SBS Hadron and Electron Calorimeters Mark Jones. SBS Hadron and Electron Calorimeters Mark Jones Overview of GEn, GMn setup Overview of GEp setup The.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Measuring the Neutron and 3 He Spin Structure at Low Q 2 Vincent Sulkosky for the JLab Hall A Collaboration College of William and Mary, Williamsburg VA.
Advertisements

CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
Particle identification in ECAL Alexander Artamonov, Yuri Kharlov IHEP, Protvino CBM collaboration meeting
Jin Huang PhD Candidate, MIT For MENU 2010 May 31, Williamsburg.
HARP Anselmo Cervera Villanueva University of Geneva (Switzerland) K2K Neutrino CH Meeting Neuchâtel, June 21-22, 2004.
SBS Hadron and Electron Calorimeters Mark Jones 1 TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint manual before you delete this box.: AAA A.
W. Clarida, HCAL Meeting, Fermilab Oct. 06 Quartz Plate Calorimeter Prototype Geant4 Simulation Progress W. Clarida The University of Iowa.
Calorimeter1 Understanding the Performance of CMS Calorimeter Seema Sharma,TIFR (On behalf of CMS HCAL)
A preliminary analysis of the CALICE test beam data Dhiman Chakraborty, NIU for the CALICE Collaboration LCWS07, Hamburg, Germany May 29 - June 3, 2007.
ALICE EMCal Physics and Functional Requirements Overview.
The LHCf experiment Hiroaki MENJO INFN Firenze on behalf for the LHCf collaboration at 29 March 2010, MC4LHC.
Update on the Gas Ring Imaging Cherenkov (GRINCH) Detector for A 1 n using BigBite Todd Averett Department of Physics The College of William and Mary Williamsburg,
Proton polarization measurements in π° photo-production --On behalf of the Jefferson Lab Hall C GEp-III and GEp-2γ collaboration Wei Luo Lanzhou University.
Proton Form Factor ratio GEp/GMp with polarization method --on behalf of Jefferson lab GEp3 collaboration Wei Luo Lanzhou University, China April
The HERMES Dual-Radiator Ring Imaging Cerenkov Detector N.Akopov et al., Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A479 (2002) 511 Shibata Lab 11R50047 Jennifer Newsham YSEP.
Proton polarization measurements in π° photo- production --on behalf of the Jefferson Lab Hall C GEp-III and GEp-2 γ collaboration 2010 Annual Fall Meeting.
Medium heavy Λ hyper nuclear spectroscopic experiment by the (e,e’K + ) reaction Graduate school of science, Tohoku University Toshiyuki Gogami for HES-HKS.
HARP for MiniBooNE Linda R. Coney Columbia University DPF 2004.
GlueX Particle Identification Ryan Mitchell Indiana University Detector Review, October 2004.
SHMS Optics and Background Studies Tanja Horn Hall C Summer Meeting 5 August 2008.
Reaction plane reconstruction1 Reaction plane reconstruction in extZDC Michael Kapishin Presented by A.Litvinenko.
Possibility for Double DVCS measurement in Hall A Alexandre Camsonne SBS Meeting June 4 th 2013.
Tests of a Digital Hadron Calorimeter José Repond Argonne National Laboratory CALICE Collaboration Meeting March 10 – 12, 2010 University of Texas at Arlington.
International Workshop on Linear Colliders, Geneve Muon reconstruction and identification in the ILD detector N. D’Ascenzo, V.Saveliev.
Status of GlueX Particle Identification Ryan Mitchell September 10, 2004.
BigCal Reconstruction and Elastic Event Selection for GEp-III Andrew Puckett, MIT on behalf of the GEp-III Collaboration.
Hadron Calorimeter HCAL-J GEp Electron Calorimeter BigCal Hadron Calorimeter 1 G. Franklin, Carnegie Mellon University 10/13/2011.
Detector Monte-Carlo ● Goal: Develop software tools to: – Model detector performance – Study background issues – Calculate event rates – Determine feasibility.
ECAL PID1 Particle identification in ECAL Yuri Kharlov, Alexander Artamonov IHEP, Protvino CBM collaboration meeting
Vina Punjabi Norfolk State University Hall A Collaboration Meeting June 10-11, 2010 GEp-V Experiment to Measure G Ep /G Mp.
Proton Charge Form Factor Measurement E. Cisbani INFN Rome – Sanità Group and Italian National Institute of Health 113/Oct/2011E. Cisbani / Proton FF.
Particle Identification at BESIII Kanglin He April 23, 2007, Amsterdam.
Spin Asymmetries of the Nucleon Experiment ( E07-003) Anusha Liyanage APS April Meeting, February 15, 2010 Measurement Of the Proton Form Factor Ratio.
Jefferson Laboratory Hall A SuperBigBite Spectrometer Data Acquisition System Alexandre Camsonne APS DNP 2013 October 24 th 2013 Hall A Jefferson Laboratory.
Calorimetry for Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering in Hall A Alexandre Camsonne Hall A Jefferson Laboratory Workshop on General Purpose High Resolution.
E Precision Measurement of the Neutron Magnetic Form Factor up to Q 2 =13.5 (GeV/c) 2 by the Ratio Method B. Quinn, J. Annand, R. Gilman, B. Wojtsekhowski.
HARP measurements of pion yield for neutrino experiments Issei Kato (Kyoto University) for the HARP collaboration Contents: 1.HARP experiment Physics motivations.
GEp-III in Hall C Andrew Puckett, MIT On behalf of the Jefferson Lab Hall C GEp-III Collaboration April 15, 2008.
FSC Status and Plans Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino on behalf of the IHEP PANDA group PANDA Russia workshop, ITEP 27 April 2010.
Magnetized hadronic calorimeter and muon veto for the K +   +  experiment L. DiLella, May 25, 2004 Purpose:  Provide pion – muon separation (muon veto)
1 Muon Veto System and Expected Backgrounds at Dayabay Hongshan (Kevin) Zhang, BNL DayaBay Collaboration DNP08, Oakland.
Nantes — 2008, July Analysis of results from EmCal beam test at CERN PS (and SPS) energies P. La Rocca & F. Riggi University & INFN Catania University.
1 Hadronic calorimeter simulation S.Itoh, T.Takeshita ( Shinshu Univ.) GLC calorimeter group Contents - Comparison between Scintillator and Gas - Digital.
SANE Collaboration ( E07-003) Anusha Liyanage Hampton University January 12, 2010 Measurement Of the Proton Form Factor Ratio at High Q 2 by Using The.
Radia Sia Syracuse Univ. 1 RICH 2004 Outline:  The CLEO-III RICH Detector  Physics Requirements  CLEO-III RICH at work… Performance of the CLEO-III.
April 26, McGrew 1 Goals of the Near Detector Complex at T2K Clark McGrew Stony Brook University Road Map The Requirements The Technique.
Christian Lippmann (ALICE TRD), DPG-Tagung Köln Position Resolution, Electron Identification and Transition Radiation Spectra with Prototypes.
A N DY Status Commissioning with colliding beams (p  +p  at  s=500 GeV) L.C.Bland, for AnDY 22 February 2011 Time Meeting, BNL.
Highest Q 2 Polarized Measurement of the Electric Form Factor of the Neutron – E Presented by Jonathan Miller For the Hall A E Collaboration.
First results from SND at VEPP-2000 S. Serednyakov On behalf of SND group VIII International Workshop on e + e - Collisions from Phi to Psi, PHIPSI11,
Hall C Summer Workshop August 6, 2009 W. Luo Lanzhou University, China Analysis of GEp-III&2γ Inelastic Data --on behalf of the Jefferson Lab Hall C GEp-III.
Energy Reconstruction in the CALICE Fe-AHCal in Analog and Digital Mode Fe-AHCal testbeam CERN 2007 Coralie Neubüser CALICE Collaboration meeting Argonne,
FEE for Muon System (Range System) Status & Plans G.Alexeev on behalf of Dubna group Turin, 16 June, 2009.
Super BigBite DAQ & Trigger Jens-Ole Hansen Hall A Collaboration Meeting 16 December 2009.
1 Cosmic Ray Physics with IceTop and IceCube Serap Tilav University of Delaware for The IceCube Collaboration ISVHECRI2010 June 28 - July 2, 2010 Fermilab.
 CC QE results from the NOvA prototype detector Jarek Nowak and Minerba Betancourt.
Simulation and reconstruction of CLAS12 Electromagnetic Calorimeter in GSIM12 S. Stepanyan (JLAB), N. Dashyan (YerPhI) CLAS12 Detector workshop, February.
Understanding the 3 He Nuclei: Asymmetry Measurements in Quasi- Elastic Ge Jin University of Virginia For the E Collaboration.
Calorimeters at CBM A. Ivashkin INR, Moscow.
Panagiotis Kokkas Univ. of Ioannina
PARTICLE FLUX CALCULATION-III
VEPP-2000 plans for the study of the nucleon form factors
Plans for checking hadronic energy
Kazuya Aoki For the PHENIX Collaborations. Kyoto Univ. / RIKEN
GEANT Simulations and Track Reconstruction
Geant4 in HARP V.Ivanchenko For the HARP Collaboration
NKS2 Meeting with Bydzovsky NKS2 Experiment / Analysis Status
Background rejection in P326 (NA48/3)
A Neutron Counter for the CLAS12 Central Detector
Presentation transcript:

SBS Hadron and Electron Calorimeters Mark Jones

SBS Hadron and Electron Calorimeters Mark Jones Overview of GEn, GMn setup Overview of GEp setup The SBS hadron calorimeter (HCalo) Design of HCalo Neutron and proton detection efficiency, energy and position resolution BigCal for GEp

Experiment Setup for GEn and GMn  Use standard BigBite double layer calorimeter Electron PID (combined with gas Cherenkov). Electron energies in range from 1.2 to 3.5 GeV. High threshold for trigger.  Hadron calorimeter based on successful design used in COMPASS. Proton and Neutron momentum from 2.6 to 10.5 GeV/c Need good position (angular) resolution to separated (quasi-) elastic from inelastic background.

Experiment Setup for Gep  Reconfigure BigCal for electron detection. Electron energies range from 3.1 to 4.0 GeV/c Use 20cm thick Al wall to reduce flux of low energy background. High threshold to reduce single arm trigger rate. Position resolution needed in track reconstruction ( L. Pentchev’s talk)  Use same Hadron calorimeter Proton momentum range from 3.5 to 8.8 GeV/c High threshold to reduce the single arm trigger rate Position resolution needed in track reconstruction

Module of Hadron Calorimeter As starting point, use COMPASS design of JINR group. Iron and scintillator sandwich

Module of Hadron Calorimeter  As starting point, use COMPASS design of JINR group. Optimizing design for experiment’s energy range.  Carnegie Mellon and JINR will design and build calorimeter.

Hadron Calorimeter (Hcalo) Each block has frontal area 15x15cm Arrange 11x22 blocks Area = 5 m 2 Total weight is 36 tons.

COMPASS HCalo Performance Muons Pions Extensive tests of calorimeter performance were done at CERN Calibrated energy spectra for 10 GeV beam

COMPASS HCalo Performance Position resolution In range of 2-10 GeV/c  E/E = 20-30% Energy resolution

GEANT study of HCalo Performance Response of neutrons and protons nearly identical Good energy resolution High thresholds reduce backgrounds GMn: Near identical p/n efficiency reduces systematics

GEANT study of HCalo Performance Response of neutrons and protons nearly identical Good position resolution GMn, GEn, GEp: Cut on  nq to separate (quasi-)elastic events GEp : Need for track reconstruction, reduce pseudo-tracks

BigCal for GEp experiment Reassemble 20 x 76 block array blocks Block size is 4x4x40 and 3.8x3.8x45 cm 3 Covers area of 3.04 x 0.80 = 2.4 m 2 Actual shape of configuration will match curved shape expected for elastic events.

BigCal for GEp experiment Use NIM “summing” modules (special built for and used in Hall C experiment) which have: 8 analog inputs 8 analog outputs (amplify 5x) 6 “sum of 8” analog outputs Each red block is 4x2 grouping into NIM “summing” module. Need 5x38 = 190 modules (available)

BigCal for GEp experiment For trigger form “group of 32” by summing analog output of 4 of “group of 8”. (Use available Lecroy NIM FI/FO) Blue box represents one “group of 32”

BigCal for GEp experiment For trigger form “group of 32” by summing analog output of 4 of “group of 8”. (Use available Lecroy NIM FI/FO) Blue box represents one “group of 32” Turquoise box is next “group of 32” in vertical which overlaps by 2 rows.

BigCal for GEp experiment For trigger form “group of 32” by summing analog output of 4 of “group of 8”. (Use available Lecroy NIM FI/FO) Blue box represents one “group of 32” Turquoise box is next “group of 32” in vertical which overlaps by 2 rows. Dark green is next group

BigCal for GEp experiment For trigger form “group of 32” by summing analog output of 4 of “group of 8”. (Use available Lecroy NIM FI/FO) Most “groups of 8” are in 4 “groups of 32”

BigCal for GEp experiment Each dot is the center of “group of 32” Have 4x37 = 148 “group of 32” which will be used in trigger. Trigger discussed in O. Hansen’s talk.

Conclusions  Hadron Calorimeter Used in all three from factor experiments. Based on the proven COMPASS design. Energy resolution allows high thresholds to eliminate background and lower trigger rates Position resolution allows for good angular resolution o Needed in all FF experiments to separate (quasi-)elastic from inelastic o Needed in GEp to help in tracking with large low-energy background rates Neutron and proton response above 2.5 GeV/c nearly identical  Electron Calorimeter GEn and GMn use standard BigBite calorimeter GEp uses a reconfigured BigCal calorimeter High threshold reduces trigger rate Position resolution needed for tracking and separating (quasi-) elastic from inelastic.

Backup Slides

GEANT study of HCalo Performance Response of neutrons and protons nearly identical F. F. Benmokhtar Protons Neutrons 2.5 GeV/c 3.2 GeV/c 4.0 GeV/c 5.4 GeV/c 6.2 GeV/c 7.3 GeV/c 8.1 GeV/c 9.4 GeV/c 10.5 GeV/c

GEANT study of HCalo Performance Response of neutrons and protons nearly identical Good energy resolution High thresholds reduce backgrounds GMn: Near identical p/n efficiency reduces systematics F. Benmokhtar

GEANT study of HCalo Performance Response of neutrons and protons nearly identical Good position resolution GMn, GEn, GEp: Cut on  nq to separate quasi-elastic events GEp : Need for track reconstruction, reduce pseudo-tracks F. F. Benmokhtar

COMPASS Hcalo

GEp experiment

GEn experiment

GMn experiment

Geant study of HCalo Performance Response of neutrons and protons nearly identical Good position resolution GMn, GEn, GEp: Cut on Qnq to separate quasi-elastic events GEp : Need for track reconstruction, reduce pseudo-tracks Good energy resolution High thresholds reduce backgrounds GMn: Near identical p/n efficiency reduces systematics