Evaluating Claims. Scientific Reasoning What are the tools of scientific reasoning? “FiLCHeRs” – six tools for distinguishing science from pseudoscience.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Scientific Literacy Evaluating Statements as Scientific.
Advertisements

WHAT IS THE NATURE OF SCIENCE?
CRITICAL THINKING “Learning without thought is a labor lost.” -Confucius.
Science, Technology, and Pseudoscience Issues in Science and Technology.
Modules 1 & 2 Practice Questions.
Read Sections 1.4, 1.5, and 1.13 in the textbook before reviewing the slides.
LogicandEvidence Scientific argument. Logic Reasoning –Deductive –Inductive.
James A. Herrick Chapter 2
Building Logical Arguments. Critical Thinking Skills Understand and use principles of scientific investigation Apply rules of formal and informal logic.
Acquiring Knowledge in Science. Some Questions  What is science and how does it work?  Create a list of words to describe science  Which ways of knowing.
Unit 1 Lesson 1 What Is Science?
Learning Objectives LO1 Introduce the concept of auditor responsibilities. LO2 Explain the importance of the study of ethics in helping define auditor.
Is it Science or Pseudoscience? Kathy Saunders University of Waikato.
Read Sections 1.4 and 1.12 in the textbook before reviewing the slides
PSYC 200 DAY 8 Parts of a APA Paper & Psych Science.
Overview of Basic Concepts, Roles, and Goals What is Psychology?  Comprehensive discipline in which practitioners focus on understanding human behavior.
Unit 1 Lesson 1 What Is Science?
Freud and Falsifiability Was he even wrong?. “It just seems wrong”... In Science, you cannot reject or confirm something based on feelings or anecdotal.
Pseudoscience. Science v. Pseudoscience Best way to understand critical thinking is by comparison to the opposite -- pseudoscience Today we will be talking.
Debate: Reasoning. Claims & Evidence Review Claims are statements that serve to support your conclusion. Evidence is information discovered through.
1. “FALSE” SCIENCE. 2. FAILS TO COMPLY WITH THE USUAL SCIENTIFIC TESTS. 3. INCONSISTENT WITH EXISTING, WELL- ESTABLISHED SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE. What is.
Academic VocabAcademic Vocab. Academic Vocab PacketAcademic Vocab Packet  If you lose this packet: It is mandatory after school tutoring It is mandatory.
The Science of Psychology. What is something you believe to be true? How did you arrive at that belief? 2.
UNIT 1 – LESSON 1 WHAT IS SCIENCE. WHAT CHARACTERIZES SCIENCE?  Science: the systematic study of natural events and conditions.  Community Consensus.
 Understand the meaning of science and the main branches of science.  Review characteristics of science.  Understand the meaning and importance of.
WHAT IS THE NATURE OF SCIENCE?. SCIENTIFIC WORLD VIEW 1.The Universe Is Understandable. 2.The Universe Is a Vast Single System In Which the Basic Rules.
Questions you may have asked yourself: Why do people suggest that chemicals are bad for us? Why should I study chemistry? Why do scientists so often say.
QOTD 9/9/14 1. Pick up a safety quiz (do not write on it!) and an answer sheet. Take the quiz- 10 minute time limit! 2. Return the quiz and your answer.
READING #4 “DEDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS” By Robert FitzGibbons from Making educational decisions: an introduction to Philosophy of Education (New York & London:
Theory of Knowledge Ms. Bauer
PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH AND THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD.
Ultimate goal Assessment of several tools developed to address different aspects of higher reasoning and scientific thinking – Tools informed by philosophy.
The Scientific Method: Terminology Operational definitions are used to clarify precisely what is meant by each variable Participants or subjects are the.
Developing Business Practice –302LON Critical thinking, reading and taking notes Unit: 4 Knowledgecast: 1.
CH. 2 Science Basics Biology: the scientific study of life. What makes something scientific? Observations, data, inferences, and generalizations are important.
Scientific Method. Philosophy of Science Rules that define what is acceptable knowledge Many of them Nonjustificationism – one type You can prove something.
What is Science? Chapter 1, Lesson 1. Using one or more of your senses and tools to gather information. observing.
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE Chapter 2 Tools of Environmental Science 2.1 Scientific Methods.
Scientific methods in psychology Why we have confidence in the principles of contemporary psychology.
The Scientific Method. Warm Up Unit 1 Day 4 How is a guess different from an educated guess and how is a theory different from a hypothesis?
1.3: Scientific Thinking & Processes Key concept: Science is a way of thinking, questioning, and gathering evidence.
Performance Assessment of Critical Thinking: The Dolphin Dilemma Task Yigal Rosen, Ph.D. Sr. Research Scientist Pearson Knowledge Technologies.
Activity 5a Systems of Professional Learning Module 3 Grades K–5: Supporting All Students in Writing and Research.
Understanding Science 5. The Burden of Proof © Colin Frayn,
At this time I admit nothing that is not necessarily true. I am therefore precisely nothing but a thinking thing Descartes.
ANOMALISTIC PSYCHOLOGY ISSUES OF PSEUDOSCIENCE AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD.
What is Scientific Knowledge?. What is “knowledge”? 1. A person must hold a belief. 2. This belief must be true. 3. There must be evidence that the belief.
Responsibilities of researchers Asking ourselves what responsibilities do we have towards the scientific community and society? Research is regulated by.
Unit 1 Lesson 1 What Is Science?
Writing a sound proposal
KARL POPPER ON THE PROBLEM OF A THEORY OF SCIENTIFIC METHOD
Distinguish between an experiment and other types of scientific investigations where variables are not controlled,
Science or Pseudoscience?
Unit 1 Lesson 1 What Is Science?
Pseudoscience.
ANOMALISTIC PSYCHOLOGY
WHAT IS THE NATURE OF SCIENCE?
WHAT IS THE NATURE OF SCIENCE?
Lesson #3 Objective(s): Identify the key features of scientific skepticism. Identify and explain the text’s six principles of scientific thinking. Agenda:
Unit 1 Lesson 1 What Is Science?
What is Scientific Argumentation?
Let’s Play Jeopardy.
PSEUDOSCIENCE Stuff that looks like science but isn’t.
EQ: What are the characteristics of science?
Unit: Science and Technology
SEP S.1A.7 Construct and analyze scientific arguments to support claims, explanations, or designs using evidence from observations, data, or informational.
Unit 1 Lesson 1 What Is Science?
Analyzing and Evaluating Arguments
Unit Organizer Template
Science and Pseudoscience
Presentation transcript:

Evaluating Claims

Scientific Reasoning What are the tools of scientific reasoning? “FiLCHeRs” – six tools for distinguishing science from pseudoscience

#1 - Falsifiability It must be possible to conceive of evidence that would prove the claim false Which of the 7 Guidelines for Critical Thinking does #1 sound like?

Examples of “falsifiability” Online Learning Module More links -

#2 - Logic Any argument offered as evidence in support of any claim must be sound. Which of the 7 Guidelines for Critical Thinking does #2 sound like? Example - Turkish admiral Piri Re'is map of the world

#3 - Comprehensiveness The evidence offered in support of any claim must be exhaustive -- that is all of the available evidence must be considered. Which of the 7 Guidelines for Critical Thinking does #3 sound like? Example – Psychics and their predictions

#4 - Honesty The evidence offered in support of any claim must be evaluated without self- deception. Which of the 7 Guidelines for Critical Thinking does #4 sound like?

Example of Honesty (no self-deception)

#5 - Replicability It is necessary for the evidence to be repeated in subsequent experiments or trials. Which of the 7 Guidelines for Critical Thinking does #5 sound like? Example - ESP

#6 - Sufficiency The evidence offered in support of any claim must be adequate to establish the truth of that claim Which of the 7 Guidelines for Critical Thinking does #6 sound like? Example – If you were abducted by a UFO, how would you prove it?

Summary of “FiLCHeRs” The first three rules of FiLCHeRS: -- falsifiability, logic, and comprehensiveness -- are all logically necessary rules of evidential reasoning. The last three rules of FiLCHeRS -- honesty, replicability, and sufficiency -- are all pragmatically necessary rules of evidential reasoning.

Professional Skeptics James Randi Video of James Randi in Australia testing water diviners and dowsers - How does James Randi exemplify the 7 Guidelines for Critical Thinking? - How does water divining exemplify the 10 Characteristics of Pseudoscience - How does James Randi’s test of water divining exemplify 6 Tools of Scientific Reasoning?