Presentation Agenda Administrative Simplification Provisions

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Medicare HIPAA Issues October, 2002 Kathy Simmons Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
Advertisements

The National Provider Identifier NPI 101 An Information Resource Tool Developed by BCBS Nebraska and the BCBS Association.
X12N Task Group 3/Work Group 2 July2000 Health Care Transactions ANSI ASC X12N Insurance Sub-Committee Task Group 3 Business Transaction Coordination and.
Presented by Elena Chan, UCSF Pharm.D. Candidate Tiffany Jew, USC Pharm.D. Candidate March 14, 2007 P HARMACEUTICAL C ONSULTANTS, I NC. P RO P HARMA HIPAA.
1 Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 IS&C Expo October 16 & 17, 2002 John Wagner Governor’s Office of Technology.
Health Care Claim Preparation & Transmission Chapter 8 OT 232 Lecture 2 1OT 232 Ch 8 lecture 1.
HIPAA Privacy Rule Training
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996– charged the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) with creating health information.
© 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 McGraw-Hill Chapter 1 The Goal of HIPAA: Administrative Simplification HIPAA for Allied Health.
HIPAA Administrative Simplification Final Rule for Transactions Code Sets Stanley Nachimson
Presents: Weekly HIPAA Teleconference Revised
TM The HIPAA Privacy Rule: Safeguarding Health Information in Research and Public Health Practice Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Beverly A.
CHAPTER © 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 2 The Use of Health Information Technology in Physician Practices.
Reviewing the World of HIPAA Stephanie Anderson, CPC October 2006.
HIPAA Privacy Rule Compliance Training for YSU April 9, 2014.
1 Operating Rules Status NCVHS Subcommittee on Standards December 3, 2010 Updated on enhancements to Operating Rules for Eligibility and Claim Status.
2 The Use of Health Information Technology in Physician Practices.
HIPAA TRANSACTIONS HIPAA Summit IV 2002 UPDATE. HHS Office of General Counsel l Donna Eden l Office of the General Counsel l Department of Health and.
Preparing for ICD-10 Implementation WV HFMA 2012 Revenue Cycle Spring Workshop.
Electronic Data Interchange Assessment Strategies Application Systems Trading Partners Business Associates Application Vendors The Standards Application.
HIPAA Medicare FFS Issues Fourth National HIPAA Summit April 26, 2002 Janis Nero-Phillips Director OIS/Division of Data Interchange Standards.
© 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 McGraw-Hill Chapter 4 The HIPAA Transactions, Code Sets, and National Standards HIPAA for.
Facilitators: Kit Cairns, WIITTS Karen Navarro, University of WI Hospital & Clinics Claudia Yoakum-Watson, WEA Trust and CCRS Overview of 5010 and ICD-10:
WHAT'S AHEAD? Kathy Whitmire Dale Gibson February 15, 2011 HIPAA 5010, ICD-10, ACO's, VBP, HIGLAS, PECOS.
Avoiding a Wipeout! Spring Conference April 4, 2008 EDI Session 1 Gary Beatty President EC Integrity, Inc Vice-Chair ASC X12.
© 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Career Education Computers in the Medical Office Chapter 2: Information Technology.
1 Analysis of Proposed Rules regarding Transactions/Code Sets National HIPAA Audioconferences September 3, 2008.
The Use of Health Information Technology in Physician Practices
Presented by Joan Kossow Data Compliance Manager The Changing Face of Claims Processing &
National Provider Identifier. Background The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) mandated that the Secretary of Health.
PricewaterhouseCoopers Transaction Compliance Date Extension & Privacy Standards NPRM Audioconference April 19, 2002 HIPAA Administrative Simplification.
POA – Present on Admission
Standards Thomas Sullivan MD. HSCI 709. Standards – Why have them? Successful data exchange Not vendor, application or platform dependent Move data across.
Copyright Fleisher & Associates A HIPAA PRIMER FOR PUBLIC HEALTH PEOPLE CPHA-N Conference 2003 January 30, 2003 Presented by: Steven M. Fleisher,
© 2015 TriZetto Corporation ICD-10: Ready, Set, Go! August 27, 2015.
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)
EDI Standards Development Pamela A. Grosze, Manager of Systems and Software Engineering, NDCHealth.
Thomas D. Bixby Law Office LLC (608) May 12-14, 2010 New Orleans, LA Health Reform and Administrative Simplification: Keeping.
 Being the new reimbursement manager, I hope to work with you all for the benefit of this entity.  I manage reimbursement transactions, as well as facilitating.
STEVEN S. LAZARUS, PHD, CPEHR, CPHIT, FHIMSS PRESIDENT, BOUNDARY INFORMATION GROUP AUGUST 20, – The Twelve Year Journey is Not Over.
HIPAA & Public Schools New Federalism in a New Century The Challenges of Administering HIPAA in Public Schools ASTHO/NGA Center Joint Audioconference September.
National Provider Identifier: Implementation Issues Presented by Andrea S. Danes September 25, 2006.
HP Provider Relations October 2011 Medical Review Team.
HIPAA TRANSACTIONS 2002 UPDATE. HHS Office of General Counsel l Donna Eden l Office of the General Counsel l Department of Health and Human Services.
© 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Ch 8 Privacy Law and HIPAA.
HIPAA Transactions Testing Update Kepa Zubeldia, M.D. September 13, 2004.
Health Information Technologies and Health Care Transformation James Golden, PhD Director, Division of Health Policy Minnesota Department of Health February.
National Provider Identifier HIPAA Summit 13 September 25, 2006 Peter Barry Hospital Implementation Planning.
HIPAA Summit Audioconference Analysis of Addenda to HIPAA Transactions and Code Sets Rule Larry Watkins Executive Vice President, Claredi Co-chair, WEDI.
Facilitators: Kit Cairns, Dean Health Greg Margrett, Netwerkes/Ingenix.
Standard Unique Health Identifier for Health Care Providers April 9, th Annual HIPAA Summit Gail Kocher Highmark.
© 2004 Moses & Singer LLP HIPAA and Patient Privacy Issues Raised by the New Medicare Prescription Drug Program National Medicare Prescription Drug Congress.
Confidential 1 HIPAA Compliance at Blue Cross Blue Shield of Minnesota: A Case Study Tim Wittenburg Director of Corporate Architecture & Data Management.
Intelligently Linking Information Systems Copyright 2002, Rensis Corporation Rensis Corporation HIPAA Transactions and Code Sets Timings Addenda, Attachments,
Systems, Data and HIPAA from a Medicaid Perspective Rick Friedman, Director Division of State Systems Center for Medicare and Medicaid US Dept Health &
ASCA Transaction Extension and Resources to Help Extending Your Compliance Deadline for Transactions & Code Sets April 19, 2002 Steven S. Lazarus, PhD,
The Coming Crash? HIPAA: Transactions, Codes Sets and Identifiers (TCI) Joseph C Nichols MD Paladin Data Systems Sept 16, 2003.
ICD-10 Operational and Revenue Cycle Impacts Wendy Haas, MBA, RN Dell Services Healthcare Consulting.
HIPAA Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow? Dianne S. Faup Office of HIPAA Standards Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
1 HIPAA’s Impact on Depository Financial Institutions 2 nd National Medical Banking Institute Rick Morrison, CEO Remettra, Inc.
HIPAA Privacy Rule Training
Electronic Data Interchange (EDI)
Electronic Transactions Workshop
Electronic Transactions Workshop
Disability Services Agencies Briefing On HIPAA
TM Workgroup for Electronic Data Interchange.
TM Workgroup for Electronic Data Interchange.
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
Electronic Data Interchange: Transactions and Security
Electronic Data Interchange: Transactions and Security
Presentation transcript:

HIPAA 201: EDI An Introduction to the HIPAA Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) Regulations For audio dial: 1-800-749-9918

Presentation Agenda Administrative Simplification Provisions Benefits of EDI EDI Key Business and IT Impacts Standard Identifiers Code Sets Transaction Sets Introduction Transaction Sets Next Steps Internal External Communication

Presentation Objectives At the end of this presentation, you should: Understand why the EDI standards were developed Understand each of the specific EDI standards and their impact on the organization Be able to determine your own organizational strategies and next steps for tackling HIPAA EDI requirements

Purposes of Administrative Simplification

Purposes of Administrative Simplification To improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the health care system by standardizing the electronic transmission of certain administrative and financial transactions and protect the security and privacy of transmitted information. Over 400 formats of EDI are used in the US

Intent of the Transaction and Code Set Rule To encourage electronic commerce in health care To simplify administrative processes To decrease the administrative costs of health care To eliminate software adaptation for multiple formats

Benefits of EDI Reduction in manual data entry and processing Elimination of cost and delays of postal service Improved data comparability Elimination of disparate forms and codes Improved cash flow Improved accuracy of information Fewer claims rejections

Benefits of EDI (cont’d) Cost savings (including reduced labor costs) Fewer billing errors Improved accuracy, reliability and usefulness of shared information Improved customer service Prevent inadvertent errors that could lead to allegations of fraud and abuse Minimized risk of penalties

Covered Entities Health plans Health care clearinghouses – services that translate information between organizations Health care providers who transmit any health information in electronic form in connection with a covered transaction

Non-Covered Entities Workers’ Compensation Programs Property and Casualty Programs Disability Insurance Programs Nursing Home Fixed Indemnity Policies Prisons

Requirements of Health Plans Must accept and process standard transactions from any person in the same time frame in which they processed transactions prior to the implementation of the HIPAA standard May not offer an incentive to conduct a transaction as a non-standard transaction Must be able to process earlier versions of code sets

Requirements of Health Plans (cont’d) Must keep code sets for current billing period and appeals periods still open to processing under terms of the plan’s coverage MAY use a clearinghouse to translate transactions that are not in standard format

Requirements of Clearinghouses A provider submitting standard transactions through a clearinghouse must not be adversely affected financially by doing so The cost of submission to a clearinghouse cannot exceed the cost of direct transmission to the health plan

Requirements of Providers Must use standard transactions if conducted electronically MAY continue to use paper media MAY use a business associate to conduct a transaction MAY use a clearinghouse to translate non- standard transactions

Key EDI Impacts All trading partner agreements that stipulate data content format definitions or conditions that do not comply to the ANSI X12 standards are no longer valid agreements and will need to be modified The standardization of data elements and the values in the data elements will eliminate proprietary codes The HIPAA standards are not required on paper transactions, but can be used on paper to prevent dual system maintenance

Key EDI Impacts (cont’d) For on-line interactions between a server and a browser, data content must comply with the HIPAA X12 standards, but not the data format Transmissions within a corporate entity would not be required to comply with the standards unless it is sending electronic data from a provider portion to a health plan portion Case management is considered a health care service

Standard Identifiers HIPAA Proposed Standard Identifiers Potential Key Impacts – Standard Identifiers

Proposed Standard Identifiers Employer Identification Number (EIN) Format: 00-0000000 (9 digit) Final Rule expected anytime National Provider Identifier (NPI) Format: 10 digit Note: This number will be randomly assigned and not tied to processing logic

Proposed Standard Identifiers (cont’d) National Plan Identifier (PlanID) Format: 10 digit Notice of Proposed Rule Making expected anytime Individual Format On hold due to privacy concerns

Potential Key Impacts: Standard Identifiers Business processes related to issuance of new identification cards will be impacted Identify field availability, field format and field length of HIPAA identifier fields in existing IT applications Choose to “crosswalk” old and new identifiers or migrate to new identifiers and use throughout systems

Potential Key Impacts: Standard Identifiers (cont’d) Produce and maintain new business directories tables to include mapping to older identification numbers Provide education to familiarize providers with new identification numbers and formats for data transmission Business process related to handling of paper (no standard ID required) and electronic (standard ID required) Dual processes may be required

Code Sets What is a Code Set? HIPAA Code Sets Key HIPAA Impacts - Code Sets Key IT and Business Impacts - Code Sets

What is a Code Set? Any set of codes used to encode data elements, such as tables of terms, medical concepts, medical diagnostic codes or medical procedures Includes codes and descriptors Includes modifiers For ICD-9-CM, it includes the Official Guidelines for Coding & Reporting

HIPAA Medical Code Sets ICD-9-CM, Volumes 1 & 2: ICD-9-CM, Volume 3: CPT-4: Coding for diseases, injuries, impairments, causes of injury, other health problems Coding for prevention, diagnosis, treatment, management of hospital inpatients Coding for professional services, clinical lab tests, diagnostic procedures, hearing and vision services

HIPAA Medical Code Sets (cont’d) HCPCS: NDC: CDT-3: Coding for medical equipment and supplies as well as injectable drugs Coding for drugs and biologics (replaces “J” codes)* Coding for dental services (replaces “D” codes) These Code Sets do away with all local codes. * An Notice of Proposed Rule Making will be released to remove NDC Code requirements

HIPAA Non-Medical Code Sets Codes valid at the time the transaction is initiated Claim Status Reason Codes Claim Adjustment Reason Codes Codes used in the Implementation Guides, such as: UB92 Revenue Codes Value Codes Condition Codes Place of Service Codes Type of Service Codes Provider Taxonomy Codes

Key HIPAA Impacts: Code Sets Will capture data elements not currently captured Adjustment reason codes and claim status codes will change Work to eliminate all proprietary codes – may mean requesting new standard codes Future claim submissions may require code plus modifier for services Number of diagnosis codes allowed on a submission will increase from 4 to 8 with 4 pointers per diagnosis for each service line on the claim

Key IT and Business Impacts: Code Sets Identification of all proprietary codes to determine their applicability Require mapping of proprietary codes to HIPAA code sets Develop plan on how to handle elimination of proprietary codes Require providers to insure vendors plan to include all HIPAA modifiers and applicable codes in new software releases Require an update to policies and procedures

Transaction Sets Introduction Implementation Guides Transaction Sets Pharmacy Claims

Implementation Guides Implementation Guides include: Data elements required or conditionally required Definition of each data element Technical transaction formats for the transmission of the data Code sets or values that can appear in selected data elements

Downloading Implementation Guides Where to download Implementation Guides: www.wpc-edi.com www.ncpdp.org Implementation Guides are in PDF format X12N Implementation Guide downloads are free NCPDP Implementation Guides require a fee

Pharmacy Claims National Council for Prescription Drug Programs The final standards for electronic health care transactions, and for code sets, adopt the NCPDP Telecommunication Standard Format, Version 5.1 and the NCPDP Batch Standard, Version 1 Release 0 for pharmacy claims Health plans, health care clearinghouses and health care providers who utilize electronic transactions will be required to use these standards beginning October 2002 Application for an extension until October 2003 available from the DHHS website (due Oct 2002)

Standard Transaction Types Purpose 270/271 Eligibility inquiry/response 278 Authorization/referral 837 Claim submission, 3 types: Institutional, Professional, and Dental 276/277 Claim status inquiry/response 835 Claim payment remittance 834 Enrollment 820 Premium payment

Transaction between Providers and Health Plans Transaction Sets Accounts Receivable Accounts Payable Claim Status Inquiries Adjudication Service Billing / Claim Submission Claim Acceptance Pretreatment, Authorization, and Referrals Pre-certification / Adjudication Eligibility Verification Enrollment 270/271 278 837 276/277 835

270/271:Eligibility Transaction 270 Eligibility Inquiry - A request sent by a provider for determination of eligibility 271 Eligibility Response - An information source that responds to the request with either an acknowledgement that the patient has active or inactive coverage, or that the patient was not found within their system

Business Considerations: 270/271 Transaction Requires a revision in eligibility policies and procedures Requires a change in how eligibility information is received, stored, and transmitted Requires a change in how eligibility information is interpreted Will result in fewer telephone calls Includes both batch and real-time bi-directional EDI transactions

278: Health Care Services Review Transaction 278 – Pre-certification/Authorization/Referrals The 278 is the only transaction that has both request and response within the same Implementation Guide The 278 is used to request that a utilization management organization review a proposed or actual procedure or admission and provide approval or authorization of that service Although not mandated within the transaction, the 278 should be used for one patient for one service

Business Considerations: 278 Health Care Services Review Transaction will effect Medicare and Medicaid work flow Requires a change to operating procedures and policies relating to timeliness of referral and response Medicare and Medicaid will establish and direct operating protocols

837: Institutional, Professional, Dental Claims Used to submit health care claim billing information, encounter information, or both from providers of health care services to payers, either directly or via intermediary billing agencies and clearinghouses It can also be used to transmit health care claims and billing information between payers with different payment responsibilities where coordination of benefits is required or between payers and regulatory agencies to monitor the provision, billing and payment for health care services

837: Institutional, Professional, Dental Claims (cont’d) Implementation Guides have no recommended limit to the number of claims transaction submissions within one ISA-IEA (outer envelope) transmission For translation processing, it is recommended to limit the number of claims per transmission When a provider submits the complete data set of claims information, the health plan cannot request the data at a later date

IT and Business Considerations: 837 Transaction Requires education on new electronic claims format Requires a change to policies and procedures Eliminates all proprietary codes not contained within the transaction Involves mapping of existing claims transaction formats such as NSF, UB92, and HCFA 1500 to the 837 X12N Implementation Guides

IT and Business Considerations: 837 Transaction (cont’d) Requires a change in how claim information is entered and processed Requires a change to reason codes used today Contains additional required data fields that current claims transactions do not include A uni-directional, batch EDI transaction set

835: Remittance Transaction Remittance information is provided as justification for the payment received by the 837 transaction, as well as input to the provider’s accounts receivable system Remittance information consists of two separate levels Level 1 - consists of claim and service information packaged with detail information Level 2 - consists of remittance information that is not specific to claims and services contained in Level 1; this information relates to the Provider Adjustment Segment which provides for reporting increases and decreases in the amount remitted

835: Remittance Transaction (cont’d) The transmission of any of the following from a health plan to a health care provider’s financial institution: Payment Information about the transfer of funds Payment processing information The transmission of either of the following from a health plan to a health care provider: Explanation of benefits Remittance advice

IT and Business Considerations: 835 Transaction Requires a change in policies regarding financial transaction processing Requires review of electronic funds transfer (EFT) procedures as the 835 allows direct EFT Review of workflow process to ensure that all processes are documented Contains additional required data fields that current claims transactions do not include A uni-directional batch EDI transaction set

276/277: Claim Status Transaction The 276 Claim Status Request is the inquiry from the provider to the health plan regarding the status of a specified claim(s) Status information can be requested at the claim or line level The 277 Claim Status Response is the reply from the health plan to the provider on the status of the claim(s) within the adjudication process

Business Considerations: 276/277 Transaction Change business structure in how requests for claims information are processed Develop data file to capture and retain claims information for specified periods of time Upgrade claims data to capture requirements in 276/277 to provide comprehensive information Both batch EDI and real-time, bi-directional transactions

834: Enrollment / Disenrollment Transaction One of two transactions not processed by the provider; NOT required since employers/ sponsors are not covered entities The 834 transaction was developed for transfer of enrollment information from a sponsor of insurance coverage, benefits, or policy to a payer The 834 deals with three types of transactions: Initial enrollment Changes to enrollment benefit information Reconciliation to ensure accuracy of data

Business Considerations: 834 Transaction Enrollment process must be reviewed to ensure all transaction data is available Requires a change in policies and procedures Status inquiries must be enhanced to handle an automated process EDI agreements must be reviewed

820: Premium Payment Transaction The 820 transaction is not required since employer/sponsor is not a covered entity; 820 is sent from employer/sponsor to payer Used to initiate an electronic payment that includes the remittance detail needed by the receiver to properly apply the payment Payment can be initiated without the remittance detail, and send the remittance detail separately to the plan Payment can be made electronically or by paper

Covered Transactions: Standards Not Yet Determined First report of injury – Workers’ Compensation Health claims attachments – following electronic claims with paper attachments does not make sense

Planning for Implementation Strategic approach Enhance EDI capabilities to realize savings Recognize data and information as an asset Identify HIPAA as an opportunity Map HIPAA compliance to the organization’s strategic plan

Next Steps

Next Steps Educate your staff Define an organizational EDI strategy and determine which transactions you want to process electronically using the standard formats Conduct a comprehensive analysis Evaluate transactions and code sets currently in use Identify information systems and feeder systems Identify and begin discussions with trading partners and vendors Review contracts Identify process changes necessary

Next Steps (cont’d) Select implementation recommendations based on alternatives identified during the analysis Develop transition and conversion plans Establish a training plan Establish monitoring and reporting mechanisms

Industry Collaboration WEDI - Workgroup for Electronic Data Interchange: www.wedi.org SNIP - Strategic National Implementation Process: www.wedi.org/snip SNIP is a collaborative health care industry-wide process resulting in the implementation of standards and furthering the development and implementation of future standards Many white papers available, written by industry collaborative effort: Direct Data Entry (DDE) Coordination of Benefits (COB) Testing and certification

Requesting Changes to Standards Requesting Changes to the HIPAA X12N or NCPDP Implementation Guides: HHS named consortium consisting of X12N, NCPDP, HL7, NUBC, NUCC, ADA Consortium is the Designated Standards Maintenance Organizations (DSMO) December 2000 – current: approximately 300 changes requested Go to www.hipaa-dmso.org to request changes

Questions and Discussion Press 1 on your touch tone phone for questions.

Resources American Health Information Management Association (AHIMA): Benchmark information and case studies Interim Steps for Getting Started http://www.ahima.org/hipaa.html Computer-Based Patient Record Institute (CPRI): CPRI Security Toolkit http://www.cpri-host.org Department of Health and Human Services HIPAA Administrative Simplification: Latest News on Regulations Current proposed and final rules http://aspe.hhs.gov/admnsimp/index.htm For the Record: Protecting Electronic Health Information (National Academy Press, 1997) 800-624-6242 Full Report http://www.nap.edu HIPAA Transaction Implementation Guides from the Washington Publishing Company http://www.wpc-edi.com Links to federal HIPAA sites http://www.hcfa.gov/medicare/edi/hipaaedi.htm Subscribe to email release of HIPAA documents (such as notice of proposed rule making) http://www.hcfa.gov/medicare/edi/admnlist.htm