Multichannel Analysis of Surface Waves (MASW)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Slide 1Niederleithinger BAM VIII.2 Flood Defence 2008 Toronto Evaluation of Geophysical Techniques to Investigate River Embankments E. Niederleithinger.
Advertisements

Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and Geography West Virginia University Morgantown, WV.
Seismic Reflection Ground Roll Filtering Ted Bertrand SAGE 2004.
Mechanical Wave Measurements Electromagnetic Wave Techniques
Near-Surface Geophysical Investigation of the 2010 Haiti Earthquake Epicentral Area Eray Kocel, Robert R. Stewart, Paul Mann, and Li Chang Eray Kocel,
Houston, TX | May 2, 2012 Finding blind faults using ground roll reflection Craig Hyslop Robert Stewart.
Near-surface Imaging at Meteor Crater, Arizona Soumya Roy, Ph. D. Student Advisor: Dr. Robert R. Stewart AGL Annual Meeting University of Houston, 2 nd.
electromagnetic method
Lab 2 Seismogram Interpretation
Characterization of Glacial Materials Using Seismic Refraction and Multichannel Analysis of Surface Waves Glenn Larsen Ohio Department of Natural Resources.
Applied Geophysics An Introduction
Reflection GPH492 By: Jonathan Payne Peter Bernhard Eve Marie Hirt.
SOES6004 Data acquisition and geometry
Occurs when wave encounters sharp discontinuities in the medium important in defining faults generally considered as noise in seismic sections seismic.
Advanced Seismic Imaging GG 6770 Variance Analysis of Seismic Refraction Tomography Data By Travis Crosby.
UTAM 2004 Travis Crosby. UTAM 2004 Travis Crosby Very Low Frequency EM Surveys for the Purpose of Augmenting for the Purpose of Augmenting Near-Surface.
Bedrock Delineation by a Seismic Reflection/Refraction Survey at TEAD Utah David Sheley and Jianhua Yu.
Acquisiton of Passive Seismic Data at Tooele Army Depot, Utah David Sheley, Travis Crosby, Jianming Sheng.
The surface profiles in Grenoble area determined by the MASW measurements Seiji Tsuno, Cecile Cornou, Pierre-Yves Bard (LGIT) QSHA meeting, 1/Juin/2007,
Reflection Processing and Analysis Bryce Grimm Mayo Thompson Shallow Subsurface Investigation across many areas of the V-line and Truckee Canal Fallon,
Filters  Temporal Fourier (t f) transformation  Spatial Fourier (x k x ) transformation applications  f-k x transformation  Radon (-p x ) transformation.
(see also Seismic Methods: Refraction.
Downhole seismic and S-Waves Jacques JENNY Geo 2X Genève.
The Use of MASW in the Assessment of Soil Liquefaction Potential Chih-Ping Lin C-C Chang, I-L Chen, T-S Chang National Chiao Tung University, Taiwan November.
Application of Near-Surface Geophysics to Agricultural Drainage Pipe Detection.
Eagle Mountain – Woodfibre Gas Pipeline Project Geotechnical and geophysical tests James Lota, FortisBC September 25, 2014.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
Seismic reflection Ali K. Abdel-Fattah Geology Dept.,
University of Missouri - Columbia
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 26 Feb 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 For Fri 28 Feb: Burger (§8.4–8.5) Last Time: Industry Seismic Interpretation.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 18 Feb 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 For Wed 20 Feb: Burger (§ ) Last Time: Reflection Data Processing Step.
SOES6002: Modelling in Environmental and Earth System Science CSEM Lecture 1 Martin Sinha School of Ocean & Earth Science University of Southampton.
Searching for blind faults: the Haiti subsurface imaging project ERAY KOCEL ERAY KOCEL with with Robert R. Stewart, Paul Mann, Robert R. Stewart, Paul.
Earthquake Engineering GE / CEE - 479/679 Topic 13. Wave Propagation 2
Last week’s problems a) Mass excess = 1/2πG × Area under curve 1/2πG = × in kgs 2 m -3 Area under curve = -1.8 ×10-6 x 100 m 2 s -2 So Mass.
Predicting Site Response. Based on theoretical calculations –1-D equivalent linear, non-linear –2-D and 3-D non-linear Needs geotechnical site properties.
SASW – an in situ method for determining shear modulus
Physical Properties of Permafrost: The Impact of Ice in the Ground to Geophysical Surveys Brian Moorman Department of Geology and Geophysics and.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 28 Feb 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 Last Time: Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) Radar = electromagnetic radiation (light)
The main instrument used is called the sonde. A basic sonde consists of a source and two receivers one-foot apart. The sonde is lowered down the borehole.
SEISMIC INTERPRETATION
NS/V noise NS/H noise NS/H earthquakes The use of a very dense seismic array to characterize the Cavola, Northern Italy, active landslide body. By P. Bordoni.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
Surface-wave Derived Focal Mechanisms in Mid-America R. B. Herrmann 1, C. J. Ammon 2 and H. M. Benz 3 1 Saint Louis University, 2 Pennsylvania State University,
Motivation To characterize the shallow subsurface at Wadi Qudaid for its water storage and reuse potential.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and Geography West Virginia University Morgantown, WV.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 29 Feb 2016 © A.R. Lowry 2016 Last Time: Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) Radar = electromagnetic radiation (light)
Lee M. Liberty Research Professor Boise State University.
1 Introduction to Applied Geophysics & Geophysical Exploration Prof Jeannot Trampert (coordinator) Dr Fred Beekman
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 12 Feb 2016
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 26 Feb 2016 © A.R. Lowry 2016 For Mon 29 Feb: Burger (§8.4) Last Time: Industry Seismic Interpretation Seismic.
Microtremor method Saibi. Dec, 18, 2014.
. Lakeside Drive and Manzanita Lane to the north corner of Jasper Lane and Manzanita Lane.
Seismic Methods Geoph 465/565 Vertical Seismic Profiling– Nov 2, 2015
Ground-roll Inversion for Near-surface Shear-Wave Velocity
Central Mining Institute
Seismic Refraction Interpretation
Applied Geophysics Fall 2016 Umass Lowell
Mohd Nawawi and Amin E. Khalil PPSF, Universiti Sains Malaysia
Creating a Conference Poster
Summary of GPR Systems for Mars Exploration
Exploration and Environmental Geophysics
New ProMAX modules for reflectivity calibration and noise attenuation
Acoustic Reflection 2 (distance) = (velocity) (time) *
Detection of Mobile Fluids
The radar band is loosely taken to extend from approximately 0
Cableless seismograph Atom
—Based on 2018 Field School Seismic Data
Bison – 120 Channels.
Presentation transcript:

Multichannel Analysis of Surface Waves (MASW) Short Course October, 2000

Instructor Education Expertise 1984, Seoul National University (B.S.) 1988, Ohio University (M.S.) 1995, The University of Kansas (Ph.D.) Expertise Seismic Technique Development for Near-Surface Application Swept Impact Seismic Technique (SIST) MASW Software Development WinSeis SurfSeis

Short Course (Schedule) Introduction to MASW (Friday, 10/13) Field Survey I (Saturday, 10/14) Field Survey II (Monday, 10/16) Use of “SurfSeis” (Tuesday, 10/17)

Introduction to MASW CONTENTS Geophysical Methods for Near-Surface Investigation Surface-Wave Method SASW and MASW Higher Modes (Overtones) Overall Procedure of MASW Case Studies with MASW

Geophysical Methods for Near-Surface Investigation Seismic Resistivity Electromagnetic (EM) Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) Potential Field (e.g., Gravity Survey)

Seismic Methods Refraction Method Reflection Method Surface-Wave Method Joint (Refraction+Surface Wave) Method

Seismic Method (Refraction) Most Widely Used Method for Engineering Applications Reconnaissance Method (I.e., inappropriate as Exploration Method) Problem with Velocity Reversal Tomographic Approach-Most Advanced

Seismic Method (Reflection) High-Resolution Imaging Most Difficult Method Weak Signal Complicated Processing Limitation with Wavelength Future - Ultra High Frequency (UHF) Method

Seismic Method (Surface Wave) Simplest and Easiest Method for Engineering Applications Reconnaissance and Exploration Both S-Wave and P-Wave Velocity Widest Application

Surface-Wave Method CONTENTS Surface Waves MASW MASW and SASW

Surface Waves Ground Roll Large Amplitude Dispersion Property Near-Surface

Dispersion of Surface Waves Dispersion Curve

Dispersion and Attenuation Earth Model Dispersion Curve Attenuation Curve

Multichannel Analysis of Surface Waves (MASW) Pattern Recognition Fast Survey Various Multichannel Processing Methods

Higher Modes (Overtones) of Surface Waves Wave Equation Predicts Multiple Velocities for One Frequency Energy and Velocity — changes with Layer Model, Source and Receiver Parameters

Layer Model and Higher Modes Amplitudes

River-Bottom Hydrophone Data Offset and Higher Modes River-Bottom Hydrophone Data (Fraser River, B.C.)

Dispersion Curves — Fraser River, B.C.

Higher Modes — Why Excluded? Not Significant Energy? Not Easy to Detect?

MASW and SASW Multichannel Analysis of Surface Waves (MASW) -Pattern Recognition -Diverse Processing -P- and S-Wave Velocities -1-D and 2-D Profiling Spectral Analysis of Surface Waves (SASW) -Two Receivers (Q/C Impossible) -Repeated Measurements (Time and Labor Intensive) -Dispersion Curves Speculative -S-Wave Velocity only -1-D

MASW and SASW MASW SASW Pattern Recognition Accurate Dispersion Curves Higher Modes Offset Dependent Dispersion Curve Risk of Error Many Measurements

Procedure of MASW (3 Steps) Acquisition Dispersion Analysis Inversion

MASW - Applications 1-D S-Wave Profile 2-D S-Wave Map

Vp, Vs, and Poisson's Ratio Map MASW - Applications 2-D & 3-D Vp, Vs, and Poisson's Ratio Map

MASW - Field Procedure Seismic Source Receivers Seismograph Offsets (Source Offset and Receiver Spacing) Field Notes

MASW - Seismic Source Hammer Near-Surface Material The Heavier, The Deeper Strong Source: Low Frequency Weak Source: High Frequency Investigation Depth (Z) Z < 5 m ( < 2 Kg) Z < 10 m (< 5 Kg) Z > 10 m (10 Kg)

MASW - Seismic Receivers Low-Frequency Geophones Near-Surface Material The Lower Frequency, The Deeper Investigation Depth (Z) Z < 5 m ( 4.5 Hz, 10 Hz, 20 Hz) Z < 10 m (4.5 Hz, 10 Hz) Z > 10 m (4.5 Hz)

MASW - Seismograph Minimum 12 Channel Absolutely No Low-Cut Filter Low Dynamic Range OK Preparation of (at least) 24 traces by Walkaway Format Absolutely No Low-Cut Filter

MASW - Offsets Source Offset Receiver Spacing Noise Analysis Approximately 1/2 Max. Depth of Investigation Receiver Spacing The Softer Material, The Narrower Usual Soil Sites (0.5 m) Hard Surface (1 m) Noise Analysis

MASW - Field Notes Source Sampling Interval (e.g., 1 ms) Recording Time (e.g., 1000 ms) Number of Channels (e.g, 12) Geophone (e.g., 4.5 Hz) Field Map Each Shot File Name (e.g., 1001.dat) Location of Source and Receiver (e.g., Station Number) Source Offset (e.g., 5 m) Receiver Spacing (e.g., 0.5 m)