Wire scanners MDW chicane energy collimator 3 MPS collimators in this region end of linac Damage Simulation in MPS Collimators L. Keller Apr. 9, 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Photon Collimation For The ILC Positron Target Lei Zang The University of Liverpool Cockcroft Institute 24 th March 2007.
Advertisements

Background studies Takashi Maruyama SLAC GDE Baseline Assessment Workshop SLAC, January 18-21, 2011.
1 ILC Bunch compressor Damping ring ILC Summer School August Eun-San Kim KNU.
Masahito TOMIZAWA and Satoshi MIHARA Accelerator and proton beam.
Collimator Damage Adriana Bungau The University of Manchester Cockcroft Institute “All Hands Meeting”, January 2006.
CLIC collimator survival IWLC 2010 J.L. Fernández-Hernando – ASTeC/Cockcroft Institute (Daresbury Lab.) 21/10/2010 J.L. Fernández-HernandoASTeC/CI21/10/2010.
Bunch compressor design for eRHIC Yichao Jing and Vladimir Litvinenko FLS2012, Newport News, VA 3/8/2012.
Zero Degree Extraction using an Electrostatic Separator Take another look at using an electrostatic separator and a weak dipole to allow a zero degree.
MERIT Beam Collimator Design Nicholas Olesen 9 August 2006.
Juhao Wu LCLS FAC 7 Apr Dark Current, Beam Loss, and Collimation in the LCLS J. Wu, D. Dowell, P. Emma, C. Limborg, J. Schmerge,
P. Emma, SLACLCLS FAC Meeting - April 29, 2004 Linac Physics, Diagnostics, and Commissioning Strategy P. Emma LCLS FAC Meeting April 29, 2004 LCLS.
1 Energy-Phase Rotation with a proton absorber David Neuffer September 27, 2011.
Linear Collider Machine Protection Issues M. Palmer Injection System Injector Damping Rings Bunch Compressor and Transfer Sections Main LINAC Beam Delivery.
K. Moffeit 6 Jan 2005 WORKSHOP Machine-Detector Interface at the International Linear Collider SLAC January 6-8, 2005 Polarimetry at the ILC Design issues.
2 February 2005Ken Moffeit Spin Rotation scheme for two IRs Ken Moffeit SLAC.
JHF2K neutrino beam line A. K. Ichikawa KEK 2002/7/2 Overview Primary Proton beamline Target Decay Volume Strategy to change peak energy.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project NLC Backgrounds What’s New? Tom Markiewicz LC’99, Frascati, Italy October 1999.
ILC RTML Lattice Design A.Vivoli, N. Solyak, V. Kapin Fermilab.
3 GeV,1.2 MW, Booster for Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
Simulation of Positron Production and Capturing. W. Gai, W. Liu, H. Wang and K. Kim Working with SLAC & DESY.
October 31, BDS Group1 ILC Beam Delivery System “Hybrid” Layout 2006e Release Preliminary M. Woodley.
Status of Phase II Energy Loss Studies 1. FLUKA with “simple” CERN-provided input file modeling ~40m around primary collimators used for all SLAC studies.
Estimation of temperature increase in the dump through Monte – Carlo simulations and rough calculations N. Charitonidis (EN/MEF)
LER Workshop, CERN, October 11-12, 2006Detector Safety with LER - Henryk Piekarz1 LHC Accelerator Research Program bnl-fnal-lbnl-slac Accelerator & Detector.
Plans for collimator survival and SLAC tests J. L. Fernandez-Hernando STFC/ASTeC Daresbury Lab.
Status of ILC BDS Design Deepa Angal-Kalinin ASTeC/Cockcroft Institute, Daresbury Laboratory Andrei Seryi SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory ILC-CLIC.
11th December 2007 LET workshop, SLAC 1 Beam dynamics issues in Beam Delivery System Deepa Angal-Kalinin ASTeC, Daresbury Laboratory.
Max Cornacchia, Paul Emma Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Max Cornacchia, Paul Emma Stanford Linear Accelerator Center  Proposed by M. Cornacchia (Nov.
Electron Model for a 3-10 GeV, NFFAG Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
A bunch compressor design and several X-band FELs Yipeng Sun, ARD/SLAC , LCLS-II meeting.
Updates on FLUKA simulations of TCDQ halo loads at IR6 FLUKA team & B. Goddard LHC Collimation Working Group March 5 th, 2007.
17 th November, 2008 LCWS08/ILC08 1 BDS optics and minimal machine study Deepa Angal-Kalinin ASTeC & The Cockcroft Institute Daresbury Laboratory.
Collimator design and short range wakefields Adriana Bungau University of Manchester CERN, Dec 2006.
10 mm depth 16 mm depth BEFORE AFTER. TiTi alloyDiff. % 2 mm10 mm16 mm2 mm10 mm16 mm Adriana GEANT ~7% Luis FLUKA ~10.
Accelerator Science and Technology Centre POST-LINAC BEAM TRANSPORT AND COLLIMATION FOR THE UK’S NEW LIGHT SOURCE PROJECT D. Angal-Kalinin,
PROBLEM 1 Show that the (beam size ^2) varies quadratically with distance in a drift section with no quadrupoles.
Nigel Watson / Birmingham CollimationCollimation EDR to specify and find optimal solutions for  Damage survival, 2 (1) bunches at 250 (500) GeV  Jaw.
BDS Lattice Design : EDR plans GWP03 Meeting 04/12/2007.
G.Kurevlev - Daresbury meeting Collimators Material Damage Study Previous results In our group - Adriana Bungau’s thesis - heat deposition on.
Collimation in the CERN PS Booster Penny Jackson: John Adams Institute/University of Oxford/CERN This is a feasibility study.
Injector Options for CLIC Drive Beam Linac Avni Aksoy Ankara University.
Impedance results of SLAC RC MD N. Biancacci, E.Mètral, B.Salvant, A.Valimaa OP, & Collimation Team.
Future Circular Collider Study Kickoff Meeting CERN ERL TEST FACILITY STAGES AND OPTICS 12–15 February 2014, University of Geneva Alessandra Valloni.
DRAFT Simulation of Errant Beams in the BDS How many bunches will damage beamline components or quench SC coils? Analysis Steps 1.Use TRANSPORT with BDS.
Recent Energy Deposition Simulations TCSM-A6L7 L. Keller LARP Video Mtg. 02 Oct
G.Kurevlev - Manchester meeting1 Collimators Material Damage Study Previous results In our group - Adriana Bungau’s thesis - heat deposition on.
E+/e- Backgrounds at BEPCII/BESIII JIN Dapeng Aug. 22, 2011.
accident deformation – doyle 1/12 Phase II Collimator - Accident Deformation Simulation December 11, 2006.
Fluka Simulations: Electron spectrometer window for AWAKE Jose A. Briz and V. Vlachoudis.
Halo Collimation of Protons and Heavy Ions in SIS-100.
Status of Collimator Damage Studies
Radiation damage simulations for CLIC and ILC spoilers and ATF tests
Design and testing of the Beam Delivery System collimators for the International Linear Collider J. L. Fernandez-Hernando STFC/ASTeC Daresbury Lab.
Status of the MAX IV Short Pulse Facility
Show that the (beam size ^2) varies quadratically with distance in a drift section with no quadrupoles.
Problem: A kicker failure can deposit 9 x 1011 protons on any metallic
Beam Optics Set-Up at SLAC End Station A
23 April 2012 Tom Markiewicz/SLAC
Status Report on E-166 Undulator-Based Production of Polarized Positrons K.T. McDonald Princeton University EPAC Meeting SLAC, November 15, 2003.
Collimation for beta-beams
Interaction Region Design Options e+e- Factories Workshop
Linac/BC1 Commissioning P
MERIT Beam Collimator Design
US LHC Accelerator Research Program
Direct Hits on Titanium Alloy Spoilers
RC1 Prototype Conceptual Design Review 15 December, 2005
Linac Physics, Diagnostics, and Commissioning Strategy P
US LHC Accelerator Research Program
Standard SLAC BSY Copper Protection Collimator Rated at 20 kW
Undulator Physics Issues Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / LCLS July 11, 2007
Presentation transcript:

wire scanners MDW chicane energy collimator 3 MPS collimators in this region end of linac Damage Simulation in MPS Collimators L. Keller Apr. 9, 2006

500 kW beam (0.65 MJ in 1.3 sec) Beam diameter ~ 2000 µ 30 cm Beam scraping the edge of a 30 cm long copper block SLAC Damage Test It took about 1.3 sec to melt thru the 30 cm block, but for this relatively large beam, the front two radiation lengths remain intact.

MPS energy collimator ΔE/E = ±10% trajectories Diagnostic Chicane Use FLUKA to Model an Off-energy Beam Hitting the Sacrificial Energy Collimator MDW

X (cm) beam axis Z (cm) cm Al melting Beam into Edge of Two Meter Aluminum MPS Collimator FLUKA 200 bunches 1  from edge, E beam = 250 GeV 0.2 cm half-gap 250 GeV beam, 0.16 MJ in 60 µsec Al boiling Above Al melting GeV/e -

X (cm) Y (cm) beam axis into page FLUKA Aluminum melting Aluminum MPS Collimator Near Shower Maximum 200 bunches 1  from edge, E beam = 250 GeV 0.2 cm half-gap 250 GeV beam, 0.16 MJ in 60 µsec GeV/e -

X (cm) beam axis Z (cm) cm Beam into Body of Two Meter Aluminum MPS Collimator FLUKA 200 bunches E beam = 250 GeV 0.2 cm half-gap 250 GeV beam, 0.16 MJ in 60 µsec Al boiling Al melting GeV/e -

X (cm) beam axis Z (cm) cm Beam into Edge of Two Meter Aluminum MPS Collimator FLUKA 200 bunches 1  from edge, E beam = 500 GeV 0.2 cm half-gap 500 GeV beam, 0.32 MJ in 60 µsec Al boiling Al melting Above Al melting GeV/e -

X (cm) beam axis 200 bunches 1  from edge, E beam = 250 GeV Z (cm) cm C melting Beam into Edge of Two Meter Carbon MPS Collimator FLUKA C boiling 250 GeV beam, 0.16 MJ in 60 µsec GeV/e -

MPS Collimator Summary: full energy bunches hitting an aluminum block within 2 mm of the edge will eject molten and vaporized aluminum into the gap over a length of ~1 meter. 2. During accelerator tune up, the bunch intensity would need to be reduced by ~2 orders-of-magnitude and the emittance increased to avoid melting. (This is not new information.) 3. To avoid collimator damage, a spoiler/absorber combination would require a ≈0.5 rl consumable spoiler and many tens of meters of drift to the absorber (not simulated yet). 4. If the first part of the 200-bunch train vaporizes aluminum along the beam path, the longitudinal extent of the collimator damage may be considerably greater than one meter (not simulated). 5. A carbon collimator melts and vaporizes in a much smaller volume than in aluminum.