Focus on Clinical Research. RESPONSIBILITIES 1) Ensure the research responds to the health needs and priorities of the target community 2) Ensure any.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
R.K. Baxi Professor Medical College, Baroda. Ensure Purpose of research is towards betterment of all Research is conducted with professional fair treatment.
Advertisements

The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.
Human Subjects Research at the University of Michigan
Chapter 10 Ethical Issues in Nursing Research. Perspectives for Assessing Ethical Acceptability Utilitarian Perspective - the good of a project is defined.
Criteria For Approval 45 CFR CFR Minimized risks Reasonable risk/benefit ratio Equitable subject selection Informed consent process Informed.
Ethical Considerations in Human Subjects Research Stacey Berg, M.D. Texas Children’s Cancer Center.
Informed consent requirements
The Consent Process: It’s More Than Just a Form A “10 Minute Training” Brought to you by Cyndi Long, MS, RD, CCRC CU Sports Medicine.
Susan Sonne, PharmD, BCPP Chair, MUSC IRB II
Ethical Considerations when Developing Human Research Protocols A discipline “born in scandal and reared in protectionism” Carol Levine, 1988.
Human Subjects & Research Understanding the protection of human subjects, HSRC, and the nature of the process.
Obtaining Informed Consent: 1. Elements Of Informed Consent 2. Essential Information For Prospective Participants 3. Obligation for investigators.
 Daylene Meuschke, Ed.D Barry Gribbons, Ph.D RP Conference: April 2, 2013.
Subject Selection and Recruitment David Wendler Department of Clinical Bioethics NIH, USA.
Use of Children as Research Subjects What information should be provided for an FP7 ethical review?
Justification of Research in Humans Impossible to reach the important conclusions without studying humans Impossible to reach the important conclusions.
Justification of Research in Humans Impossible to reach the important conclusions without studying humans Impossible to reach the important conclusions.
STANDARD Anything serving as a type or pattern to which other like things must conform (Stedman’s Medical Dictionary) STANDARD OF CARE The level at which.
CUMC IRB Investigator Meeting November 9, 2004 Research Use of Stored Data and Tissues.
© HRP Associates, Inc. Ethics & Regulation of Human Subjects Research Jeffrey M. Cohen, Ph.D., CIP President, HRP Associates, Inc.
8 Criteria for IRB Approval of Research 45 CFR (a)
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم. THE TITLE “INTRODUCTION”
FOUNDATIONS OF NURSING RESEARCH Sixth Edition CHAPTER Copyright ©2012 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Nursing Research,
1 Ethics in Psychological Research  Ethics – __________________  Research ethics – responsibility of researchers to be honest and respectful of all individuals.
Informed Consent and HIPAA Tim Noe Coordinating Center.
THE ETHICAL CONDUCT OF RESEARCH Chapter 4. HISTORY OF ETHICAL PROTECTIONS The Nuremberg Code The Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP), United.
Is this Research? Exempt? Expedited?
Human Subject Research Ethics
1 Wheaton College INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB)
Cornell Evaluation Network The Use of Human Participants in Research Office of Research Integrity and Assurance ~ May 14, 2007.
Idara C.E.. Three ethical principles guides research with human participants. principle of Autonomy 1. The principle of Autonomy requires investigators.
15 September Development of Nursing Research.
What makes Clinical Research Ethical? Dr Enoka Corea Co-secretary, ERC Faculty of Medicine, Colombo.
Ruth Carrico PhD RN FSHEA CIC Associate Professor Division of Infectious Diseases.
Planned Emergency Research Exception from Informed Consent Requirements September 2007.
Ethics in Quality Improvement Quality Academy Cohort 6 Melanie Rathgeber MERGE Consulting.
1 Protection of Vulnerable Subjects in Research Melody Lin, Ph.D. December 2012.
IRB BASICS: Issues in Ethics and Human Subject Protections Prepared by Ed Merrill Department of Psychology November 12, 2009.
Institutional Review Board (IRB) What is our Purpose and Role for Ethical Research.
Marian University is sponsored by the Sisters of St. Francis, Oldenburg. Human Subjects Research and the Marian University Institutional Review Board (IRB)
NAVIGATING THE IRB PROCESS University Institutional Review Board California State University, Stanislaus.
Health Insurance portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)‏
1 [INSERT SPEAKER NAME DATE & LOCATION HERE] Ethics of Tuberculosis Prevention, Care and Control MODULE 5: INFORMATION COUNSELLING AND THE ROLE OF CONSENT.
TUN IRB: The Basics February 26, IRB Function Review human-subject research Ensure the rights & welfare of human subjects are adequately protected.
What Institutional Researchers Should Know about the IRB Susan Thompson Senior Research Analyst Office of Institutional Research Presented at the Texas.
Case Studies: Puzzles in Human Research Kevin L. Nellis, M.S., M.T. (A.S.C.P.) Program Analyst, Program for Research Integrity Development and Education.
Regulations 201: Thorny Issues What is Research? Exempt and Expedited Reviews.
 Epidemiology -- Research – or Not Research? Medical Research Summit March Tom Puglisi, PhD.
Donna B. Konradi, DNS, RN, CNE GERO 586 Understanding the Ethics of Research.
Idara C.E.. Three ethical principles guides research with human participants. principle of Autonomy 1. The principle of Autonomy requires investigators.
ETHICAL ISSUES AND INFORMED CONSENT Juan M. Lozano, MD, MSc Department of Paediatrics and Clinical Epidemiology Unit School of Medicine, Javeriana University.
HPTN Ethics Guidance for Research: Community Obligations Africa Regional Working Group Meeting, May 19-23, 2003 Lusaka, Zambia.
Principles for the Protection of Human Rights Beneficence Primary goal of health care as doing good for clients under our care. Good care requires that.
Chapter 2: Ethical Issues in Program Evaluation. Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) Federal mandate for IRBs –Concern during 1970s about unethical research.
Doing IRB Right … Together JOHN POTTER, OD, MA Chair, Institutional Review Board.
Research ethics.
Investigator Initiated Research Best Practices for IRB: SBER Corey Zolondek, Ph.D. IRB Operations Manager Wayne State University.
Research Ethics Dr Nichola Seare Aston Health Research & Innovation Cluster.
Current Legal and Ethical Controversies in American Health Care
Back to Basics – Approval Criteria
Research on Populations Prone to Being Vulnerable
Ethical Principles of Research
Intro to Projects – Research with Human Subjects
Greg Nezat CRNA, PhD CDR/NC/USN Chairman, IRB II
Ethics Review Morals: Rules that define what is right and wrong Ethics: process of examining moral standards and looking at how we should interpret and.
IRB Educational Session - IRB Regulations on Expedited Review
Office of Research Integrity and Protections
Validity, Specificity, and Reliability Of Informed Consent
Research with Human Subjects
Ethical Theories and Principles in Clinical and Research
Presentation transcript:

Focus on Clinical Research

RESPONSIBILITIES 1) Ensure the research responds to the health needs and priorities of the target community 2) Ensure any product or benefit developed will be made available to the community 2) Ensure any product or benefit developed will be made available to the community Entities With Limited Resources

Responsiveness to Community Health Needs Successful interventions that result from the research must be made available to the community. If this is not done, the research is exploitative.

Prior Agreement Before the research begins, offer a plan to make available the product to the host nation when the study is done. In planning investigators should include representatives of the government, local authorities, community members, and NGO groups.

Agreement The agreement should include decisions about payments, royalties, distribution costs, subsidies, technology, and intellectual property. In some cases, international organizations, public and private, may also be included in the discussions.

Need Community Approval Community must have legitimate, empowered spokesperson(s) Community must have a common health- related culture A communication network for the community must be in place

Ethical Issues Should investigators ever use the standards of care/ethics of a developing countries vs. developed countries in comparisons? Are investigators responsible for the health of their participants? Can participants in developing countries understand informed consent (e.g., is there an expectancy of benefit or treatment even if not stated in the informed consent)? Is it ethical to do research in developing countries on issues relevant to developed countries but not relevant to developing countries?

US IRB Requirements A. Investigator’s knowledge of the community B. Literacy level and language of population C. Status of women: 1. Ensure volunteer participation. 2. ? Supplemental male permission. 3. Potential benefit to women. 4. Procedures respecting women’s autonomy to consent. 5. Written assurance that in no case will a competent adult woman be enrolled in research solely on permission of another person.

D. Status of children E. How research aqddresses important question related to host community/country F. How to avoid therapeutic misconception G. How at least some of the national population will get beneficial health care

Definition Informed consent does not relate to what investigators think they need to disclose. but rather what the participant needs to know!

Ensuring Protections for Research Participants Avoiding the “therapeutic misconception. ” Helping the patient is not the reason for the research. Critical importance of INFORMED CONSENT Participants trust you more than a confusing piece of paper. Be worthy of their trust. Participate in the consenting process and make sure they understand.

Human Subjects Consent Form 1. Purpose of the study 2. Procedures 3. Potential risks and discomforts 4. Anticipated benefits to subjects 5. Anticipated benefits to society 6. Alternatives to participation 7. Payment for participation 8. Possible commercial products 9. Sample remaining at the end of the study 10 Financial obligation 11. Emergency care and compensation for injury 12. Privacy and confidentiality 13. Participation and withdrawal 14. Consequences of withdrawal 15. Withdrawal of participation by the investigator 16. New findings 17. Identification of investigators 18. Rights of research subjects 19. Adherence to HIPAA

Therapeutic Misconception Participants often enter clinical trials because they think they will benefit from the treatment. Sometimes the investigator is a little misleading to encourage them to enter, but often, they refuse to hear anything but the possibility of treatment.

Influences on Voluntary Informed Consent Is it voluntary? Is it informed? Vulnerability to incentives Impact of community pressure coercion Intimidating power of investigators Ability of participants to understand procedures, goals, benefits and risks

Additional Risks of Participation Stigmatization, Privacy, Confidentiality

Stigmatization = characterizing or branding (a persons) as disgraceful or ignominious (American Heritage Dictionary, 7 th Edition, 1992) Privacy = freedom from unsanctioned intrusion (American Heritage Dictionary, 7 th edition, 1992) Stolen From Detels Stolen From Detels

The poor Ethnic minorities Sex workers Drug users The uneducated (illiterate) Men/women who have sex with persons of the same gender HIV- infected persons Persons infected with sexually transmitted organisms Sexually promiscuous persons Marginalized groups

Investigator must arrange to guarantee freedom from stigmatization for participants

Privacy Respect for persons guarantees the participants RIGHT to privacy Lack of privacy also reduces willingness to participate. Assertion that privacy is guaranteed is insufficient Participant must perceive that privacy is guaranteed. Investigators must deliver on their promise.

Confidentiality vs Anonymity Name and identifying information are recorded Guarantee that identifying information will not be shared with unauthorized persons That is only as good as the integrity and care of the investigator and staff With anonymity, name and identifying information are not recorded Impossible to trace back results to informant

New HIPAA Rules on PHI PHI = private health information. HIPAA rules are designed to keep health information out of the wrong hands. Need a privacy review of all data collection and analysis. eyes only on need to know basis. anonymization very limited and specific. time limited access. Permission to use health data to screen for participants in some cases.

HIPAA and The Common Rule HIPAA uses the same definition of research as the federal Common Rule (45 CFR 46), which is “a systematic investigation designed to contribute to generalizeable knowledge.” Research that creates, uses, or discloses personally identifiable information in the course of providing health care services is protected health information (PHI) under the HIPAA Privacy Rule. Research that records personally identifiable health information to characterize and better understand disease processes without associated clinical intervention, is covered by the common rule but is not protected health information under HIPAA.

Research That Is Covered By HIPAA Studies that involve review of the medical record (PHI). Studies in which a health care service is being performed such as testing a new way of diagnosing a condition or a new drug or device for treating a health condition, i.e., creating new medical records. In general, if any part of the research is recorded in a medical record

Research That Is Not Under HIPAA but is Covered by the Common Rule The University of California HIPAA Task Force defined the term research-related health information (RHI) when individually identified health information is used during participation in a research study that is not part of any medical treatment. A large fraction of biomedical research using human subjects that is sponsored by NIH and other federal and not-for-profit entities is done to characterize and better understand disease processes without an associated intervention.

Was this an ethical study? 1. Was a placebo control justified a.If the subjects were children? b.If the subjects were adults? 2. Seven ethical requirements for clinical research as delineated by Emanuel et al are: a.scientific value b.scientific validity c.fair subject selection d.favorable risk/benefit ratio e.independent review f.informed consent g.respect for enrolled subjects

Ongoing Controversies Placebo groups International or local standards of care Should participants be assured care beyond the trials – if so, for how long? Should care be provided to the trial community? Should trials be evaluated for scale-up feasibility before implementation?