What is an Argument? What does Monty Python have to say? A philosophical argument is not a disagreement. A philosophical argument is not a dispute. A philosophical.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Basics of Logical Argument Two Kinds of Argument The Deductive argument: true premises guarantee a true conclusion. e.g. All men are mortal. Socrates.
Advertisements

Basic Terms in Logic Michael Jhon M. Tamayao.
Formal Criteria for Evaluating Arguments
Today’s Outline Hume’s Problem of Induction Two Kinds of Skepticism
Logic and Logical Fallacies A.P. English Language.
Deductive Validity Truth preserving: The conclusion logically follows from the premises. It is logically impossible for the premises to be true and the.
Philosophy 103 Linguistics 103 Introductory Logic: Critical Thinking Fall 2007 Dr. Robert Barnard.
Other Info on Making Arguments
Logos Formal Logic.
Deduction and Induction
This is Introductory Logic PHI 120 Get a syllabus online, if you don't already have one Presentation: "Good Arguments"
 Monty Python – Argument Clinic video  Monty Python Monty Python.
Philosophy 251: Introduction to Philosophy Dr. Stephen H. Daniel Get a syllabus before or after class Get a textbook Locate your graduate instructor Craig.
1 Arguments in Philosophy Introduction to Philosophy.
DEDUCTIVE & INDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS
Basic Argumentation.
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 1.
1 Lesson 11: Criteria of a good argument SOCI Thinking Critically about Social Issues Spring 2012.
1 Arguments. 2 What is an Argument? What does Monty Python have to say? A philosophical argument is not a disagreement. A philosophical argument is not.
0 Validity & Invalidity (Exercises) December 23, 2005.
Deduction, Validity, Soundness Lecture II – 01/25/11.
Three Modes of Persuasion Qualitative/Quantitative September 2011 Rhetoric: Communication Techniques.
Logic in Everyday Life.
Question of the Day!  We shared a lot of examples of illogical arguments!  But how do you make a LOGICAL argument? What does your argument need? What.
Chapter 3: MAKING SENSE OF ARGUMENTS
The Philosopher’s Toolkit Write as a thinker, think as a writer.
2.8 Methods of Proof PHIL 012 1/26/2001.
Theory of Knowledge Ms. Bauer
0 Validity & Invalidity (Exercises) All dogs have two heads. 2. All tigers are dogs. ___________________________________ 3. All tigers have two.
Critical Thinking. Critical thinkers use reasons to back up their claims. What is a claim? ◦ A claim is a statement that is either true or false. It must.
BBI 3420 Critical Reading and Thinking Critical Reading Strategies: Identifying Arguments.
The construction of a formal argument
Do Now  What does logos appeal to in an advertisement?  Give three examples.
PHIL 2525 Contemporary Moral Issues Lec 2 Arguments are among us…
Class 1 (Sept.6): “First steps …”.  You all are philosophers. You all are theologians.  Your Philosophy Should Evolve.  You are not required to have.
Deductive s. Inductive Reasoning
What is an argument? An argument is, to quote the Monty Python sketch, "a connected series of statements to establish a definite proposition." Huh? Three.
Logic: The Language of Philosophy. What is Logic? Logic is the study of argumentation o In Philosophy, there are no right or wrong opinions, but there.
What is an Argument? What does Monty Python have to say? A philosophical argument is not a disagreement. … is not a dispute. … is not a quarrel. … is not.
© 2009 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.1 Chapters1 & 2.
Use of Reason and Logic RATIONALISM.  A Rationalist approach to knowledge is based on the belief that we can ascertain truth by thinking and reflection.
Deductive Reasoning. Inductive: premise offers support and evidenceInductive: premise offers support and evidence Deductive: premises offers proof that.
THE NATURE OF ARGUMENT. THE MAIN CONCERN OF LOGIC Basically in logic we deal with ARGUMENTS. Mainly we deal with learning of the principles with which.
Do now Can you make sure that you have finished your Venn diagrams from last lesson. Can you name 5 famous mathematicians (including one that is still.
Part One: Assessing the Inference, Deductive and Inductive Reasoning.
PHIL102 SUM2014, M-F12:00-1:00, SAV 264 Instructor: Benjamin Hole
Deductive reasoning.
Philosophical Arguments
a valid argument with true premises.
WEEK 3 VALIDITY OF ARGUMENTS Valid argument: A deductive argument is valid if its conclusion is necessarily and logically drawn from the premises. The.
Philosophical Arguments
Win Every Argument Every Time
Philosophy.
Validity and Soundness
Reasoning, Logic, and Position Statements
Arguments.
3.5 Symbolic Arguments.
Logic Problems and Questions
Logical Fallacies.
Phil2303 intro to logic.
Argumentation.
Propositional Logic 1) Introduction Copyright 2008, Scott Gray.
ID1050– Quantitative & Qualitative Reasoning
Evaluating Deductive Arguments
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
Philosophical Arguments
3.5 Symbolic Arguments.
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
Presentation transcript:

What is an Argument? What does Monty Python have to say? A philosophical argument is not a disagreement. A philosophical argument is not a dispute. A philosophical argument is not a quarrel. A philosophical argument is not an opinion. Philosophical Arguments A philosophical argument consists of one or more statements set out in support of some other statement. Premises: the statements set out in support of some other statement. Conclusion: the statement that other statements are set out to support.

Examples of Arguments All human beings are mortal. Socrates is a human being. Therefore, Socrates is mortal. Premises Conclusion Scrabble is not exciting,for Scrabble is safe, and nothing is both safe and exciting. Although all men are created equal, because Batman is fictional, and fictional men are not the same as other men. Batman is not equal to other men,

More Examples Poetry cannot be translated; and, therefore, it is the poets that preserve the languages; for we would not be at the trouble to learn a language if we could have all that is written in it just as well in a translation. But as the beauties of poetry cannot be preserved in any language except that in which it was originally written, we learn the language. -- Ben Johnson Poetry cannot be translated. We would not be at the trouble to learn a language if we could have all that is written in it just as well in a translation. The beauties of poetry cannot be preserved in any language except that in which it was originally written. Therefore, it is the poets that preserve the languages.

More Examples It is impossible to make people understand their ignorance; for it requires knowledge to perceive it and therefore he that can perceive it hath it not. -- Jeremy Taylor Understanding ignorance requires knowledge to perceive it. Therefore, he that can perceive ignorance hath it not. Therefore, it is impossible to make people understand their ignorance.

Deductive and Inductive Arguments Deductive Arguments Deductive arguments are arguments in which the conclusion is presented as following from the premises with necessity. Inductive Arguments Inductive arguments are arguments in which the conclusion is presented as following from the premises with a high degree of probability.

Examples Deductive Argument: I own every Dario Argento film. Suspiria is a Dario Argento film. Therefore, I own a copy of Suspiria. Inductive Argument: Every Keanu Reeves movie ever made has been awful. The Night Watchman will be a Keanu Reeves movie. So The Night Watchman will be awful.

Logical Validity & Soundness in Deductive Arguments In constructing and evaluating an argument, we need to consider two things: Does its conclusion follow necessarily from its premises? Are its premises true? Philosophers use the answers to these questions to classify arguments.

Logical Validity & Soundness in Deductive Arguments A deductive argument is valid just in case the truth of its premises would absolutely guarantee the truth of its conclusion. In other words, it is valid just in case there is no possible way the premises could all be true but the conclusion false. A deductive argument is sound just in case it is valid and all of its premises are true. So an argument can only be sound if it is also valid.

Evaluating Arguments for Validity & Soundness To be a Canadian citizen, one has to be born in Canada. Darren was born in Canada. Therefore, Darren is a Canadian citizen. All cats chase mice. Tigers do not chase mice. Therefore, tigers are not cats.

More Arguments Everyone likes Phil101. All Phil101 exams are easy. Therefore, everyone will receive a high grade in Phil101. Some tests are multiple choice. Some exams are multiple choice. Therefore, some tests are exams. Nicholas is taller than Adam. Adam is taller than Abigail. Therefore, Nicholas is taller than Abigail.

Some Common Fallacies Equivocation In the fallacy of equivocation, the meaning of a key term shifts during the course of an argument. Man is the only rational creature. No woman is a man. Therefore, no woman is a rational creature. Any person with a handicap is at a disadvantage. Raymond has a handicap in golf. Raymond is at a disadvantage in golf.

Circular Arguments In a circular argument, something (A) is asserted to be true just in case something else (B) is true. But B turns out to be true just in case A is true. The Bible is the infallible Word of God. The Bible says that God exists. Therefore, God exists. Some Common Fallacies

Necessary & Sufficient Conditions Necessary Condition If A is a necessary condition for B, then if not-A then not-B. Sufficient Condition If A is a sufficient condition for B, then if A, then B. Sleeping is a necessary condition for dreaming. If you are not sleeping, then you are not dreaming. Dreaming is a sufficient condition for sleeping. If you are dreaming, then you are sleeping.