Mining For Lost Treasure National Geospatial Data Clearinghouse Archibald Warnock U.S. Federal Geographic Data Committee A/WWW Enterprises.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Clearinghouse and OGC Web Services Overview Doug Nebert FGDC Secretariat December 4, 2001.

Advertisements

U.S. States Abbreviations Directions: Type the state abbreviation in the box on each slide. “The English language website where everything.

The West` Washington Idaho 1 Montana Oregon California 3 4 Nevada Utah

NSDI Douglas Nebert, Clearinghouse Coordinator Federal Geographic Data Committee An Overview.

Integrating Biodiversity Data

Business Meeting 2013 sunapsis® User’s Conference Gillian Thiebe sunapsis® Business Manager.

Harvesting Metadata for Use by the geodata.gov Portal Doug Nebert FGDC Secretariat Geospatial One-Stop Team.

MCNC/CNIDR & A/WWW Enterprises Introduction to CNIDR’s Isite Jim Fullton - MCNC/CNIDR Archie Warnock - A/WWW Enterprises.

NBII and the FGDC CAP Grant: Building Metadata Partnerships Vivian Hutchison Metadata Program Coordinator NBII/USGS.

Planned Title: Review of Evaluation of Geospatial Search Allan Doyle.

BINARY CODING. Alabama Arizona California Connecticut Florida Hawaii Illinois Iowa Kentucky Maine Massachusetts Minnesota Missouri 0 Nebraska New Hampshire.

States and Cities SOL US II 2c A state is an example of a political region. States may be grouped as part of different regions, depending upon the criteria.

What are the states in the Northeast Region?

U.S. Civil War Map On a current map of the U.S. identify and label the Union States, the Confederate States, and U.S. territories. Create a map key and.

Regions By Katelyn Ebenkamp Picture background with textured caption

Southeast Region States Contained in the region: Alabama (AL) Florida (FL) Georgia (GA) Mississippi (MS) Louisiana (LA) Arkansas (AR) Tennessee (TN)

PLASC Member Survey: Who’s our crowd? Conducted by Stephanie Bennett and Adrienne Pruitt Presented at the PLASC annual business meeting, Friday, August.

Metadata Understanding the Value and Importance of Proper Data Documentation Exercise 2 Reading a Metadata File Exercise 3 Using the Workbook Exercise.

Mining For Lost Treasure National Geospatial Data Clearinghouse Archibald Warnock U.S. Federal Geographic Data Committee A/WWW Enterprises.

This chart compares the percentage of cases filed in Maine under chapter 13 with the national average between 1999 and As a percent of total filings,

Regions of the United States

Fasten your seatbelts we’re off on a cross country road trip!

Why We Create Metadata and How it is Useful Bruce Godfrey University of Idaho Library INSIDE Idaho

1 Systems Development Cheryl Itkin SIMCorB Meeting RTP, NC June 29-30, 2000 SIMCorB Organization Policy Systems Outreach.

Map Review. California Kentucky Alabama.

Publishing Clearinghouse resources to geodata.gov Doug Nebert FGDC Secretariat Geospatial One-Stop Team September 17, 2004.

Planning for Arctic GIS and Geographic Information Infrastructure Sponsored by the Arctic Research Support and Logistics Program 30 October 2003 Seattle,

Harvesting Metadata for Use by the geodata.gov Portal Doug Nebert FGDC Secretariat Geospatial One-Stop Team.

1. AFL-CIO What percentage of the funds received by Alabama K-12 public schools in school year was provided by the state of Alabama? a)44% b)53%

The Earth Day Groceries Project

Let’s See What You Know: Draw the outline of the United States Draw California Identify and label our three major bodies of water Star the location of.

The United States.

Directions: Label Texas, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Tennessee, Alabama, Georgia, Florida, South Carolina, North Carolina, Virginia--- then color.

Warm Up Complete the Coordinate Practice #10. Content Objective: – Compare the physical and political regions. Language Objectives: – SWBAT define region.

CHAPTER 7 FILINGS IN MAINE CALENDAR YEARS 1999 – 2009 CALENDAR YEAR CHAPTER 7 FILINGS This chart shows total case filings in Maine for calendar years 1999.

GIS data sources; catalogs of data and services. USGS: National Mapping.

Midwest Northeast West Southwest Southeast.

Geospatial One-Stop FGDC and GOS: Working as One to Build the NSDI Sharon Shin Federal Geographic Data Committee Geospatial One-Stop Metadata Coordinator.

GBIF Data Access and Database Interoperability 2003 Work Programme Overview Donald Hobern, GBIF Programme Officer for Data Access and Database Interoperability.

1 Overview Finding and importing data sets –Searching for data –Importing data_.

The FGDC and Metadata. To maintain an organization's internal investment in geospatial data To provide information about an organization's data holdings.

PUBLIC SCHOOL LAW Part 16 : Primary Legal Sources—Judicial.

Study Cards The East (12) Study Cards The East (12) New Hampshire New York Massachusetts Delaware Connecticut New Jersey Rhode Island Rhode Island Maryland.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Central Data Exchange Pilot Project Promoting Geospatial Data Exchange Between EPA and State Partners. April 25, 2007.

Hawaii Alaska (not to scale) Alaska GeoCurrents Customizable Base Map text.

US MAP TEST Practice

FGDC and ASF Using Structured Metadata Archie Warnock A/WWW Enterprises

Don’t Duck Metadata March 2005 Introducing Setting Up a Clearinghouse Node Topic: Introduction to Setting Up a Clearinghouse Node Objective: By.

Exhibit 1. Average 2016 Premiums, by State and Metal Tier, and Average Change in Premiums, and Premium Increases Premium Increases.

National Geospatial Enterprise Architecture N S D I National Spatial Data Infrastructure An Architectural Process Overview Presented by Eliot Christian.

Sponsored by the National Center for Education Statistics U.S. Department of Education as a component of the National Cooperative Education Statistics.

After reading this chapter, you will be able to:  Find U.S. Supreme Court cases  Find other federal court decisions  Locate state court opinions  Know.

TOTAL CASE FILINGS - MAINE CALENDAR YEARS 1999 – 2009 CALENDAR YEAR Total Filings This chart shows total case filings in Maine for calendar years 1999.

2c: States grouped by region

Water Resources and Natural s Production

Expanded State Agency Use of NMLS

1 Washington, WA 2 Oregon, OR 3 California, CA 4 Arizona, AZ 5 Nevada, NE 6 Utah, UT 7 Idaho, ID 8 Montana, MT 9 Wyoming, WY 10 Colorado, CO 11 New Mexico,

Physicians per 1,000 Persons

USAGE OF THE – GHz BAND IN THE USA

New Mexico’s RGIS Program: State Geospatial Data Clearinghouse

The States How many states are in the United States?

APPLYING FOR THE CPA EXAM

Identify the State & Capital

Regions of the United States

DO NOW: TAKE OUT ANY FORMS OR PAPERS YOU NEED TO TURN IN

Regions of the United States

Expanded State Agency Use of NMLS

Earth Data Analysis Center at The University of New Mexico

CBD Topical Sales Restrictions by State (as of May 23, 2019)

USAGE OF THE 4.4 – 4.99 GHz BAND IN THE USA

Presentation transcript:

Mining For Lost Treasure National Geospatial Data Clearinghouse Archibald Warnock U.S. Federal Geographic Data Committee A/WWW Enterprises

What is Clearinghouse? zDistributed service to locate geospatial data based on their characteristics expressed in metadata zClearinghouse allows one to pose a query of all or a portion of the community in a single session zLike a spatial AltaVista

Components of Clearinghouse zThere are three functional areas that interact to create the Clearinghouse: yMetadata preparation and indexing yMetadata service yUser Access via Gateway forms

Clearinghouse Method Metadata preparation Metadata validation/ staging Metadata publication User access

Clearinghouse Design zThe Clearinghouse in its distributed form includes a registry of servers, several WWW-to-Z39.50 gateways, and many Z39.50 servers zA primary goal of Clearinghouse is the ability to find spatial data throughout the entire community, not one site at a time

Essential Configuration FGDC Gateways Web Client Web Client Node Clearinghouse Sites

User downloads query form FGDC Gateways Web Client Web Client Node Clearinghouse Sites

User sends query to web server FGDC Gateways Web Client Web Client Node Clearinghouse Sites

Gateway passes query to Clearinghouse Servers FGDC Gateways Web Client Web Client Node Clearinghouse Sites

Gateway receives and collates response as list of “hits” FGDC Gateways Web Client Web Client Node Clearinghouse Sites

Client receives results summary as HTML by default FGDC Gateways Web Client Web Client Node Clearinghouse Sites

Client can request a specific metadata record for viewing FGDC Gateways Web Client Web Client Node Clearinghouse Sites

Node in More Detail MetadataIndex/DB Z39.50 server InternetData

Metadata Solutions zNumerous software solutions available zCommercial and free-ware zStandalone, DB-linked, GIS-linked zPermit collection and structuring of FGDC- compatible metadata zPresent metadata as HTML, XML, or text

Server Solutions zZ39.50 Protocol is used z“GEO” Geospatial Metadata Profile is published for Z39.50 implementors to understand FGDC metadata structures zSupports search across numeric, text, date, and spatial extent and full-text zFreeware and commercial solutions

Gateway in more detail Nodes Gateway Web server interface Z39.50 clients Web Gateway Case Web client Web client

User Interfaces zHTML-based forms hosted at Gateways are the primary access method zJava map-based interface from MEL allows more sophisticated search zInclusion of search capabilities in GIS client software is possible

Who’s in Clearinghouse? z109 Nodes (servers) online as of 3/1/99 y28 Federal, national scope y35 State/University state-wide scope y28 International scope or location y18 Local or Regional scope

Federal Participation zNOAA (10) zUSGS (6) zFEMA (sampler) zNRCS climate and soils zCIESIN/EPA zCIESIN/NASA zDOT NTAD z National Park Service z Army Corps of Engineers z Tri-Services Center z National Wetlands Inventory z Census (sampler) z Minerals Management Service

State Participation zNew York (2) zNorth Carolina zOklahoma zKansas zTexas zMontana (3) zVermont zPennsylvania z West Virginia z Washington z Wisconsin z Wyoming (2) z Florida z Alabama z New Mexico z Arizona zGeorgia zIllinois zMinnesota zAlaska zCalifornia zDelaware zNebraska (2) zNew Jersey

Regional/Local Participation zMcKinley Co, NM zCity of Santa Fe, NM zNorth Texas GIS zResearch Planning zSabine R Authority, TX zSan Francisco Bay zS Florida Ecosystem zSW Natural Resources z Olympic Peninsula, WA z Greater Yellowstone z Helena NF z Ecological Reserves, KS z MIT/Mass Boston DOQs z Great Lakes EIS z Eastern Sierra

International Participation zNOAA/Japan GOIN zSouth Africa (2) zESA AVHRR sampler zGELOS, Italy zPAIGH, Mexico zS57 Hydrography, Canada zNRL MEL zAfrica DDS z Inter-American Geospatial Data Network z Hong Kong z CIESIN/USDA Global Environmental Change z Australia (10+) z Costa Rica z Caribbean CEPNET, Jamaica

Planned or Funded Nodes zMt Desert Island, ME zSW Washington COG zNASA GCMD zCODEPLAN, Brazil zIowa zMissouri zKentucky z South Dakota z Oregon z Louisiana z Ohio z Connecticut MAGIC z Colorado z NW Ecosystems

88 Independent Nodes? NSDI One Common Access Method

For more information: Visit the FGDC website: Contact the Clearinghouse Coordinator, Doug Nebert