41st International Military Testing Association Conference, November 11, 1999 SA-ALC Supervisor Feedback Survey Assessing organizational issues: Using.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dr. Robin Largue Dr. Janet Pilcher
Advertisements

NumericNoExplosionAnswer.
Campus-wide Presentation May 14, PACE Results.
Measuring Employee Engagement City and Borough of Juneau, Alaska Presented by Mila Cosgrove, HR Director.
Alabama Professional Education Personnel Evaluation Program Administrator Systems August 2002.
1 PSD SHIP REPAIR ASSOCIATION TRAINING NEEDS ASSESSMENT RESULTS PRESENTATION Created by: Thomas D. Bright Quality Training Systems.
Personal Assessment of the College Environment (PACE)
What do you know about Effective Teaching Behaviors?
ACGME Survey and Program Evaluation Analysis
SUPERINTENDENT AND BOARD OF EDUCATION MEMBER PERCEPTIONS REGARDING PREFERRED LEADERSHIP BEHAVIORS FOR SUPERINTENDENTS IN WEST VIRGINIA Keith A. Butcher.
Field Test of Psychologist/ Psychometrist Evaluation System July 2000 Alabama Professional Education Personnel Evaluation Program.
Performance Management
It’s About Us: Employee Experience Survey Gender umanitoba.ca.
“LEADS”: Leadership Enhancement And Development System.
SE 450 Software Processes & Product Metrics Survey Use & Design.
1 Sources:  SusanTurner - Napier University  C. Robson, Real World Research, Blackwell, 1993  Steve Collesano: Director, Corporate Research and Development.
Employee Satisfaction Survey Report 2006 OIRA. Introduction  Administered in November 2006 to all AUB employees, academic and non-academic.  Purpose.
EPIC Online Publishing Use and Costs Evaluation Program.
Effect of Staff Attitudes on Quality in Clinical Microbiology Services Ms. Julie Sims Laboratory Technical specialist Strengthening of Medical Laboratories.
2010 Performance Evaluation Process Information Session for Staff
Stanford Employee Survey. Topics Background, Purpose of Employee Satisfaction Surveys –Survey Specifics –Survey Participants, Spring and Fall 2010 Fall.
Appraisal Types.
UHCL Support Staff Association (SSA) and Professional and Administrative Staff Association (PASA) In consultation with Dr. Lisa M. Penney RAs: Lisa Sublett,
UGA Libraries Faculty Job Satisfaction Survey Conducted Spring 2006.
2013 Administration & Resource Management (AR) Division Climate Survey Results 21 January 2014.
Survey Monkey A “How To” Guide.
Assessment Surveys July 22, 2004 Chancellor’s Meeting.
CHEN Program Assessment Advisory Board Meeting June 3 rd, 2012.
Development and Validation of a Biodata Tool for Civilian Army Personnel The U.S. Army developed the Civilian Leader Improvement Battery (CLIMB) containing.
Section 29.2 The Marketing Survey
© 2013 K12 Insight Central Office Climate Survey Results Las Cruces Public Schools March , 2013.
Tool for Assessing Statistical Capacity (TASC) The development of TASC was sponsored by United States Agency for International Development.
Alabama Professional Education Personnel Evaluation Program Teacher
Initial Call ® - Confidential COWIB Workforce Oklahoma Survey Results – Occupational Training Summary Survey Results April 2014.
Human Resource Management Lecture 14 MGT 350. Last Lecture Holland Vocational Preferences Three major components – People have varying occupational preferences.
Comprehensive Cultural Assessments Summary of Scope & Methodology A. Levin © SYNERGY Consulting Services Corporation, 1999.
January 18, 2012 Administrative Council Presentation.
1.
ASSESSMENT OF THE INDEPENDENT STUDY PATHWAY AT LECOM: STUDENT FEEDBACK Mark A.W. Andrews, Ph.D., Professor and Director, The Independent Study Pathway.
Mountain View College ModernThink © Survey Results Analyzed MVC College-wide Forum April 9, 2009 MVC Core Values: Celebration of Student & Employee Success.
Campus Quality Survey 1998, 1999, & 2001 Comparison Office of Institutional Research & Planning July 5, 2001.
Field Test of Counselor System July 2000 Alabama Professional Education Personnel Evaluation Program.
United Nations Regional Seminar on Census Data Dissemination and Spatial Analysis for Arabic Speaking Countries, Amman, Jordan May 2011 Identification.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Conducting Surveys.
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL 1. Performance Appraisal Performance Appraisal (PA) refers to all those procedures that are used to evaluate the personality, performance.
Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Application, 9 th edition. Gay, Mills, & Airasian © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Concerns, Data, Next Steps.  New Administration Software from Scantron  New Academic Senate Policy  New Items/Survey Form (ACE, Iowa Item Pool)  New.
MEASURING THE CLIMATE OF YOUR PROGRAM. Climate assessment undertaken by many in business and industry Early childhood programs are unique due to funding.
Title Block HSOPS: So You’ve Done the Survey – Now What? Dolores Hagan, RN, BSN K-HEN Education/Data Manager.
United Nations Regional Seminar on Census Data Dissemination and Spatial Analysis for Arabic Speaking Countries, Amman, Jordan May 2011 Identification.
Chapter 14: Affective Assessment
Fidelity of Implementation A tool designed to provide descriptions of facets of a coherent whole school literacy initiative. A tool designed to provide.
March 14, 2009 ACRL 14 th National Conference Seattle, WA ClimateQUAL™: Organizational Climate and Diversity Assessment Presented by Martha Kyrillidou,
Personal Assessment of the College Environment (PACE) Survey Summary of Fall 2014 Results Presentation to College Council Executive Cabinet August 5, 2015.
2009 Annual Employee Survey U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development December 29,2009 (updated January 8, 2010)
© 2015© 2016 Results and Analysis 2016 School Climate Survey: Jenkins Elementary School.
Performance Management  Identify the major determinants of individual performance.  Discuss the three general purposes of performance management. 
Mid Michigan Community College Prepared by President Christine Hammond March 31, 2016 PACE Survey Results Summary.
Journal Entry §Do you think taking surveys online has had a positive or negative effect of marketing research? Why?
BLOOMFIELD PUBLIC SCHOOLS B Learning and Growing Together Climate and Satisfaction Survey Results Dr. James Thompson, Superintendent Dr. Ellen J. Stoltz,
Department of Defense Voluntary Protection Programs Center of Excellence Development, Validation, Implementation and Enhancement for a Voluntary Protection.
Development of Self-Determination and Social Skills of College-Bound Students with Visual Impairments Report on an Intervention Program Designed to Improve.
Personal Assessment of the College Environment (PACE)
administered at MMCC six times:
Chapter 2 Performance Management Process
Sharing Your School Climate Data with YOUR FAMILIES
Employee Performance Management System
A VOYAGE THROUGH PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT TOOLS
Sharing Your School Climate Data with YOUR FAMILIES
Personal Assessment of the College Environment (PACE)
Presentation transcript:

41st International Military Testing Association Conference, November 11, 1999 SA-ALC Supervisor Feedback Survey Assessing organizational issues: Using a computer-based supervisor feedback survey at several organizational levels to assess relative unit supervisory climate Charles Holt Institute for Job and Occupational Analysis Carol Maske Metrica, Inc.

41st International Military Testing Association Conference, November 11, 1999 SA-ALC Supervisor Feedback Survey Purposes of Study: To provide insight on how supervisors are perceived to be performing according to their direct subordinates To identify supervisory training needs

41st International Military Testing Association Conference, November 11, 1999 SA-ALC Supervisor Feedback Survey Conducted in the fall of 1998 at Kelly AFB, Texas All SA-ALC personnel surveyed Administered twice per year since 1994 Anonymous

41st International Military Testing Association Conference, November 11, 1999 SA-ALC Supervisor Feedback Survey Feedback Six Critical Performance Areas: Communication Decision Making Human Development Management Support Safety Transition Issues

41st International Military Testing Association Conference, November 11, 1999 SA-ALC Supervisor Feedback Survey Feedback Survey format 30 multiple choice items rated on a 6-point scale with “1” being “Strongly Disagree” and “6” being “Strongly Agree” Items were identical to those used in previous surveys except five additional questions that were related to transition issues we added to this iteration. Also four open-ended items asking respondents to comment on things they would like their supervisor to Stop Doing, Start Doing, Continue Doing and one question asking for General Comments

41st International Military Testing Association Conference, November 11, 1999 SA-ALC Supervisor Feedback Survey Feedback Utilized the Air Force Survey Authoring Software (AUTHOR) Surveys were completed on 3.5” floppy disks Respondents completed the surveys at work The disks were returned to IJOA and uploaded using AUTHOR’s Collect function The data was analyzed and summarized with the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), Version 8.0 Data “rolled up” from lowest level of hierarchy to highest

41st International Military Testing Association Conference, November 11, 1999 SA-ALC Supervisor Feedback Survey Feedback 4,840 Valid cases returned 76th ABW20% of total 76th ABG8% of total SA-ALC72% of total

41st International Military Testing Association Conference, November 11, 1999 SA-ALC Supervisor Feedback Survey Feedback Reports generated: 1099 individual supervisor reports with means and standard deviations 38 division reports rolled up from supervisor reports 3 organizational reports rolled up from division reports 1 overview report 1141 total reports generated

41st International Military Testing Association Conference, November 11, 1999 SA-ALC Supervisor Feedback Survey Feedback Overall Means by Critical Area

41st International Military Testing Association Conference, November 11, 1999 SA-ALC Supervisor Feedback Survey Feedback Only one division appeared problematic

41st International Military Testing Association Conference, November 11, 1999 SA-ALC Supervisor Feedback Survey Feedback Individual results 40 supervisors identified as scoring less than 2.0 standard deviations below the overall mean. Remedial training to be provided by appropriate organization

41st International Military Testing Association Conference, November 11, 1999 SA-ALC Supervisor Feedback Survey Feedback Comment Analysis Over 1000 pages of narrative comments generated No full semantic analysis performed No attempt to group comments by areas of concern or topic Reviewed for threatening or abusive statements Very few threatening comments found.

41st International Military Testing Association Conference, November 11, 1999 SA-ALC Supervisor Feedback Survey Feedback Discussion Demonstrated the versatility of AUTHOR Demonstrated the willingness of respondents to make comments when appropriate opportunities are provided Raised issues regarding confidentiality of “anonymous” responses Demonstrated the need for easily accessible semantic analysis tools

41st International Military Testing Association Conference, November 11, 1999 SA-ALC Supervisor Feedback Survey Feedback Thank you !