EXEMPT VS. EXPEDITED PROJECTS. EXEMPT PROJECTS  If an investigator is affiliated with UTHSC, you have to submit to UTHSC IRB in order for us to ascertain.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dr. Vajira H. W. Dissanayake MBBS (Colombo), PhD (Nottingham) Senior Lecturer, Human Genetics Unit & Joint-secretary, Ethics review committee Faculty of.
Advertisements

Human Investigation Committee  Is It Research?  Is It Human Subjects Research?  Is It Human Subjects Research that requires IRB review?
QI project or research? Thomas F. Byrd M.D. HRRC Chair Subcommitees 2 and 4 December 3, 2013.
The Research Application Process Charles Morgan, Ph.D. Clinical Investigation Department (CID) Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, VA.
THE UW HEALTH SCIENCES IRB S OVERVIEW PRACTICAL REGULATORY ISSUES IN HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH.
Protecting the Privacy of Family Members in Survey and Pedigree Research Jeffrey R. Botkin, MD, MPH University of Utah.
Expedited Review Procedure Expedited Review Procedure Initial Review of Research.
Understanding the Various Levels of IRB Review:
Exempt Research Mary Banks BS, BSN IRB Director CRC IRB and BUMC IRB.
IRB 101: Informed Consent Columbia University Medical Center IRB September 22, 2005.
 Federal regulations specify “engagement” at the institutional level  Cornell has a Federalwide Assurance specifying its commitment to comply with regulations.
CUMC IRB Investigator Meeting November 9, 2004 Research Use of Stored Data and Tissues.
Human Investigation Committee  Is it research?  If yes, does it involve human subjects?  If yes, can it be exempt?  If no, will a Request for.
Determinations of Research, Human Subjects Research, Exemptions, and Expedited Review Kevin L. Nellis, M.S., M.T. (A.S.C.P.) Program Analyst, Program for.
Is this Research? Exempt? Expedited?
Tasha Osafo, CIP Assistant Director IRB Office Exempt Review.
Quick Facts about Exempt Research No continuing review required IRB Reviewer makes Exempt determination 6 OHRP & 4 FDA categories(1 category overlaps)
Conducting Exempt Research An Overview of Human Subjects Protections Issues and the Review Process at ASU Office of Research Integrity and Assurance Institutional.
Dana Evans 1 1 Exempt & Expedited Human Subjects Research.
Expedited vs Exempt by Richard R. Riker MD Vice-Chair, IRB Maine Medical Center.
The IRB Approval Process Michael Bingham, JD Assistant Director, University of Wisconsin-Madison Education IRB
Submitting IRB Applications (or “Do I have to do an IRB?”) Linda A. Detman, Ph.D. Research Associate Lawton & Rhea Chiles Center for Healthy Mothers and.
Expedited Procedures Bob Craig June Expedited problems Usually individual investigators (rather than trained coordinators) Individuals not “ active.
Risk by Richard R. Riker MD Vice-Chair, IRB Maine Medical Center.
Teaching Research Methods (Classroom Protocols) Boston University Charles River Campus Boston University Medical Center Mary A. Banks BS, BSN IRB Director.
1 Developed by: U-MIC To start the presentation, click on this button in the lower right corner of your screen. The presentation will begin after the.
Stanley Estime, MSCI, CIP Senior QA/QI Specialist Lisa Gabel, CIP QA/QI Specialist IRB Determinations: What type of Review will your study receive?
Conducting Exempt Research: An Overview of Human Subjects Protections Issues and the Review Process at ASU.
Privacy and Confidentiality. Definitions n Privacy - having control over the extent, timing, and circumstances of sharing oneself (physically, behaviorally,
The Linguistics Department Institutional Review Board Committee Silvina Montrul, chair Fred Davidson Irene Koshik Ryan Shosted September 22, 2008.
A step-by-step guide to help you determine if your research protocol is required to be reviewed by the Lindenwood University IRB INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD.
Dustin Yocum, MA Institutional Review Board University of Illinois HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH.
UD IRB Guidelines for Applications for: Registrations of exempt research, Expedited IRB review, Full IRB review.
Determinations of Research, Human Subjects Research, Exemptions, and Expedited Review Kevin L. Nellis, M.S., M.T. (A.S.C.P.) Program Analyst Program for.
HIPAA and Human Subjects Research IRB Member CE May 2014 Slideshow by Sean Horkheimer.
Investigational Devices and Humanitarian Use Devices June 2007.
Case Studies: Puzzles in Human Research Kevin L. Nellis, M.S., M.T. (A.S.C.P.) Program Analyst, Program for Research Integrity Development and Education.
Regulations 201: Thorny Issues What is Research? Exempt and Expedited Reviews.
WELCOME to the TULANE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION OFFICE WORKSHOP for SOCIAL/BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH (March 2, 2010) Tulane University HRPO Uptown.
 Epidemiology -- Research – or Not Research? Medical Research Summit March Tom Puglisi, PhD.
Regulatory requirements: children, assent, and consent waivers and waiver of documentation Bob Craig, 2007.
EXPEDITED PROTOCOL REVIEW AN IRB INFOSHORT APRIL 2013.
Privacy/Confidentiality – Principles and Regulations in the Social Sciences and Behavioral Research Moira Keane, MA, CIP University of Minnesota May 4,
Human Subjects Research at Mines Colorado School of Mines New Faculty Orientation November 20, 2015.
Human Specimen Repositories Requirements of 21 CFR Parts 50 & 56 PRIM & R May 5, 2004 Sally A. Hojvat, Ph.D. Director of Microbiology Devices Office of.
Exempt Unless otherwise required by Department or Agency heads, research activities in which the only involvement of human subjects will be in one or more.
Human Research Protection Program 101 March 20, 2007 Cincinnati, OH.
Created by Steve Martin, PA-C IRB Application Received Exempt Complete Yes No Mississippi College IRB Application Process Determine Review Category Expedited.
Presentation prepared for GCSU ENGAGE INSTITUTION REVIEW BOARD (IRB): FUNCTION AND SERVICE Tsu-Ming Chiang, Chair Whitney Heppner, Vice Chair Qiana Wilson,
What is exempt research? Angela Bain, IRB Administrator
Submitting human subjects research
University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commercialization
Changes to Exempt Categories
University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commercialization
Introduction to the Institutional Review Board
Lana Gevorkyan Corporate Director Human Research Protection Program
IRB Educational Session - IRB Regulations and Types of Review
Submitting human subjects research
Changes to Exempt Categories
This takes approximately 5 minutes or less from start to finish
The 2018 Human Subject Rules
What types of research are exempt and ohrp guidance on exemptions
Jeffrey M. Cohen, Ph.D. Associate Dean,
Common Rule Update: Exempt categories UT IRB
IRB Educational Session - IRB Regulations on Expedited Review
Revised Common Rule: Informed Consent Changes
What the IRB is looking for when reviewing your protocol
Human Participants Research
Current IRB at DMACC September 2018.
Research with Human Subjects
Presentation transcript:

EXEMPT VS. EXPEDITED PROJECTS

EXEMPT PROJECTS  If an investigator is affiliated with UTHSC, you have to submit to UTHSC IRB in order for us to ascertain exempt status.  Exempt status is given when the project does not meet definition of research at 45 CFR (d) or when project does not inv0lve human subjects as defined at 45 CFR (f).  Exempt status is also given when the project meets the federal regulations at 45 CFR (b)(1)-(6).  Minimal risk projects  Cannot include prisoners as subjects, and does not apply to classified research  No yearly continuation application for exempt projects  However, must submit all revisions, reportable problems, advertisements, and study closure form

DEFINITION OF RESEARCH AT 45 CFR (d)  Research means a systematic investigation, including research development, testing and evaluation, designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge.  Presentation or Publication  Research versus Quality Improvement

HUMAN SUBJECTS AS DEFINED AT 45 CFR (f)  Human subject means a living individual about whom an investigator (whether professional or student) conducting research obtains: (1) Data through intervention or interaction with the individual, OR (2) Identifiable private information.  If someone on your project de-identifies the data, your team is still obtaining identifiable private information at first.  What matters is that the identity of subjects is not available to the anyone in the research team at any point.

45 CFR (b)(1) - EXEMPT  Research conducted in established or commonly accepted educational settings, involving normal educational practices, such as (i) research on regular and special education instructional strategies, or (ii) research on the effectiveness of or the comparison among instructional techniques, curricula, or classroom management methods  Examples: Comparing 2 different education instructional strategies Effectiveness of current curricula on learning objectives Comparing 2 different classroom management methods

45 CFR (b)(2) - EXEMPT  Research involving the use of educational tests (cognitive, diagnostic, aptitude, achievement), survey procedures, interview procedures or observation of public behavior, UNLESS: (i) information obtained is recorded in such a manner that human subjects can be identified, directly or through identifiers linked to the subjects; AND (ii) any disclosure of the human subjects' responses outside the research could reasonably place the subjects at risk of criminal or civil liability or be damaging to the subjects' financial standing, employability, or reputation  (b)(2) does not apply to research with children, except for the use of educational tests, and research involving observations of public behavior when the investigator(s) do not participate in the activities being observed

45 CFR (b)(2) - EXEMPT  Examples: Surveys where the subject cannot be identified, directly or indirectly Identifiable surveys or interviews on harmless topics such as exercise habits Research using aptitude tests where the subject cannot be identified, directly or indirectly Observational studies where identifiable information is not recorded OR where the subject matter is not sensitive if identifiable information is recorded (remember children caveat) Focus group on harmless topics, or where subjects cannot be identified

45 CFR (b)(3) - EXEMPT  Research involving the use of educational tests (cognitive, diagnostic, aptitude, achievement), survey procedures, interview procedures, or observation of public behavior that is not exempt under paragraph (b)(2) of this section, if: (i) the human subjects are elected or appointed public officials or candidates for public office; OR (ii) federal statute(s) require(s) without exception that the confidentiality of the personally identifiable information will be maintained throughout the research and thereafter  Like (b)(2) except subject matter can be sensitive because research on public official

45 CFR (b)(4) - EXEMPT  Research involving the collection or study of existing data, documents, records, pathological specimens, or diagnostic specimens, if these sources are publicly available OR if the information is recorded by the investigator in such a manner that subjects cannot be identified, directly or through identifiers linked to the subjects  Examples: Retrospective chart reviews where subjects are not identifiable (or you must agree to destroy any identifiers at completion of study) Retrospective means the data is already in existence at the time you submit your research application to the IRB (one revision of dates allowed) Research using criminal records that are publicly available

45 CFR (b)(5) - EXEMPT  Research and demonstration projects which are conducted by or subject to the approval of department or agency heads, and which are designed to study, evaluate, or otherwise examine: (i) Public benefit or service programs; (ii) procedures for obtaining benefits or services under those programs; (iii) possible changes in or alternatives to those programs or procedures; or (iv) possible changes in methods or levels of payment for benefits or services under those programs  Example: Medicare or Social Security benefits research (specific approval of the agency head, under specific authority of law, is required to conduct this research)

45 CFR (b)(6) - EXEMPT  Taste and food quality evaluation and consumer acceptance studies, (i) if wholesome foods without additives are consumed OR (ii) if a food is consumed that contains a food ingredient at or below the level and for a use found to be safe, or agricultural chemical or environmental contaminant at or below the level found to be safe, by the Food and Drug Administration or approved by the Environmental Protection Agency or the Food Safety and Inspection Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture  Example: Taste test research on pears grown in different parts of the country

EXEMPT CELL LINE PROJECTS  UTHSC investigators using anonymized cell lines from ATCC® do not need to undertake any interaction with the IRB. However, all obligations to interact with the IBC and IACUC remain in place.  Use of anonymized human cell lines from sources other than ATCC® must be registered with the IRB using the shortened cell line registration process, so that the IRB can confirm that the conditions for non- applicability of the regulations are satisfied.

EXPEDITED PROJECTS  45 CFR (b) & (b)(1): An IRB may use the expedited review procedure to review… some or all of the research appearing on the [category] list and found by the reviewer(s) to involve no more than minimal risk.  Definition of minimal risk at 45 CFR (i): Minimal risk means that the probability and magnitude of harm or discomfort anticipated in the research are not greater in and of themselves than those ordinarily encountered in daily life or during the performance of routine physical or psychological examinations or tests.  In order for the expedited review procedure to be used, all of the research procedures must fit into the expedited categories.

EXPEDITED PROJECTS  Expedited projects require an annual renewal/continuation, as well as submission of all other forms (revisions, reportable problems, advertisements, and study closure).  The expedited review procedure may NOT be used where identification of the subjects and/or their responses would reasonably place them at risk of criminal or civil liability or be damaging to the subjects’ financial standing, employability, insurability, reputation, or be stigmatizing, unless reasonable and appropriate protections will be implemented so that risks related to invasion of privacy and breach of confidentiality are no greater than minimal.  Cannot include prisoners as subjects  Does not apply to classified research

EXPEDITED CATEGORY 1  Clinical studies of drugs and medical devices only when condition (a) or (b) is met. (a) Research on drugs for which an investigational new drug application (21 CFR Part 312) is not required (Note: Research on marketed drugs that significantly increases the risks or decreases the acceptability of the risks associated with the use of the product is not eligible for expedited review.) (b) Research on medical devices for which (i) an investigational device exemption application (21 CFR Part 812) is not required; or (ii) the medical device is cleared/approved for marketing and the medical device is being used in accordance with its cleared/approved labeling

EXPEDITED CATEGORY 2  Collection of blood samples by finger stick, heel stick, ear stick, or venipuncture as follows: (a) from healthy, nonpregnant adults who weigh at least 110 pounds. For these subjects, the amounts drawn may not exceed 550 ml in an 8 week period AND collection may not occur more frequently than 2 times per week; or (b) from other adults and children, considering the age, weight, and health of the subjects, the collection procedure, the amount of blood to be collected, and the frequency with which it will be collected. For these subjects, the amount drawn may not exceed the lesser of 50 ml OR 3 ml per kg in an 8 week period AND collection may not occur more frequently than 2 times per week

EXPEDITED CATEGORY 3  Prospective collection of biological specimens for research purposes by noninvasive means.  Examples: (a) hair and nail clippings in a nondisfiguring manner (b) deciduous teeth at time of exfoliation or if routine patient care indicates a need for extraction (c) permanent teeth if routine patient care indicates a need for extraction (d) excreta and external secretions (including sweat) (e) uncannulated saliva collected either in an unstimulated fashion or stimulated by chewing gumbase or wax or by applying a dilute citric solution to the tongue

EXPEDITED CATEGORY 3  Examples (contd.): (f) placenta removed at delivery (g) amniotic fluid obtained at the time of rupture of the membrane prior to or during labor (h) supra- and subgingival dental plaque and calculus, provided the collection procedure is not more invasive than routine prophylactic scaling of the teeth and the process is accomplished in accordance with accepted prophylactic techniques (i) mucosal and skin cells collected by buccal scraping or swab, skin swab, or mouth washings (j) sputum collected after saline mist nebulization

EXPEDITED CATEGORY 3  OHRP clarified its view regarding noninvasive procedures in expedited category 3, and this is consistent with the FDA’s definition of “noninvasive.” The following procedures are considered noninvasive for the purposes of expedited category 3: Vaginal swabs that do not go beyond the cervical os; Rectal swabs that do not go beyond the rectum; and Nasal swabs that do not go beyond the nares.

EXPEDITED CATEGORY 4  Collection of data through noninvasive procedures (not involving general anesthesia or sedation) routinely employed in clinical practice, excluding procedures involving x-rays or microwaves. Where medical devices are employed, they must be cleared/approved for marketing. (Studies intended to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the medical device are not generally eligible for expedited review, including studies of cleared medical devices for new indications.)  Examples: (a) physical sensors that are applied either to the surface of the body or at a distance and do not involve input of significant amounts of energy into the subject or an invasion of the subject’s privacy

EXPEDITED CATEGORY 4  Examples (contd.): (b) weighing or testing sensory acuity (c) magnetic resonance imaging (d) electrocardiography, electroencephalography, thermography, detection of naturally occurring radioactivity, electroretinography, ultrasound, diagnostic infrared imaging, doppler blood flow, and echocardiography (e) moderate exercise, muscular strength testing, body composition assessment, and flexibility testing where appropriate given the age, weight, and health of the individual

EXPEDITED CATEGORY 5  Research involving materials (data, documents, records, or specimens) that have been collected, or will be collected solely for nonresearch purposes (such as medical treatment or diagnosis)  This is similar to the exempt regulation; however, it allows for identifiers to be recorded and prospective data collection  Prospective means the data is NOT already in existence at the time you submit your research application to the IRB

EXPEDITED CATEGORY 6  Collection of data from voice, video, digital, or image recordings made for research purposes

EXPEDITED CATEGORY 7  Research on individual or group characteristics or behavior (including, but not limited to, research on perception, cognition, motivation, identity, language, communication, cultural beliefs or practices, and social behavior) OR  Research employing survey, interview, oral history, focus group, program evaluation, human factors evaluation, or quality assurance methodologies

CONSENT WAIVERS & ALTERATIONS  Just because a project qualifies for exempt or expedited review, this does not mean you can automatically forgo consent/assent!  Waivers and alterations of consent may be given for certain types of projects which meet the 4 criteria for waivers/alterations at 45 CFR (d)(1)-(4): (1) The research involves no more than minimal risk to the subjects; (2) The waiver or alteration will not adversely affect the rights and welfare of the subjects; (3) The research could not practicably be carried out without the waiver or alteration; AND (4) Whenever appropriate, the subjects will be provided with additional pertinent information after participation.

CONSENT WAIVERS & ALTERATIONS  You must request a waiver or alteration of consent in your electronic application in iMedRIS, and this must be approved by the IRB.  If you receive approval for an alteration of consent, you may be required to use the Consent Survey Elements posted on our website: 1. A brief statement that the survey is part of a “research study.” 2. A brief statement regarding the purpose of the research and who is performing it. 3. A statement regarding research procedures. Explain that the study involves answering a series of questions and will take a specific length of time.

CONSENT WAIVERS & ALTERATIONS  Consent Survey Elements (contd.): 4. A statement regarding any foreseeable risks. These might include tiring from answering questions or being asked sensitive questions. If there are no risks, this should be indicated. 5. A statement regarding anticipated benefits. Describe the potential benefits of the knowledge to be gained and any benefits for subjects. If there are no benefits to subjects, this should be indicated. 6. A statement that participation is voluntary and that failure to participate will not adversely affect the care of the subject. 7. A statement regarding provisions to maintain the confidentiality of the data.

HIPAA WAIVERS  The HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) regulations (45 CRF & 164) require that a Privacy Board permit a covered entity to use or disclose PHI (protected health information) for research without an individual’s authorization. The UTHSC IRB serves as the Privacy Board for UTHSC.  If you receive approval for an alteration or waiver of consent where the subject will not sign a full consent form containing the subject authorization for the HIPAA requirements, then you must also request a HIPAA waiver in your electronic application in iMedRIS. This request must be approved by the IRB.  This approval allows you to collect PHI without having subjects sign a HIPAA authorization in order to identify potential subjects for recruitment, to contact potential subjects regarding study participation, or for the conduct of the study.