ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use ExoMars ESWT#7 9 Dec 2014 1 ESWT #7 2018 Rover science preparations (RSM, LS) Status, problems, and how we will solve.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A didactic plan for a communicative translation class Dr. Constanza Gerding Salas Leipzig Universität - Universidad de Concepción May 2012.
Advertisements

Page 1 ENVISAT Calibration Review, ESTEC, 9 September 2002 ENVISAT Calibration Review Objectives Prepared by: J. Louet.
TK3333 Software Management Topic 7: Schedule Control.
Michel Denis, ExoMars Ground Segment Manager, HSO-OPM
All rights reserved © Altec ExoMars 2018 Rover Operations Control Centre Decision making process, Communications and Planning.
All Hands Meeting, 2006 Title: Grid Workflow Scheduling in WOSE (Workflow Optimisation Services for e- Science Applications) Authors: Yash Patel, Andrew.
All rights reserved © Altec ExoMars 2018 Rover Operations Control Centre Plans for rover operations training at ROCC M. Cinato.
14/06/20151 MORE Requirements seen from ESA Pedro Pablos 1 st MORE Team Meeting 27 Febrero 2007.
Simulation.
Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) Organisational Strategy –Need for structural change –IT tools –Increased integration (rather than “point solutions”)
09 May 2014page 1 ROCC to PPL ICD Initial Definition ExoMars Rover Operations Control Center ROCC.
1 ExoMars Programmatic situation December 2014 Rolf de Groot Head of Robotic Exploration Coordination Office ESWT#7 meeting, 9-10 December 2014, Altec,
LOFAR Self-Calibration Using a Blackboard Software Architecture ADASS 2007Marcel LooseASTRON, Dwingeloo.
Applying Multi-Criteria Optimisation to Develop Cognitive Models Peter Lane University of Hertfordshire Fernand Gobet Brunel University.
Solar Orbiter SOWG 5| Richard Carr| Low Latency Pipeline Hosting and Delivery Architecture | Slide 1 ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use Solar Orbiter.
©Ian Sommerville 2000Software Engineering, 6th edition. Chapter 4 Slide 1 Project management l Organising, planning and scheduling software projects l.
Nonlinear Stochastic Programming by the Monte-Carlo method Lecture 4 Leonidas Sakalauskas Institute of Mathematics and Informatics Vilnius, Lithuania EURO.
LSU 10/09/2007System Design1 Project Management Unit #2.
Software Evolution Planning CIS 376 Bruce R. Maxim UM-Dearborn.
1 TEC-MTT/2012/3788/In/SL LMD1D v1 and v2 Comparison with Phoenix Flight Data Prepared by Stéphane Lapensée ESA-ESTEC, TEC-MTT Keplerlaan 1, 2201 AZ Noordwijk.
The Pursuit for Efficient S/C Design The Stanford Small Sat Challenge: –Learn system engineering processes –Design, build, test, and fly a CubeSat project.
S/W Project Management
Imaging and Localisation Package for a Martian Balloon Based Aerobot Dave Barnes, Andy Shaw, Phil Summers Roger Ward, Mark Woods, Malcolm Evans Gerhard.
All rights reserved © Altec ExoMars 2018 Rover Operations Control Centre Available Tools for planning and Data Processing I. Musso.
Tietojärjestelmien peruskurssi Systeemisuunnittelu ja prototyyppimenetelmä Malin Brännback.
Data processing group. General study of data processing architecture: - overall definition of the data processing functions - share of tasks between on-board.
Additional Unit 2 Lecture Notes New Instructional Design Focus School of Education Additional Unit 2 Lecture Notes New Instructional Design Focus School.
Common PDR Problems ACES Presentation T. Gregory Guzik March 6, 2003.
NIST Special Publication Revision 1
Demystifying the Business Analysis Body of Knowledge Central Iowa IIBA Chapter December 7, 2005.
December To share best practices from the experience of 100 NSDS implemented over the last years. To take into account international community.
Live Simulations Featuring: FSI: Tranquility Base.
Standards Analysis Summary vMR – Pros Designed for computability Compact Wire Format Aligned with HeD Efforts – Cons Limited Vendor Adoption thus far Represents.
December 14, 2011/Office of the NIH CIO Operational Analysis – What Does It Mean To The Project Manager? NIH Project Management Community of Excellence.
Creating a Shared Vision Model. What is a Shared Vision Model? A “Shared Vision” model is a collective view of a water resources system developed by managers.
Trust-Aware Optimal Crowdsourcing With Budget Constraint Xiangyang Liu 1, He He 2, and John S. Baras 1 1 Institute for Systems Research and Department.
An evaluation of HotSpot-3.0 block-based temperature model
All rights reserved © Altec ExoMars 2018 Rover Operations Control Centre Planned Organization of ROCC Operations I. Musso.
Introduction to Management
©Ian Sommerville 2000 Slide 1 Project management l Organising, planning and scheduling software projects l Objectives To introduce software project management.
ESWT # Rover operations concept
SOWG # 6, 20/01/2015 ESAC Agenda  Finalization of the service 20 specifications  Test plans for the service20 at spacecraft level  Instruments.
Object-Oriented Software Engineering using Java, Patterns &UML. Presented by: E.S. Mbokane Department of System Development Faculty of ICT Tshwane University.
3/30/04 16:14 1 Lessons Learned CERES Data Management Presented to GIST 21 “If the 3 laws of climate are calibrate, calibrate, calibrate, then the 3 laws.
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use ExoMars Pasteur Payload Status ExoMars Project Team Albert Haldemann ExoMars Payload and AIV Manager.
Developing an Algorithm. Simple Program Design, Fourth Edition Chapter 3 2 Objectives In this chapter you will be able to: Introduce methods of analyzing.
1 Data simulations / Community challenges Stephan Birkmann / Jeff Valenti.
All rights reserved © Altec ExoMars 2018 Rover Operations Control Centre Science instruments data pipeline G. Martucci.
Testing and Evaluating Software Solutions Reporting on the Testing Process.
Aquarius Mission Simulation A realistic simulation is essential for mission readiness preparations This requires the ability to produce realistic data,
Gül Begüm ŞEMİS. Milestones Appointments Due dates Check lists Approval The FOAK Process Phase I2 Project Process.
Managing programs that promote personal effectiveness.
Workflow Recovery with Ensuring Task Dependencies Presented by Yajie Zhu March 08, 2005.
Robotics and Autonomy Test Facility - Hardware Verification needs Elie Allouis HRAF Workshop – 28/02/2012.
Ch7: Project Monitoring and Control  To reduce differences between plan and actual in the 3D space of T/C/P.  Best utilization of organization’s primary.
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use HSO-OP - Solar and Planetary Missions Division Solar Orbiter Instrument Operations, Data Handling and FDIR Ignacio.
Ian Bird Overview Board; CERN, 8 th March 2013 March 6, 2013
PMT time offset calibration (not completed) R.Sawada 27/Dec/2007.
TMP3413 Software Engineering Lab Lab 01: TSPi Tool Support.
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use Experiment Development and Integration Process Philippe Schoonejans, Head of Robotics and Future Projects Office ESA.
Autonomy: Executive and Instruments Life in the Atacama 2004 Science & Technology Workshop Nicola Muscettola NASA Ames Reid Simmons Carnegie Mellon.
Disaster Recovery Planning (DRP) DRP: The definition of business processes, their infrastructure supports and tolerances to interruptions, and formulation.
Avatar Explore PROPOSAL NUMBERS Not available SCIENCE TEAM Erick Dupuis, Canadian Space Agency RESEARCH OBJECTIVES Demonstrate an operational and technical.
Statistical process model Workshop in Ukraine October 2015 Karin Blix Quality coordinator
Valorisation: getting added value from projects Elli Georgiadou Middlesex University School of Science and Technology.
Project Cost Management
Joint Meeting of the CCSDS and the OMG-SDTF
The RSP Archive System RSP Archive Concept Review 28 September 2017
Philae status 21st Rosetta Science Team meeting
Presentation transcript:

ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use ExoMars ESWT#7 9 Dec ESWT # Rover science preparations (RSM, LS) Status, problems, and how we will solve them at this meeting. by Jorge Vago & Luc Joudrier

ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use Content 1.ROSEX rover analysis tool at TAS-I; 2.RSM template: Some points for discussion; 3.Data relay and sharing of TGO bandwidth; 2

ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use Recall of ESWT #6: Actions Tasks Activity Plans ROSEX Simulator runs of the Reference Surface Mission will be presented by TAS-I during Sol#2 RSM Optimisation 9:00-10:30 3

ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use Content 1.ROSEX rover analysis tool at TAS-I; 2.RSM template: Some points for discussion; 3.Data relay and sharing of TGO bandwidth; 4

ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use Points of discussion for RSM template TAS-I will address the RSM optimisation based on ROSEX Sol#2. Since the last ESWT, work has been done to propose solutions to the following points:  Ways to fit WISDOM grid in one sol:  WISDOM has proposed ways to reduce the grid (length, number of point turns, accumulations)  Other ways are being evaluated by TAS-I (e.g. driving faster, using NavCam instead of PanCam, etc…)  Raman calibration  The RLS Team has proposed a calibration sequence with a shorter duration.  We need check using ROSEX if it can be reintroduced the day before RLS runs.  Number of measurements, compression ratio and data volume vs. bandwidth (150 Mbits/sol constraint);  TGO has a new orbit, the so-called frozen orbit 370:30. It allows a finer scan of the planet. The new orbit presents no major impacts for data relay capabilities.  TAS-I is consolidating the data relay estimates —to be considered for the Rover/SP sharing discussions.  To fit the various resource constraints we will require some flexibility in the measurements each instrument needs. To be iterated as the resources evolve e.g. Ma_Miss measurements vs. drilling.  PanCam-HRC commanding  No more on-board algorithms for choosing HRC/ISEM targets from WAC images.  Instead, targets for HRC/ISEM will be identified on ground (e.g. based on previous PanCam and HiRISE images). On-board computation will determine the correct “point and tilt” values —taking into account the actual position of the rover after the last drive— to ensure the targets can be imaged. There will be NO EXTRA SOL introduced to decide where to point HRC/ISEM.  Coordinated science in ALD:  Difficulties with SPDS eccentricity and thermal gradients for fine positioning.  Difficulties with relative positioning and target knowledge for RLS. 5

ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use Content 1.ROSEX rover analysis tool at TAS-I; 2.RSM template: Some points for discussion; 3.Data relay and sharing of TGO bandwidth; 6

ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use Data Relay Sharing Strategy 7  ON-GOING  Tests with ELECTRA to confirm the time necessary to reconfigure between the two assets communication for the same pass (essential for pass sharing)  TAS-I is consolidating the data volume requirement based on ROSEX runs performed with each instruments’ inputs (resource consumption)  TAS-I & ALTEC are formulating the TGO data relay needs on the basis of two communication passes per sol for the rover.  LAV/IKI/ESA are working on the consolidation of the Surface Platform payload suite and associated operations needs. Probable AO early next year.  STILL TOO EARLY TO FREEZE A DATA SHARING STRATEGY.

ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use ExoMars Project 8