput with Channel Width Related CCA and Rules
MU with Frequency Domain Multiplexing
80MHz/160MHz Protection Date: Authors: Date: September 2010
80MHz/160MHz Protection Date: Authors: Date: September 2010
80MHz/160MHz Protection Date: Authors: Date: September 2010
VHT NAV Assertion Date: Authors: Month Year
Scheduled Peer Power Save Mode for TDLS
80MHz/160MHz Protection Date: Authors: Date: September 2010
Error Recovery Scheme for Scheduled Ack
Channel Width Selection Within TXOP
Reserving STA Date: Authors: January 2011 January 2011
1MHz Dup Mode Date: Authors: Nov 2012 Month Year
NAV Update Rule Considering UL MU Operation
TXOP Truncation Enhancement
SM Power Save for 11ay Date: Authors: August 2017
80MHz/160MHz Protection Date: Authors: Date: September 2010
Utilizing Unused Resources by Allowing Simultaneous Transmissions
80 MHz Channelization Date: Authors: July 2010 Month Year
Presentation transcript:

Submission doc.: IEEE /0081r0 Michelle Gong, et alSlide 1 Transmission Rules for Wider Bandwidth TXOP Date: Authors: Jan. 2011

Submission doc.: IEEE /0081r0 Outline Motivation Transmission rules in a TXOP –Case 1: no non-HT duplicate frame exchange in a TXOP –Case 2: at least one non-HT duplicate frame exchange (not including RTS/CTS) in a TXOP Conclusions Michelle Gong, et alSlide 2 Jan. 2011

Submission doc.: IEEE /0081r0 Transmission rules within a wider bandwidth TXOP is not clearly defined in the current spec Many TXOPs are not obtained through a non-HT duplicate frame exchange –Therefore, NAV may not be correctly set at either the transmitter or the receiver 11mb v4.01, section : “The duration of a TXOP is the duration during which the TXOP holder maintains uninterrupted control of the medium …” The following scenario would occur if the TXOP holder does not maintain uninterrupted control of the TXOP over all channels Slide 3 Michelle Gong, et al Jan BA EIFS+backoff BA interférence

Submission doc.: IEEE /0081r0 In some cases, no non-HT duplicate frame exchange is used in a TXOP If there is no non-HT duplicate frame exchange in a TXOP, once the TXOP holder transmits using a narrower bandwidth, for subsequent transmissions, it cannot transmit anything wider than such bandwidth In this case, physical carrier sensing is utilized. Once a TXOP holder losses uninterrupted control over certain channels, it cannot re-claim the channels in the same TXOP Michelle Gong, et allSlide 4 Jan time BA time BA EIFS+backoff BA

Submission doc.: IEEE /0081r0 In some cases, there is at least one non-HT duplicate frame exchange in a TXOP If there is at least one non-HT duplicate frame exchange (not RTS/CTS exchange) in a TXOP, the TXOP holder transmits using the same or narrower bandwidth than the bandwidth used in the first non-HT duplicate frame exchange in the same TXOP –The first non-HT duplicate frame exchange (not RTS/CTS) determines the max bandwidth for subsequent transmissions in the same TXOP Once NAV is set at both the transmitter and the receiver, the TXOP holder has uninterrupted control of the bandwidth occupied by the non- HT duplicate frame exchange Michelle Gong, et alSlide 5 Jan time BA time BA BAR BA

Submission doc.: IEEE /0081r0 In conclusion, two transmission rules are defined for wider bandwidth TXOP If there is no non-HT duplicate frame exchange in a TXOP, a TXOP holder shall not transmit frames using more bandwidth than the bandwidth occupied by the preceding frame in the same TXOP If there is at least one non-HT duplicate frame exchange (not RTS/CTS exchange) in a TXOP, a TXOP holder shall not transmit frames using more bandwidth than the bandwidth occupied by the first non-HT duplicate frame exchange in the same TXOP Michelle Gong, et alSlide 6 Jan. 2011

Submission doc.: IEEE /0081r0 Pre-motion 1 Do you support updating the TGac spec framework to include the following protocol rule? If there is no non-HT duplicate frame exchange in a TXOP to set the NAV: –A TXOP holder shall not transmit frames using more bandwidth than the bandwidth occupied by the preceding frame in the same TXOP Michelle Gong, et alSlide 7 Jan. 2011

Submission doc.: IEEE /0081r0 Pre-motion 2 Do you support updating the TGac spec framework to include the following protocol rule? If there is at least one non-HT duplicate frame exchange (not a RTS/CTS exchange) in a TXOP: –A TXOP holder shall not transmit frames using more bandwidth than the bandwidth occupied by the first non-HT duplicate frame exchange in the same TXOP Michelle Gong, et alSlide 8 Jan. 2011