Fundamentals of Radio Astronomy Lyle Hoffman, Lafayette College ALFALFA Undergraduate Workshop Arecibo Observatory, 2009 Jan. 12.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The York College Radio Telescope Ian OLeary, Tim Paglione, & Waynewright Joseph (York College, CUNY) Introduction Radio telescopes allow us to observe.
Advertisements

NAIC-NRAO School on Single-Dish Radio Astronomy. Arecibo, July 2005
Lecture 11 (Was going to be –Time series –Fourier –Bayes but I haven’t finished these. So instead:) Radio astronomy fundamentals NASSP Masters 5003F -
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy Lecture 10 Today I plan to cover: –A bit more about noise temperatures; –Polarized radio signals;
1 Transmission Fundamentals Chapter 2 (Stallings Book)
Observing Techniques with Single-Dish Radio Telescopes Dr. Ron Maddalena National Radio Astronomy Observatory Green Bank, WV.
Teachers workshop 21feb09 arecibo observatory The Arecibo radio telescope 2009 teachers workshop Phil Perillat.
Probing the field of Radio Astronomy with the SKA and the Hartebeesthoek Radio Observatory: An Engineer’s perspective Sunelle Otto Hartebeesthoek Radio.
Introduction to Radio Astronomy Updated February 2009.
Radio `source’ Goals of telescope: maximize collection of energy (sensitivity or gain) isolate source emission from other sources… (directional gain… dynamic.
Parkes “The Dish”. 19’ M83 Parkes “The Dish” VLA, Very Large Array New Mexico.
Radio Astronomy Overview 9 May 2005 F.Briggs, RSAA/ATNF Radio `source’ Goals of telescope: maximize collection of energy (sensitivity or gain) isolate.
Lesson 7: Remote Sensing Dr Andrew Ketsdever MAE 5595.
Note to students: Figure numbers (from the textbook) are not up-to-date here for the 6 th edition. But you should be able to recognize the figures anyway.
BDT Radio – 1b – CMV 2009/09/04 Basic Detection Techniques 1b (2009/09/04): Single pixel feeds Theory: Brightness function Beam properties Sensitivity,
Fundamentals of Radio Astronomy Lyle Hoffman, Lafayette College ALFALFA Undergraduate Workshop Union College, 2005 July 06.
The Future of the Past Harvard University Astronomy 218 Concluding Lecture, May 4, 2000.
Radio Telescopes. Jansky’s Telescope Karl Jansky built a radio antenna in –Polarized array –Study lightning noise Detected noise that shifted 4.
Introduction to Radio Telescopes
REU-Summer Student Seminars 14-June-2011 Signal Processing Instrumentation (RF / Analog) Ganesan Rajagopalan Electronics Department Arecibo Observatory.
1 Astronomical Observational Techniques and Instrumentation RIT Course Number Professor Don Figer Radio Astronomy.
Introduction to Radio Waves Vincent L. Fish source: Windows to the Universe (UCAR)‏ Image courtesy of NRAO/AUI.
Search for isotropic microwave radiation from electron beam in the atmosphere T. Yamamoto a, I. S. Ohota a, Y. Inome a, D. Ikeda b, H. Sagawa b, S. Ogio.
6-1 EE/Ge 157b Week 6 EE/Ae 157 a Passive Microwave Sensing.
REU TALK – June 14,2011 Signal Processing REU talk 14jun11 Phil Perillat.
Lecture 1 By Tom Wilson.
J.M. Wrobel - 19 June 2002 SENSITIVITY 1 SENSITIVITY Outline What is Sensitivity & Why Should You Care? What Are Measures of Antenna Performance? What.
Harvey LisztArecibo July 2009 Harvey S. Liszt NRAO, CHARLOTTESVILLE.
Antennas The primary elements of a synthesis array M. Kesteven ATNF 25/September/2001.
Weak Signal Detection of Virgo A Exploring some Limitations in Amateur Radio Astronomy Dr David Morgan Exploring some Limitations in.
The Radio Sky Chris Salter NAIC/Arecibo Observatory.
Incoherent Scattering
Lecture 3 By Tom Wilson. Summary of Lecture 1 Noise in a Receiver time on source Receiver itself, atmosphere,ground and source Analying bandwidth (for.
Ninth Synthesis Imaging Summer School Socorro, June 15-22, 2004 Sensitivity Joan Wrobel.
Tenth Summer Synthesis Imaging Workshop University of New Mexico, June 13-20, 2006 Antennas in Radio Astronomy Peter Napier.
The Interstellar Medium and Interstellar Molecules Ronald Maddalena National Radio Astronomy Observatory.
Radio Astronomy Techniques Preethi Pratap MIT Haystack Observatory.
Radio Astronomy ASTR 3010 Lecture 25. Intro to Radio Astronomy Concepts - Amplifiers - Mixers (down-conversion) - Principles of Radar - Radio Astronomy.
Solution Due to the Doppler effect arising from the random motions of the gas atoms, the laser radiation from gas-lasers is broadened around a central.
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy Lecture 9 – Radio Astronomy Fundamentals Source (randomly accelerating electrons) Noisy electro- magnetic.
K band History Science workshop determined efficiency improvements necessary for K Band: weather, observing requests, mapping programs. Only enough funds.
AST 443: Submm & Radio Astronomy November 18, 2003.
PHY418 PARTICLE ASTROPHYSICS Radio Emission 1. Radio emission and particle astrophysics 2 Why are the.
Extragalactic Absorption Lines Observed from Arecibo Chris Salter (National Astronomy & Ionosphere Center, Arecibo Observatory, Puerto Rico)
Radio Astronomy Emission Mechanisms. NRAO/AUI/NSF3 Omega nebula.
Intrinsic Short Term Variability in W3-OH and W49N Hydroxyl Masers W.M. Goss National Radio Astronomy Observatory Socorro, New Mexico, USA A.A. Deshpande,
LOFAR LOw Frequency Array => most distant, high redshift Universe !? Consortium of international partners… Dutch ASTRON USA Haystack Observatory (MIT)
P.W. Gorham et al.. TEST BEAM A SLAC Time relative to beam entry Antenna V/V rms Time relative to beam entry Antenna V/V rms close to shower maximumshower.
Atom and Light Lancelot L. Kao Updated: Jan 24, 2010.
National Radio Astronomy Observatory Sept – Indiana University How do Radio Telescopes work? K. Y. Lo.
BDT Radio – 1b – CMV 2009/09/04 Basic Detection Techniques 1b (2011/09/22): Single dish systems Theory: basic properties, sky noise, system noise, Aeff/Tsys,
1 1 CORNISH WORKSHOP Leeds, 13 th April 2007 James Green The Methanol Multibeam Project Project MMB.
Observations of SNR G at 6cm JianWen Xu, Li Xiao, XiaoHui Sun, Chen Wang, Wolfgang Reich, JinLin Han Partner Group of MPIfR at NAOC.
Brief Introduction to Radio Telescopes Frank Ghigo, NRAO-Green Bank July 2015 Terms and Concepts Parabolic reflector Blocked/unblocked Subreflector Frontend/backend.
Option D. 3. Universe was born around 13.8 billion years ago in process called Big Bang In the beginning, all matter & energy in the entire universe was.
SHRI RAM MURTI SMARAK WOMENS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY.
The Mechanisms of Electromagnetic Emissions
SARA Conference Meter Dish Demo
G. Mevi1,2, G. Muscari1, P. P. Bertagnolio1, I. Fiorucci1
EDGES: The ‘Global’ Perspective
Introduction to Using Radio Telescopes
Really Basic Optics Instrument Sample Sample Prep Instrument Out put
G. Mevi1,2, G. Muscari1, P. P. Bertagnolio1, I. Fiorucci1
Diffraction and Resolution
Bob Zavala US Naval Observatory
Instrument Considerations
Diffraction and Resolution
A Search for water masers in High-redshift un-beamed AGNs: T. Ghosh, S
Masers from the Early Universe
Fundamentals of Radio Astronomy
Presentation transcript:

Fundamentals of Radio Astronomy Lyle Hoffman, Lafayette College ALFALFA Undergraduate Workshop Arecibo Observatory, 2009 Jan. 12

Outline Sources in brief Radiotelescope components Radiotelescope characteristics Useful Texts Burke & Graham-Smith, An Introduction to Radio Astronomy Rohlfs, Tools of Radio Astronomy Stanimirovic et al., Single-dish Radio Astronomy: Techniques and Applications

Sources of Radio Emission Blackbody (thermal) Continuum sources Spectral line sources

Blackbody Sources Peak in cm-wave radio requires very low temperature: m T = cm K Cosmic Microwave Background is about the only relevant blackbody source Ignored in most work – essentially constant source of static (same in all directions) and much weaker than static produced by instrumentation itself

Continuum Sources Due to relativistic electrons: Synchrotron radiation Bremsstrahlung

Continuum Sources Quasars, Active Galactic Nuclei, Pulsars, Supernova Remnants, etc. Used by ALFALFA for calibration

Spectral Line Sources Neutral hydrogen (H I ) spin-flip transition Recombination lines (between high-lying atomic states) Molecular lines (CO, OH, etc.)

Doppler effect: frequency shift of spectral line due to relative motion of source and observer Closely related: redshift due to expansion of universe Customarily report “velocity” as cz = c(   )/ o = c  f   f)/f 0

H I spectral line from galaxy shifted by expansion of universe (“recession velocity”) and broadened by rotation Frequency

Radiotelescope Components Reflector(s) Feed horn(s) Low-noise amplifier Filter Downconverter IF Amplifier Spectrometer

Feedhorns 4 GHz feedhorn on LCRT Typical cm-wave feedhorn

Signal Path Filter Down- converter Low-Noise Amplifier Local Oscil- lator IF Amplifier Spectro- meter

Autocorrelation Spectrometer Special-purpose hardware computes autocorrelation function: R n =    1 N [  (t j )  (t j +n  t)] where  t is lag and  is signal voltage; integer n ranges from 0 to (  t  f) -1 if frequency channels of width  f are required Power spectrum is discrete Fourier transform (FFT) of R n

Nyquist theorem: must sample at rate 2B to achieve spectrum of bandwidth B without aliassing Diamonds: samples at rate ~B give aliassed signal near 0 Hz Ovals: samples at rate >2B give ~correct period

Radiotelescope Characteristics Gain & effective area Beam, sidelobes, stray radiation Sensitivity, noise & integration time Polarization & Stoke’s parameters

Gain & effective area Received power P rec Flux (energy per unit area per unit time) S Effective area A eff = P rec / S Gain G for transmitter is ratio of emitted flux in given direction to P/(4  r 2 ) Most emitted (received) within central diffraction max, angle ~  / D So G = 4  A eff / 2

Beam & sidelobes Essentially diffraction pattern of telescope functioning as transmitter Uniformly illuminated circular aperture: central beam & sidelobe rings

Obstructions, non-uniform illumination by feedhorn  asymmetry and alter strengths of sidelobes vs. central beam ALFA Center (Pixel 0)ALFA Outer (Pixel 1)

Emission received from pattern outside first sidelobe ring often called stray radiation FWHM of central beam is beamwidth Integrated solid angle of central beam is  o Gain related to beam via G = 4  /  o

Sensitivity Limited by noise – mostly thermal noise within electronics but also from ground reflected off telescope structure into feedhorn and CMB System temperature: temperature of blackbody producing same power as telescope + instrumentation produces when there is no source in beam – ca. 25K for ALFA

Often give brightness of source in temperature units: difference in effective blackbody temperature when source is in beam vs. when no source is in beam – even when source is spectral line or synchrotron radiation and brightness has little to do with actual temperature of the source Preferred unit (requires calibration via noise diode and known continuum sources) is Jansky: 1Jy = W m -2 Hz -1

Gain related to temperature vs. Jy units: brightness temperature of 1 Jy point source at center of beam ALFA center pixel 11 K/Jy, outer pixels ca. 9 K/Jy

Limiting sensitivity for unpolarized source set by requiring signal added by source to equal rms uncertainty in T sys :  S = 2kT sys A eff -1 (B  ) -1/2 (k: Boltzmann’s constant;  integration time) For spectral line work, B is set by velocity resolution required; T sys and A eff set by telescope and instumentation  increase sensitivity by integrating longer – but need 4 times integration time to increase sensitivity by factor of 2

Polarization H I sources unpolarized, but synchrotron sources are often polarized to some extent – E in plane of electron’s acceleration Single receiver (LNA) can respond to only single polarization at any instant– either one component of linear polarization or one handedness of circular polarization So two receivers required to receive both polarizations

Linear E x and E y with phase difference  Stokes’ parameters: I = E x 2 + E y 2 Q = E x 2  E y 2 U = 2E x E y cos  V = 2E x E y sin 

Unpolarized source: E x = E y and  So Q = 0, V = 0, and I = U for H I ; usually report only Stokes’ I or total flux = sum of fluxes of x and y polarizations 