Farm family exposure to glyphosate Monsanto U Mn School of Public Health Rollins School of Public Health Exponent Corp. Published in Environmental Health.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Exposure to Pesticides How personnel are exposed to pesticides and what to do about it – safety equipment and common sense.
Advertisements

Interactive Safety Survey MSU Pesticide Education Program 2010.
Selection, use and laundering Clothing and protective equipment for agricultural chemical application.
Tobacco & Cancer. Tobacco Use And Cancer Tobacco use, the most preventable cause of death in our society, accounts for at least 30% of all cancer deaths.
HEALTH HAZARD PESTICIDES AND CHEMICALS ON THE FARM.
Toxicology 23 March Drugs, Poisons, Toxins Drug - a substance that when taken into the body produces a physiological or psychological effects, usually.
Use of pesticides and residues in wine Patrizia Restani SCRAISIN - March 2009 Patrizia Restani SCRAISIN - March 2009.
Pesticides: Choose Your Poison What are pesticides?
Using Pesticides Safely.  RST.11 ‐ 12.1 Cite specific textual evidence to support analysis of science and technical texts, attending to important distinctions.
Plant Science Course. Goals Understand how herbicides, pesticides and fertilizers affect health. – Understand the negative respiratory health effects.
We will talk about risk.. Risk = Toxicity X Exposure = X.
Microcystin toxin in blue crabs in James River; Analysis of 2012 and 2013 monitoring.
Harmful Effects and Emergency Response Poisoned: harm to internal organs Injuries: harm due to external irritants Hazard is the risk of harmful effects.
Chemical Handling/Hazards All Chemicals Are Hazardous PDO has 785 chemicals Rejected 22 Carcinogens 7 (e.g, Benzene, Crystalline Silica, Asbestos) A cigarette.
OMNI FACILITY SERVICES Copyright  Progressive Business Publications Material Safety Data Sheets.
Let’s Test Your Smoking I.Q.  1. TRUE or FALSE? The majority of Canadian teens don't smoke.  THE CORRECT ANSWER IS TRUE  In 2003, 79% Canadian teens.
Michael H. Dong MPH, DrPA, PhD readings Human Exposure Assessment II (8th of 10 Lectures on Toxicologic Epidemiology)
THE RISK OF CHEMICAL EXPOSURE IN AGRICULTURE PRACTICES.
Lesson 2 Why is radon a health problem?. Slide 2-1 Radon and lung cancer Radon is largest source of radiation exposure to general public Radon is leading.
Understanding Pesticide Safety Topic #2049 Aaron Gearhart.
NC STATE UNIVERSITY Prepared by Julia F. Storm, MSPH North Carolina Cooperative Extension North Carolina State University Department of Environmental &
Why evaluate nitrate losses from watersheds?   Potential health risks to public and private water supplies   Eutrophication   Hypoxia - Deficiency.
M.S.D.S.. MSDS MSDS Provides Information What is it Who makes or sells it Where the company is located Why it’s hazardous How you can be exposed to.
Chemical Safety John and Mitchie Moe Master Rosarians Pacific Northwest District American Rose Society December 7, 2011.
Safe Chemical Handling
Pesticide Safety Update Brian Jones Agronomy Extension Agent February 2, 2009.
Greenhouse Safety Mr. Kee West Carroll Jr./Sr. High School.
Protecting Yourself, Workers and Family from Pesticide Poisonings.
Community Health Risk Assessment An Assessment of Risk Related to the Oil and Gas Industry in Garfield County Teresa A. Coons, PhD Senior Scientist Saccomanno.
Dr. Manfred Wentz Director, Hohenstein Institutes (USA) Head, Oeko-Tex Certification Body (USA) AAFA – Environmental Committee Meeting November 10, 2008.
Chemical Safety American Rose Society Presentation Program Services Committee Steve Jones, Chairman © ARS 2005.
Brian Jones Extension Agronomist
Approaches for Evaluating the Relevance of Multiroute Exposures in Establishing Guideline Values for Drinking Water Contaminants Kannan Krishnan, Université.
ARSENIC CONTAMINATION OF WATER IN BANGLADESH SENGE NGALAME MPH 583 DR. WHEELER.
smoke: the act of smoking tobacco or other substances What is smoking ?
The Pesticide Label Montana Pesticide Education & Safety Program.
Environmental Hazards & Human Health
Field Sprayer Safety Kit Kevin Fry
Health Hazards Instructional Goal
A Review of Exposure and Toxicity. The Need for Gloves and Respirators A Brief Review of Exposure.
CLASSES OF CHEMICALS Toxic Chemicals Reactive Chemicals Flammables
Depleted Uranium (DU) Follow-Up Program Update Melissa A. McDiarmid, MD, MPH, DABT VA Maryland Health Care System University of Maryland Baltimore, USA.
Ag. Chemical Safety East Robertson High School Instructor Mr. Gregory.
Pesticides: What You Need to Know Some of the rules and how the game is played.
The Vieques Problem By Monique Latalladi. Table of Contents Background / History Definition of Problem ATSDR findings Documentation Analysis Conclusion.
MSU Extension Pesticide Education Pesticide Safety.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Health Statistics Occupational exposure to.
Environmental Health and Toxicology
PESTICIDES AWARENESS TRAINING.
TOXICOLOGY OCCUPATIONAL HAZARDS CHEMICAL PHYSICAL ERGONOMIC PSYCHOLOGIC BIOLOGIC.
NC STATE UNIVERSITY Understanding the Agricultural Health Study Prepared by Julia F. Storm, MSPH North Carolina Cooperative Extension North Carolina State.
1 A Summary of the Glyphosate Biomonitoring Results from the Farm Family Exposure Study Fred Fishel, Ph.D. Department of Agronomy University of Florida/IFAS.
INFLUENCES ON YOUR HEALTH Chapter One Lesson Two PPT.
Farm family exposure to 2,4-D DuPont, Dow U Minn Public Health American Chemistry Published in Environmental Health Perspectives.
TOXICOLOGY The study of chemical or physical agents and their interaction with biologic systems to produce a response in a organism. The dose makes the.
Environmental and Social Influences on Tobacco Use Among 18 to 24 Year-Olds in Idaho Dr. John Hetherington Clearwater Research, Inc. Influences on Young.
Revised Spring 2007 Hazard Communication And Your Right - To - Know Dept of Environmental Safety Services.
The Worker Protection Standard is a regulation issued by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for the protection of agricultural workers that are.
이 장 우. 1. Introduction  Bisphenol A is a high production volume chemical -Annual production of over six billion pounds -polycarbonate plastics.
An Overview DCC Annual Retreat February 20, 2012.
Toxicity Lecture 2. The Case of Jennifer Strange YES or NO Is there a substance that is toxic at any dose? YES or NO Is there a substance that is safe.
Health Consultation Cincinnati Country Day School Lead Site Cincinnati, OH Ashley Roberts February 9,2009.
The Safe Use of Pesticides Unit 17. The Worker Protection Standard Rules to reduce pesticide-related illness for all who use them. Rules to reduce pesticide-related.
August 2008 Ag. Chemical Safety East Robertson High School Instructor Mr. Gregory May 2007.
Pesticide Jeopardy Created By: Purdue Pesticide Program
Conventional sugar beet
AnnMarie Lee Walton, PhD, MPH, RN, OCN, CHES Postdoctoral Fellow
THE DOSE MAKES THE POISON
Oregon Health & Science University Oregon Child Development Coalition
TOXICOLOGY.
Presentation transcript:

Farm family exposure to glyphosate Monsanto U Mn School of Public Health Rollins School of Public Health Exponent Corp. Published in Environmental Health Perspectives

Glyphosate characteristics Low acute oral LD 50 (> 5,000 mg/kg) Not considered to cause mutagens, cancers, no effect on reproductive system or development Low vapor pressure – low inhalation potential Dermal penetration < 2% of dose placed on skin Overall low potential for harm to applicators

Study Purpose Identify real-world pesticide exposure and factors before, during, and after application Glyphosate – 2 nd in pounds applied in US agriculture – US EPA 2002

Participants Certified pesticide applicators – South Carolina & Minnesota Farmer, spouse, 1+ child 4 to 18 years old Live on farm Farm at least 10 acres within 1 mi of residence Make at least 1 glyphosate application / yr

Answer questions and allow observation Collect all urine for 5 consecutive days – day before, application day, 3 consecutive days after 48 families – 78 children Field observer documented weather, application practices, family activities Participants

Characteristics 48 families – 25 MN 23 SC Average age – farmer 45, spouse 42 Used pesticides for 23.9 years 15% cigarette smokers Few spouses personally mixed pesticides

Practices – survey responses 29% applied glyphosate within 7 days of study 22% never wore protective gloves 27% changed gloves 1 to 4 times per season 96% of spouses had not mix pesticides within 1 week of study

Practices 60% used enclosed cab tractors 33% treated 10 to 44 ac; 33% - 45 to 145 ac; 33% to 439ac 25% - 1 to 2 loads; 31% - 3 loads; 25% 4 to 6 loads; 19% 7 to 12 loads Most applied Roundup Ultra

Spray day observations 71% wore rubber gloves - mixing /loading/ application 31% had skin contact w/ glyphosate 15% spills during mixing and /or loading 27% repaired their equipment at some time during the application

Results – Applicator

Detectable glyphosate in urine Level ranged from <1 ppb to 332 ppb Some sprayed > 100 acres – no detection in urine 60% of application day samples positive 27% positive 3 days after

96% used rubber gloves 1.4 ppb in urine 43 % used rubber gloves 7.9 ppb in urine 3.2 ppb mean for all farmers – application day

Glyphosate in urine (ppb) Yes No Wore gloves when mixing Closed cab Mixing loading spill Application spill Observed skin contact Equipment repair7.22.3

Glyphosate in urine (ppb) Acres treated No. of loads

Factors associated with INCREASE in urinary glyphosate when gloves NOT used More Acres treated Mixing / loading operations Observed spills Equipment repairs

Results – 78 children 9 (11%) had detectable levels of glyphosate - all from South Carolina 8 of 26 (31%) present during mixing or application had detectable levels Highest conc (29 ppb) in teenage boy most active in assisting with mixing and application - father had highest urine conc (233) - had spills, spent long periods repairing boom & smoked during repairs

Results – 48 spouses None participated in applications 2 (4%) had detectable levels of glyphosate – highest 3 ppb 8 in immediate area of mixing and loading- none had detectable levels 40 (83%) washed applicators clothes during study – 2 (5%) had detectable glyphosate levels (1 ppb)

Glyphosate exposure Maximum farmer dose was mg/kg Average farmer dose was mg/kg EPA lowest no effect level set at 175 mg/kg/d Estimated daily oral exposure for life with no harmful effect – 2 mg/kg/d

Limits of study Only one application evaluated per family All were tractor boom sprayer applications Participation in study may have affected behavior of applicators

Some lessons Use of rubber gloves when mixing, loading, and applying glyphosate was associated with greatly reduced urinary concentrations of glyphosate Little evidence of glyphosate exposure to family members not participating in or around exposures Increased loading, mixing, and repairs increases potential for exposure What would you add?

Reminders Glyphosate is not as likely to be absorbed through the skin or enter through the lungs as other pesticides used on the farm Glyphosate metabolism in the body may be very different than that for other pesticides This study points out factors that affect exposure – the effects will vary with other products