1 TAC Report to the ERCOT Board March 21, 2006. 2 TAC Summary 3 unanimous PRRs 3 unanimous PRRs TAC discussion regarding Board Retreat Action Items TAC.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee February 7, 2008.
Advertisements

Protocol Revision Subcommittee Sandy Morris August 5, 2010.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee September 7, 2006.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee January 8, 2008.
1 ERCOT True-Up Resettlement Restart Criteria Discussion Retail Market Subcommittee Meeting, February 24, 2003.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee May 4, 2006.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee April 8, 2010.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee June 4, 2009.
Technical Advisory Committee Presentation to the ERCOT Board of Directors July 21, 2009.
1 Commercial Operations Sub-Committee Update to TAC October 5, 2007.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Sandy Morris October 6, 2011.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee March 4, 2010.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee August 7, 2008.
Technical Advisory Committee Presentation to the ERCOT Board of Directors October 17, 2006.
Technical Advisory Committee Presentation to the ERCOT Board of Directors June 16, 2009.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee June 3, 2010.
1 TAC Report to the ERCOT Board June 21, TAC Summary 8 PRRS 8 PRRS Withdrawal of PRR 552 Withdrawal of PRR 552 Potomac Recommendations Potomac.
October 9, 2012 Commercial Operations Subcommittee RMS Update Kathy Scott RMS Vice Chair.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee April 9, 2009.
1 TAC Report to the ERCOT Board February 21, 2006.
1 Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee January 12, 2006.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee May 4, 2007.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Report to ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee October 9, 2003.
Item 3: PRS Report John Varnell 2013 PRS Chair Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Meeting ERCOT Public November 7, 2013.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee May 8, 2008.
1 TAC Report to the ERCOT Board February 16, 2005.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee February 2, 2006.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee January 6, 2010.
October 3, 2013 Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Update to RMS Kathy Scott October 16, 2013TAC Update to RMS 1.
Feb 18, TAC Report to the ERCOT Board February 18, 2003.
1 Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee January 6, 2004.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee October 6, 2006.
Technical Advisory Committee Presentation to the ERCOT Board of Directors March 21, 2007.
Technical Advisory Committee Presentation to the ERCOT Board of Directors May 16, 2007.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee November 2, 2006.
1 TAC Report to the ERCOT Board January 17, 2006.
1 Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee December 1, 2005.
Technical Advisory Committee Presentation to the ERCOT Board of Directors September 16, 2008.
RMS Update to TAC October 2, RMS Update to TAC TAC Confirmation Vote Request Kyle Patrick of Reliant Energy and Independent Power Marketer segment.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee October 1, 2009.
Role of Account Management at ERCOT 2006 TAC Subcommittee Review ERCOT Board February 21, 2006.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Report to ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee September 4, 2003.
1 TAC Report to the ERCOT Board November 14, 2006.
1 Commercial Operations Sub-Committee Update to RMS November 10, 2005.
Technical Advisory Committee Presentation to the ERCOT Board of Directors October 21, 2008.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee September 3, 2009.
1 PRR479 IDR Optional Removal Threshold (ERCOT Project PR40055)
Profiling Working Group 1 PWG Update Report By Brad Boles of Cirro Energy ERCOT PWG Vice-Chair for COPS Meeting December 3, 2007.
Commercial Operations Sub-Committee Update to TAC January 8, 2009 Lee Starr, BTU.
Technical Advisory Committee Presentation to the ERCOT Board of Directors May 20, 2009.
Technical Advisory Committee Presentation to the ERCOT Board of Directors November 17, 2008.
Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee July 1, 2010.
Jan 22, TAC Report to the ERCOT Board January 22, 2003.
1 TAC Report to the ERCOT Board July 18, TAC Summary 4 PRRs for approval (3 unanimous) 4 PRRs for approval (3 unanimous) 5 Nodal PRRs for approval.
Technical Advisory Committee Presentation to the ERCOT Board of Directors July 15, 2008.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Sandy Morris May 5, 2011.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee May 7, 2009.
RMS Update to TAC June 7, RMS Activity Summary RMGRR052 File Naming Convention for Customer Billing Contact Information URGENT (Vote) RMS Procedures:
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Tom Burke November 29, 2012.
February 26, 2015 Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Update to RMS Kathy Scott March 3, 2015 TAC Update to RMS 1.
1 Commercial Operations Working Group Update to TAC April 7, 2005.
Technical Advisory Committee Presentation to the ERCOT Board of Directors April 18, 2007.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee October 5, 2007.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee June 05, 2008.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee
TAC Report to the ERCOT Board
TAC Report to the ERCOT Board
TAC Report to the ERCOT Board
Technical Advisory Committee
Presentation transcript:

1 TAC Report to the ERCOT Board March 21, 2006

2 TAC Summary 3 unanimous PRRs 3 unanimous PRRs TAC discussion regarding Board Retreat Action Items TAC discussion regarding Board Retreat Action Items Other high interest issues Other high interest issues

3 PRR 635 – Resource Plan Performance Metrics Update Purpose (Tenaska, IPM, QSEMWG) Modifies metrics to, among other things, account for changes due to EMMS R4, exclude units in testing or with operational issues, clarify that the down bid/obligation measure is done by congestion zone where possible Benefit Ensures accuracy of resource plans Market Impact N/A System Change NoN/A AssumptionsN/A TAC Vote TAC unanimously recommends approval ; all market segments were present Effective Date April 1, 2006

4 PRR 635 – Resource Plan Performance Metrics Update Impact Analysis Item Reviewed Description NoImpact Credit Monitoring/ Liability Budget Staffing Computer Systems Business Functions Grid Operations Impact

5 PRR 640 – Update Provisions for Capacity/Energy Payments for RMR & Add New Standard Form Agreement For Synchronous Service Purpose(ERCOT) Revises RMR language to provide more consistency between agreement and protocols, removes synchronous condenser language and includes a new agreement for Synchronous Condenser Service Benefit Clearer payment process for RMR units Market Impact N/A System Change NoN/A AssumptionsN/A TAC Vote TAC unanimously recommends approval ; all market segments were present Effective Date April 1, 2006

6 PRR 640 – Update Provisions for Capacity/Energy Payments for RMR & Add New Standard Form Agreement For Synchronous Service Impact Analysis Item Reviewed Description NoImpact Credit Monitoring/ Liability Budget Staffing Computer Systems Business Functions Grid Operations Impact

7 PRR 642 – Lower Limit to IDR Meters in MRE for True-Up Settlement IDR Threshold Purpose (TXU Wholesale, IOU, COPS) Sets a lower limit to the number of IDR meters within a Meter Reading Entity (MRE) that would be considered when determining whether or not the IDR threshold requirement is met for True-Up Settlement Benefit Avoids impact of missed True-Up Settlement; eliminates risk of True-Up Settlement suspension; allows for more predictable exchange of dollars per the Settlement calendar Market Impact N/A System Change NoN/A AssumptionsN/A TAC Vote TAC unanimously recommends approval ; all market segments were present Effective Date April 1, 2006

8 PRR 642 – Lower Limit to IDR Meters in MRE for True-Up Settlement IDR Threshold Impact Analysis Item Reviewed Description NoImpact Credit Monitoring/ Liability Budget Staffing Computer Systems Business Functions Grid Operations Impact

9 Recommended Board Actions Approval Approval PRR 635 – Resource Plan Performance Metrics UpdatePRR 635 – Resource Plan Performance Metrics Update PRR 640 – Update Provisions for Capacity/Energy Payments for RMR & Add New Standard Form Agreement For Synchronous ServicePRR 640 – Update Provisions for Capacity/Energy Payments for RMR & Add New Standard Form Agreement For Synchronous Service PRR 642 – Lower Limit to IDR Meters in MRE for True-Up Settlement IDR ThresholdPRR 642 – Lower Limit to IDR Meters in MRE for True-Up Settlement IDR Threshold

10 Board Retreat Action Items for TAC  Develop strawman for TAC consideration regarding possibility of only sending PRRs with priority/ranking above cut line to Board, include review of Board oversight in Protocols – TAC taskforce to address and report to TAC in May  Discuss advantages and disadvantage of Market Participants directly funding some PRRs – assigned to PRS on PRS agenda this month

11 Other High Interest Issues  Credit risk management  RMS to reconsider status of long-term solution and report to TAC in April regarding timeline for implementation with objective of improving month timeline  ERO implementation  Stakeholder input and involvement  Jurisdictional issues  Status of in-flight projects  Better market understanding as to status and available information  Review whether ERCOT can provide additional information or information in a different format