4/28/20151 Presented by: Anne Taylor, NECTAC David Steele, OSEP OSEP Part C Fiscal Management Verification: What Is It And How Do I Prepare For It?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1. Regulatory Requirements 2. Written Policies & Procedures 3. Documentation of Expenses 4. Managing Cash 5. Efficient Accounting System 6. Budget Controls.
Advertisements

Financial Literacy May 10, 2007 Jonnie M. Jenkins, CPA Walker and Company LLP.
MONITORING OF SUBGRANTEES
OMB Regulatory Requirements Regulatory Requirements 2. Written Policies & Procedures 3. Documen- tation of Expenses 4. Managing Cash 5. Efficient.
Contract Staff Training Contract Management 2007.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION ARRA GREEN JOB AND HEALTH CARE / EMERGING INDUSTRIES NEW GRANTEE POST AWARD FORUM JUNE.
OMB Circular A133 Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations 1 Departmental Research Administrators Training Track.
A-133 Compliance & Audit Readiness Presented By: Tracy Jackson and Susan Cook.
Precision Experience Assurance Accounting For Grants FGFOA Beginner Boot Camp, Tuesday, November 19, 2013 Hyatt Regency, Sarasota FL Bert Martinez CPA,
OMB Circular A-133 Audits of States, Local Governments and Non-Profit Organizations CReATE May 2013 Cathi Bass, Grants Compliance Manager Sponsored Research.
MARCH 26,2013 PRE-AWARD MATTERS THAT AFFECT POST-AWARD COMPLIANCE MODULE SERIES 3, SESSION III AAPLS (APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON SERIES)
Documenting Expenses & In-Kind Contributions. 2 Donations that Aren ’ t Dollars: In-Kind Contributions Session Objectives: Have participants understand:
P ART C M AINTENANCE OF E FFORT Charles Kniseley Slide presentation by Anthony White 5/19/09 RRC IFA S UBGROUP P ART C MOE 1.
External Auditors – Common Findings in Federal Programs Allen, Green & Williamson, LLP.
Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards University Senate Meeting Martha Taylor.
Subrecipient Monitoring Webcast Presenters Pat O'Rourke, Irene St. Croix, Bridget Ware Department of Health and Human Services Health Resources and Services.
Documenting Cash and In-Kind Match Project Director Training & Annual Meeting.
“The mission of the Sub-recipient Monitoring Section is to monitor, assess, and assist Sub-recipients to successfully implement and complete Grant Program.
Financial and Grants Management Institute - March 18-20, Federal Grants Management for Fiscal Staff.
School Lunch Internal Controls Ryan Preston W. Tyler Michael Stephanie Jacobs.
Grants.maryland.gov The Governor’s Grants Office Presents Successful Post Award Grants Management For the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Lifecycle.
Financial Management For Project Administrators. How Feds View Themselves.
Financial Management Stacey Jones, Resolution Specialist OGCM- Division of Policy, Review and Resolution Young Offender Grants New Grantee Orientation.
1 INTERNAL CONTROLS Matthew Pakos School Improvement Grant Programs May 23, 2011.
PREPARING FOR SUPPLEMENTAL MONITORING PERKINS COMPLIANCE Monieca West ADHE Federal Program Manager October 19, 2012.
Effective Management and Compliance 1 ANA GRANTEE MEETING  FEBRUARY 5, 2015.
Cost Principles – 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart E U.S. Department of Education.
“Establishing Internal Financial Controls” Presented by: Fred Thomas, Bureau Chief of Administration.
Presented by Raaj Kurapati and Charlene Hart. Introduction  The Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 was enacted to streamline and improve the effectiveness.
1. The Perkins Act – bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=109_cong_bills&docid=f:s250enr.tx t.pdf Your OMB Circulars
NRS Financial Jeopardy! The Adult Education Community’s Favorite Game Show.
The Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards The OMB SuperCircular Information for FTA Grantees.
BTOP OVERSIGHT WASHINGTON D.C. MAY 2012 U.S. DOC Inspector General Recovery Act Oversight Task Force 1.
USDOL REGION 3 FISCAL FORUM Introduction to Grants ManagementApril 26 – 29, 2005.
FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY IN TITLE III AND OTHER SPONSORED PROGRAMS AND GRANTS ADMINISTRATION Presented by Sharon S. Crews, M.Ac., CPA Vice President for Administrative.
Risk and Subaward Management under the Uniform Guidance U.S. Department of Education.
2 Donations that Aren’t Dollars: In Kind Contributions Session Objectives Have participants understand: Implication of in-kind contributions as related.
Stay on Top of Your Perkins Grant: Surviving Monitoring Visits and Audits May 2009 Renee Kuharski, Ph.D. Colorado Mountain College.
SBIR Budgeting Leanne Robey Chief, Special Reviews Branch, NIH.
2008 California AmeriCorps Conference1 Federal and Grants Management for Program and Fiscal Staff.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION ARRA GREEN JOB AND HEALTH CARE / EMERGING INDUSTRIES NEW GRANTEE POST AWARD FORUM JUNE.
Brette Kaplan, Esq. Erin Auerbach, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring Forum 2013
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION ARRA GREEN JOB AND HEALTH CARE / EMERGING INDUSTRIES NEW GRANTEE POST AWARD FORUM JUNE.
Preston Alderman MSDE, Director of Audit.  As recipients of federal and state funds we are charged with ensuring that the funds are adequately accounted.
Arkansas Association of Federal Coordinators September 23, 2011.
Subgrantees’ Monitoring (PRAEP Programmatic and Fiscal Monitoring Guide) Puerto Rico Department of Education Educational Services to the Community Adult.
“SPEAR” W ORKSHOP O CTOBER 19 & 30, 2015 ANGELLE GOMEZ S UBAWARD R ISK A SSESSMENT / MONITORING.
Uniform Administrative Requirements 2014 YouthBuild Webinar Series.
1 The Basics - Grant Management 101  Basics of Financial Reporting Requirements  Administrative Requirements (record keeping)  On Site Monitoring.
OMB Circular A-122 and the Federal Cost Principles Copyright © Texas Education Agency
Subgrantee Compliance February 27, 2013 Preparing TPPS Subgrantees for Monitoring Shelby County Grants Office presents:
Copyright © Texas Education Agency Texas Education Agency Grants Administration Training for Nonprofit Grantees Hosted by the Division of Grants.
A risk assessment is the process of identifying potential hazards an organization may face and analyzing methods of response if exposure occurs.
1 On-Line Financial Management Workshops Cost Classification, Administrative Costs & Program Income June 2009.
What’s your friend up to? Subrecipient Monitoring Issues Tom Egan, MIT OSP Jeannette Gordon, Division of Grants Compliance and Oversight OPERA, OER, NIH.
United States Department of Labor Employment & Training Administration TAA-CCCT Round 4 New Grantee Fiscal and Administrative Q&A TAA-CCCT Round 4 New.
Copyright © Texas Education Agency Other Key Uniform Administrative Grant Requirements.
(404) The Wesley Peachtree Group, CPAs Presented by Keith X. Terrell, CPA, Cr.FA, FCPA, CGMA.
Sub-recipient Monitoring and Contractor Determination
Subrecipient Monitoring
TAA-CCCT Round 2 New Grantee Fiscal and Administrative Q&A
The Administration of Subrecipient Agreements
Other Key Uniform Administrative Grant Requirements
Guidelines for Use of Government Owned Equipment
The Importance of Subrecipient Monitoring
Research Administration
Managing Federal grants
Guidelines for Use of Government Owned Equipment
Understanding a Subrecipient Agreement
Uniform Guidance and Grants Accounting
Presentation transcript:

4/28/20151 Presented by: Anne Taylor, NECTAC David Steele, OSEP OSEP Part C Fiscal Management Verification: What Is It And How Do I Prepare For It?

4/28/20152 Agenda Definition Definition Framework for Accountability Framework for Accountability Fiscal Verification Process Fiscal Verification Process Document Review Document Review

4/28/20153 Definition Fiscal Management Verification is the process used to assess how effectively the lead agency implements the Part C fiscal requirements identified in the IDEA, GEPA, Federal regulations, and applicable OMB guidance

4/28/20154 Framework for Accountability Legal authorities provide a framework for understanding accountability. These authorities address the following three aspects of grantee operations: Legal authorities provide a framework for understanding accountability. These authorities address the following three aspects of grantee operations: –Administrative requirements refer to matters that are common to grants in general, such as financial management, kinds and frequency or reports, and record retention.

4/28/20155 Framework for Accountability - Continued –Fiscal requirements pertain to different aspects of Federal revenues and expenditures (e.g., cash management, budgeting, procurement, etc.) –Program performance relates to criteria that pertain to a grantee achieving its grant objectives.

4/28/20156 Framework for Accountability: Legal Authorities In their order of precedence, legal authorities include: In their order of precedence, legal authorities include: –Statutes –Regulations and OMB Circulars –Non-regulatory guidance –Departmental letters

4/28/20157 Framework for Accountability: Statutes Administrative Administrative –General Education Provisions Act (GEPA) »Sets forth general administrative framework for education grant funds. –Single Audit Act »Sets forth audit requirements for grant funds. Programmatic Programmatic –Statutory requirements for each Federal education program.

4/28/20158 Framework for Accountability: Regulations Regulations Regulations –Education Department General Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) »Sets forth administrative requirements that pertain to Federal education funds. »Is presently composed of three volumes (part 1-299, part , and part 400 to end). Programmatic Programmatic –Regulatory requirements for each Federal program.

4/28/20159 Framework for Accountability: OMB Circulars A series of Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circulars provide detailed guidance about administrative and cost principles related to grant awards. A series of Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circulars provide detailed guidance about administrative and cost principles related to grant awards. –A-133, Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations »Sets forth standards for obtaining consistency and uniformity among Federal agencies for audits of States, local governments and non-profit organizations.

4/28/ Framework for Accountability: A-133 Compliance Requirements Activities Allowed or Disallowed Activities Allowed or Disallowed –Are program funds being used for program purposes? Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Allowable Costs/Cost Principles –Are charges in accordance with applicable principles (A-21, A-97, A-122, etc.)? Cash Management Cash Management –Are funds drawn within allowable timeframes? Eligibility Eligibility –Are participants (including sub-recipients) eligible to participate in Federal programs?

4/28/ A-133 Compliance Requirements- Continued Equipment & Real Property Management Equipment & Real Property Management –Is the grantee managing and disposing of equipment and real property purchased with Federal funds in accordance with applicable requirements? Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking –Is the grantee complying with general requirements for each program? Period of Availability Period of Availability –Are Federal funds used within their allowed period of availability?

4/28/ A-133 Compliance Requirements - Continued Procurement & Suspension/Debarment Procurement & Suspension/Debarment –Is the grantee ensuring that sub-recipients and contractors are not suspended or debarred from receiving Federal funds? Program Income Program Income –Is the grantee property accounting for income generated from Federal funds, and is the income used for allowable purposes? Reporting Reporting –Did the grantee comply with applicable requirements for monitoring sub-recipients of Federal funds?

4/28/ Framework for Accountability: OMB Circulars –A-87 Cost Principles for State, Local, and Indian Tribal Governments »Sets forth principles and standards for determining costs for Federal awards carried out through grants, cost reimbursement contracts, and other agreements with State and local governments and Federally recognized Indian tribal governments.

4/28/ Fiscal Management Verification (FMV) Process Identify the components of the lead agency’s fiscal management system. Identify the components of the lead agency’s fiscal management system. Determine if the lead agency’s fiscal management system contains the components necessary to ensure compliance with Part C fiscal requirements. Determine if the lead agency’s fiscal management system contains the components necessary to ensure compliance with Part C fiscal requirements. Identify barriers that may impede the lead agency’s ability to implement fiscal controls. Identify barriers that may impede the lead agency’s ability to implement fiscal controls.

4/28/ Fiscal Management does not stand alone. It is a critical component of the State’s overall General Supervision System.

4/28/ FMV Process - Continued FMV assesses the components of a State’s General Supervision System. An audit is an examination of records or financial accounts to check for accuracy FMV assesses the components of a State’s General Supervision System. An audit is an examination of records or financial accounts to check for accuracy FMV focuses on the State’s financial policies, procedures and fiscal controls - NOT accounting codes, software programs, tracking receipts, etc.

4/28/ Document Review Part C: Fiscal Management Verification

4/28/ FMV: Desk Audit Functions: –Identify components of the lead agency’s fiscal management system; –Provide information about how the lead agency meets Federal fiscal requirements; –Identify issues to address during the verification visit.

4/28/ Major Sections (Page 5) Interagency Financial Responsibility - How does the lead agency ensure the assignment and maintenance of interagency financial responsibility? Interagency Financial Responsibility - How does the lead agency ensure the assignment and maintenance of interagency financial responsibility? Fiscal Controls - How does the lead agency ensure Part C funds are used in accordance with State and Federal requirements? Fiscal Controls - How does the lead agency ensure Part C funds are used in accordance with State and Federal requirements? Service Provision Arrangements - How does the lead agency ensure the provision of Part C services? Service Provision Arrangements - How does the lead agency ensure the provision of Part C services?

4/28/ Document Format (page 7) Fiscal Indicator Related Requirements Investigative Questions Lists the indicator(s) for each section Cites relevant regulations Cites relevant regulations Sets out requirements applicable for most grantees Sets out requirements applicable for most grantees Includes specific issues (from audits, Use of Funds form, etc.) Includes specific issues (from audits, Use of Funds form, etc.) Includes questions for requirements applicable for most grantees Includes questions for requirements applicable for most grantees Includes questions for specific issues Includes questions for specific issues