Imagine the result The TVA Kingston Ash Recovery Project: Ecological Risk Approach Daniel Jones † Suzy Young † Amber Stojak † Neil Carriker ‡ † ARCADIS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Framework for the Ecological Assessment of Impacted Sediments at Mining Sites in Region 7 By Jason Gunter (R7 Life Scientist) and.
Advertisements

Animals Unit 1 Theme.
TVA Kingston Ash Recovery Project Roane County, TN Environmental Research Symposium Roane State Community College – August 2, 2011 Craig Zeller, P.E. US.
The Need for Requirements and Guidance for Protection of Biota: Basis for DOE’s Biota Dose Limits and Guidance Biota Dose Assessment Committee Meeting.
Fish Bioaccumulation Studies Associated with the Kingston Fly Ash Release Marshall Adams - Oak Ridge National Lab Tyler Baker - TVA Allison Fortner - Arcadis.
Assessment of Fish Population Health in the Vicinity of the Kingston Fly Ash Release Marshall Adams - Oak Ridge National Lab Allison Fortner – Arcadis.
Ecological Studies at the Kingston Ash Spill Site Marshall Adams, Mark Greeley, & John Smith - Oak Ridge Natl Lab Tyler Baker and Hill Henry - TVA Bill.
Suzy Young † T. Hill Henry ‡ Elizabeth Burton ¶ Jesse Morris ¶ † ARCADIS U.S., Inc.; ‡ Tennessee Valley Authority; ¶ Restoration Services, Inc.
1 Best Practices for Risk-Informed Remedy Selection, Closure, and Post-closure Control for DOE’s Contaminated Sites October 30, 2013.
Centre for Ecology & Hydrology - Lancaster 1 st – 3 rd April 2014 David Copplestone & Nick Beresford.
River Corridor Closure Project Safety People Results U.S. Department of Energy Richland Operations Office 100 Area and 300 Area Component of RCBRA Steve.
Kingston Fly Ash Release Environmental Symposium August 2, 2011 Neil E. Carriker, Ph.D. Tennessee Valley Authority.
Trends in Bioaccumulation of Fly Ash Contaminants by Aquatic Invertebrates Downstream of the Tennessee Valley Authority Kingston Fossil Plant John G. Smith,
Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) Kingston Fossil Plant Knoxville.
“to provide and apply an integrated approach of addressing scientific, managerial and societal issues surrounding environmental effects of ionising.
Virginia Wildlife Action Plan David K. Whitehurst Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries.
Tritium: Fleet-Wide Assessment Program Zigmund A. Karpa Director Environmental and Regulatory Affairs.
Introduction to the ERICA Tool Radiation Protection of the Environment (Environment Agency Course, July 2015)
Centre for Ecology & Hydrology - Lancaster October 2011 David Copplestone & Nick Beresford.
Biological Resource Management Division Science and Conservation in National Parks Loyal A. Mehrhoff.
Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Plan (CWCP) and Citizen-based Monitoring Signe Holtz Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources.
Heartland Network Heartland Network Natural Resource Monitoring Program.
Porewater Collection and Risk Evaluation 27 th Alabama Water Resources Conference Orange Beach, AL Jacob Gruzalski Environmental Standards, Inc.
TV Kingston Fossil Plant Coal Fly Ash Slurry Spill
INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION ON RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION —————————————————————————————————————— ICRP And Protection of The Environment Dr Jack Valentin Scientific.
1 Uncertainty in Ecological Risk Assessments Larry Tannenbaum, U.S. Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine (USACHPPM)
Environmental Risk Analysis
USGS Chesapeake Bay Watershed EDC Science: The Next Five Years Kelly Smalling, NJ Water Science Center, Project Lead Chesapeake Bay TCW Group April 8,
Screening Level Ecological and Human Health Risk Assessment Poplar Point, Washington, DC.
Jan 2005 Kissimmee Basin Projects Jan Kissimmee Basin Projects Kissimmee River Restoration Project (KRR) Kissimmee Chain of Lakes Long Term Management.
COMMITMENT & INTEGRITY DRIVE RESULTS Risk Based Corrective Action Using site-specific risk assessment to achieve Regulatory Closure.
TVA Kingston Ash Recovery Project Roane County, TN Project Update September, 2012 Neil Carriker.
From:
There are many kinds of animals. Animals can be put into groups based upon their characteristics. Some animals do not have backbones.
Natural Resource Damage Assessment Basics; Applicability to Compacts with FSM and RMI Michael Fry Environmental Contaminants Coordinator U.S. Fish and.
Italy: the new legislation on the remediation of contaminated sites F. Quercia, APAT Tour de Table NATO CCMS Pilot Study Meeting 5-7th June 2006, Athens,
1 Inter-Areas Investigation to Support the River Corridor Baseline Risk Assessment River Corridor Closure Contractor River Corridor Inter-Areas Investigation.
DOE ORDER ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROGRAM WORKSHOP Natural Resource Trusteeship John J. Bascietto
Animal Groups Your Name.
ANIMAL RESPIRATION Mrs. Sandy Gómez. ANIMAL RESPIRATION 0 Functions of the respiratory system: 0 Take in O2 0 Eliminate CO2 0 Eliminate water vapor.
NATURAL RESOUCE DAMAGE ASSESSMENT AND RESTORATION Shelly Hall – Assistant Solicitor Branch of Environmental Restoration Branch of Environmental Restoration.
1 Joseph P. Nicolette, Vice President, CH2MHILL Keith Hutcheson, Associate, Marstel-Day, Inc. April 8, 2004 Use of a Net Environmental Benefits Analysis.
Confidence in Assessments Workshop in Anchorage, Alaska 26 and 27 March, 2008.
Minnesota Birds By: Chris & Dayne. Common Loon (Gavia immer) Food- Fish; some other aquatic vertebrates and invertebrates Food- Fish; some other aquatic.
Ms. Charlip 1 st Grade Science. Students will learn different types of habitats Students will classify animals into various groups Students will know.
Wednesday October 7th In Notebook: Identify: a primary producer, primary consumer, and secondary consumer.
Margaret Byrne, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
100 NR-2 Evaluation Status TM Poston and JL Downs River Corridor End State and Final Closure Project Update And SAP Refinement Workshop June 1, 2006.
Individual Birds Of Minnesota By: Kyra and Aaron.
Strategic Planning for Contaminated Sediment Projects: Setting the Course for Proper Project Execution Howard L. Cumberland Geosyntec Consultants October.
Date Planning for Compliance with the Final 316(b) Phase II Regulations For APPA – March 8, 2004 David E. Bailey EPRIsolutions.
Food Chains and Food Webs. A food chain shows how each living thing gets its food. Plants are called producers because they are able to use light energy.
Minnesota Ornithology Heidi Heldberg & Nichole Christensen.
RESERVE DETERMINATION STUDIES FOR SELECTED SURFACE WATER, GROUNDWATER, ESTUARIES AND WETLANDS IN THE GOURITZ WMA – PSC MEETING NO 1 OVERVIEW OF THE RESERVE.
RECOVER Role/Science Guidance during Design, Construction and Implementation Phases RECOVER Science Meeting March 1, 2016.
Abstract A step-wise or ‘tiered’ approach has been used as a rational procedure to conduct environmental risk assessments in many disciplines. The Technical.
Ecosystem Mural Components. Above water – Nonliving Sun (energy) Soil Carbon dioxide Oxygen CO 2 O2O2.
PNAMP Monitoring Terminology Data Dictionary The meta data file provides a better explanation of the project’s intent. The estuary work group is still.
Modified from DRERIP Foodweb Conceptual Model (Durand 2008) SF Estuary Aquatic Food Web Water Habitat Food web drivers Ecological processes Zooplankton.
TVA Kingston Ash Recovery Project Roane County, TN
Science: Year 1 Overview
Natural sciences 2.
Variation and Classification
Variation and Classification
Variation and Classification
Interdependence and Adaptation
Comparing Bird Adaptations
Variation and Classification
Strategies for Integrated Human and Ecological Assessment
Variation and Classification
Presentation transcript:

Imagine the result The TVA Kingston Ash Recovery Project: Ecological Risk Approach Daniel Jones † Suzy Young † Amber Stojak † Neil Carriker ‡ † ARCADIS U.S., Inc.; ‡ Tennessee Valley Authority

Overview Environmental Management and the Integrated Research Program River System ERA Status Ecological Receptors –Exposure pathways –Lines of evidence –Bioaccumulation data –Effects Data Environmental Management and Future Monitoring

TVA Kingston: Environmental Management TVA Kingston, TN RemediationRestorationStewardship GoalsProtection of Human Health Environment Replacement of Environmental Services Lost Services Maintenance Human Use Ecological Assessments HHRA ERA NRDA Human Use Ecological Monitoring Guidance & Guidelines RAGS ERA 8-Step Federal Guidance 43 CFR 11 TVA Stewardship Programs and Standard Operating Procedures DecisionsRisk ManagementServices CompensationResource Management Integrated assessment and research program

Three-Phased Removal Strategy Phase 2 Phase 1

Cleanup: Phase 3 River System –Emory River (post-dredging) –Clinch River –Tennessee River EE/CA Implementation –Residual ash, larger area –Numerous receptors –Risks are uncertain –Cleanup is challenging

Cleanup: Phase 3 Non-Time Critical Removal Action –Screening RAs done Baseline RAs –Human Health, Ecological –Comprehensive, robust –Site-specific data –Fewer assumptions –Refined uncertainties –Scientifically defensible –Rational decisions Analysis Risk Characterization Screening Baseline SMDP Collect Information No Further Action or Remedial Actions

River System ERA

© 2009 ARCADIS 02 August 2011 of 22

Ecological Receptors: Bioaccumulation Aquatic plants Pelagic fish Benthic fish Benthic invertebrates Aquatic- or riparian-feeding birds –Herbivores (wood duck) –Omnivores (mallard; killdeer) –Piscivores (osprey; great blue heron) Aquatic- or riparian-feeding mammals –Herbivores (muskrat) –Omnivores (raccoon) –Piscivores (mink) Aerial-feeding insectivores –Birds (tree swallow) –Mammals (gray bat) Aquatic- or riparian-feeding reptiles Aquatic- or riparian-feeding amphibians

Ecological Receptors: Effects Aquatic plants Pelagic fish Benthic fish Benthic invertebrates Aquatic- or riparian-feeding birds –Herbivores (wood duck) –Omnivores (mallard; killdeer) –Piscivores (osprey; great blue heron) Aquatic- or riparian-feeding mammals –Herbivores (muskrat) –Omnivores (raccoon) –Piscivores (mink) Aerial-feeding insectivores –Birds (tree swallow) –Mammals (gray bat) Aquatic- or riparian-feeding reptiles Aquatic- or riparian-feeding amphibians

Lines-of-Evidence Exposure Concentrations vs. Literature- Derived Effects Values –Abiotic media –Biota –Diet Bioassays –Sediment/Ash –Surface water Biosurveys –Fish, Benthics –Birds, Mammals –Herps, Plants Weight-of-Evidence

Three Primary Components –Remediation, Restoration, and Stewardship –Monitoring is common to all three Ultimately about Making Decisions –Monitoring must support the decision-making process for EM components Zero-Sum Enterprise –Time, money, effort and expertise spent on one question or action are not available for other environmental activities –Choices must be made wisely! Environmental Management

Questions?