Identification of Two Distinct Inactive Conformations of the β 2 -Adrenergic Receptor Reconciles Structural and Biochemical Observations Ron Dror, Daniel.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Energetic Considerations in the Mechanisms of Activation of Rhodopsin-like Receptors Irache Visiers§, Barbara J. Ebersole‡, Stella Dracheva‡, Juan Ballesteros§*,Stuart.
Advertisements

Heterotrimeric G proteins and the role of lipids in signaling John Sondek, Ph.D. Depts. of Pharmacology and Biochemistry & Biophyscis.
Current Topics of Genomics and Epigenomics. Outline  Motivation for analysis of higher order chromatin structure  Methods for studying long range chromatin.
Cell signaling: responding to the outside world Cells interact with their environment by interpreting extracellular signals via proteins that span their.
11.2 Reception: A signaling molecule binds to a receptor protein, causing it to change shape A receptor protein on or in the target cell allows the cell.
Folding and flexibility. Outline What is protein folding ? How proteins fold in vivo ? What is protein flexibility ?
How mechanical force regulates the function of proteins? Vesa Hytönen Research group of Professor Viola Vogel, Biologically Oriented.
Protein Rigidity and Flexibility: Applications to Folding A.J. Rader University of Pittsburgh Center for Computational Biology & Bioinformatics.
Crystal Structure of Rhodopsin : A G Protein-Coupled Receptor Authors : Krzysztof Palczewski, Takasi Kumasaka, Tetsuya Hori, Craig A. Behnke, Hiroyuki.
The 3 Steps.  Intracellular Receptors ◦ Proteins in the cytoplasm or in the nucleus ◦ Example: transcription factors  Receptors in the Plasma Membrane.
oY. G-Protein Coupled Receptor.
Monomeric GPCR as a Functional Unit Marc Chabre and Marc le Maire Presented by : Naveena Sivaram.
Molecular dynamics simulations reveal structural instability of human trypsin inhibitor upon D50E and Y54H mutations Surasak Chunsrivirot Biostatistics.
G Protein-Coupled Receptors Stuart C. Sealfon. Major Classes of GPCRs Class I: rhodopsin-like Class II: glucagon-like Class III: metabotropic glutamate-like.
Journal Report 党新星、郭春芬、高迪. Scientists Raymond C. Stevens Brian K. Kobilka.
Example: Critical Evaluation of a Paper Barthe et al. (2009) Dynamic and Structural Characterization of a Bacterial FHA Protein Reveals a New Autoinhibition.
Today: Epinephrine nestles in predicted binding site of predicted human 1- adrenergic receptor. [Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 99, (2002)]. Battery.
STRUCTURE CALCULATIONS OF PROTEIN SURFACE SEGMENTS: MONTE CARLO SIMULATED ANNEALING WITH SCALED COLLECTIVE VARIABLES AND FORCE CONSTANT ANNEALING Sergio.
Anna Adell, Mariona Bartrolí, Marina Brasó i Abel Eraso MEMBRANE PROTEINS.
Chem. 860 Molecular Simulations with Biophysical Applications Qiang Cui Department of Chemistry and Theoretical Chemistry Institute University of Wisconsin,
Structure of GPCRs and G proteins
By Siavoush Dastmalchi Tabriz University of Medical Sciences Tabriz-Iran Modelling the Structures of G Protein-Coupled Receptors Aided by Three-Dimensional.
Systematic calculation and characterization of local motions in allosteric proteins Michael D. Daily 1 and Jeffrey J. Gray 1,2 1 Program in Molecular &
Proteins in Bionanotechnology Computational Studies Andrew Hung, Oliver Beckstein, Robert D’Rozario, Sylvanna S.W. Ho and Mark S.P. Sansom Laboratory of.
ABSTRACT We need to study protein flexibility for a better understanding of its function. Flexibility determines how a conformation changes when the protein.
Exploiting a natural conformational switch to engineer an interleukin-2 ‘superkine’ May 22, 2012 Joseph Argus, Pardeep Singh, Uland Lau.
Computational Approaches to GPCR Structure anf function Christopher A Reynolds Department of Biological Sciences University of Essex United Kingdom Essex.
Methods and Software NAMD (NAnoscale Molecular Dynamics) is a parallel molecular dynamics code designed for high performance simulation of large systems.
G-protein-Couped receptor Liu Ningsheng 12/3/2010.
Understanding RNA Structure and Function using Molecular Dynamics Simulations ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________.
By: Jillian Rainville Faculty Sponsor: Linda Hufnagel
A Computational Study of RNA Structure and Dynamics Rhiannon Jacobs and Harish Vashisth Department of Chemical Engineering, University of New Hampshire,
STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS OF RHODOPSIN: A G-PROTEIN-COUPLED RECEPTOR by Basak Isin.
The β adrenergic receptor (βAR)
Dr. Jagdish Kaur, P.G.G.C.,Sector 11 Chandigarh

“Simulations of the dynamics at an RNA-protein interface”
2E2 – Timing and coordination of physiological events are regulated by multiple mechanisms. 3B2 – A variety of intercellular and intracellular signal transmissions.
Transmembrane and GPCR Mohammed Mohammed Khan PhD Scholar- Department of Biochemistry King Abdul-Aziz University.
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (August 2011)
Conformational changes in rhodopsin Example Lecture
Study on the Self-assembly of Diphenylalanine-based Nanostructures by Coarse-grained Molecular Dynamics Cong Guo and Guanghong Wei Physics Department,
Ligand-Specific Interactions Modulate Kinetic, Energetic, and Mechanical Properties of the Human β2 Adrenergic Receptor  Michael Zocher, Juan J. Fung,
Structure and Signaling Mechanism of Per-ARNT-Sim Domains
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages (December 2009)
Volume 23, Issue 12, Pages (December 2015)
The crystal structure of rhodopsin.
Ligand-Specific Interactions Modulate Kinetic, Energetic, and Mechanical Properties of the Human β2 Adrenergic Receptor  Michael Zocher, Juan J. Fung,
Supriyo Bhattacharya, Nagarajan Vaidehi  Biophysical Journal 
Free Energy Diagrams for Protein Function
Molecular Simulation Approaches to Membrane Proteins
Volume 19, Issue 10, Pages (October 2011)
The HETE Is on FFAR1 and Pancreatic Islet Cells
Structural basis for nucleotide exchange in heterotrimeric G proteins
How Ligands Illuminate GPCR Molecular Pharmacology
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages (June 2016)
Ligand Control of G Protein-Coupled Receptor Activity: New Insights
Probing the Energy Landscape of the Membrane Protein Bacteriorhodopsin
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (August 2011)
Discovery of New GPCR Biology: One Receptor Structure at a Time
David L. Mobley, Ken A. Dill  Structure 
Chris Neale, Henry D. Herce, Régis Pomès, Angel E. García 
Exchange of Regions between Bacterial Poly(A) Polymerase and the CCA-Adding Enzyme Generates Altered Specificities  Heike Betat, Christiane Rammelt, Georges.
Volume 23, Issue 12, Pages (December 2015)
Structural Basis of Inward Rectification
Conformational Ensembles in GPCR Activation
Molecular Modeling of the Human A1 Adenosine Receptor
Fig. 2 Dynamics of Im7 protein by backbone 15N-NMR spin relaxation and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Dynamics of Im7 protein by backbone 15N-NMR.
Matthew T. Eddy, Tatiana Didenko, Raymond C. Stevens, Kurt Wüthrich 
Species-Dependent Ensembles of Conserved Conformational States Define the Hsp90 Chaperone ATPase Cycle  Daniel R. Southworth, David A. Agard  Molecular.
Presentation transcript:

Identification of Two Distinct Inactive Conformations of the β 2 -Adrenergic Receptor Reconciles Structural and Biochemical Observations Ron Dror, Daniel Arlow, David Borhani, Morten Jensen, Stefano Piana, and David Shaw D. E. Shaw Research

Adrenergic signaling 101

Adrenaline

Adrenergic signaling 101

P Scheerer et al. Nature 455, (2008) GDP  

Adrenergic signaling 101

GPCR crystal structures Rhodopsin (2000) β 1 AR (2008) A 2A AR (2008) β 2 AR (2007) T4L Rasmussen et al., 2007 Cherezov et al., 2007 Palczewski et al., 2000 Li et al., 2004 Jaakola et al., 2008Warne et al., 2008

Broken ionic lock in β 2 AR crystals Rhodopsinβ 2 AR extracellular intracellular

GPCR crystal structures Rhodopsin (2000) β 1 AR (2008) A 2A AR (2008) β 2 AR (2007) Ionic lock formed Ionic lock broken Ionic lock broken Ionic lock broken T4L Rasmussen et al., 2007 Cherezov et al., 2007 Palczewski et al., 2000 Li et al., 2004 Jaakola et al., 2008Warne et al., 2008

Broken ionic lock presents a puzzle Biochemical data suggests that lock stabilizes inactive state of β 2 AR and other GPCRs (Ballesteros et al., 2001; Yao et al., 2006) Hypotheses for broken lock in inactive β 2 AR crystal structures: –Lock is typically broken in β 2 AR (Rosenbaum et al., 2007; Warne et al., 2008) –Broken lock reflects particular ligand properties (Lefkowitz et al., 2008; Audet & Bouvier, 2008) –Crystals capture one of multiple inactive conformations (Rasmussen et al. 2007; Ranganathan, 2007)

Molecular dynamics simulations: inactive β 2 AR T4L

Molecular dynamics simulations: inactive β 2 AR

All-atom simulations performed in Desmond with CHARMM force field

Ionic lock forms

Helices 3 and 6 move together, adopting a rhodopsin-like conformation

Ionic lock forms Helices 3 and 6 move together, adopting a rhodopsin-like conformation

Lock shows broken/formed equilibrium In four similar simulations, lock formed 91% of time on average

T4L removed, carazolol-bound No ligand T4L fusion biases equilibrium toward broken lock state % time lock formed Reconstructed intracellular loop 3 Inactive Active-likeT4L fusion protein *

Intracellular loop 2 folds into a helix, matching β 1 AR structure

Intracellular loop 3 folds Intracellular loop 3 is absent from β 2 AR crystal structures. It was reconstructed for this simulation.

Conclusions Inactive β 2 AR appears to be in equilibrium between major conformation with ionic lock formed and minor conformation with lock broken –Explains biochemical observations –Crystal structures may represent minor conformation Secondary structure elements form, some of which match β 1 AR structure.

Acknowledgments Acknowledgments: Michael Eastwood, Justin Gullingsrud, Kresten Lindorff-Larsen, Paul Maragakis, and Kim Palmo and other colleagues at D. E. Shaw Research Questions? Paper in press at PNAS Desmond available for free for non-commercial use: