U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration UPDATE Montana Pipeline River Crossings PHMSA\Office of Pipeline.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Application of the Continuous Slope-Area Method for Determining Stream Discharge and Development of Rating Curves in Ephemeral Channels Navajo Nation Hydroclimate.
Advertisements

Joe Killins & Associates, LLC Pipelines & Risk Based Management How Safe is Safe?
2009 City of Bozeman Storm Water Update
BoRit Superfund Site Timeline
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Gas Gathering Update Pipeline Safety – Getting to Zero Pipeline.
Water Crossing Survey of Montana Petroleum Pipelines
Allegro ENERGY CONSULTING Corro sion November 17, 2011 New Orleans, LA © Cheryl J. Trench, 2011 A Tour of Lessons Learned from PHMSA Accident Data Prepared.
PHMSA Western Region Overview Tempe, AZ August 20, 2014
1 Armour Ranch Road Bridge Emergency Repairs SB County Project Number 01STRM R015 Storm Damage caused during March 5 th 2001 storm.
TRANS ALASKA PIPELINE 800 mile Trans Alaska Pipeline system (TAPS) stretches from Prudhoe Bay to Valdez in North America Pipeline Transports crude oil.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration NW Area Committee Meeting Focus on Pipelines PREVENTION & PREPAREDNESS.
Importance of Processing Plant Information Gas Processors Association 88 th Annual Convention March 8-11, 2009 Barbara Mariner-Volpe
2 Permian Basin Supply San Juan Basin Supply Washington Ranch Storage Waha Compressor Stations Gas Supplies Transport Flow Directions Pipelines Production.
Regulatory / WDR Update What’s Going On?. Waste Discharge Requirements Adapted by the State Water Resources Control Board on May 2, 2006 Adapted by the.
1 Preparing for emergencies and climate impacts Gina Blus Sustainable Communities Feb. 28, 2013.
PHILLIPS 66 Yellowstone Pipeline Idaho Worst Case Discharge TTX Kellogg, Idaho September 11 & 12, 2013.
Overview of Key Rule Features
Assessing Your School An Environmental Investigation You have been hired by Eagle Environmental, Inc. to perform an Environmental Assessment of South Hunterdon.
1 Resources for Integrity Management Marty Matheson, American Petroleum Institute OPS Public Meeting August 8, 2001 Houston, TX.
The Kalamazoo River Oil Spill What did we learn and how did we learn it Chris Killian The Kalamazoo Gazette.
Yellowtail Dam & Bighorn Lake Billings, Montana January 2011 RECLAMATION Managing Water in the West.
Yellowstone River Compact Commission Technical Committee Discussions Sheridan County Courthouse Sheridan, WY April 24, 2007 Bighorn Reservoir operations.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Cover Over Buried Pipelines Section 28 of the Pipeline Safety,
2013 Section Engineer’s Meeting.  Correct Type, Gauge, and Coating (Standard Drawings)  Based on Pipe Diameter, Fill Height & Soil pH  Obtain copy.
SCOPING MEETING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT REQUIRED BY PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE SECTION 3161 (b)(3) AND (4) (SENATE BILL 4) (PAVLEY) C ALIFORNIA D EPARTMENT.
Module 4: Getting Ready: Scoping the RI/FS. 2 Module Objectives  Explain the purpose of the scoping phase of the RI/FS  Identify existing data which.
Pipeline Qra Seminar Title slide Title slide.
Emergency Action Plans Miriam Gradie Anderson Planning Specialist 608/ Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources.
ILLINOIS COMMERCE COMMISSION Darin Burk Pipeline Safety Program Manager.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration San Bruno – Lessons Learned Alan K. Mayberry, P.E. Deputy Associate.
SCC DA Program Stress-corrosion-cracking direct assessment (SCCDA) is a structured process that contributes to pipeline company’s efforts to improve.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Harold Winnie, CATS Manager (Central Region) Leak detection for.
1 ELEMENTS OF AN EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN PLANNING APPROACH Issued May 2009 Level II: Introduction to Design Education and Certification for Persons.
U. S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
CLICK TO EDIT MASTER TITLE STYLE TRIPR FLAMMABLE LIQUID UNIT TRAINS 8.0 CLEAN-UP AND POST-EMERGENCY OPERATIONS.
Part 3.3 Production Safety. Objectives After reading the chapter and reviewing the materials presented the students will be able to: Understand safety.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration USDOT – PHMSA HMEP Grants Major Audit Findings NASTTPO April 25,
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES Preparations for Flood Season DFM Flood Maintenance Office Presented By: Noel Lerner, Former Chief Flood.
Icicle Creek Salmon Habitat Conditions* Land Development has affected stream channel movement, off channel habitat, and LWD recruitment. Barriers to migration.
Hands-On Approaches to Place-Based Learning of Earth Sciences Through the NSF-BSI GK-12 Program Monica Z. Bruckner Montana State University, Bozeman.
Chapter 37 Pipeline Construction. Objectives After reading the chapter and reviewing the materials presented the students will be able to: Explain the.
1 Natural Gas Transmission Pipelines Brisbane City Council Meeting June 6, 2011.
Review of Current Conditions Report and Work Plan for Area 1 Presented by The Great Plains/Rocky Mountain Technical Outreach Services for Communities.
ILLINOIS COMMERCE COMMISSION Darin Burk Manager – Pipeline Safety 1.
SKUNK RIVER PIPELINE PROTECTION PROJECT NEAR DENMARK, IOWA SUB MAR.
Building a Weather-Ready Nation 2015 Spring Flood Outlook National Weather Service Valley/Omaha National Weather Service Sioux Falls 1.
10/09/03 GR: U.S. Department of Transportation Research and Special Programs Administration 10/09/03 Number of Accidents Trendline 01.
Ensuring Success in Integrity Management Marty Matheson American Petroleum Institute July 24, 2002.
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project Plenary Meeting January 4, 2010 Handout #3.
An Overview of our Community’s Stormwater Management Program
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Gas Transmission 2012 Annual Reports Joint Advisory Committees.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration 1 Mike Israni Senior Technical Advisor Manager: Standards & Committees.
Member Companies Aka Energy Group, LLC Anadarko Petroleum Anadarko Petroleum / Fort Union Gas Gathering Anadarko Petroleum / MGTC, Inc. Anadarko Petroleum.
Pipeline Safety – 2015 Year in Review. Large PHMSA Budget Increase Pipeline Safety spending in 2015 was increased $26.9 million. Main areas of expansion.
Part 5: Meeting the Challenge of the “EC Tracers” Healthcare Engineering Consultants How Should I Prepare for the “EC Tracer” Part of the Survey?
How Old is too Old? Who Makes that Decision? Alan Mayberry New Orleans, Louisiana Pipeline Safety Trust Annual Conference
U.S. DOT Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Integrity Management Systems November 18, 2015 Chris McLaren - 1 -
Groundwater Protection Project Greg Robison Project Manager Ed Sullivan Consulting Engineer June 23, 2008.
2015 HURRICANE SEASON PREPARATIONS March 18, 2015.
The Clark Fork River Approximately 360 mi (579 km) long. The largest river by volume in Montana, it drains an extensive region of the Rocky Mountains.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Oil Spill Response Plans A History Lesson PHMSA Review and Approval.
Renewable Energy at Closed Landfills Workshop: Landfill Post Closure Use Critical Components July 26, 2012 John Carrigan MassDEP Northeast Regional Office.
Office of Pipeline Safety Remedial Action Review Protocol Integrity Management Workshop July 23-24, 2002.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration PREVENTION & PREPAREDNESS May 11, 2016 REGIONAL RESPONSE TEAM.
What is Stormwater? Direct result of rainfall Recharges groundwater by infiltration Produces “runoff” (excess rainfall after infiltration) May be concentrated.
Why the Need for Increased Stormwater Funding? Citizens expect a higher level of protection from flooding Increased development.
Presentation to Pipeline Safety Trust Conference November 18 & 19, 2015.
Lesson Seven: Flood Works Monitoring
Excavation.
TRIPR High Hazard flammable Trains
Presentation transcript:

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration UPDATE Montana Pipeline River Crossings PHMSA\Office of Pipeline Safety 2/8/2012

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Focus 1.Petroleum pipelines (crude oil and refined products) 2.Major river crossings (greater than 100 feet) 3.Located in Montana and rivers flowing into Montana 4.Constructed with open-trench technology 5.Exposed or lack of depth-of-cover 6.River characteristics

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Information Collected or Obtained Depth of Cover Surveys Mainline Valve Alignment Sheets & Actuation Method Worst Case Discharge Integrity Threats Reports/Studies Analysis Used for Remedial Actions (stream flow, depth-of- cover Remedial Actions taken in 2011 –Short-term Remedial Action Schedule –Long-term Remedial Action Schedule Procedures to Monitor During Flood Conditions

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Progress Since July 2011 Release ExxonMobil –HDD completed: Yellowstone River (Laurel) –HDD completed: Rock Creek –HDD completed: Clark’s Fork CHS –Musselshell River: sandbag and increased patrolling –3 rd party analysis on Musselshell River HDD will be complete before spring runoff

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration EMPL - Preparing Pipe for Installation Under Yellowstone River - 8/27/11

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration CHS Musselshell HDD – 2/6/12

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Progress Since July 2011 Release Cont. ConocoPhillips –Depth-of-Cover surveys conducted for all major crossings –Belt Creek: added cover –Judith River: Grout bags/spring monitoring –Beauvais Creek: HDD completed –Coure d’Alene River: Grout bags/temporary repairs (Campground Rd, Sliver Bridge & Mile Post 476) –Beaver Creek: Line lowered (Refrigerator Canyon & Winston) –Tongue River (WY): Grout bags/spring monitoring

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Progress Since July 2011 Release Cont. KinderMorgan –Clark Fork of Yellowstone River; Greybull River; Musselshell River: depth-of-cover surveys Marathon (Wyoming) –Shoshone River; Wind River; Big Horn River: depth-of- cover surveys True (Bridger Pipeline) –Poplar River/Missouri: Took out of service during flooding event –Yellowstone River and Poplar River: 2011 depth-of-cover surveys conducted and show adequate cover

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Montana River Crossings OperatorMT Major River Crossings (open-cut & greater than 100 feet) ExxonMobil1 CHS3 Conoco Phillips16 Plains0 Marathon (Wyoming)3 Kinder Morgan4 ONEOK1 (HVL) True2 * Note: Montana Refining less than 5 miles with no water crossings

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Planned Remediation Measures ExxonMobil –Monitor as normal (3 crossings were HDD’d since July 2011). Implement procedures to monitor during flooding CHS –Musselshell River: HDD planned before 2012 spring runoff – Tongue River: HDD planned in 3-5 years KinderMorgan –Monitor as normal. Implement procedures to monitor during flooding conditions Marathon –Monitor as normal. Implement procedures to monitor during flooding conditions

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration ConocoPhillips –Yellowstone Pipe Line: HDD across Clark Fork River at MP (just east of Missoula) before Spring runoff –Yellowstone Pipe Line: stabilize with grout bags across East Gallatin River at MP and install MOV before 2012 spring runoff & plan HDD in 2012 –Glacier Pipe Line: stabilize with grout bags across Judith River at MP before 2012 spring runoff; 2012 HDD –Glacier Pipe Line: Monitor & plan future mitigation across Missouri River at MP (stable bedrock trenched crossing) –Seminoe Pipe Line: Big Horn River – 2012 HDD –Other Remediation has been risk ranked for completion True (Bridger Pipeline) –Yellowstone River and Poplar River: Continue to monitor through depth of cover surveys and ILI

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration PHMSA’s Immediate Area of Focus What is PHMSA’s immediate focus for 2012 Spring Runoff: –CHS Musselshell River: Exposed line. Finish HDD by end of 2/2012 –Conoco Phillips Clark Fork: Install HDD prior to 2012 runoff East Gallatin River (MP 148.3): Exposed line plan to install motor-operated valve before spring runoff. HDD later in 2012 Missouri River (MP 269.3): Exposed line in stable bedrock trenched crossing plan - Either HDD, New Trenched Crossing, Armoring, or Line Lowering

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Next Steps Continue collecting and aggregating data Monitor planned on-going remediation activities Inspect new construction and remediation activities of water crossings Ongoing information exchange with State, including the need for safety enhancements at water crossings Develop enforcement actions for operator’s not following remedial action plans