Sergio Palomares-Ruiz June 22, 2005 Super-NO A Based on O. Mena, SPR and S. Pascoli hep-ph/0504015 a long-baseline neutrino experiment with two off-axis.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
September 20, 2002 NeSS 2002 Adam Para, Fermilab Physics Opportunities with NuMI Beam Physics Motivation Off-axis NuMI Beam Backgrounds and Detector Issues.
Advertisements

Double Chooz: Collaboration, Experimental concept, Detector, Physics Prospect, Status & Schedule, Summary.
High  Li/B  -Beam Enrique Fernández-Martínez, MPI für Physik Munich Based on a collaboration with: P. Coloma, A. Donini and J. López-Pavón.
Resonant Leptogenesis In S4 Model Nguyen Thanh Phong Cantho University In cooperation with Prof. CSKim, SKKang and Dr. YHAhn (work in progress)
J. Strait Fermilab October 21, 2005 The Neutrino Detector of the Future: A Massive Liquid Argon TPC.
MINOS+ Starts April 2013 for three years April
Status of Neutrino Science Hitoshi Murayama LBNLnu April 11, 2003.
Neutrino Oscillation Physics at a Neutrino Factory Rob Edgecock RAL/CERN-AB.
Neutrino physics: experiments and infrastructure Anselmo Cervera Villanueva Université de Genève Orsay, 31/01/06.
F Axis Off Axis Physics Potential Cambridge Off-Axis Meeting 12 January 2004 Gary Feldman.
November 19, 2005 Sergio Palomares-Ruiz Physics of Atmospheric Neutrinos: Perspectives for the Future Topical Workshop on Physics at Henderson DUSEL Fort.
Reactor & Accelerator Thanks to Bob McKeown for many of the slides.
INDIA-BASED NEUTRINO OBSERVATORY (INO) STATUS REPORT Naba K Mondal Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Mumbai, India NUFACT Scoping Study Meeting at.
Neutrino Study Group Dec 21, 2001 Brookhaven Neutrino Super-BeamStephen Kahn Page 1 Horn and Solenoid Capture Systems for a BNL Neutrino Superbeam Steve.
T2K experiment at J-PARC Epiphany 2010D. Kiełczewska1 For T2K Collaboration Danuta Kiełczewska Warsaw University & Sołtan Institute for Nuclear Studies.
Summary of WG1 – Phenomenological issues Osamu Yasuda (TMU)
LBL neutrinos; looking forward to the future Hisakazu Minakata Tokyo Metropolitan University.
Probing the Octant of  23 with very long baseline neutrino oscillation experiments G.-L. Lin National Chiao-Tung U. Taiwan CYCU Oct Work done.
1 V. Antonelli, G. Battistoni, P. Ferrario 1, S. Forte (Università degli Studi di Milano e I.N.F.N. Sezione di Milano and 1 University of Valencia) Standard.
Resolving neutrino parameter degeneracy 3rd International Workshop on a Far Detector in Korea for the J-PARC Neutrino Beam Sep. 30 and Oct , Univ.
Physics with a very long neutrino factory baseline IDS Meeting CERN March 30, 2007 Walter Winter Universität Würzburg.
 Leslie Camilleri CERN, PH November 23, NO A is a Long Baseline experiment using the NUMI beam from Fermilab Now being used for MINOS (732km)
Long Baseline Experiments at Fermilab Maury Goodman.
Future Neutrino Physics Mitch Soderberg Fermilab Institutional Review June 6-9, 2011.
Dec. 13, 2001Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Neutrino and Anti-Neutrino Cross Sections and CP Phase Measurement Yoshihisa OBAYASHI (KEK-IPNS) NuInt01,
Karsten M. Heeger US Reactor  13 Meeting, March 15, 2004 Comparison of Reactor Sites and  13 Experiments Karsten Heeger LBNL.
The NOvA Experiment Ji Liu On behalf of the NOvA collaboration College of William and Mary APS April Meeting April 1, 2012.
Monday, Feb. 19, 2007PHYS 5326, Spring 2007 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 5326 – Lecture #7 Monday, Feb. 19, 2007 Dr. Jae Yu 1.Neutrino Oscillation Experiments 2.Long.
Long Baseline Neutrino Beams and Large Detectors Nicholas P. Samios Istanbul, Turkey October 27, 2008.
If  13 is large, then what ? Hisakazu Minakata Tokyo Metropolitan University.
1 Neutrino Phenomenology Boris Kayser Scottish Summer School August 11,
Towards precision lepton flavour physics. Some reflections… have brought us many clues for a deeper understanding in the SM and continue to do so: They.
Working Group 1 Summary: D. Casper * M. Lindner K. Nakamura Oscillation Physics (mostly) - Part 3 -
NuMI Off-Axis Experiment Alfons Weber University of Oxford & Rutherford Appleton Laboratory EPS2003, Aachen July 19, 2003.
Superbeams Deborah Harris Fermilab July 26, 2004 NuFact’04 Osaka University.
Getting the most in neutrino oscillation experiments Hisakazu Minakata Tokyo Metropolitan University.
Search for Sterile Neutrino Oscillations with MiniBooNE
NUFACT’06 Summary of working group 1 Neutrino Oscillations Experiments Mark Messier Indiana University August 30, 2006.
The quest for  13 : Parameter space and performance indicators Proton Driver General Meeting At Fermilab April 27, 2005 Walter Winter Institute for Advanced.
Detector possibilities: scintillator based detectors EUCARD 1 st Annual Meeting, RAL, 13 April 2010 Paul Soler.
Measuring  13 with Reactors Stuart Freedman HEPAP July 24, 2003 Bethesda Reactor Detector 1Detector 2 d2d2 d1d1.
Θ 13 and CP-Violation in the Lepton Sector SEESAW25 Institut Henri Poincaré, Paris Caren Hagner Universität Hamburg SEESAW25 Institut Henri Poincaré, Paris.
Michel Gonin – Ecole Polytechnique – France : SUPER NOVA SN1987A Super-Kamiokande Introduction neutrino oscillations mixing matrices Introduction.
2 July 2002 S. Kahn BNL Homestake Long Baseline1 A Super-Neutrino Beam from BNL to Homestake Steve Kahn For the BNL-Homestake Collaboration Presented at.
CP phase and mass hierarchy Ken-ichi Senda Graduate University for Advanced Studies (SOKENDAI) &KEK This talk is based on K. Hagiwara, N. Okamura, KS PLB.
Water Cherenkov detector - brief status report - Kenji Kaneyuki Research Center for Cosmic Neutrinos, ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo.
Energy Dependence and Physics Reach in regard to Beta/EC Beams J. Bernabeu U. Valencia and IFIC B. Pontecorvo School September 2007.
Monday, Mar. 3, 2003PHYS 5326, Spring 2003 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 5326 – Lecture #12 Monday, Mar. 3, 2003 Dr. Jae Yu 1.Neutrino Oscillation Measurements 1.Atmospheric.
GOOD RUN SELECTION FOR NO ν A ANALYSIS Barnali Chowdhury 1, Louise Suter 2, Joao Coelho 3, Jim Musser 4 1 University of South Carolina, 2 Argonne National.
Neutrino physics: The future Gabriela Barenboim TAU04.
Complementarity of Terrestrial Neutrino Experiments in Searching for  13 Pasquale Migliozzi INFN - Napoli P.M., F. Terranova Phys. Lett. B 563 (2003)
T2K Experiment Results & Prospects Alfons Weber University of Oxford & STFC/RAL For the T2K Collaboration.
David Finley / LArTPC VidCon / June 22, Fermilab Slide 1 Example of a Penultimate Detector: A 3 kton LArTPC On-Axis at Soudan The Ultimate Detector.
Neutrino Physics Now and in Near Future Hisakazu Minakata U. Sao Paulo.
Epiphany06 Alain Blondel A revealing comparison: A detailed comparison of the capability of observing CP violation was performed by P. Huber (+M. Mezzetto.
Marcos DRACOS IPHC-IN2P3/CNRS Université de Strasbourg
Non-unitary deviation from the tri-bimaximal mixing and neutrino oscillations Shu Luo The Summer Topical Seminar on Frontier of Particle Physics.
Neutrinos and the Evolution
LBL Oscillation H. Minakata (Tokyo Metropolitan U.)
Peter Litchfield Minnesota University For the NOA collaboration
Report of the T2KK Workshop
High g Li/B b-Beam Enrique Fernández-Martínez, MPI für Physik Munich
Parameter Degeneracy in Neutrino Oscillations (and how to solve it?)
T2KK sensitivity as a function of L and Dm2
T2KK Sensitivity of Resolving q23 Octant Degeneracy
T2KK (without reactor) solves 8-fold degeneracy
Naotoshi Okamura (YITP) NuFact05
Toward realistic evaluation of the T2KK physics potential
Will T2KK see new physics?
Finish neutrino Physics
Presentation transcript:

Sergio Palomares-Ruiz June 22, 2005 Super-NO A Based on O. Mena, SPR and S. Pascoli hep-ph/ a long-baseline neutrino experiment with two off-axis detectors

June 22, 2005 Sergio Palomares-Ruiz What we know and what we do not know about neutrinos We don’t know if there are sterile neutrinos We don’t know if there are sterile neutrinos We don’t know what the absolute mass of neutrinos is We don’t know what the absolute mass of neutrinos is We don’t know what is their nature: Majorana or Dirac We don’t know what is their nature: Majorana or Dirac We don’t know what is the mass mechanism We don’t know what is the mass mechanism We know that neutrinos do oscillate: have mass We know that neutrinos do oscillate: have mass We know that there are only 3 light active neutrinos We know that there are only 3 light active neutrinos

June 22, 2005 Sergio Palomares-Ruiz Solar sector  m 2 21 = ( ) eV 2 sin 2  12 = (0.28 – 0.33) Reactor sector sin 2  13 < Atmospheric sector |  m 2 31 | = (1.5 – 3.4) eV 2 sin 2 2  23 > 0.92 We don’t know the octant of  23 We don’t know the octant of  23 We don’t know whether there is CP violation in the lepton sector We don’t know whether there is CP violation in the lepton sector We don’t know the type of mass hierarchy We don’t know the type of mass hierarchy We don’t know whether  13 is different from 0 We don’t know whether  13 is different from 0 We know We know O. Mena and S. J. Parke, Phys. Rev. D69:117301, 2004

June 22, 2005 Sergio Palomares-Ruiz Degeneracies (  23,  /2 -  23 ) (  23,  /2 -  23 ) ( ,  13 ) ( ,  13 ) sign(  m 2 31 ) sign(  m 2 31 ) % % H. Minakata and H. Nunokawa, JHEP 0110:001,2001 ~ sin  ~ cos 

June 22, 2005 Sergio Palomares-Ruiz Resolving degeneracies : (  23,  /2 -  23 ) Atmospheric neutrino experiments Atmospheric neutrino experiments Sub-GeV events (solar term) Sub-GeV events (solar term) Multi-GeV events (matter effect) Multi-GeV events (matter effect) Very long-baseline neutrino experiments Very long-baseline neutrino experiments Through the solar term contribution Through the solar term contribution Neutrino factories and  beams Neutrino factories and  beams e →  and e →  e →  and e → 

June 22, 2005 Sergio Palomares-Ruiz Resolving degeneracies: ( ,  13 ) Long-baseline neutrino experiments Long-baseline neutrino experiments Reduce degeneracy under special configurations Reduce degeneracy under special configurations Reactor neutrino experiments Reactor neutrino experiments Only sensitive to  13 Only sensitive to  13 Atmospheric neutrino experiments Atmospheric neutrino experiments Neutrino factories and  beams Neutrino factories and  beams

June 22, 2005 Sergio Palomares-Ruiz Resolving degeneracies: sign(  m 2 31 ) Atmospheric neutrino experiments Atmospheric neutrino experiments Multi-GeV events Multi-GeV events Long-baseline neutrino experiments Long-baseline neutrino experiments Off-axis experiments Off-axis experiments Neutrino Factories and  beams Neutrino Factories and  beams Need of matter effects →  13  0

June 22, 2005 Sergio Palomares-Ruiz Off-axis concept D. Beavis et al., BNL Proposal E-889 Neutrinos produced in two body decays:  →  + 

June 22, 2005 Sergio Palomares-Ruiz Experimental set-up NO A Medium energy beam Medium energy beam 50 (30) kton calorimeter 50 (30) kton calorimeter L = 810 km L = 810 km Off-axis distance = 10 km Off-axis distance = 10 km → E = 2.3 GeV → E = 2.3 GeV 3.7 (6.5) x pot/yr 3.7 (6.5) x pot/yr Proton Driver = Proton Driver = 18.5 (25) x pot/yr 18.5 (25) x pot/yr Super-NO A NO A + another off-axis detector with the same L/E (L = 200 km) NO A + another off-axis detector with the same L/E (L = 200 km) We will consider 50 kton Liquid Argon detectors (high efficiency) We will consider 50 kton Liquid Argon detectors (high efficiency) Only neutrinos Only neutrinos 5 years 5 years No A 2nd detector = Super-No A D. S. Ayres et al. [NO A Collaboration], hep-ph/

June 22, 2005 Sergio Palomares-Ruiz Probabilities Up to second order in  13,  12 /  13,  12 /A and  12 L Up to second order in  13,  12 /  13,  12 /A and  12 L A. Cervera et al., Nucl. Phys. B579:17, 2000 P(  → e ) = x 2 f x y f g cos(  -  ) + y 2 g 2 x ≡ sin  23 sin 2  13 y ≡ (  m 2 21 /  m 2 31 ) cos  23 sin 2  12 f ≡  sin(  -AL/2)/(  - AL/2) g ≡ sin(AL/(2  ))/(AL/(2  ))  ≡  m 2 31 L / (4 E )

June 22, 2005 Sergio Palomares-Ruiz Asymmetry O. Mena, SPR and S. Pascoli, hep-ph/

June 22, 2005 Sergio Palomares-Ruiz O. Mena, SPR and S. Pascoli, hep-ph/

June 22, 2005 Sergio Palomares-Ruiz Bi-event plot for NO A O. Mena, SPR and S. Pascoli, hep-ph/ P = A cos  cos  + B sin  sin  + C It collapses to a line if: (AB - AB) cos  sin  B = A B = -A cos  sin  NO A NO A 0.9 <  <  1.3

June 22, 2005 Sergio Palomares-Ruiz Bi-event plots for Super-NO A O. Mena, SPR and S. Pascoli, hep-ph/ P F = A F cos  cos  + B F sin  sin  + C F P N = A N cos  cos  + B N sin  sin  + C N B F = A F B N = A N It collapses to a line if: (A F B  – A  B F ) cos  sin  It is always a line

June 22, 2005 Sergio Palomares-Ruiz Measurable integrated asymmetry O. Mena, SPR and S. Pascoli, hep-ph/ PD 95% C.L.  2 analysis 99% 95% 90%

June 22, 2005 Sergio Palomares-Ruiz Comparison with NO A and T2K pot/yr = 6.5 x pot/yr (PD) = 25 x km off-axis 3 yrs + 3 yrs 6 yrs + 6 yrs with NO A + 3 yrs + 3 yrs with 2nd detector at second maximum With Super-No A only 5 yrs to get there D. S. Ayres et al. [NO A Collaboration], hep-ph/

June 22, 2005 Sergio Palomares-Ruiz Conclusions Resolving degeneracies is a crucial task Resolving degeneracies is a crucial task Super-NO A: 2 off-axis (LAr) detectors with same L/E using the NuMI beam → determination of sign(  m 2 31 ) free of degeneracies Super-NO A: 2 off-axis (LAr) detectors with same L/E using the NuMI beam → determination of sign(  m 2 31 ) free of degeneracies Only need of 5 years of neutrino run to resolve the type of hierarchy down to sin 2 2  13 = 0.02 with Proton Driver (for all values of  ) Only need of 5 years of neutrino run to resolve the type of hierarchy down to sin 2 2  13 = 0.02 with Proton Driver (for all values of  ) Better capabilities than NO A + T2K at HK for determining the type of mass hierarchy Better capabilities than NO A + T2K at HK for determining the type of mass hierarchy