12/9-10/2009 TGDC Meeting Ballot On Demand David Flater National Institute of Standards and Technology

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Testing the AutoMARK Ballot Marking Device on Election Day.
Advertisements

TGDC Meeting, December 2011 Usability and Accessibility (U&A) Research Update Sharon J. Laskowski, Ph.D.
IEEE P1622 Meeting, Oct 2011 IEEE P1622 Meeting October 24-25, 2011 Overview of IEEE P1622 Draft Standard for Electronic Distribution of Blank Ballots.
TGDC Meeting, July 2010 Report of the Auditability Working Group David Flater National Institute of Standards and Technology DRAFT.
Election Observer Training 2008 Elections Certification & Training Program
TGDC Meeting, July 2011 Review of VVSG 1.1 Nelson Hastings, Ph.D. Technical Project Leader for Voting Standards, ITL
Voting Machines Failing the World *Voting machines around the world are failing in Colorado as well as 34 other states. *This could be crucial in the upcoming.
TGDC Meeting, Jan 2011 VVSG 1.1 Test Suite Status Mary Brady National Institute of Standards and Technology
Guide to the Voting Action Planner Voting is the way we elect government officials, pass laws and decide on issues…
Voting System Qualification How it happens and why.
12/9-10/2009 TGDC Meeting TGDC Recommendations Research as requested by the EAC John P. Wack National Institute of Standards and Technology
TGDC Meeting, Jan 2011 UOCAVA Pilot Projects for the 2012 Federal Election Report from the UOCAVA Working Group Andrew Regenscheid National Institute of.
Improving U.S. Voting Systems The Voters’ Perspective: Next generation guidelines for usability and accessibility Sharon Laskowski NIST Whitney Quesenbery.
TGDC Meeting, July 2011 Overview of July TGDC Meeting Belinda L. Collins, Ph.D. Senior Advisor, Voting Standards, ITL
Voting Systems.  DS200  DS850  AutoMARK Voting Equipment.
Election Administration. Ensuring legitimacy of the government Legitimacy: acceptance of the right of public officials to hold office and to promulgate.
TGDC Meeting, Jan 2011 VVSG 2.0 and Beyond: Usability and Accessibility Issues, Gaps, and Performance Tests Sharon Laskowski, PhD National Institute of.
EAC-requested VVSG Research Overview and Status June 2008 Mark Skall Chief, Software Diagnostics and Conformance Testing Division National Institute of.
12/9-10/2009 TGDC Meeting Vote-by-Phone David Flater / Sharon Laskowski National Institute of Standards and Technology
TGDC Meeting, July 2011 IEEE P.1622 Update John P. Wack Computer Scientist, Software and Systems Division, ITL
ELECTIONS Upcoming Trends. ELECTIONS ADMINSTRATORS Duties o Protect the security and integrity of the elections o Redistricting o Secure polling locations.
12/9-10/2009 TGDC Meeting NIST Research on UOCAVA Voting Andrew Regenscheid National Institute of Standards and Technology
Digital Democracy: A look at Voting Machines Presented by Justin Dugger April 2003.
Standards in Elections: NIST and the Help America Vote Act Lynne S. Rosenthal National Institute of Standards and Technology
IEEE P1622 Meeting, Feb 2011 Common Data Format (CDF) Update John P. Wack National Institute of Standards and Technology
Improving U.S. Voting Systems Security Breakout Session Improving U.S. Voting Systems Andrew Regenscheid National Institute.
Usability and Accessibility Working Group Report Sharon Laskowski, PhD National Institute of Standards and Technology TGDC Meeting,
Briefing for NIST Acting Director James Turner regarding visit from EAC Commissioners March 26, 2008 For internal use only 1.
TGDC Meeting, Jan 2011 Accessibility and Usability Considerations for UOCAVA Remote Electronic Voting Systems Sharon Laskowski, PhD National Institute.
TGDC Meeting, Jan 2011 Auditability Working Group David Flater National Institute of Standards and Technology r4.
VVSG: Usability, Accessibility, Privacy 1 VVSG, Part 1, Chapter 3 Usability, Accessibility, and Privacy December 6, 2007 Dr. Sharon Laskowski
12/9-10/2009 TGDC Meeting Usability and Accessibility Progress and Challenges Sharon Laskowski, PhD National Institute of Standards and Technology
Idaho Procedures M100 OPTICAL SCAN PRECINCT TABULATOR.
Oct 15-17, : Integratability and Data Export Page 1Next VVSG Training Voting devices must speak (produce records) using a commonly understood language,
TGDC Meeting, July 2010 Report of the UOCAVA Working Group John Wack National Institute of Standards and Technology DRAFT.
NIST Voting Program Page 1 NIST Voting Program Lynne Rosenthal National Institute of Standards and Technology
TGDC Meeting, July 2011 Voluntary Voting System Guidelines Roadmap Nelson Hastings, Ph.D. Technical Project Leader for Voting Standards, ITL
Political Process 3.6 Politics and Government. E- voting Electronic voting systems for electorates have been in use since the 1960s when punched card.
Kurt S. Browning Secretary of State Dr. Gisela Salas Director, Division of Elections Presented by: David Drury, Bureau Chief Bureau of Voting Systems Certification,
TGDC Meeting, Jan 2011 Help America Vote Act (HAVA) Roadmap Nelson Hastings National Institute of Standards and Technology
TGDC Meeting, July 2010 Report on Other Resolutions from Dec 2009 TGDC Meeting John Wack National Institute of Standards and Technology
TGDC Meeting, July 2010 Report on Logging Requirements in VVSG 2.0 Nelson Hastings National Institute of Standards and Technology
TGDC Meeting, Jan 2011 Common Data Format (CDF) Update John P. Wack National Institute of Standards and Technology
WHY THE vvpat has failed
NIST Voting Program Activities Update January 4, 2007 Mark Skall Chief, Software Diagnostics and Conformance Testing Division.
1 DECEMBER 9-10, 2009 Gaithersburg, Maryland TECHNICAL GUIDELINES DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Commissioner Donetta Davidson.
EAC-requested VVSG Research Overview and Status June 2008 Mark Skall Chief, Software Diagnostics and Conformance Testing Division National Institute of.
Creating Accessibility, Usability and Privacy Requirements for the Voluntary Voting System Guidelines (VVSG) Whitney Quesenbery TGDC Member Chair, Subcommittee.
12/9-10/2009 TGDC Meeting The VVSG Version 1.1 Overview John P. Wack National Institute of Standards and Technology
Idaho Procedures M650 GREEN LIGHT OPTICAL SCAN TABULATOR.
12/9-10/2009 TGDC Meeting NIST-developed Test Suites David Flater National Institute of Standards and Technology
Voting Centers and Managing Change “Rockin’ the Vote” Phoenix Style.
Association of World Election Bodies Contents ICT–based Election Management Voter Registration and Identification Voting and Counting Examples.
Election Assistance Commission 1 TGDC Meeting High Level VVSG Requirements: What do they look like? February, 09, United States.
Update: Revising the VVSG Structure Sharon Laskowski vote.nist.gov April 14, 2016 EAC Standards Board Meeting 1.
TGDC Meeting, Jan 2011 Report from Workshop on UOCAVA Remote Voting Systems Nelson Hastings National Institute of Standards and Technology
TGDC Meeting, Jan 2011 VVSG 2.0 and Beyond: Usability and Accessibility Issues, Gaps, and Performance Tests Sharon Laskowski, PhD National Institute of.
TGDC Meeting, Jan 2011 UOCAVA Pilot Projects for the 2012 Federal Election Report from the UOCAVA Working Group Andrew Regenscheid National Institute of.
TGDC Meeting, Jan 2011 Accessibility and Usability Considerations for UOCAVA Remote Electronic Voting Systems Sharon Laskowski, PhD National Institute.
12/9-10/2009 TGDC Meeting Alternatives to Software Independence Nelson Hastings National Institute of Standards and Technology
The VVSG 2005 Revision Overview EAC Standards Board Meeting February 26-27, 2009 John P. Wack NIST Voting Program National Institute.
National Institute of Standards and Technology
CDF for Voting Systems: Human Factors Issues
2015 All-Mailed Ballot Election Overview
UOCAVA Electronic Blank Ballot Delivery Use Case
The Voters Choice Act (SB 450) Modernizing The Voting Experience
Texas Secretary of State Elections Division
Presented by Vermont Secretary of State Jim Condos
Texas Secretary of State Elections Division
Accessible Voting Initiatives in Maryland
Presentation transcript:

12/9-10/2009 TGDC Meeting Ballot On Demand David Flater National Institute of Standards and Technology

12/9-10/2009 TGDC Meeting What is Ballot On Demand? What does it integrate with? How does it work? What problems does it solve? More than one answer At least two commercial products Wish-listing Need to agree on a generic, neutral definition that leaves room for future innovation but eliminates spurious use cases Page 2 12/9-10/2009 TGDC Meeting

BOD = no pre-printed ballots A dedicated application, possibly integrated with an electronic pollbook and/or registration database, prints out a ballot of the correct ballot style as each voter is checked in, based on each voter's registration information. No ballots are prepared in advance. May be of particular use in vote centers for early voting. Concerns Potential for information leakage from registration to ballots Extra set-up, calibration and testing steps for COTS printers Scanning: quality and variability of printed ballots Another thing that can fail on election day Page 3 12/9-10/2009 TGDC Meeting

BOD = a backup mechanism A dedicated application running in the polling place is used by election officials on location to produce additional ballots in response to emergencies such as (1) the ballots prepared in advance run out; (2) as a back-up voting mechanism in case the DREs won't work; (3) as an accommodation for voters who specifically want or need a paper ballot instead of a DRE. Concerns Scanning: mixing ballots from two different production processes Readiness testing and L&A testing for the back-up path—delay between testing and use Page 4 12/9-10/2009 TGDC Meeting

BOD = Electronic Ballot Printer An Electronically-assisted Ballot Marker which integrates the BOD functionality. One does not need to have a blank ballot of the correct ballot style prepared in advance; the device activates the correct style of ballot, collects the votes, and prints the completed ballot (both ballot style information and votes) onto blank paper. No electronic record of the votes is retained by the device. Already handled by draft VVSG 2.0 as EBP Manufacturer must specify printer set-up, calibration and testing, paper, ink or toner, and other variables, sufficient to meet accuracy benchmark Page 5 12/9-10/2009 TGDC Meeting

BOD = DRE + printer A DRE has a BOD feature as a kind of add-on whereby it can send an activated ballot to a printer instead of displaying it on the touchscreen. Blank ballots only—implementation of first or second use case Voted ballots—additional concerns Retention, tabulation, use of electronic CVRs in parallel to paper ballots is interesting, disruptive possibility Page 6 12/9-10/2009 TGDC Meeting

Other use cases Uniformed and overseas citizens—remote locations Voters print their own absentee ballots at home Different requirements and consequences for security, privacy, etc. Page 7 12/9-10/2009 TGDC Meeting

Summary Need to agree on a generic, neutral definition that leaves room for future innovation but eliminates spurious use cases Most likely impacts on VVSG Classify any new devices Security implications re information leakage from registration Security implications re multiple applications on the same device Readiness testing, L&A testing Usability for poll workers Reliability benchmark? Issues for certification Variability of COTS printers, paper, ink or toner vs. performance and calibration of the scanners Quality of manufacturer specification of printer set-up, calibration and testing, paper, ink or toner, and other variables Page 8 12/9-10/2009 TGDC Meeting