NIH Grants Management Policies DOM Weekly Fund Management Training.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1. Regulatory Requirements 2. Written Policies & Procedures 3. Documentation of Expenses 4. Managing Cash 5. Efficient Accounting System 6. Budget Controls.
Advertisements

Fiscal Guidelines/ Budget and Program Revisions NC Committee on Dropout Prevention Procedures Manual 2010.
Office of University Partnerships Office of Policy Development and Research U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Office of University Partnerships.
Office of Sponsored Projects Administration COST ACCOUNTING STANDARDS.
Office of Management & Budget
1 Fiscal Compliance Requirements for Sponsored Programs University of Missouri – St. Louis College of Education March 6, 2009.
Regulation Grant Brown Bag Session February 12, 2013.
Rules Governing Sponsored Projects (aka OMB Circulars) Presented by Beverly Blakeney, Diane Cummings and Julie Macy.
OMB Circular A-21 General Overview – F&A OSP Brown Bag Norm Hebert, Director December 8, 2005.
OMB Circulars and Beyond Nancy Duncan, Award Analysis Supervisor Sponsored Projects Administration.
The University of Texas at Arlington Office of Research and Office of Accounting and Business Services Brown Bag Training Session Two: Indirect Costs.
MARCH 26,2013 PRE-AWARD MATTERS THAT AFFECT POST-AWARD COMPLIANCE MODULE SERIES 3, SESSION III AAPLS (APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON SERIES)
INDIRECT COST BASICS Presented by Gene Fornecker, CPA DPI School Finance Auditor.
Those costs that can be identified specifically with a particular sponsored project.
University of Connecticut Health Center Research Administration & Finance Allowable Costs September 24, 2007.
Fiscal Compliance Requirements for Sponsored Programs University of Missouri College of Agriculture, Food and Natural Resources December 11, 2009.
Circular A-110 Everything You Didn’t Want to Know.
Office of the Vice Provost for Research & Graduate Studies Cost Sharing Why and How Trudy M. Riley Manager, Sponsored Programs Administration Susan Tkachick.
Project Management: Post Award Policies, Procedures and Guidelines A Tutorial for New Principal Investigators.
Fiscal Compliance Why it matters… University of Delaware.
Financial Management For Project Administrators. How Feds View Themselves.
Fiscal Compliance Corner Recent Happenings, etc. MRAM May 2015 Ted Mordhorst Director for Post Award Financial Compliance Research Accounting & Analysis.
Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal.
EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY OFFICE OF GRANTS AND CONTRACTS Effort Reporting System Departmental Coordinator Training Updated 01/11/2012.
“Grants Boot Camp” Workshop Series January 9, 2014 Creighton University Sponsored Programs Administration 2500 California Plaza, Omaha, NE  Phone:
General Provisions for Selected Items of Cost OMB A-21 Section J.
MANAGING SPONSORED PROJECTS FINANCIAL COMPLIANCE May 1, 2008 Office of Grants &Contracts Accounting.
KEYS TO SUCCESS NCURA Region IV Spring Meeting April 27 – 30, 2014 © 2014 National Council of University Research Administrators Cost Principles: It Depends!
Cost Principles – 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart E U.S. Department of Education.
Washington University Washington University School of Medicine Research Administrators Forum May 2002.
1 Sponsored Programs AdditionalReviewSteps. 2 Sponsored Program Section Content How to Identify a Sponsored Program Types of Costs Review Budget to Actual.
1 Fiscal Compliance Requirements for Sponsored Programs Missouri University of Science and Technology April 7, 2009.
Policy Update Michelle G. Bulls Chief Grants Management Officer Grants Policy.
CONTRACTS & GRANTS PROCESS AT A RESEARCH UNIVERSITY FSU ALUMNI CENTER MAY 7, 2015 Post Award Processes Angie Rowe Associate Director – Sponsored Research.
UCLA Department of Medicine Office of Research Administration.
Fishery Management Councils Executive Director Session Grants Rimas T. Liogys Director, Grants Management Division February 25, 2009.
DCB New Grantee Workshop: Post-Award Administration of Grants Brett Hodgkins Team Leader National Cancer Institute Office of Grants Administration.
Page 1 Discretionary Grants Administration David J. Downey Office of the Deputy Secretary Risk Management Service.
Sponsored Programs Services (SPS) PROPOSALS. What is the PI’s role in the proposal?  Contact the central pre-award center,
Costing and Cost Transfers John Caruso Campus Relations Manager, Sponsored Projects Administration.
SBIR Budgeting Leanne Robey Chief, Special Reviews Branch, NIH.
Cost Policy Training Sponsored Project Training Program April 30, 2012 Beverly Blakeney & Jennifer Gagnon April 30, 2012Sponsored Project Training Program1.
New NSF Awardee Checklist Requirements: WHY? November 19, 2014 joyce y. JOHNSON POST-AWARDS COORDINATOR OFFICE OF SPONSORED PROGRAMS.
FAR Part 31 Contract Cost Principles and Procedures.
Cost Sharing James Trotter Quality Standards Manager Sponsored Projects Administration.
Let’s Talk Cost Sharing Sherrelle Vaughn Sponsored Programs Accounting and Reporting July 17, 2012.
Time with Office of Sponsored Programs May 4, 2010 Topic: Allowability.
Prepared by the Office of Grants and Contracts1 The Basics of Grants Administration.
Post-Award basics MATTHEW MOORE ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR, POST-AWARD OPERATIONS.
MAY 10, 2011 SESSION 6 OF AAPLS – BUDGET PREPARATION & IMPLICATIONS OF COST SHARE APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON SERIES Module C: Budget.
1 SPS Primer SPS Primer Workshop Cost Accounting Considerations When Preparing Budgets for Sponsored Proposals Division of Financial Affairs.
Kuali Financial Systems – Financial Administrator Development Series - October, 2006 Indirect Cost Facilities and Administrative (F&A) Costs.
BACKGROUND, BEST PRACTICES, AND THE FUTURE OF DIRECT CHARGING ADMINISTRATIVE/CLERICAL SALARIES TO GRANTS MRAM MARCH 2014 Administrative and clerical salaries.
+ Departmental Research Administrator Training Series FS 204 Jean Cody Assistant Director, Post-Award Office of Sponsored Programs.
Grant Financial Reporting. Importance of Accuracy Each Contract specifies that the grantee must have accurate accounting records – Grantee financial management.
Sponsored Research Accounting1 Cost Transfers Policy and Procedure.
Department of Community and Senior Services Jason Stempinski, CIA Compliance Manager COST ALLOCATION PLAN Presented by:
OMB Circular A-122 and the Federal Cost Principles Copyright © Texas Education Agency
Copyright © Texas Education Agency Accounting for Grant Funds, including Documentation for Expenditures.
12/11/20071 Indirect Cost Study Facilities and Administrative (F&A) Costs Indiana University Sally Link Cost Accounting Manager Financial Management Services.
COBRE Post Award Management Christy Leake Grants Administration Branch National Institute of General Medical Sciences, NIH.
Office Of Sponsored Programs Allowable Costs. What is 2 CFR Chapter 1 and 2 parts 200 Subpart E (OMB Uniform Guidance)? A document that contains Principles.
NIH Grants Management Policies
2015 Leadership Conference “All In: Achieving Results Together”
Post-Award Grant Administration
NIH Grants Management Policies
Results of NSF Data Analytics and Other Audits
Uniform Guidance and Grants Accounting
COS RESEARCH ADMINISTRATORS MEETING
Post-Award Grant Administration
Presentation transcript:

NIH Grants Management Policies DOM Weekly Fund Management Training

OMB Circulars OMB Circular A-21 –Purpose: Establishes the principles for determining costs applicable to grants, contracts, and other agreements with educational institutions OMB Circular A-110 –Purpose: Sets forth standards for obtaining consistency and uniformity among Federal agencies in the administration of grants to and agreements with institutions of higher education, hospitals, and other non-profit organizations Uniform Guidance will replace OMB Circular A21 & A110 effective Dec. 26, 2014

Factors Affecting Allowability of Costs (A21) The tests of allowability of costs under these principles are: (a) they must be reasonable; (b) they must be allocable to sponsored agreements under the principles and methods provided herein; (c) they must be given the consistent treatments through application of those generally accepted accounting principles appropriate to the circumstances; and (d) they must conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the sponsored agreement as to types or amounts of cost items.

Reasonable Costs (A21) A cost may be considered reasonable if the nature of the goods or services acquired or applied, and the amount involved therefore, reflect the action that a prudent person would have taken under the circumstances prevailing at the time the decision to incur the cost was made.

Allocable Costs (A21) A cost is allocable to a particular cost objective (i.e. specific function, project, sponsored agreement, department, or the like) if the goods or services involved are chargeable or assignable to such cost objective in accordance with relative benefits received or other equitable relationship. A cost is allocable to a sponsored agreement if: –(1) it is incurred solely to advance the work under the sponsored agreement –(2) it benefits both the sponsored agreement and other work at the institution, in proportions that can be approximated through use of reasonable methods –(3) it is necessary to the overall operation of the institution and is deemed to be assignable in part to sponsored projects

Consistency (NIH GPS, page IIA-53) Grantees must be consistent in assigning costs to cost objectives. Therefore, under NIH grants, although costs may be charged as either direct costs or F&A costs, depending on their identifiable benefit to a particular project or program. They must be treated consistently for all work of the organization under similar circumstances, regardless of the source of funding, so as to avoid duplicate charges.

NIH Grants Policy Statement NIH Grants Policy Statement (NIH GPS, version dated 10/01/2013) Purpose: The NIH GPS is intended to make available to NIH grantees, in a single document, the policy requirements that serve as the terms and conditions of NIH grant awards.

Direct Costs and Facilities & Administrative Costs (GPS, page IIA-54) Direct Cost: any cost that can be specifically identified with a particular project, program, or activity or that can be directly assigned to such activities relatively easily and with a high degree of accuracy. Direct costs include, but are not limited to, salaries, travel, equipment, and supplies directly benefitting the grant-supported project or activity.

Direct Costs and Facilities and Administrative Costs (GPS, page IIA-54) F&A: costs that are incurred for common or joint objectives and, therefore, cannot be identified readily and specifically with a particular sponsored project, and instructional activity, or any other institutional activity. Facilities operation and maintenance costs, depreciation, and administrative expenses are examples of costs that are usually treated as F&A costs.

Questions to Ask to Determine Allowability Reasonable: Would a prudent person purchase this good or service under the same circumstances? Allocable: Is this good or service being charged to the sponsored agreement in accordance with relative benefit received? Consistently Treated: Is this good or service normally treated as a direct cost or an F&A cost under similar circumstances?

Questions to Ask to Determine Allowability It is also important to ask if the item being purchased is a general purpose item. General purpose items (e.g. office supplies, telephones, office computers, etc), are usually treated as F&A costs, and should be charged to an unrestricted fund. Would the item still need to be purchased if the grant being charged did not exist? –If the answer is YES, then it is probably NOT an allowable expense to the grant.

Documentation & Justification If a PI requests to purchase an item that may be considered unallowable (e.g. computer, project related office supplies, etc.), you should request a justification from the PI to explain how the item directly benefits the grant being charged, and is not a general purpose item. If the justification is appropriate, and you determine the item is allowable on the grant, be sure to include the justification with the order documentation, AND with your grant folder in case of an audit.

It’s in the Proposal Budget & Justification, So It’s Allowable, Right? Not necessarily!!! The individuals responsible for reviewing proposals for award issuance are not necessarily reviewing for allowable vs. unallowable expenses. This is really a post-award issue. The auditors who review post-award expenses will not base allowability on inclusion in the proposal budget, but rather, they will base allowability on the policies contained within the OMB circulars and NIH Grants Policy Statement.

GPS Policy Highlights Cost Transfers (GPS, page IIA-57-58) - Cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official. An explanation merely stating that the transfer was “to correct error” or “to transfer to correct project” is not sufficient. Transfers of costs from one project to another or from one competitive segment to the next solely to cover cost overruns are not allowable.

GPS Policy Highlights Closely Related Work (GPS, page IIA- 58) – when salaries or other activities are supported by two or more sources, issues arise as to how the direct cost should be allocated among the sources of support. In general, a cost that benefits 2 or more projects in proportions that can be determined without undue effort should be allocated to the projects on the basis of the proportional benefit.

GPS Policy Highlights Select Items of Cost (GPS, page IIA-60 – IIA-76) – The governing cost principles address selected items of cost, some of which are mentioned in this subsection for emphasis. This subsection is not intended to be all-inclusive. The cost principles should be consulted for the complete explanation of the allowability or unallowability of these costs.

GPS Policy Highlights Financial Management Standards (GPS, page IIA ) – NIH cannot support the research unless it has assurance that its funds will be used appropriately, adequate documentation of transactions will be maintained, and assets will be safeguarded. Grantees must have in place accounting and internal control systems that provide for appropriate monitoring of grant accounts to ensure obligations and expenditures are reasonable, allocable, and allowable. The system must be able to identify large unobligated balances, accelerated expenditures, inappropriate cost transfers, and other inappropriate obligation and expenditure of funds.

GPS Policy Highlights Prior-Approval Requirements (GPS, page IIA- 80 – IIA-92) Final Reports (GPS, page IIA ) – Unless the GMO grants an extension, grantees must submit: 1.Final FFR 2.Final Progress Report 3.Final Invention Statement All 3 reports are due within 90 days of the end of the grant support. Failure to submit timely and accurate final reports may affect future funding!

NIH Salary Cap The Consolidated Appropriations Act restricts the amount of direct salary of an individual under an NIH grant to Executive Level 2 of the Federal Executive Pay scale. –Effective Jan. 11, 2015 = $183,300/yr ($15,275/mo)

NIH Salary Cap Q:Am I required to use new EL 2 NIH Salary Cap on my current NIH grants? A: Maybe. Scenarios: 1)FY 2011 awards (and prior) can continue to use EL 1. 2)FY 2012 awards issued prior to Dec. 23, 2011 can continue to use EL 1 3)Any FY 2012 award issued after Dec 23, 2011 MUST use EL 2. 4)NCTE on FY 2011 awards (and prior) can continue to use EL 1.

NIH Notice of Award (NOA) The NOA is a legal document issued to notify the grantee that an award has been made and that funds may be requested from the designated HHS payment system or office. Once the award is accepted by the grantee, the contents of the NOA are binding on the grantee unless and until modified by a revised NOA signed by the GMO

NIH Notice of Award (NOA) The NOA sets forth pertinent information about the grant, including, but not limited to, the following: –Application/grant identification number –Name of grantee organization –Name of the PI –Approved project period & budget period start and end dates –Amount of funds authorized for obligation by the grantee –Names of the cognizant IC PO, GMO & GMS –Applicable terms and conditions of award, either by reference or inclusion

NIH Notice of Award (NOA) Pay special attention to Section IV of the NOA: Special Terms and Conditions. –This is where the NIH will include any special restrictions that are specific to the grant. –It is also where the NIH may include their own list of who they determine to be Key Personnel. This list supercedes the PIs list.

Notice of Award –NIH NOA Searchable DatabaseNIH NOA Searchable Database –Search for all NIH NOAs issued to UCLA Sort by Date Issued or PI Name –UCLA’s IPF # =

UCLA Policy Websites UCLA Admin Policies & Procedures –Drop down list by policy #, e.g. 900 Principal Investigator Eligibility UCLA Policies & Delegations –Admin & Operations –Gifts & Rewards to Individuals –Whistleblower –Business & Finance –Accounting Policy, Moving Expense, Travel, etcl –Research & Academic Affairs –UC Contract & Grant Manual

LINKS from Today’s Class OMB Circulars – NIH Grants Policy Statement – OCGA Prior Approval Request – NIH Report of Issued NOAs (UCLA IPF # ) – ahttps://public.era.nih.gov/chl/public/search/issuedNoticeOfAward.er a NIH Salary Cap –