Air Toxics Monitoring Results in the Houston-Galveston Area David Brymer, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AIR TOXICS MONITORING DATA EPAs Air Quality System (AQS) Ammonia data available but not in AQS Data for All Substances on Appendix O Total Chromium available.
Advertisements

Advanced Sampling and Data Analysis for Source Attribution of Ambient Particulate Arsenic and Other Air Toxics Metals in St. Louis Missouri Department.
Nez Perce Tribe Air Quality Program Air Toxics Monitoring.
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master subtitle style 1 Modeling of 1,3-Butadiene for Urban and Industrial Areas B. Rappenglück and B. Czader.
Appendix B.1 Phase 2 HGB Mid Course Review Time Series Plots Prepared by the Technical Support Section Technical Analysis Division TCEQ April, 2004.
Appendix B.2 Phase 2 HGB Mid Course Review Base Case One-Hour Scatter Plots Prepared by the Technical Support Section Technical Analysis Division TCEQ.
Air and Waste Management Association-Gulf Coast Chapter Meeting October 7, 2014.
Modeling Guidance and Examples for Commonly Asked Questions (Part 1) Rachel Melton and Matthew Kovar Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental.
Air toxics measurements in a Seattle neighborhood Doris Montecastro and Hal Westberg Laboratory for Atmospheric Research Dept. of Civil and Environmental.
AMATS Air Quality Update April 2012 Municipality of Anchorage Department of Health and Human Services.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Washington July 2013.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Colorado May 2013.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Nevada May 2013.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Ohio July 2013.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review New Jersey May 2013.
Investigation of Spatial Variation of Air Toxics in Three Houston-Area Neighborhoods Using Passive Sampling Thomas H. Stock, Maria T. Morandi, Masoud Afshar,
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Utah May 2013.
Citizen Air Monitoring in the Houston Area Jane Laping, Executive Director Mothers for Clean Air
Austin – Round Rock Toxics Study (ARTS) Albert Hendler URS Corporation June 13, 2007.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Connecticut July 2013.
Air Toxics Monitoring in the Houston- Galveston Area David Brymer, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Central States May 2013.
Talking About Air Toxics John D. Wilson Galveston-Houston Association for Smog Prevention
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Alabama May 2013.
HRM Houston Regional Monitoring 1 Hazardous Air Pollutants Ambient Air Monitoring Data Review Air Toxics: What We Know, What We Don’t Know, and What We.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Maryland May 2013.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Arkansas July 2013.
Pinal County Air Quality October 27, 2008 PM 10 Exceptional/Natural Event.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review North Dakota July 2013.
JATAP Joint Air Toxics Assessment Project 2011 National Tribal Forum for Air Quality Spokane, WA June 14-16, 2011 A Successful Multi-Jurisdictional Research.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Michigan July 2013.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review New Hampshire July 2013.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Idaho July 2013.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Iowa May 2013.
Pinal County Air Quality July 23, 2007 PM 10 Exceptional Event.
Pinal County Air Quality August 30, 2007 PM 10 Exceptional Event.
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Managing Risks at the State Level
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
WORKING BETWEEN THE LINES: ONE CITY’S APPROACH TO REDUCING AIR TOXICS
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Air Monitoring Trends in New Jersey
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
TCEQ AMBIENT Air Monitors in Corpus christi
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Presentation transcript:

Air Toxics Monitoring Results in the Houston-Galveston Area David Brymer, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality

Top 20 Compounds (by annual average concentration) during 2004 from Houston Area

Annual Average CATMN 24-Hour Benzene Levels Monitored at Houston Area Sites in 2004 Annual ESL

Is Benzene Trending Up or Down at Houston Area Sites ? Least Squares Regression Model CATMN 24-Hour Benzene

Least Squares Plot of CATMN 24-Hour Benzene Levels at Clinton Drive

Annual Average CATMN 24-Hour 1,3-Butadiene Levels Monitored at Houston Area Sites in 2004 Current ESL

Is 1,3-Butadiene Trending Up or Down at Houston Area Sites? Least Squares Regression Model of CATMN 24-Hour 1,3 Butadiene

Least Squares Plot of CATMN 24-Hour 1,3-Butadiene Levels at Clinton Drive

Galveston Airport CATMN Annual Average Trends for Benzene and 1,3-Butadiene from ppbv benzene1,3-butadiene n=15 Considered Background for Houston Area

Galena Park CATMN Annual Average Trends for Benzene and 1,3-Butadiene from ppbv benzene1,3-butadiene Benzene annual ESL

Annual Average and Highest CATMN 24-Hour 1,3-Butadiene Levels Monitored at Milby Park Annual AverageHighest 24-Hour2nd Highest 24-Hour Concentration (ppbv) Current Annual ESL

How Representative are CATMN Data (every 6 th day sampling) of an Annual Average? 1,3 Butadiene AutoGC (6694 observations) = 0.62 ppbv CATMN (59 observations) = 0.57 ppbv Benzene AutoGC (6815 observations) = 0.67 ppbv CATMN (59 observations) = 0.71 ppbv Comparison of Clinton Drive AutoGC and CATMN 2004 Annual Averages for Benzene and 1,3-Butadiene

2004 Annual Average 24- hr Formaldehyde Levels in Houston Area Rural Tx site Clinton Drive data invalidated due to sampler problem Av. US Site Conc. = 3.5 ppbV

Deer Park Annual Average Trends for Formaldehyde from US Average Site Concentration

2004 Annual Average 24 hr Values (ug/m3) of Chromium and Arsenic at NATTS sites Chromium ESL=0.1; Arsenic & Chrome VI ESL=0.01

Deer Park Annual Average Trends for Chromium PM2.5 from Chromium ESL=0.1; Chrome VI ESL=0.01

Deer Park Annual Average Trends for Arsenic PM2.5 from Arsenic (inorganic) ESL