Budapest 24 -25/08/2001 FAO categories of risk status for livestock breeds: Incidence on EU regulations. Dominique PLANCHENAULT.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Integrating the gender aspects in research and promoting the participation of women in Life Sciences, Genomics and Biotechnology for Health.
Advertisements

Dublin – August 2007 Dominique PLANCHENAULT Various aspects and possible evolution of in-situ conservation in Europe. VAPE project Discussion paper.
Ex-ante conditionality – General guidance Workshop on strategic programming, monitoring and evaluation Ilse De Mecheleer, DG EMPL Madrid, 22 February 2013.
ERFP STRATEGIC PLAN Andreas Georgoudis 12 th Annual Workshop for NCs, , Antalya, Turkey.
European Commission Health & Consumers Directorate General
Collaboration between EAAP Working Group on AGR and ERFP 11 th Workshop for European National Co-ordinators for the management of farm AGR - Uppsala June.
ERFP presentation to Standing Committee on Zootechnics Mike Roper – ERFP Chair Andreas Georgoudis – ERFP Secretariat.
Uppsala 04/06/2005 Annual Report of the European Regional Focal Point. Dominique PLANCHENAULT.
10. Workshop ERFP Uppsala, June 4, 2005 ERFP collaboration with EU - Lobbying in Bruxelles Hermann Schulte-Coerne.
Regulation 1169/2011 (FIR) – state of play Marina Valverde Food Policy Committee Brussels, 17 October 2012.
AEMB Board meeting – 28th November 2011 Ennis, Ireland EUROPEAN LIVESTOCK AND MEAT TRADEING UNION UECBV.
Cairo /08/2002 Annual Report of the European Regional Focal Point. Dominique PLANCHENAULT.
Bled 04/09/2004 Annual Report of the European Regional Focal Point. Dominique PLANCHENAULT.
Identification of Equidae in the EU Kai-Uwe Sprenger DG Health and Consumer Protection Unit D.1 Animal health
AnGR conservation and utilization in Nordic countries its history, status and trends By Erling Fimland NordGen.
Conservation of AnGR in Hungary Central Agricultural Office, Dr. Radnóczi László.
1. 2 ECRF survey - Electronic signature Mr Yves Gonner Luxembourg, June 12, 2009.
EAAP Working Group on AGR EAAP-WG-AGR Report on activities June 2005 to August th Workshop for European National Co-ordinators for the management.
SBSTTA November 2001, Montreal DRAFT PROVISIONAL AGENDA.
10. Workshop ERFP Uppsala, June 4, 2005 Proposals for an ERFP contribution to FAO Regional consultation on SoW- AnGR Hermann Schulte-Coerne.
Role of Breeders Organisations in agricultural policy Attila Takacs Hungarian Animal Breeders Association.
EUROPEAN LIVESTOCK AND MEAT TRADEING UNION UECBV PIGLETS CASTRATION.
Overview of the EU Food Safety Requirements
DOMESTIC ANIMAL BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION IN THE EUROPEAN UNION GIOVANNI SIGNORELLO GIUSEPPE CUCUZZA and GIOACCHINO PAPPALARDO UNIVERSITY OF CATANIA.
University of Ljubljana, Biotechnical Faculty Zootechnical Department Groblje 3, 1230 Domžale, Slovenia REPORT ON SUBREGIONAL WORKSHOP FOR CENTRAL AND.
ERFP Working Group on Documentation and Information Animal Genetic Resources 14. / 15. April 2011 Bonn / BLE Federal Agency for Agriculture and Food.
© BLE 2010 Contact Dr. Frank Begemann Jörg Bremond Babette Balzer European Regional Focal Point The European Regional Focal Point for Animal Genetic Resources.
Development of a National Report on Animal Genetic Resources, the Netherlands Experiences and outcomes Start follow-up actions within Europe S.J. Hiemstra.
Geneticaly modified Food and Feed – current situation in EU Petr Beneš Food Safety Department Prague, 9 October 2009.
Concept of Characterization and Conservation of Farm Animal Genetic Resources Subhransu Pan Department of Animal Production and Management W. B.University.
CHALLENGES OF PROTECTING INDIGENOUS LIVESTOCK GENETIC RESOURCES AND ASSOCIATED TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE Ilse Koehler-Rollefson, League for Pastoral Peoples.
ERFP Decisions – 2005/06 Uppsala Decisions 2005 To maintain a classic ERFP workshop To have 2 ERFP meetings –Technical meeting – March April –Annual.
Experience of the Slovak Republic Budapest April 16, 2015 European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation.
Characterization, Inventory and Monitoring of trends in indigenous livestock Dr. E. D. Ilatsia D. N. Kamiti 23-Oct-15Animal Breeding and Genomics Group1.
BSE/TSE measures – state of play and future work Plenary of the Advisory Group on the Food Chain, Animal and Plant Health 19 December 2008.
The EU Commission's legislative proposal on implementing the Nagoya Protocol in the Union I.Background II.Preparatory work done in support of the proposal.
Advisory Committee on Fisheries and Aquaculture Maria Fladl, Brussels, 3. June 2010 EU Regulation for organic aquaculture.
Rome 30/08/2003 Annual Report of the European Regional Focal Point. Dominique PLANCHENAULT.
Budapest 23/08/2001 Development of a Regional Focal Point for Animal Genetic Resources : the European example. Dominique PLANCHENAULT Louis OLLIVIER.
ACTIONS AT NATIONAL LEVEL Proposal on criteria to choose ERFP activities/projects on national (sub-regional) level Elżbieta Martyniuk on behalf of the.
Electronic Identification EUROPEAN LIVESTOCK AND MEAT TRADES UNION UECBV.
Budapest /08/2001 Annual Report of the European Regional Focal Point. Dominique PLANCHENAULT.
Invasive Alien Species REFIT Process The perspective from European hunters Meeting of the Directors-general of Hunting and Game management – 1 st of September.
September 12-14, 2006OECD-Eurostat Expert Meeting1 OECD-Eurostat Expert Meeting on Trade in Services Statistics Foreign Affiliates Statistics in Eurostat.
Assessing status and trends of birds in the European Union: Assessing status and trends of birds in the European Union: Reviewing methods and experience.
Implementing the Global Plan of Action for Animal Genetic Resources Opportunities for collaboration Beate Scherf Animal Genetic Resources Group Animal.
Expert workshop on biodiversity indicators (3-5 June 2013 Tirana, Albania) Ministry of Environment and Physical Planning Republic of Macedonia National.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 27 – Environment and Climate Change.
The need for a new seed legislation
Reprotoxic substances in the context of the revision of the 2004/37/EC (CMD) - Viewpoint from WPC and France - Matthieu Lassus Ministry of Labour, Employment,
Animal welfare policies and standards of the OIE
Sheep carcass classification
EU Reference Centres for Animal Welfare
FAO/OIE Agreement for the Global Declaration of Rinderpest Freedom
Animal welfare policies and standards of the OIE
Legal basis classification
Overwiew report on study visits on rearing pigs with intact tails
Art. 12 species population trends: feedback on discussion paper
Animal Health Information
Art. 17 EGTC Indicators 13th Meeting of the Expert Group on Delegated and Implementing Acts for the ESI Funds 4th July 2013.
DEVELOPMENT OF A GENETIC INDICATOR OF BIODIVERSITY FOR FARM ANIMALS
Preliminary methodology for the assessment of Member States’ reporting on Programme of Measures (Article 16) WG DIKE Sarine Barsoumian (12/10/2015, Brussels)
Objectives, Scope and Structure of Country Reports
Measuring progress towards Target 1
NUTS amendment
Possible solutions at the EU level within the Animal Health Law
Future Actions of ERFP Mike Roper.
ESTABLISHING CONSERVATION MEASURES FOR NATURA 2000 SITES
PROVISIONS UNDER THE HABITATS DIRECTIVE RELEVANT TO NEEI
OVERVIEW ON STATISTICAL DATA CONFIDENTIALITY AND ACCES TO MICRODATA
Presentation transcript:

Budapest /08/2001 FAO categories of risk status for livestock breeds: Incidence on EU regulations. Dominique PLANCHENAULT

Budapest /08/2001 Historical overview  The figures for stable populations were reproducing females for cattle, for sheep and goats.  The figures for decreasing populations were reproducing females for cattle, for sheep and goats.  The figures for increasing populations were reproducing females for cattle, for sheep and goats. Under regulation 2078/92. 1

Budapest /08/2001 Historical overview Under regulation 2078/92. 2  On this base the breeds were selected :  In 1994, STAR committee added the list of equidae with the criteria of less than reproducing females. 149 for cattle 246 for sheep 72 for goats

Budapest /08/2001 Historical overview Application until  Some difficulties with regards to the determination of the number of breeding females animal’s non-registered on a herd book, the lack of data, the detection of some rare breeds with no genealogical book.  No criteria were set for pigs and no list elaborated.  Three countries (Austria, Finland, Sweden) have been omitted from original survey.

Budapest /08/2001 Historical overview New application regulation 1750/99. 4  Council regulation 1257/99 gives the possibilities of support to genetic diversity, amends and repeals regulation 2078/92 – application regulation 1750/99.  Evidence should be given of the endangered statue of the breed consistent with scientific data accepted by international organisation regarded authorities in the field (annex VI A).  Support for rearing farm animals of local breeds indigenous to the area and in danger of extinction (Art 13).  The Commission services have asked the Member States to base their assessment of the breeds on the FAO list of endangered species. Therefore, the list presented by the members states are limited to the FAO definition and list of endangered species.

Budapest /08/2001 Historical overview FAO criteria for breeds at risk. 5  Categorization based on overall population size, number of breeding females or males and the population trends (increasing, stable, decreasing).  Number of breeding females remains the most used factor. Number of breeding females Not at riskEndangeredCritical  The criteria adopted by FAO limits the categories of livestock breed in danger of extinction to females for all species.

Budapest /08/2001 Historical overview Following the 6 th NCs workshop. 6  The members States underline:  The members States propose to the Commission:  General criteria for global level identification of breeds at risk for use in preparing the WWL for Domestic Animal Diversity.  For developing and implementing conservation plans and programmes for developing and developed countries.  No formal review and evaluation of these criteria.  A criteria for use in particular incentive systems remain to be developed.  To recognize the NCs’ group, as an ad hoc group of international experts.  To be able to receive the scientific support of EAAP WG-AnGR.  To be able to provide the necessary data before the end of 2000.

Budapest /08/ ERFP and EAAP activities. 1  Brussels meeting – 6/11/2000.  ERFP asks WG-AnGR to develop a new criterion (12/2000).  Preparatory meeting one day before. NCs global agreement.  As “scientific authority” Committee of the Health and Animal Welfare.  The Members States express their disapproval.  No news from European Commission (01/2001).  Old criteria are maintained until the end of 2001 (03/2001).  ERFP asks NCs to take part in a live Internet chat (06/2001).  ERFP and EAAP jointly organise a one-day meeting (26/06/2001).

Budapest /08/2001 Case study in France 1 Under regulation 2078/92. Aures et St Girons Flamande Ferrandaise Bordelaise Bleue du Nord Béarnaise Bazadaise NantaiseMaraîchineVillards de Lans Vosgienne Armoricaine Mirandaise LourdaiseFroment du Léon Camargue SalersSaint Nectaire Tarentaise Bretonne Pie Noire

Budapest /08/2001 Case study in France 2 FAO criteria (1000 breeding females). SalersSaint Nectaire Tarentaise Aures et St Girons Flamande Ferrandaise Bordelaise Bleue du Nord Béarnaise Bazadaise NantaiseMaraîchineVillards de Lans Vosgienne Armoricaine Mirandaise LourdaiseFroment du Léon Camargue Saônoise Bretonne Pie Noire

Budapest /08/2001 Case study in France 3 EAAP proposal (1000 breeding females). SalersSaint Nectaire Tarentaise Aures et St Girons Flamande Ferrandaise Bordelaise Bleue du Nord Béarnaise Bazadaise NantaiseMaraîchineVillards de Lans Vosgienne Armoricaine Mirandaise LourdaiseFroment du Léon Camargue Saônoise Bretonne Pie Noire MassanaiseMarine Landaise Espagnol Brava Maine Anjou Lait Betizu

Budapest /08/2001 I thank you for your attention.