Roadless Area Conservation: National Forest System Lands in Idaho Proposed Rule www. roadless.fs.fed.us State of Idaho.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Notebook Ref 3.5. Tier 3: No Degradation in ONRWs Applies only to waters classified as Outstanding National Resource Waters (ONRW) This classification.
Advertisements

Medway Valley Heritage Forest Environmentally Significant Area Phase One - Conservation Master Plan Community Information Meeting July 25, :45 –
Forest Practices Code Transition Planning Ian Miller Legislation and Policy Forester, MOF.
Spruce Beetle Epidemic & Aspen Decline Management Response EIS Adaptive Implementation Process.
Shoreline Master Program Update. Shoreline Management Act approved by voters in the early 1970’s to: – Encourage water-dependent uses – Protect shoreline.
Thanks for joining us. We’ll be starting soon. To join the teleconference, dial , passcode # To download handouts : Click the Handouts.
HEALTHY FOREST RESTORATION ACT Western Hardwood Association June 26, 2005.
Farm Bill Agricultural Act of 2014 Title VIII- Forestry
New England Cottontail Conservation Efforts Anthony Tur US Fish and Wildlife Service New England Field Office Concord, New Hampshire.
NFIP ESA ComplianceImplementing a Reasonable and Prudent Alternative – FEMA Region 10 ESA and the National Flood Insurance Program Implementing a salmon.
Information Needs National Forest System Update 2011 FIA User Group Meeting – Sacramento, CA March 9, 2011 Greg Kujawa NFS, Washington Office.
“ We are in the business of healthy ecosystems.” A Business Plan For Ecosystem Health & Large-Scale Watershed Restoration In the Northern Region.
Wetlands Mitigation Policy Sudbury Wetlands Administration Bylaw April 27, 2015.
Feasibility Studies National Heritage Areas. Initiating National Heritage Areas National Heritage Area designations have been initiated in four different.
Safeguarding Animal Health 1 Proposed BSE Comprehensive Rule: A New Approach to BSE Rulemaking Dr. Christopher Robinson Assistant Director, NCIE BSE Comprehensive.
Forest Plan Revision Using the 2012 Planning Rule Process Overview Steps and Expectations (I don’t know….but I’ve been told…if the horse don’t pull….you.
Provisions of the Spotted Owl CHU Rule: How Are We Interpreting What It Says? And How Does it Integrate with the NWFP? Bruce Hollen (BLM) and Brendan White.
Sacred Sites. Documentation Documentation: Forest Supervisor or Ranger District Offices may document Sacred site (s) information in a variety of ways.
CSG West Energy and Environment Committee July 28, 2015 Dustin T. Miller Governor’s Office of Species Conservation.
Direction for Fire Management in Land Use Plan Revisions.
US FOREST SERVICE REGIONAL ROUNDTABLE Planning Rule Revision Photographer: Bill Lea.
Travel Management Rule Implementation
Chapter 10 Land, Public and Private. The Tragedy of the Commons In 1968, ecologist Garrett Hardin described the “tragedy of the commons” Tragedy of the.
Fish and Wildlife Service Mission Conserve, protect and enhance fish, wildlife, and plants and their habitats for the continuing benefit of the American.
1 Overview of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)  Objective: Clarify the roles of NEPA and Negotiated Rulemaking Clarify the roles of NEPA and Negotiated.
The Colorado Roadless Rule - January 29, 2013 Lisa Reynolds Kaplan Kirsch & Rockwell LLP January 29, 2013.
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act March 23, 2010.
Hazard Mitigation Planning and Project Funding. Agenda Objectives Overview of Hazard Mitigation Hazard Mitigation Planning Mitigation Project Funding.
Healthy Forests Initiative Al Murphy BLM, NIFC. In August 2002, President Bush announced the “Healthy Forests Initiative for Wildfire Prevention and Stronger.
1 The Delta Plan The Delta Plan Presentation to San Joaquin County Dan Ray Delta Stewardship Council June 19, 2012.
Accelerating Vegetative Treatments to Improve Condition Class (also known as our Fuels Strategy Meeting!!!)
Feedback on the Draft EIS Myrtle HFRA Project 7/17/06.
Wisconsin’s Forests and the Comprehensive Planning Law Preserving forests in the wilderness of Smart Growth.
Programmatic Regulations PDT Workshop COMPREHENSIVE EVERGLADES RESTORATION PLAN April 18, 2002.
LEGISLATIVE DEVELOPMENTS IN NATURE CONSERVATION AND HABITATS LAW IN 2011 Margaret Austin 29 March 2012.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Decision Authority l All permit decisions, scope of analysis, 404(b)(1), mitigation, alternatives, jurisdiction -- Corps.
Phase 3 Environmental Documentation Process SEQUOIA NATIONAL FOREST AND GIANT SEQUOIA NATIONAL MONUMENT.
Dominguez-Escalante National Conservation Area Dominguez Canyon Wilderness Resource Management Plan Scoping Meetings August 30 and 31, 2010.
FIRE STRATEGY Fire Policy Update. Background Agricultural land is defined as forestland, rangeland, cropland and pastureland. Types of fires – Prescribed,
SEQUOIA NATIONAL FOREST AND GIANT SEQUUOIA NATIONAL MONUMENT.
Sierra Water Workgroup Water Summit Kings Beach, California June 11, 2013 Barry Hill, Hydrologist Pacific Southwest Region USDA Forest Service.
Welcome Opportunity to Learn – Public, Groups, Agencies and FS Patience Respect Ask.
THE SPECIES AT RISK ACT (SARA) CBA/Justice National Section Meeting National Environmental Energy Resources Law Group Ottawa – October 24, 2004.
What Does it Mean When >80 Equals Spotted Owl Habitat?
Regional Water Availability Rulemaking Chip Merriam Water Resources Advisory Commission February 8, 2007 Chip Merriam Water Resources Advisory Commission.
CALIFORNIA'S STATE WILDLIFE ACTION PLAN 2015 UPDATE A Conservation Legacy for Californians Armand Gonzales, Project Lead.
Greater Sage-Grouse and BLM’s Nevada/Northeastern California Record of Decision and Approved Plan Amendment History and Overview.
Outdoor Heritage Fund. Established on August 1, 2013 by the Legislature. Continuing Appropriation of $20,000,000 annually from oil and gas taxes. Outdoor.
The Colorado Roadless Rule July 31, 2012 Hermosa Creek Roadless Area Trey Schillie US Forest Service: Rocky Mountain Region May 31, 2013.
Overview of Proposed Alaska National Wildlife Refuges Regulatory Changes U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
California Water Plan Update Advisory Committee Meeting January 20, 2005.
Draft Generic Environmental Impact Statement for Adoption of Stream Corridor Management Regulations for the Lake George Park.
United States Department of Interior Bureau of Land Management Winnemucca District Draft Resource Management Plan and Draft Environmental Impact Statement.
U.S. Section International Boundary and Water Commission Rio Grande and Tijuana River Flood Control Projects Programmatic EIS.
Soil Quality Standards Randy L. Davis National Soils Program Leader USDA Forest Service March 30, 2006.
JACK MORROW HILLS COORDINATED ACTIVITY PLAN Bureau of Land Management Rock Springs Field Office Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact Statement Public.
Presented to: Montana Forest Restoration Committee (MFRC) Presented by: Julia Riber, R1 Regional Planner Chris Partyka, Lolo NF Env. Coordinator 1.
NEPA and WildernessNEPA and Wilderness Michael C. Blumm & Lorena Wisehart ‘13 Wilderness Act at 50 (April 11, 2014) Lewis and Clark Law School.
GOOD NEIGHBOR AGREEMENTS (AUTHORITY) MARCH 31, 2016.
1 Sahtu Land Use Planning Board Public Hearing on the Draft 3 Sahtu Land Use Plan May 2011 INAC Presentation.
USING STEWARDSHIP AUTHORITY TO ADVANCE RESTORATION Mae Lee Hafer Regional Stewardship Coordinator Collaborative Restoration.
PETER A. APPEL ALEX W. SMITH PROFESSOR UNIVERSITY. OF GEORGIA SCHOOL OF LAW UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PRESENTED AT LEWIS AND CLARK LAW SCHOOL APRIL 11,
Planning – LUP Process I. Introduction II. Inventory Procedures III.Planning A. Background to LWCs in Planning B. Factors to Consider When Protecting LWCs.
Wilderness Fires Law, Policy, Mgt Approach Steve Kimball, R1 Prog. Mgr. Wilderness, WSR’s, O/G’s Law, Policy, Mgt Approach Steve Kimball, R1 Prog. Mgr.
OPEN SPACE/ CONSERVATION
Draft Environmental Assessment Report for Bradley International Airport October 2016
Wilderness Fires Law, Policy, Mgt Approach
Vegetation Management Update
Alaska Roadless Rulemaking
Exceptional and Natural Events Rulemaking
Presentation transcript:

Roadless Area Conservation: National Forest System Lands in Idaho Proposed Rule www. roadless.fs.fed.us State of Idaho

2 Idaho Roadless Meeting 1/08 State of Idaho Idaho Roadless Rule-making Outline of the presentation Overview of the proposed rule The draft Environmental Impact Statement How you can help Remember this is a Draft Rule – It can be improved with your help!

3 Idaho Roadless Meeting 1/08 State of Idaho Idaho Roadless Rule-making The proposal and purpose State Petition submitted by the Governor of Idaho and accepted by Secretary of Agriculture, as recommended by the Roadless Area Conservation National Advisory Committee (RACNAC) Provide State-specific direction Integrate local management concerns with national objectives Protect roadless values and characteristics

4 Idaho Roadless Meeting 1/08 State of Idaho Idaho Roadless Rule-making Designates a system of lands called “Idaho Roadless Areas” Establishes five management themes for individual roadless areas Provides prohibitions and limited permissions for –Road construction and reconstruction –Mineral activities –Timber cutting, sale or removal Provides for modifying designations and classifications. Proposed action – Idaho Roadless Rule

5 Idaho Roadless Meeting 1/08 State of Idaho Idaho Roadless Rule-making The Proposed Rule does not apply to: Status of existing roads or trails Grazing Motorized equipment and mechanical transport Locatable minerals Appropriate management response to fires Existing rights including responsibilities to Tribes Any activities permitted still require environmental review – and consistency with Forest Plan standards and guidelines

6 Idaho Roadless Meeting 1/08 State of Idaho Idaho Roadless Rule-making Idaho Roadless Area Continuum

7 Idaho Roadless Meeting 1/08 State of Idaho Idaho Roadless Rule-making Wild Land Recreation (1,378,600 acres) Lands show little evidence of human-caused disturbance Natural processes predominant Road construction/reconstruction – prohibited Timber cutting – prohibited Mineral activities – surface use and occupancy – prohibited. More protection than 2001 Rule

8 Idaho Roadless Meeting 1/08 State of Idaho Idaho Roadless Rule-making Special Areas of Historic or Tribal Significance (SAHTS) (68,600 acres) Relatively undisturbed by human activities Natural processes predominant Three areas –Pilot Knob –Nimiipuu and Lewis and Clark Trails –Pioneer Area Road construction/reconstruction – prohibited Timber cutting – permitted to a very limited degree Mineral activities – surface use and occupancy – prohibited. More protection than 2001 Rule

9 Idaho Roadless Meeting 1/08 State of Idaho Idaho Roadless Rule-making Primitive (1,656,300 acres) Relatively undisturbed by human activities Natural processes predominant, but allows for limited forest health activities Road construction/reconstruction – prohibited Timber cutting – permitted to a very limited degree Mineral activities – surface use and occupancy – prohibited. More protection than 2001 Rule

10 Idaho Roadless Meeting 1/08 State of Idaho Idaho Roadless Rule-making Backcountry/Restoration (5,246,100 acres) Retain undeveloped character Provide for a variety of recreation opportunities Permit limited forest health activities Similar to 2001 rule but further addresses needs to protect communities, homes and property from the risk of severe wildland fire

11 Idaho Roadless Meeting 1/08 State of Idaho Idaho Roadless Rule-making Backcountry/Restoration (5,246,100 acres) Road construction/reconstruction – generally prohibited – but has 7 situations where permitted Routine timber cutting – prohibited Forest health timber cutting – permissible if it maintains or improves one or more of the roadless characteristics Mineral activities – road construction/reconstruction prohibited, except for those associated with phosphate leasing Surface use and occupancy for mineral activities- permitted

12 Idaho Roadless Meeting 1/08 State of Idaho Idaho Roadless Rule-making Stewardship roads in Backcountry …. Permits limited road construction only when needed “to protect public health and safety in cases of”: + significant risk or + “imminent threat of flood, fire or other catastrophic event that, without intervention, would cause the loss of life or property”; or to facilitate forest health activities permitted under timber cutting Purple from 2001 Rule, Green from HFRA

13 Idaho Roadless Meeting 1/08 State of Idaho Idaho Roadless Rule-making Stewardship roads in Backcountry for forest health activities permitted when Timber cutting will maintain or improve one or more of the roadless characteristics and is needed for one of the following: “To improve threatened, endangered, proposed, or sensitive species habitat; or To maintain or restore the characteristics of ecosystem composition and structure” or to reduce the significant risk “of wildland fire effects”. Purple from 2001 Rule, Green from HFRA

14 Idaho Roadless Meeting 1/08 State of Idaho Idaho Roadless Rule-making Backcountry – roads and timber cutting Reducing significant risks before they become imminent threats to communities helps the Forest Service be a good neighbor. The proposed rule incorporates concepts established under the 2003 Healthy Forests Restoration Act. Not intended for routine forest management. There must be a “significant risk” present to warrant an activity. Not every acre is at significant risk and not every acre at significant risk will be treated. Road construction is not the objective – it is a tool to be used only when there are no reasonable alternatives.

15 Idaho Roadless Meeting 1/08 State of Idaho Idaho Roadless Rule-making General Forest, Rangeland and Grassland (609,500 acres) Provides a variety of goods and services Broad range of recreational activities Conservation of natural resources Road construction/reconstruction – permissible Timber cutting – permissible Mineral activities – permissible About 87,000 acres more in GFRG than was identified in the Petition

16 Idaho Roadless Meeting 1/08 State of Idaho Idaho Roadless Rule-making Accommodating change to roadless area boundaries or management themes Provides process for minor or significant changes All changes require public notification Two-tiered approach –Correct technical errors; or changes beyond the scope of this proposed rule –Mechanism for modifying boundaries or management direction 30-day notice If determined to be significant, notice and comment rule- making would be undertaken

17 Idaho Roadless Meeting 1/08 State of Idaho Idaho Roadless Rule-making Summary FS and State are committed to conserving and managing Idaho Roadless Areas State-specific rule allows state-specific consideration of the needs of these areas Recognizes national values and local situations Provides more protections based on the unique values Provides for more flexibility to address values at risk

Draft Environmental Impact Statement

19 Idaho Roadless Meeting 1/08 State of Idaho Idaho Roadless Rule-making DEIS alternatives –2001 Roadless Rule –Existing Forest Plans –State Petition as presented by Governor Risch – Idaho Roadless Rule

20 Idaho Roadless Meeting 1/08 State of Idaho Idaho Roadless Rule-making Environmental analysis assumptions Focusing on changes from no action. Focusing on roads, timber harvest and minerals. Budgets are projected to continue a downward trend, meaning roadless area projects are a low priority. Past and future activities in Idaho Roadless Area’s are projected to be quite limited. There is no attempt to limit or change existing rights.

21 Idaho Roadless Meeting 1/08 State of Idaho Idaho Roadless Rule-making Idaho Roadless Rule theme and equivalent themes for the 2001 Roadless Rule and Existing Plans (in acres) Theme2001 Roadless Rule Existing Plans Idaho Roadless Rule Wild Land Recreation01,320,8001,378,600 Primitive02,131,4001,656,300 Special Areas of Tribal and Historical Significance 0068,600 Backcountry/Restoration9,304,2004,244,5005,246,100 General Forest, Rangeland, and Grassland 01,262,400609,500 Other Lands – The Petition would not apply to these other special areas Forest Plan Special Areas0345,100 9,304,200

22 Idaho Roadless Meeting 1/08 State of Idaho Idaho Roadless Rule-making Projected road construction/reconstruction Projected miles of road construction/ reconstruction activities; yearly average 2001 Roadless Rule Existing Plans Idaho Roadless Rule Permanent - other0.8 Temporary - other0.2 Reconstruction - other0.0 Total1.0 Permanent – timber040.0 Temporary – timber021.5 Reconstruction - timber051.5 Total0113 Grand total Decommissioning143 Net Change081

23 Idaho Roadless Meeting 1/08 State of Idaho Idaho Roadless Rule-making Projected timber cutting 2001 Roadless Rule Existing Plans Idaho Roadless Rule timber harvest yearly average (MMBF) timber harvest yearly average (acres)*1002, * based on the assumption an average of 5 MBF/acre would be harvested.

24 Idaho Roadless Meeting 1/08 State of Idaho Idaho Roadless Rule-making Implementing projects under the Idaho Roadless Rule Projects screened at Regional level Forest Service works collaboratively with the State implementation commission to develop projects consistent with the rule Projects undergo full environmental analysis Projects are required to be consistent with forest plan direction that provide sideboards on project design.

25 Idaho Roadless Meeting 1/08 State of Idaho Idaho Roadless Rule-making Specific request for public comment To what extent should the FS allow building roads for the purpose of conducting limited forest health activities in Backcountry? Are the limitations on sale of common variety minerals and discretionary mineral leasing appropriate? Will the proposed mechanism for administrative corrections and modifications be sufficiently adaptive for the future?

26 Idaho Roadless Meeting 1/08 State of Idaho Idaho Roadless Rule-making Projected Schedule Notice of IntentApril 2007 DEIS and Draft Rule publishedJan 2008 FEIS PublishedFall 2008 ROD and Final Rule PublishedFall 2008 January Winter Fall days after FEIS DEIS & Draft Rule FEIS ROD & Final Rule Public Meetings Comment ends April 7 Public Involvement & Consultation NOI April

27 Idaho Roadless Meeting 1/08 State of Idaho Idaho Roadless Rule-making Questions?