EGF – Supplier report Understand and Apply. September 17, 2010 2 Supplier Performance Evaluation 1.EGF Presentation 2.EGF Composition 3.Detailed Scoring.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Halton Housing Trust Customer Scrutiny Panel An introduction to our Service Reviews.
Advertisements

Quality Improvement Level Up Program December 17, 2008.
Preventing and Resolving Reporting Errors Using Monitor Data Checking Software (MDC) Louis Nichols Clean Air Markets Division.
SERVICE LEVEL AGREEMENTS The Technical Contract Within the Master Agreement.
GSRS 2.1 Training Module S.2.1 Navigation General
SIS – NBS Online Specimen Tracking System Training
Microsoft Project.
Basic Seven Tools of Quality
Seven Quality Tools The Seven Tools
Where does Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) come from?  Developed by the Aerospace industry in the1960s  Spread to the Automotive industry 
Renewals Review January Why are We Here Today ? During today’s web-conference, we’ll : Review the renewals “package” Discuss the process for.
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster Strategy, Balanced Scorecard, and Strategic Profitability Analysis.
Strategy, Balanced Scorecard, and Strategic Profitability Analysis
Oregon Reading First (2010)1 Oregon Reading First Regional Coaches’ Meeting May 13, 2010.
Oregon Reading First (2009)1 Oregon Reading First Regional Coaches’ Meeting May 2009.
Oregon Reading First (2010)1 Winter 2010 Data Based Planning for Instructional Focus Groups.
1© 2013 by Nelson Education Ltd. CHAPTER TWELVE The Costs and Benefits of Training.
ISHIKAWA’S BASIC SEVEN TOOLS OF QUALITY
Based on Chapter 13, Cost Accounting, 12th ed. Horngren et al., Edited and Modified by C. Bailey 1.
Based on Chapter 13, Cost Accounting, 12th ed. Horngren et al., Edited and Modified by C. Bailey 1.
E2Open Supplier Training
4/20/2017 Supplier Score Card.
Sean O’Brien Associate General Counsel Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority ICJIA Monthly ARRA Report Webinar.
Steps in Using the and R Chart
MICS Survey Design Workshop Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Survey Design Workshop Interpreting Field Check Tables.
CSA Release 2 CYBER Training. Training Purpose Review the new functionality in CYBER that will assist in the submission and review of Treatment Plans.
Energy Drink Report BY OMAR ABDUL, JACOB BIMBI, AND ZACH CLIPPER.
Keys to Effective Reading Valdosta State University Terence Sullivan.
REVIEW OF CMS “INITIAL APPROVAL” OF RHP PLAN AND FOLLOW-UP REQUIREMENTS May 8, 2013 REGION 10.
Principal’s Per Session Application Screen Shots
1 Reportnet for Noise: Feedback from member countries Colin Nugent Eionet National Reference Centres for Noise meeting Copenhagen October 2009.
School Performance Framework Sponsored by The Colorado Department of Education Summer 2010 Version 1.3.
Chapter 16 Problem Solving and Decision Making. Objectives After reading the chapter and reviewing the materials presented the students will be able to:
1. To start the process, Warehouse Stationery (WSL) will invite you to use The Warehouse Group Supplier Electronic Portal and will send you the link to.
No (clock stops) Yes No Yes Determination of Initial Credit Limit - Process Flow Creditworthiness Evaluation Process (Section ) Applicant Creditor.
On-line briefing for Program Directors and Staff 1.
Seven Quality Tools The Seven Tools –Histograms, Pareto Charts, Cause and Effect Diagrams, Run Charts, Scatter Diagrams, Flow Charts, Control Charts.
SGP Logic Model Provides a method that enables SGP data to contribute to performance evaluation when data are missing. The distribution of SGP data combined.
1© 2010 by Nelson Education Ltd. Chapter Twelve The Costs and Benefits of Training.
Outpatient Rehab Questionnaire Presented To: OP Rehab Providers May 2015 INTEGRATED CARE MANAGEMENT AND QUALITY IMPROVEMENT.
Order response to Skanskas eProcurement system For suppliers using as order response method.
1 Forming Relationships for the Future SUPPLIER RATING PROGRAM Space & Electronics TRW WORKING TOWARDS COMMON GOALS, AND FORMING RELATIONSHIPS FOR THE.
CSA 2010 DRIVER INFORMATION 11/27/ WHAT IS CSA 2010? CSA 2010 is a government initiative to make roads safer by contacting motor carriers sooner.
1/33.  Performance based approach  Definitions and responsibilities  Standard requirements  Exposure classes  Fresh concrete requirements  Hardened.
GSRS Support team Philips Supply Management May 29, 2007 GSRS 2.1 Training Module S.2.6 How to find an Order Line.
Global Fund Assessments Part II: Understanding Assessment Results Geneva – December 2005.
COSTING AND THE VALUE CHAIN CHAPTER 18 PAGE# 794 Faisal
Supplier Capacity Worksheet User Instructions September 2015 Revised December 2, 2015.
Order Unit 5. It is the consumer, and the consumer alone, who casts the vote that determines how big any company should be. ---Crawford H. Greenwalt A.
1 Business Integration Update to PRS Troy Anderson ERCOT Enterprise Project Portfolio Management August 18, 2011.
Program Evaluation Making sure instruction works..
Suppliers on Contract Purchase Order for Services.
Suppliers without a Contract Purchase Order for Services.
Microsoft Project 2010 ® Tutorial 5: Tracking Progress and Closing the Project.
9 - 1 Chapter 9 Management Control Systems and Responsibility Accounting.
Step 1 Lead Notifications Dear Partner, New leads have been assigned to your organization based on customer preference and are available for you.
Table 1. The Five Medical Laboratory Case Studies Jan Martin et al. Transnational Evaluation of a New Continuing Professional Development Activity for.
Vendor Date VALU Monthly Project Review (VMPR) Project Name/IN #
Good Morning and welcome. Thank you for attending this meeting to discuss assessment of learning, pupil progress and end of year school reports.
DSQR Training Reliance System
ACCOUNTING FOR MERCHANDISE OPERATIONS
Active Training Awards 2017: Training Provider of the Year
Level 1 / 2 Engineering Moderation Key Issues.
How Does KEG Score Our Vendors???
Supplier Performance Management (SPM): Scoring and Grading
Supplier Performance Measurement
Deployment & Available-to-promise (ATP) in SCM Theories & Concepts
6.1 Quality improvement Regional Course on
How to Place an Order on the UVa Marketplace
Presentation transcript:

EGF – Supplier report Understand and Apply

September 17, Supplier Performance Evaluation 1.EGF Presentation 2.EGF Composition 3.Detailed Scoring Tables 4.Supplier Scorecard 5.FAQ

September 17, EGF (“Évaluation Globale Fournisseur”, comprehensive supplier evaluation) The EGF system is a monthly scoring system based on many delivery & quality factors. The lower the scoring, the better the performance. The upper acceptable limit is 100 points. Objectives To allow Nova Bus to measure our suppliers and prioritize our actions. To work with our suppliers with the aim of receiving better quality product and more precise deliveries. To standardize our performance measures and eliminate subjective elements.

September 17, EGF Composition  EGF = QPM + DPM EGF  QPM = Quality Performance Measure  PPM (parts per million) PPM  Quantity of non-conforming partsnon-conforming  Quantity of MCN (Material Complaint Notices)MCN  Monetary value ratio of non-conforming parts  DPM = Delivery Performance Measure  Quantity of faulty deliveriesfaulty deliveries  Percentage of faulty deliveries  Quantity of late deliverieslate deliveries  The QPM and DPM are both based on a rolling 3-month horizon An action plan is requested when the EGF score exceeds 100 points.

September 17, DPM Scoring Table DPM Livraisons fautives Faulty Deliveries (#) - DA Livraisons fautives Faulty deliveries (%) DB Livraisons en retard Late deliveries (#) DC Statut DPM Status DeÀPtsDe (%)À (%)PtsDeÀPts>90Alarme / Alarm Action Surveillance / Monitor <35Pas d'action / No action

September 17, QPM Scoring Table QPM PPM -QA Pièces rejetées Rejected Parts (#)-QB MCN (#)-QC Volume rejeté Rejected volume (%)-QD DeÀPtsDeÀPtsDeÀPtsDeÀPts ,010, ,160, , , Statuts QPM Status >90Alarme / Alarm 70-90Action 50-65Surveillance / Monitor <50Pas d'action / No action

September 17, Supplier Scorecard Objective  To inform suppliers rapidly and effectively of the evolution of their performance. Results  Highly visual scorecard with graphic elements  EGF results as well as 5 other important factors  More detailed data available on other sheets  Blue columns = Rolling data (cumulative EGF for the last 3 months)  Black columns = monthly data only

September 17,

9 FAQ 1.What is the utility of this system?What is the utility of this system? 2.How to read the Scoring TablesHow to read the Scoring Tables 3.How is the EGF calculated?How is the EGF calculated? 4.What is the difference between a faulty delivery and a late delivery?What is the difference between a faulty delivery and a late delivery? 5.How can we improve our score?How can we improve our score? 6.Who should we contact for more details regarding our EGF score?Who should we contact for more details regarding our EGF score? 7.How often is the EGF Scorecard issued?How often is the EGF Scorecard issued? 8.Are previous results revised?Are previous results revised? 9.What should we do if we want to challenge a MCN?What should we do if we want to challenge a MCN?

September 17, What is the utility of this system? This system is based on timely information and is consistent for all suppliers. This eliminates subjective aspects in evaluating supplier performance. This system highlights aspects to target and prioritize, in order to increase supplier quality levels and delivery performance.

September 17, How to read the Scoring Table? You can refer to the Supplier Scorecard. The information is presented in a complete and visual way. It shows information concerning the various measured aspects that affect the overall score.Supplier Scorecard The system focuses on two (2) critical aspects that add up to give an overall performance level; they are product quality and supplier delivery performance. EGF=DPM+QPM EGF=DPM+QPM By referring to the scoring tables (DPM and QPM) you will be able to know which aspects affect your resultDPM QPM The maximum acceptable EGF score is 100 points. An action plan is requested for scores that exceed this limit. Action plans may also be requested if either the QPM or DPM reach “Action” level.

September 17, How is the EGF calculated? The EGF score breaks down as follows: EGF DPM Number of Faulty deliveries Percentage of Faulty deliveries Number of late deliveries QPM PPM Number of rejected parts Number of MCN Volume of rejected parts

September 17, What is the difference between faulty deliveries and late deliveries? Firstly, we should mention that a delivery is a complete quantity listed on a single line on a purchase order. Therefore, if the same part appears on several lines, they are considered separate deliveries. So, an on-time delivery is the delivery of a full quantity of parts ordered on a single line, within the allowed timeframe. i.e. no more than four (4) days in advance to no further than one (1) day late. A faulty delivery is a delivery made outside of the allowed timeframe. Therefore, a late delivery is any delivery made more than one (1) day after the requested date. Please note that every faulty delivery causes delays and additional fees that Nova Bus must incur, even in the case of early deliveries.

September 17, How can we improve our score? You can improve your EGF score by targeting the information provided in the scoring details. In general, you should be able to identify causes by seeking out chronic problems. With this information, you will be able to draw up an action plan. This plan can be submitted to Nova Bus for follow up. Please note that action plans are mandatory whenever EGF totals exceed 100 or if either the QPM or DPM reach “Action” level.

September 17, Who should we contact for more details regarding our EGF score? DPM: Your Logistics Planner will be able to provide you with a detailed report on faulty deliveries. QPM: Your Supplier Quality Technician will be able to provide you with a summary of issued MCN.

September 17, How often is the EGF Scorecard issued? The EGF Scorecard is issued at the beginning of each month. The data represented are those from last three months and those from the last month.

September 17, Are previous results revised? Yes. Results of the 12 previous months are updated every month. Therefore, if a change is made to an MCN that is older than 3 months, results are corrected.

September 17, What should we do if we want to challenge a MCN? If you do not reach the same conclusions as Nova Bus regarding a complaint, you should answer the issued MCN and contact your Supplier Quality Technician. Your arguments will be taken in consideration and the MCN will be reassessed.

September 17, Glossary EGF: Comprehensive supplier evaluation PPM: Ratio of defective parts to total quantity received, brought back to 1 million Non-conforming part: Part presenting a defect that affects the function of the part MCN: Material Complaint Notice. It is how Nova Bus informs supplier when received parts do not meet quality requirements Faulty delivery: Part delivered outside of the allowed time frame [-4, +1]: 4 days early to 1 day late Late delivery: Part delivered more than one day late according to the requested date.