IEP Annual Goal Development Question & Answer Document

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WRITING EFFECTIVE IEP GOALS
Advertisements

Module 1: IEP Overview – A Plan for Guiding Instruction and Service Provision.
Participation in Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills.
Are Your STAARs Aligned? i2 Institute June 15, 2012 Laura Abbott.
STAAR Alternate is the state assessment for students with significant cognitive disabilities.
Standards-Based IEPs Aligning the IEP and Academic Content Standards to Improve Academic Achievement.
Enforcing and Maintaining the IEP
TEKS BASED IEPs PLAAFPS GOALS & OBJECTIVES
Standard Based IEP’s/MCA-M. Overview Why Standards Based IEPs? Eligibility for MCA-M MCA-M Decision Making PLAAFP Standards Goals Objectives.
Making the Grade Grading Practices for Students with Disabilities By Cathy Sartain Industries
Everything you need to know before the Annual Review March 16, 2011 The New State Mandated IEP.
Top ten non compliance findings from the Office for Exceptional Children from their Special Education Onsite Reviews.
Thank you for joining us for Monitoring Progress Toward IEP Goals The presentation will begin momentarily. RIGHT REASON TECHNOLOGIES YOUR SOLUTION FOR.
Standards-Based IEPs Writing Goals and Objectives
Septembe DRAFT 5, 2014 TETN # STAAR Alternate is the state assessment for students with intellectual disabilities. STAAR Alternate, as it was originally.
Spring 2012 IEP Writing Process Review Today we will cover~ Connecting the PLAAF, FINDINGS and GOALS Data/tools to use to determine the Findings and Measure.
Defensible IEPs Douglas County School District 1 Module V: Documentation and Timelines.
PED 383: Adapted Physical Education Dr. Johnson.  Who needs them?  Students with Disabilities  Students with Unique needs  Individualized Education.
STAAR Modified Participation Requirements How to use the state-required documentation form Training PowerPoint updated for the school year.
11 th Grade Michigan Merit Examination 2010 compared to 2012.
Extended School Year Decision Determination Process February 3,
Developing Short-Term Instructional Objectives For Effective Implementation of Common Core State Standards.
The Individualized Education Program (IEP) Development
Get To Know Your Neighbors Let’s Play HUDDLE! 1. November ESE Meeting Chapter 4 – IEP – ESE Reminders – Reviewing Present Levels – Accommodations and.
STANDARDS BASED GOALS and OBJECTIVES
Get To Know Your Neighbors Let’s Play Q&A Jigsaw! 1.
1/12/09Module 6 - Cypress-Fairbanks I.S.D.1 Module 6: 2 Hours Developing Objectives Aligned to State Standards.
 Special Education is mandated by federal law and we have to do what they say.
Let’s Get S.T.A.R.T.ed Standards Transformation and Realignment in Thompson.
12/4/2014ECSE 602 Dr. Y. Xu1 ECSE 602 Instructional Programming for Infants and Young Children with Disabilities This session will cover:  Child Activity.
What does progressing in general curriculum mean?  Assessing student progress?  Progress is what the fed promotes and requires  Progress in the general.
What does progressing in general curriculum mean?  Assessing student progress?  Progress is what the fed promotes and requires  Progress in the general.
Assessing Students With Disabilities: IDEA and NCLB Working Together.
10/8/20151 Focusing on the IEP Process Cypress-Fairbanks Independent School District.
Administrator Update January Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) 1997 –Students with disabilities must participate in statewide assessment.
ARD Forms – A Guide for CTE Teachers Click on each link to the featured ARD form examples. Click on each Icon to listen to the accompanying narrative.
IEPs aligned to Common Core State Standards. IEPs Aligned with CCSS Connects a student’s learning to grade level standards and evaluates progress through.
Individualized Education Plan (IEP) GOALS: Provide an understanding of your role as well as other professionals involved. Demystify the basic workings.
Instructional Accommodations/ Modifications in Cypress-Fairbanks ISD Teacher Implementation Guide.
The IEP: Drafting the IEP (Steps 1, 2, 3, and 4) Southwest Ohio Special Education Regional Resource Center Tuesday, November 7, 2006.
Exceptional Lives: Special Education in Today’s Schools, 6e ISBN: © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 2 Ensuring Progress.
Making the Grade Grading Practices for Students with Disabilities By Cathy Sartain Industries
Climbing the Ladder Special Education OVERVIEW Niles North High School, District 219.
Ensuring Progress in the General Education Curriculum ED 222 Spring 2010.
Individual Education Plans.
IEP Training for Kansas Schools Kansas State Department of Education Technical Assistance System Network Measurable Annual Goals 1.
Steps to Creating Standards-Based Individualized Education Programs The following highlights the major steps Committees on Special Education (CSEs) can.
The Standards-based IEP Process: What You Need to Know Standards-Based IEP State-Directed Project - January 2011.
STAAR Modified Participation Requirements How to use the state-required documentation form Presented at TETN #10416 on 10/13/11 TEA Student Assessment.
FACULTY MEETING OCTOBER 14, 2009 Standards-Based IEPs.
“ IT IS PROOF NOT TRUTH” THE IEP IS THE PROOF Dr. Jodi Roseman Director of Special Education School District of Springfield Township.
Parent Education Meeting February 16, Agenda Understanding PLAAFPS Understanding IEPs State Assessment – STAAR, STAAR-A, and STAAR-ALT.
Teacher Roles and Responsibilities in the IEP Process Amanda Strong Hilsmier EDUC 559.
STAAR Alternate is the state assessment for students with significant cognitive disabilities.
Navigating the ARD/IEP Process
WHS Implementation Guide for Special Education IEP’s
IEP’s, PLAAFP’s, Goals & Objectives
American Institutes for Research
Special Education for Parents
STAAR Modified Participation Requirements
STAAR Alternate is the state assessment for students with significant cognitive disabilities.
Kentucky Alternate Assessment
Quick Overview- Seven Step Process to Creating Standards Based IEPs
Participation Requirements
Standards-based Individualized Education Program (IEP) Module Two: Developing the Present Level of Academic Achievement and Functional Performance (PLOP)
Standards-based Individualized Education Program (IEP) Module One: Introduction SBIEP Module one: Introduction - The standards-based reform movement has.
Assessing Students With Disabilities: IDEA and NCLB Working Together
WHS Implementation Guide for Special Education IEP’s
Santa Ana Unified School District Dept. of Research and Evaluation
Presentation transcript:

IEP Annual Goal Development Question & Answer Document

Format Notice the title – IEP Annual Goal Development Three sections Section 1: Measurable Annual Goals Section 2: Academic/Standards-Based Goals Section 3: Functional Goals Focus of the document is access and progress in the general education curriculum On 23 pages of content the word access is found 27 times

1.2 What is the purpose of an annual goal? Identify the specific area in which a student needs assistance for special education personnel Address critical needs that are keeping the student from accessing and/or progressing in the general curriculum

1.5 Does the goal criterion relate to passing an assignment/course? No The criterion is not the score required for passing the course or assignment (ex. 70, 70%, 7 out of 10 trials) The criterion should specify the amount of growth expected

1.9 What is the role of the PLAAFP in developing measurable annual goals? A goal is included in the IEP only after examining the PLAAFP A goal should be based on an area of need that is keeping the student from accessing and/or progressing in the general curriculum The PLAAFP should provide information on where the student is currently performing

1.12 What is the difference between an academic and a functional goal?

1.14 Does a student’s IEP need to include both functional and academic goals? All students must have annual measurable goals Based on the PLAAFP, some may have academic only, functional only or both

1.16 In which subject areas do students need enrolled grade-level measurable annual goals? Two situations in which a student must have an annual goal: When content is modified (goal must specify how the content is modified) When student is removed from a general education setting for any period of time (goal must be specific to content area, but may or may not modify the content)

1.17 Can one annual goal cover multiple subject areas? Functional goals can Academic goals can if the content standards cross multiple subject areas “All annual goals should be specific to subject area curriculum standards and cannot be generalized. For example, if a reading goal was implemented in a Social Studies course, implementation of this reading goal does not constitute modification of the SS TEKS. If a student’s reading deficits are so severe that the SS content needs to be modified, then the ARDC must include a goal that is specific to SS that identifies how the SS content is modified.”

1.18 For a student who receives special education services in a general education (mainstream) setting and does not have modified content in any subject area, must the ARD committee still develop measurable annual goals? Yes The goal must be developed from an area of need addressed in the PLAAFP that affects the student’s ability to make progress and/or access the general education curriculum The goal must clearly define the specially designed instruction that the child will receive If the ARD committee is unable to determine a need to include in the annual goals, reconsider if the student’s disability creates a need for special education services Leads into question 1.19

1.19 For a student who receives special education services in a general education mainstream setting and does not have modified content in any subject area, can the ARD committee write a “mainstream” or an “inclusion” goal for the student to master the TEKS for his enrolled grade-level? No 70% mastery of TEKS does not inform the specially designed instruction from a special education professional

1.24 Can attainment of a grade level standard be a student’s annual goal? No Must designate the specially designed instruction Relates to 1.19

1.25 Can mastery of the benchmarks/short-term objectives be the criterion for mastery of an annual goal? No

1.28 -1.31 Questions pertaining to transition If you have questions, submit to us in writing and we will forward to Region 20.

1.32 How does mastery of annual goals relate to grading and promotion? Grades must reflect the student’s relative mastery of an assignment Mastery of IEP goal does not automatically mean the student passed a course and passing a course does not mean IEP goals have been mastered If a goal is not mastered, the ARDC looks at: Was goal appropriate Was goal implemented correctly What adjustments need to be made to meet the student needs

2.3 What is the difference between an enrolled grade-level standards-based goal and the enrolled-grade level standards? Goal is not a restatement of the TEKS Goals should designate the specially designed instruction the student needs to attain the standard

2.8 Does having a standards-based/academic goal automatically mean a student has modified content? No Content is modified when the nature of the task is different than it is for the general student population

2.10 For a student who takes an alternate assessment (TAKS-M, STAAR Modified, or STAAR Alternate), does he need an academic standards-based IEP goal that corresponds with the tested content area? Yes Goals must link to content areas Example: Laundry doesn’t link to a TEK

3.3 For what groups of students are functional goals appropriate? PLAAFP indicates a critical need that is preventing the student from accessing the general education curriculum

3.4 Must measurable annual functional goals be standards-based? No Must still be written in measurable terms identifying the timeframe, condition, behavior, and criterion

Contact Information Amy Doolan at adoolan@esc4.net Kirsten Omelan at komelan@esc4.net