Intake & Exhaust Team James Hogge Rebekah McNally Alisa Phillips Henos Woldegiorgis Upright Team Lloyd Outten Joseph Perry Josh Carroll Taylor Watkins.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Combustion engines main principles and definitions
Advertisements

Suspension Systems - 1 Topics covered in this presentation:
Formula 1 Group Members: Quinn Collett Steve Godlewski Tobiah Halter Jeff Swanson Academic Advisor: Dr. Chien Wern June 4, 2003.
FEA of Vehicle Front Stabilizer Bar & Airfoil Design (Final Project) Name: Antonio Sevilla & Sanh Si Course: ME 272 FEA Professor: Jose Granda Date:
Intake & Exhaust Team James Hogge Rebekah McNally Alisa Phillips Henos Woldegiorgis Front Upright Team Lloyd Outten Joseph Perry Rear Upright Team Josh.
Rolling Chassis Team Todd Anderson Matt Blackwood David Hovater Josh Smith Jessica Yoho.
Team: Clyde Baker Ken Brown Alex Cherukara Kevin Eady Sponsor: Dr. Patrick Hollis SAE 1: Mini-Baja Four Wheel Steering.
MECH Design Project I, Fall 2013 Formula SAE Brake Rotor Optimization Interim Presentation November 28, Team #2 Alex Burgess Karim Shaloh.
ODU Formula SAE MAE 435 Midterm Report
ODU Formula SAE MAE 435 Final Report 4/23/13. Introduction Charles Pearson The 2013 Michigan FSAE Competition Competition Scoring: Static Events o Design.
Vacuum Vessel Production Readiness Review
Rear Upright CDR Mike Ornstein 11/6/2012. Bearing Selection: Prime Option SKF RZ (85mm bore, 0.27kg (0.15kg in front) – 0.59lb) – Deep groove.
M.E. 462 Capstone Design I.U.P.U.I. Spring 2007 Bishop Steering: 1970 Lotus Europa Front Axle Re-design Aaron Emmons Phil Palmer Brad Holtsclaw Adam Spindler.
2012 Formula SAE Outboard Suspension
VU Motorsports Intake/Exhaust Team
Drive Train Ryan Barba Patrick Hickey Andrew Hill.
AN-Najah National University Faculty Of Engineering Mechanical Engineering Department Graduation project2 1.
04013 Micro Turbine Senior Design Micro Turbine Senior Design PDR – May 20 th, 2004 Project
Mini-Baja Advisory Presentation April 27, 2007 Quentin Holmes Chris Meyer.
Members: Rob Brown Scott Cone Thuc Le Brandon Wilen David Winkleman Advisor: Dr. Turcic.
Wire and rod drawing.
SunRayce Front Suspension Analysis Jonathan Walker Lars Moravy Ian Harrison Alexander Ellis ME 224 December 12, 2001.
Rolling flat rolling Shape Rolling Note appearance of surfaces.
SofaKing: The Lazy-Man Futon Chris Wooldridge Loren Hankla Ankur Desai JT Stukes Barrett Evans John Pendley.
Finite Element Method Final Project “ Rear Suspension- Double A- Arms” Jaime Taha T.April 29 th 2003.
Finite Element Analysis of Mini Baja Frame Ariana L. Gonzalez April 29, 2003 MECE.
F13-60-BAJA PROPOSAL SAE SALUKI FRAME DESIGN Team Members Austin Lewandowski (ME) (PM) Thang Tran (ME) Preston Mathis (ME) Keegan Lohman (ME) Kyle Koester.
TEAM MEMBERS: Chad Chandler Joe Cofer Nathan Eramian Francis Hauris Jeff Wong.
ODU F ORMULA SAE S TATUS U PDATE 2. Submitted Budget on November 2 nd Currently organizing for fabrication phase Addition of an Aero team Management.
NASA moon buggy project
Performance engine preparation Engine realities Production engines used as a base Designed for WOT 10% of the time RPM limits & improved components are.
Design of a Robotic Manipulator for a Wheelchair Gateway Coalition Ohio State University Sinclair Community College Wright State University December.
Intake & Exhaust Team James Hogge Rebekah McNally Alisa Phillips Henos Woldegiorgis Front Upright Analysis Joseph Perry Rear Upright Analysis Taylor Watkins.
A PRESENTATION on “ SUSPENSION SYSTEM ”
Engineering 309: Machine Design I Instructor: Dr. Min Lu Presented by: Mike Kraft Thanh Nguyen.
2012 Formula SAE Outboard Suspension
Redesign of the STOL CH 701 Landing Gear Strut
Suspension D.J. Conroy.
MAE 435 Progress Report 2/19/13. MAE 435W Facebook/twitter Shop clean-up Marketing meetings Engineering/club open houses Printed and reviewed rule book.
ODU Formula SAE MAE 435 Midterm Report.
Failure Criteria and stress concentration
ELLIOTT CLOWDIS MIKE PERKINS CHARLIE HODGKINS JOE PETERSON TYLER CRAVEN JUSTIN FRERICS MARK KLEPEISZ JOHN MEADOR KEITH CAMP KYLE LOWE BRANDON NAPIER RICARDO.
Suspension Peter Morabito Michael Paliga Brian Ross Drivetrain Kenny Elliot Patrick Mooney Dylan Quinn Frame Dan D’Amico Curtis May Greg Schafran.
Abdelmageed Elmustafa
Unit 91 Week 7 Jon Gutierrez, Chris Sauer, Simon Radomski, Chat Huynh, Jeff Burton, & Robert Platt October 1, 2008 Final Presentation.
Engineering/Failure Analysis
MAE 435 Progress Report Team: Formula SAE Due Date: 2/8/2016 Advisors: Dr. Bawab; Nathan Luetke Presenter: Ryan P.
Final_Bellows.ppt. The purpose for these analyses was to justify and select the appropriate NSTX Center Stack Update project VV Bellows. The bellows should.
Ben Gruenzner Nick Hanson Aaron Pilger Dustin Kalhoff Chris Kost Jason Kuenzli Justin Moe Scott Rector Mike Schmitz Jamie Schlachter Ryan Schommer Ryan.
Finite Element Analysis of a CNC Milling Machine Vice and Potential Modifications. Phil Miller Finite Element Analysis in Design – DP238.
WyoBaja 2011 SAE Mini Baja Competition Team Leader Suspension Frame
6/12/2016 Vanderbilt Motorsports Intake and Exhaust Project 1 Vanderbilt Motorsports Intake/Exhaust Team March 27, 2008 Presentation Kristina Kitko Mark.
Suspension Cody Dykman Jesse Ramer Jesson Salyards Frame Warren Starbuck Brett Schuler Doug Romoth Drive Train Josh Voorhees Corey Saner Spencer Garland.
Structural Integrity UNDERSTAND STRUCTURAL STRENGTH OF LOAD BEARING COMPONENTS IN MECHANICAL SYSTEM.
Hasmukh Goswami College Of Engineering
Ram-air, Superchargers, Turbochargers and Nitrous Oxide
End of Line “Pass Through” Conveyor
SAE Mini Baja: Powertrain
SAE Baja Senior Design Project
Kristina Kitko Mark Melasky Perry Peterson Tim Wranovix
SAE Baja Senior Design Project
Chapter 5 Power Estimation in Extrusion and Wire-rod Drawing
Clean Sheet Design – Metallic Tubular Chassis
LUKE BLOCKER & BRANDT LAMONTE ADVISOR: HO-HOON LEE
SAE Mini Baja: Powertrain
Bicycle Wrench Analysis
Mechanical Properties Of Metals - I
Suspension Systems - 1 Topics covered in this presentation:
Suspension Systems - 2 Topics covered in this presentation:
Tutorial.
Presentation transcript:

Intake & Exhaust Team James Hogge Rebekah McNally Alisa Phillips Henos Woldegiorgis Upright Team Lloyd Outten Joseph Perry Josh Carroll Taylor Watkins Frame Analysis Team Josh Carroll Lloyd Outten 1

 Design Competition for Collegiate students  Represent ODU’s Engineering Department  8 part competition (8 Events) 2

3

[Car 106 Front Upright][Car 106 Rear Upright] 4

 Good Design, but hard to machine. The integrated components would add excess machining time and cost Separated steering and brake brackets. Retains the strength and low weight of original design while lowering machining cost. 5

Brake Caliper Connection Spindle Steering Bracket Lower A-Arm Connection Brake Bracket Upper A-Arm Bracket Main Upright Spec Sheet Material: 6061 Aluminum Total Assembly Weight lb. Total Assembly Volume: in 3 Weight by Part Main Upright 1.42 lb. Brake Bracket 0.44 lb. Upper A-Arm Bracket 0.12 lb. Spindle 0.33 lb. Steering Bracket 0.11 lb. Upper A-Arm Connection 6

Normal Loading Represents Weight of Car at maximum Turning Maximum Von Mises Stress: 46,152,184 N/m^2 Factor of Safety: 5.96 Braking Force Represents Maximum Braking Force Maximum Von Mises Stress: 46,929,128 N/m^2 Factor of Safety: 5.86 Steering Force Represents Maximum Steering Force Maximum Von Mises Stress: 117,611,216 N/m^2 Factor of Safety:

Original Design Midterm Final DesignFinal Design One solid piece Heavy (2.51 lbs) Requires optimization One solid piece Very light (1.64 lbs) Difficult to machine Sharp edges result in multiple stress concentrations Three pieces 1.Upright 2.Two control arm mounts Lighter than original (2.16 lbs) Fewer corners mean fewer stress concentrations Easier to machine

Upright Control Arm Mounts Upright Specs Total Weight: 2.16 lbs Material: Al 6061-T6 Yield Strength: 31,183 psi (215 Mpa) Weight by Part: Upright: 2.02 lbs Mounts: 0.07 lbs e.

Load TransferCorneringFull Simulation Maximum load transfer onto the upright due to acceleration. Max von Mises Stress: 14.3 Mpa ( psi) Factor of Safety: Lateral force on upright due to turning. Max von Mises Stress: 56.1 Mpa ( psi) Factor of Safety: 4.9 Simulation of both the load transfer and lateral force applied to upright due to turning Max von Mises Stress: 57 Mpa ( psi) Factor of Safety: 4.82

 Current Accomplishments:  Researched different intake styles and chose the most efficient style  Created and revised design in SolidWorks  Completed flow analysis  Ordered materials for intake 11

 Intake Research  Research determined that a spherical collector upright intake was the most efficient design  (1). The taper of the cone collector should be between 3-7 degrees  (2). Optimal runner length of mm  (3). 20 mm FSAE mandated restrictor  Exhaust Research  Typical stock exhaust uses small diameter crush bent pipe or mandrel bent pipe. ◦ Crush bents are easier and cheaper to make however reduce the flow by 50%. ◦ To produce the most power exhaust should have minimal restriction on the exact flow.  Components: 4 headers and silencer canister (muffler) (3) (1) (2) 12

13

 Analysis o Bernoulli’s equation provides accurate pressure drop calculations o Air Flow velocites obtained by SolidWorks to check for choked flow o Flow rates can be calculated to compare the theoretical volumetric efficiency o Real world Flow Bench testing in the future to determine actual volumetric efficiency 14

 Analysis ◦ FloXpress provides flow through one intake runner at a time ◦ Testing in SolidWorks using the pressure drop calculations ◦ Goal is to verify when restriction chokes engine air flow. ◦ Choked flow only after RPM -Airflow through the intake at 9500 RPM -RPM at which max power was previously recorded -Airflow through the intake at RPM, when choke flow begins 15

Total Estimated Cost  $

-Runners made of pieced together pre- bent mandrel tube -Flanges laser cut by Bauer Compressor of Norfolk -Collector rolled from flat aluminum sheet -Restriction turned from solid aluminum round 17

 Accomplishments ◦ Finite Element Analysis  Patran and Nastran ◦ 5 loading cases ◦ CBAR (1D) Mat. Prop.  4031 Annealed Steel  Various Diameters 18

19

20 Factor of Safety: 4.17

21

22 Factor of Safety: 4.0

23

24 Factor of Safety: 17.6

**Forces from Statically Loaded case also included in this analysis** 25

26 Factor of Safety:.015

**Forces from Statically Loaded case also included in this analysis** **Same Total Force Used from Frontal Impact** 27

28 Factor of Safety:.016

29