Understanding the Early Years Action Planning Session Thursday, May 22, 2008 Delta Brunswick Hotel Saint John, NB.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Collaboration in Support of Early Child Development
Advertisements

Audience: Parents, families, local community members
Children’s Partnership Strategic Planning Process & Outcomes April 2014 Children First Feedback Session.
Judith J. Carta, Ph.D. Juniper Gardens Children’s Project University of Kansas with help from Elaine Carlson, WESTAT.
School Social Work: Ensuring Student Success Connecting Schools, Families & Community Removing Barriers to Education Slide show based on documents from.
Five Protective Factors
ECD INSTRUMENTS Important Considerations for Assessing the Development of Young Children across Cultures and Socio-Economic Contexts Sophie Naudeau (HDNCY)
3 High expectations for every child
EDI Neighbourhood Data EDI Results & 2011 Neighbourhood Demographics.
DIP vs DAP Question: What do these stand for?.
Understanding the Early Years: Red Deer Preliminary Research Results Forum December 1, 2009 The Understanding the Early Years: Red Deer Project is funded.
Karen L. Mapp, Ed.D. Deputy Superintendent, Boston Public Schools
Outcomes Participants will… Family-school connections and partnerships are important.
Family Resource Center Association January 2015 Quarterly Meeting.
1 Francis Xavier Sentamu Monitoring & Evaluation Officer Nutrition and Early Childhood Development Project (NECDP) - Ministry of Health.
Developmentally Appropriate Practices (DAP)
The early years – Health equity from the start May 28, 2014 Patricia Daly Chief Medical Health Officer Vancouver Coastal Health.
Understanding the fabric of our community / comprendre le tissu de notre communauté D ATA A NALYSIS C OORDINATORS : What Can DAC’s Do For You? Presented.
Supporting PreK Teachers During Act 3 Implementation.
Updated January “There’s an enormous brain drain being lost in our country. Children under 5 are not being empowered to reach their potential and.
Closing the Gap Key learner relationships By Megan Ferneley & Richard Olsen.
What should be the basis of
NAEYC Developmentally Appropriate Practice in Early Childhood Programs Serving Children from Birth through Age 8.
Presenters: Donna Morrison and Laurie Lafortune Alberta Understanding the Early Years Conference: October, 2008.
NAEYC- Early Childhood Program Standards
Understanding The Early Years Niagara College ECE Program  October 2007 Glory Ressler, B.A., Dip. GIT Coordinator, Understanding the Early Years Niagara.
This PowerPoint was developed by ECMap to be used as a framework by coalitions and communities in presenting their community profile results.
Community Input Discussions: Measuring the Progress of Young Children in Massachusetts August 2009.
What Visual Language and Visual Learning Research Has to Say about Educational Practice Thursday, April 22, 2010 State Leader Summit.
Principles of Development. Developmentally appropriate practices result from the process of professionals making decisions about the well-being and education.
Principles of Development drawn from NAEYC (1996), & Berk (2006)
Creating knowledge to help children thrive Clyde Thank you for everything.
1 UEY Red Deer Preliminary Results Research Forum: December 1, 2009 The School Readiness of Red Deer’s Kindergarten Children: A Preliminary Report on the.
Families as Partners in Learning Principals and teaching staff Why are partnerships important?
1 The Early Childhood Development Association of PEI Understanding the Early Years Prince Edward Island Profile.
COMMUNITY KNOWLEDGE: Readiness to Learn in Niagara GLORY RESSLER Coordinator Understanding the Early Years TIFFANY GARTNER Data Analysis Coordinator Ontario.
1 UEY Red Deer Preliminary Results Research Forum: December 1, 2009 Preliminary Results from the Parent Interviews and Direct Assessments of Children Survey.
Understanding The Early Years and The Community Action Plan Michelle Ward,Executive Director - Kids First Association Lisa MacRae, Public Health Nurse.
Slide 1. slide 2 slide 3 Risk to Ready begins with the Early Development Instrument Developed in Canada in 1998 and expanding across US since 2009 through.
Measuring School Readiness : The Early Development Instrument Washington, DC, 17 February 2005 Magdalena Janus, Ph.D.
Children's Planning Table Service Working Group June 20, 2013.
Defining family  U.S. Census Bureau: A group of two or more people related by birth, marriage, or adoption who reside together  Authors: Two or more.
The Creative Curriculum for Infants, Toddlers, & Twos
National Consortium On Deaf-Blindness Families Technical Assistance Information Services and Dissemination Personnel Training State Projects.
Using the Early Development Instrument to Support School Readiness NURTURING NEW ROOTS Supporting the Newcomer Family 6 th Ontario Professional Development.
Creating a jigsaw for early learning: developing high quality teaching and learning programs for K-3 classrooms Jean Rice September 2008.
A Picture of Young Children in the U.S. Jerry West, Ph.D. National Center for Education Statistics Institute of Education Sciences EDUCATION SUMMIT ON.
Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Data dissemination and further analysis workshop Child Development MICS4 Data Dissemination and Further Analysis Workshop.
How To Use This Presentation This presentation is intended to support you in starting dialogue with your stakeholders, community members, clients or colleagues.
Developmentally Appropriate Practice in Early Childhood Programs Serving Children from Birth through 8 A position statement of the National Association.
Early Development Instrument The. A teacher completed instrument which measures children’s development - Offord Centre for Child Studies.
Special Education is a service, not a place IDEA and NCLB have changed the focus on access to the general curriculum from WHERE to: WHAT, a focus on what.
April 17,  Educators have expanded communication from one-way discussions, such as parent- educator interviews, to authentic engagement where.
Early Development Index (EDI). What is the Early Development Index?  Teacher-completed checklist on children’s development measured in the spring of.
Early Childhood Special Education. Dunst model interest engagement competence mastery.
Presented by David MacLennan, Thompson Rivers University Kristy Callaghan, Stefania Maggi, & Amedeo D’Angiulli, Carleton University Financial support for.
Making Small but Significant Changes. Learning Objectives Upon completion of this module participants will be able to: Understand how protective factors.
Minnesota's Approach to Comprehensive Assessment Megan E. Cox, Ph.D. Principal Leadership Academy January 11, 2016 Minnesota’s Approach to Comprehensive.
Building The Next Phase in Ontario’s Education Strategy. “Great to Excellent” Building The Next Phase in Ontario’s Education Strategy “Great to Excellent”
Report on the NCSEAM Part C Family Survey Batya Elbaum, Ph.D. National Center for Special Education Accountability Monitoring February 2005.
Using administrative and survey data relating to monitor early childhood - Education and care Dr Paul Jelfs Assistant Statistician Australian Bureau of.
Creative Curriculum and GOLD Assessment: Early Childhood Competency Based Evaluation System By Carol Bottom.
Today’s Families and Their Partnerships with Professionals Chapter 4.
Using the CLASS tool to Improve Instructional Practices in Early Childhood Tracie Dow and Felicia Owo.
USING DATA TO INSPIRE PROGRAMMATIC CHANGE EARLY DEVELOPMENT INDEX (EDI) & DRDP/ASSESSMENTS.
Our Children Our Communities Our Future Australian Early Development Census (AEDC) Prepared by Gail Clark, WA AEDC Coordinator.
Our Children, Our Community, Our Change
Using Data To Learn About Our Young Children: Mapping Early Development Instrument (EDI) Results in Miami-Dade County. Zafreen Jaffery, Ed.D.
Community Input Discussions:
Developmentally Appropriate Practices (DAP)
Presentation transcript:

Understanding the Early Years Action Planning Session Thursday, May 22, 2008 Delta Brunswick Hotel Saint John, NB

Objectives for today Share wealth of knowledge in our community with respect to ‘early years’ Connect with community partners- past, present and future Contribute to UEY Community Action Plan: evidence-based, relevant, living, breathing document

According to Dr. Fraser Mustard… “The quality and capacity of our future population depends on what we do now to support early child development.”

Why UEY? UEY’s overall purpose is to enable members of a community to work together to address the needs of young children by: raising family and community awareness of the many and varied factors that influence child development enhancing our ability to use local data to help make decisions to enhance children’s lives. Generate data to build knowledge to enable community!

How does UEY work? Data collection Parents’ and teachers’ perspectives on development of kindergarten children Direct assessment results on children’s cognitive abilities Parents’ perspectives on family circumstances and children’s experiences Local info on programs and services Local socioeconomic characteristics

Step 1: Early Development Instrument Measures ‘readiness for school’ Survey completed by K teachers in for each child in class (n~800) 5 domains: Physical health and well-being Social competence Emotional maturity Language and cognitive development Communication skills and general knowledge

EDI Participation: 2006

EDI: things to remember… Single snapshot of one group of children: K students, SD 8, EDI is a population measure, not an individual assessment Data from EDI is useful, but does not answer ‘why?’ Best used with other valid, reliable data

UEY-SJ vs. National Sample

Percentage of Vulnerable Children

Multiple Challenge Index

Mapping the EDI Mapping is the visual representation of data by geography or location, the linking of information to place. Mapping is a powerful tool: it makes patterns based on place much easier to identify and analyze and; it provides a visual way of communicating those patterns to a broad audience, quickly and dramatically.

Step 2: PIDACS PIDACS= Parent Interview and Direct Assessment of Children Survey PIDACS based on National Longitudinal Survey of Children and Youth (see for more information) UEY-SJ area families with K children, , n~800, response rate > 83%

How are children doing in SJ?

Family and Community Supports for Early Childhood Development

Family Characteristics

Children’s Participation in Community Activities

How about the TV?

Use of Educational Resources

Use of Entertainment and Cultural Resources

Use of Recreational Resources

Barriers to Use of Programs and Resources Parents unaware the program or service was available (#1) Transportation issues (#2) Also: finding a convenient time, having time to participate and availability of programs for children this age

Use of Childcare Arrangements No child-care arrangement: 38% (vs. 43%) More than one type of care: 31% (vs. 48%) Total time per week in care: ~15 hours Type of care most frequently used: Someone else’s home by a non-relative Someone else’s home by a relative In own home by a relative

Neighbourhood Characteristics

Step 3: Census 2001 Data Variables include: Family Income Parents’ Employment Parents’ Level of Education Family Structure

Family Income

Parents’ Employment

Parents’ Level of Education

Family Structure

What makes GSJ unique? SJ children had below-average scores (UEY-21) on receptive vocabulary and number knowledge BUT, average score on test of early literacy was considerably above Canadian average (?) SJ children had scores well below national average on 4 of 5 measures on EDI- exception was language and cognitive development

What makes GSJ unique? SJ families had relatively low incomes, even though most parents worked outside the home 1 in 3 children live in families with incomes below $30,000 1 in 4 children live in single-parent families Parents had relatively high levels of education, yet the average level of SES in SJ is very low

What makes GSJ unique? High levels of positive parenting practices and engagement with their children Safe neighbourhoods, good schools, adequate recreation and health facilities Family members, friends and neighbours who help them feel safe, secure and happy **NEED MICRODATA!**

Conclusion UEY is a starting point for Greater Saint John in identifying strengths and needs among our children age 0-5 and their families Next steps? Public consultation on results-to-date leading to input on development of UEY Community Action Plan

Questions? Let’s take a break!