UNIFORM GUIDANCE Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards Presented by Colleen Ravenfeld Office.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Office of Management & Budget
Advertisements

OMB Circular A133 Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations 1 Departmental Research Administrators Training Track.
SHEILA T. LISCHWE, PH.D. OFFICE OF SPONSORED PROGRAMS UNIFORM GUIDANCE WORKING GROUP Uniform Guidance: What is the Impact at CU?
© 2014 University of New Hampshire. All rights reserved. Uniform Guidance Highlights What you really need to know.
Rules Governing Sponsored Projects (aka OMB Circulars) Presented by Beverly Blakeney, Diane Cummings and Julie Macy.
OMB Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Part 200.  The final guidance was issued on December 26, 2013 and supersedes and streamlines requirements from OMB Circulars.
1. An Introductory Look at the New Omni-Circular Big changes have arrived! Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements.
OMB Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Part 200 What has changed - What hasn’t What works – What doesn’t March 24, 2015.
Fiscal Compliance Corner Recent Happenings, etc. MRAM August 2014 Ted Mordhorst Director for Post Award Financial Compliance Research Accounting & Analysis.
The Uniform Guidance: A Top Ten List
Introduction to Uniform Guidance Presented to Engineering Research Network – Nov 19, 2014 by Sponsored Programs Accounting.
THE SUPER CIRCULAR – “OMNI CIRCULAR” THE ONE-STOP SHOP FOR FEDERAL ASSISTANCE OMB Revised Administrative, Cost, Audit Rules Governing All Federal Grants.
New Uniform Guidance Combines the requirements of OMB Circulars A-21, A-87, A-110, A-122, A-89, A-102, A-133, and A-50 into a streamlined format. *NOTE:
Grants Administration Updates - OMB’s Uniform Guidance Division of Grants Administration Office for Grants and Federal Fiscal Compliance Texas Education.
Procurement Leadership Council New Uniform Guidance Update & Discussion 9/2/14 Presented By: Jacob Godfrey UCSB Chief Procurement Officer and Materiel.
Grant Guidance Changes
Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards University Senate Meeting Martha Taylor.
What You Need to Know To Ensure Compliance October 2014.
Presented by Edward A. Hofma, CPA, CGMA Principal in the CPA firm of Averett Warmus Durkee, PA 1417 East Concord Street Orlando, Florida (407) 849.
Office of the Vice President for Research N ORMAN C AMPUS AND N ORMAN C AMPUS P ROGRAMS AT OU-T ULSA Subpart – C Pre-Federal Award Requirements and Contents.
12/08/14.  Welcoming Remarks  ORS Updates  OSP Updates.
KEYS TO SUCCESS NCURA Region IV Spring Meeting April 27 – 30, 2014 © 2014 National Council of University Research Administrators Effort Certification and.
1 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Guidance -- History & New Structure Steve Bradley, Director.
Uniform Guidance: Summary of Significant Changes 2 CFR PART 200—UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS, COST PRINCIPLES, AND AUDIT REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERAL.
Uniform Guidance 2 CFR 200 Nicole Pilman, Uniform Guidance Implementation Coordinator Sue Paulson, Assistant Controller Pamela A. Webb, Associate VP for.
Implementing the Uniform Guidance U.S. Department of Education.
Indirect Cost Presented by Bonita Brown HMEP Grant Program
Circular A-110 Everything You Didn’t Want to Know.
Financial and Grants Management Institute - March 18-20, Federal Grants Management for Fiscal Staff.
UNIFORM GUIDANCE OVERVIEW. OMB Circulars Before and After A-21 Cost principles for Educational Institutions A-21 Cost principles for Educational Institutions.
Financial Management For Project Administrators. How Feds View Themselves.
Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal.
UNIFORM GUIDANCE OVERVIEW Budget Officers Meeting January 28, 2015.
UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS, AUDIT REQUIREMENTS, AND COST PRINCIPLES 2 CFR CHAPTER 1, CHAPTER 2, PART 200, ET AL. Uniform Guidance Training June.
Uniform Grant Guidance Laura Hirst Office of the Auditor General.
KEYS TO SUCCESS NCURA Region IV Spring Meeting April 27 – 30, 2014 © 2014 National Council of University Research Administrators Cost Principles: It Depends!
Cost Principles – 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart E U.S. Department of Education.
CONTRACTS & GRANTS PROCESS AT A RESEARCH UNIVERSITY FSU ALUMNI CENTER MAY 7, 2015 Post Award Processes Angie Rowe Associate Director – Sponsored Research.
The Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards The OMB SuperCircular Information for FTA Grantees.
Presented by: Dan Parker/FHWA. Streamlines the language from eight OMB circulars to one consolidated set of guidance. The following have been combined.
FHWA Implementation 2CFR 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards September 2015.
Time with Office of Sponsored Programs April 4, 2011 Topic: Cost Share.
The Consolidation of the OMB Circulars: Exploring the “New” Administrative Rules.
SBIR Budgeting Leanne Robey Chief, Special Reviews Branch, NIH.
2008 California AmeriCorps Conference1 Federal and Grants Management for Program and Fiscal Staff.
Uniform Guidance Updates: What PI’s and their staff need to know April 2, 2015 Syracuse University Office of Sponsored Programs.
Let’s Talk Cost Sharing Sherrelle Vaughn Sponsored Programs Accounting and Reporting July 17, 2012.
UNIFORM GUIDANCE OVERVIEW December 2014 Update. Important Dates Applicable to new awards and (possibly) new funding increments issued on and after December.
Brette Kaplan, Esq. Erin Auerbach, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring Forum 2013
August, 2013 Grants Circular Reform Update Office of Management and Budget For more information visit
SUBAWARDS & SUBRECIPIENT MONITORING UNIFORM GUIDANCE AT K-STATE 2 CFR Part 200 – Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements.
Uniform Guidance: Everything You Need to Know Meredith Perry, Office of Research and Sponsored Programs.
National Institutes of Health U.S. Department of Health and Human Services NIEHS SRP Annual Meeting November 18 – 20, 2015 George Tucker Chief, Grants.
Office of Sponsored Programs- OMB Uniform Guidance October 21, 2015.
Indirect Cost Rates 101 CNCS Uniform Guidance § Indirect Costs.
Sponsored Projects Administration What’s in it for Researchers? Proposed Changes in Federal Research Guidance (A-81) Pamela A. Webb Associate Vice President.
The New Super Circular Inaugural Tribal Accounting Conference November 16, 2015 Morgan Aronson National Single Audit Coordinator
OMB Circular A-122 and the Federal Cost Principles Copyright © Texas Education Agency
RCC Update ORS Quarterly Meeting April 28, 2016 Julie Cole, Director Research Costing Compliance.
Office Of Sponsored Programs Allowable Costs. What is 2 CFR Chapter 1 and 2 parts 200 Subpart E (OMB Uniform Guidance)? A document that contains Principles.
F&A Rates 101 Basics of F&A rates for Proposals, Grants, & Contracts Dr. Mindy S. Connolly, CPCM Sr. Sponsored Research Officer Office of Sponsored Projects.
Maryland State Department of Education Brief Update on Select Fiscal Matters Related to Grant Issuance and Management Title I Spring Meeting 2016 Kim Stewart,
Juanita Syljuberget Alabama Cooperative Extension System May 23, 2012.
THE BIGGEST WINNER Uniform Guidance. Test Your Knowledge UG Basics Equipment & Facilities Shared Costs Items of Cost Bits & Pieces
Subrecipient Monitoring
The Administration of Subrecipient Agreements
2 CFR 200- aka Uniform Guidance.
Subrecipient vs. Contractor Determinations
Sponsored Programs at Penn
Uniform Guidance and Grants Accounting
Presentation transcript:

UNIFORM GUIDANCE Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards Presented by Colleen Ravenfeld Office of Research Administration

WHAT IS THE UNIFORM GUIDANCE? The White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has combined 8 federal circulars into a single document known as Uniform Guidance. In TJU’s case, the Uniform Guidance supersedes and streamlines requirements from 3 OMB Circulars. A-21 Cost Principles for Educational Institutions A-110 Uniform Administrative Requirements A-133 Audit Requirements The Council on Financial Assistance Reform (COFAR) was delegated the responsibility of developing the Uniform Guidance, with the goal of reducing administrative burden while improving oversight and accountability.

WHAT IS THE UNIFORM GUIDANCE? Addresses the administration’s goal of a government that is more efficient, effective and transparent. Strengthens requirements for INTERNAL CONTROLS while providing administrative FLEXIBILITY for non-Federal entities. The Uniform Guidance applies to new awards and incremental funding to existing awards made on or after 12/26/14. The Uniform Guidance is located in Title 2 of the CFR, Part 200 (2 CFR 200).

UNIFORM GUIDANCE TIMELINE December 26, 2013 OMB issued the Uniform Guidance June 26, 2014 Due date for the Federal agencies to submit proposed implementation plans to the OMB to allow for review and public comment December 26, 2014 Uniform Guidance goes into effect June 30, 2015 End of Jefferson’s first fiscal year under the new Uniform Guidance July 1, 2015 Uniform Guidance Audit Requirements are applicable to Jefferson awards July 1, 2016 Changes to the Procurement Provisions under the new Uniform Guidance go into effect

UNIFORM GUIDANCE WORKING GROUP GOALS Analyze the changes in UG against the requirements in the previous OMB circulars; Develop a workplan to ensure a systematic assessment of the scope of the changes against the current Jefferson policies and operating guidelines; Recommend actions needed to conform with implementation by December 26, 2014 The group sought input of Jefferson subject matter experts, including representatives from: Audit Provost’s Office Finance Supply Chain Management Enterprise Risk Innovation Pillar Leaders Research Administration RACE International Office Compliance Human Resources Conflict of Interest Office Office of Legal Counsel

HOW IT’S ORGANIZED TITLE INCLUDES: Subpart A Acronyms & Definitions Sections 0-99 Acronyms & Definitions Subpart B Sections 100-113 General Provisions Applicability Subpart C Sections 200-211 Pre-Federal Award Requirements & Contents of Federal Awards Instructions to the awarding agency (or pass-through entity) Subpart D Sections 300-345 Post Federal Award Requirements Standards for Financial & Program Managements Instructions to the recipient, including Internal Controls, Cost Sharing, Program Income, Budget/Program revisions, Procurement Standards, Subrecipient Monitoring, Closeout Subpart E Sections 400-475 Cost Principles Allowability, Prior Approval, Direct/Indirect classifications, F&A , Selected Items of Cost Subpart F Sections 500-521 Audits Audit requirements

Appendix I through IX Applicable appendices include: App. I Full Text of Notice of Funding Opportunity App. II Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contract s Under Federal Awards App. III Indirect (F&A) Costs Identification and Assignment, and Rate Determination for Institutions of Higher Education (IHEs) App. IX Hospital Costs

NEW TERMS

NEW TERMS Computing devices means machines used to acquire, store, analyze, process, and publish data and other information electronically, including accessories for printing, transmitting and receiving, or storing electronic information. (200.20) Fixed amount awards means a type of grant agreement under which the Federal agency or pass-through entity provides a specific level of support without regard to actual costs incurred under the federal award. (200.45) Micro-purchase means a purchase of supplies or services using simplified acquisition procedures, the aggregate amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold, which is currently $3,000. (200.67) Participant support costs means direct costs for items such as stipends or subsistence allowances, travel allowances, and registration fees paid to or on behalf of participants or trainees (but not employees) in connection with conferences, or training projects. (200.75)

SIGNIFICANT CHANGES

INTERNAL CONTROLS Section 200.303 Recipients of federal funding must: establish and maintain effective internal controls that provide reasonable assurance that Jefferson is managing its awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the award. Evaluate and monitor compliance and take prompt action when instances of non-compliance are identified Take reasonable measures to safeguard protected personally identifiable information The UG emphasizes the importance of having documented internal controls.

COST SHARING Section 200.306 The UG reinforces the fact that voluntary committed cost sharing is neither expected nor considered during merit review of the proposal. Voluntary committed cost sharing is cost sharing that was included in the proposal but was not a sponsor requirement. Federal agencies must require mandatory cost sharing or not consider it at all. It must be clearly defined in the funding opportunity. Unrecovered indirect costs (including indirects on cost sharing) may be considered cost sharing only with agency prior approval. The UG supports Jefferson’s strong discouragement of voluntary committed cost sharing because of it’s financial and administrative burden.

REVISION OF BUDGET & PROGRAM PLANS Section 200.308 The following budget or program deviations require prior approval from the awarding agency: Change in scope or the objective of the program Change in a key person specified in the application PI disengagement from the project for more than 3 months or a 25% reduction in time (effort) devoted to the project Inclusion of costs that require prior approval Transfer of funds budgeted for participant support costs Subawarding or contracting work out unless described in the application and funded Changes in the amount of cost sharing provided by the non-federal entity

PROCUREMENT Sections 200.317 through 326 The UG provides detailed methods by which institutions should procure goods and services when funded by a federal award which includes stricter requirements for sole-source purchases. The UG emphasizes the documentation requirements and internal written procedures for procurement. The OMB is providing a grace period to comply with these standards, during which the University will modify or develop procedures to comply with the UG.

SUBRECIPIENT AND CONTRACTOR DETERMINATIONS Section 200.330 Provides a list of characteristics which support classification as a subrecipient (federal assistance relationship) or a contractor (procurement relationship) “Contractor” replaces “vendor” Clarifies that the pass-through entity determines the classification on a case-by-case basis

REQUIREMENTS FOR PASS-THROUGH ENTITIES Section 200.331 Includes a standard list of information that must be included in all subawards Requires institutions to perform a risk assessment of subrecipients prior to issuing subagreements in order to determine the appropriate level of monitoring. The UG provides the critieria for determining risk, which includes prior experience and audit results Requirements for subaward monitoring

REQUIREMENTS FOR PASS-THROUGH ENTITIES Section 200.331 F&A ON SUBAWARDS: Pass through entities are expected to honor a subrecipient’s negotiated rate agreement When a subrecipient has a federally negotiated F&A rate, the negotiated rate must be included in all proposed subawards Guidance clarifies that if a subrecipient does not already possess a negotiated Indirect Cost Rate, it may apply a de minimus rate of 10%. (see section 200.414) It is not permissible for the PI to force or entice a proposed sub without a negotiated rate to accept less than the de minimis rate

ADMINISTRATIVE & CLERICAL SALARIES Section 200.413 The UG clarifies that the salaries of administrative and clerical staff should normally be treated as indirect costs. Direct charging of these salaries can be considered only if ALL of the following criteria is met: Services are INTEGRAL to the project; Individual can be specifically identified with the project; Cost has been explicitly included in the budget OR have written prior approval from the awarding agency; and Costs are not also recovered as indirect costs Proposal budget justification should clearly detail the integral nature of the services to the project.

INDIRECT (F&A) COSTS Section 200.414 The negotiated rate must be accepted by all Federal awarding agencies

COMPENSATION Section 200.430 Standards of documentation: Salary charges to sponsored projects must be based on records that accurately reflect the work being performed. Those records must: Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurances that the charges are accurate, allowable and properly allocated Be incorporated into our official records Encompass both federally funded and all other activities Support the distribution of the employees salary among specific activities While OMB A-21 examples and references to formal effort reporting has been replaced with new terminology, emphasis has been placed on internal controls. Jefferson’s current effort reporting system is considered an effective internal control to ensure that compensation charges to Sponsored Projects are accurate, allowable and properly allocated and will continue with no material changes

COMPUTING DEVICES Section 200.453 The UG clarifies that computing devices are generally considered to be “supplies” and can therefore be directly charged to sponsored projects as long as they are essential and allocable to the performance of the award. No longer need to be “solely dedicated” Computing devices costing $5,000 or more must be treated as equipment. The proposal budget justification should clearly explain why the device is essential to the project. NEW FORM! RACE requires for modular budgets or when the need for a device is identified in the postaward stage. Section 200.403 “Factors affecting allowability of costs” continues to apply.

PUBLICATION AND PRINTING COSTS Section 200.461 The UG allows for the “cost of publication or sharing of research results” to be charged to the project even if the costs were incurred after the end of the performance period---BUT before final financial closeout. The expense would need to be included on the final reconciliation.

TRAVEL Section 200.474 The UG relies on Jefferson’s established travel policy to determine the allowability of travel costs. Documentation must justify that participation of the individual is “necessary” to the federal award. Expect a comprehensive revision of the travel policy to coincide with the rollout of the new CONCUR travel approval system.

HOSPITAL COST PRINCIPLES Appendix IX to Part 200 45 CFR Part 74 Appendix E “Principles for Determining Costs Applicable to Research and Development Under Grants and Contracts with Hospitals” remain in effect OMB has proposed a review process to consider how best to update and align those principles with the UG.

SUMMARY OF NEW POLICIES AND REVISIONS 110.23 Costing Guidelines for Sponsored Projects 110.25 Unallowable Costs for Sponsored Projects 110.24 Cost Sharing and Matching Funds for Sponsored Projects 110.09 Status Change for Principal investigators and Key Personnel on Sponsored Projects 110.01 Authorization for Consultant Services Required Sponsored Projects 110.06 Effort Certification for Exempt University Staff on Sponsored Projects 110.07 Effort Certification for Non-Exempt University Staff and All Hospital Employees on Sponsored Projects 110.20 Sub-recipient Monitoring on Sponsored Projects 110.21 Program Income 110.22 Principal Investigator Role and Responsibilities for Sponsored Projects

TOOLS – 3 GUIDES 1.) Is it a direct or indirect cost? Clarifies how Jefferson typically incurs selected items of cost (as either a direct or indirect cost). 2.) Proposal Guide. Provides detail regarding allowability for selected items of cost. 3.) What Requires Prior Approval From a Federal Agency? Provides a comprehensive list of circumstances for which prior approval is specifically required.