Critical Thinking: A User’s Manual Chapter 4 Diagramming Arguments.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Philosophy 148 Chapter 3 (part 2).
Advertisements

PHIL 148 Chapter 5 Stuff to include in and leave out of the standard form argument.
Reading for an English Class (created by Jim Burke)
TEXT TYPE. To state your opinion about an issue.
Authority 2. HW 8: AGAIN HW 8 I wanted to bring up a couple of issues from grading HW 8. Even people who got problem #1 exactly right didn’t think about.
Since Mary visited a realtor and her bank’s mortgage department, she must be planning on buying a home. Step 1. Number each statement and note each indicator.
Lecture 9: Analyzing Arguments – Diagramming Short Arguments.
Critical Thinking: A User’s Manual Chapter 5 Detecting Fallacies.
Categorical Imperative
Critical Thinking: A User’s Manual Chapter 11 Evaluating Causal Arguments.
Invitation to Critical Thinking Chapter 4 Lecture Notes Chapter 4.
How to Write an Argumentative Essay: Common Core Style! It all comes down to 5 letters: CERCA!
Critical Thinking: A User’s Manual Chapter 6 Preparing to Evaluate Arguments.
Assessing and Developing Argument ©
Critical Thinking: A User’s Manual Chapter 3 Analyzing Arguments.
BASIC CONCEPTS OF ARGUMENTS
The Analysis of Variance
Critical Thinking: A User’s Manual Chapter 9 Evaluating Analogical Arguments.
Critical Thinking: A User’s Manual
 Main Idea/Point-of-View  Specific Detail  Conclusion/Inference  Extrapolation  Vocabulary in Context.
Logic in School Program Creighton University Director: Dr. Jinmei Yuan Student Teachers: Mark Holmberg Andrew Trapp Jason Bodewitz.
Future of the Partnership Board. The Board asked for a working group to look at the future of the Board People were worried about – Too many meetings.
BLOOM’S TAXONOMY Levels of Thinking. What is Bloom’s Taxonomy?  A model for examining the different levels of educational activities students are asked.
Standardizing Arguments
Chapter 1: Lecture Notes What Is an Argument? (and What is Not?)
Chapter 2: Lecture Notes Pinning Down Argument Structure.
Argument Visualization Tools for Corroborative Evidence 2 nd International Conference on Evidence Law and Forensic Science (ICELFS 2009) Beijing, China,
Purpose. What should we include in the opening paragraph? Topic Background Problem Standpoint.
How much do you smoke?. I Notice... That the median for the males is 13.5 cigarettes per day and the median for females is 10 cigarettes per day. This.
Step 3 of the Data Analysis Plan Confirm what the data reveal: Inferential statistics All this information is in Chapters 11 & 12 of text.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 3 Formalizing an argument By David Kelsey.
Plato's Crito Crito tries to convince Socrates to escape.
Mike McGuire MV Community College COM 101 A Closer Look at Logos Syllogism, Enthymeme, and Logical Fallacies ENGL102 Ordover Fall 2008.
GAME OFFICIALS. Conflicts If you have a conflict, sibling or child playing please add the team so you won’t get assigned to that team Click on Add New.
Argument Analysis.
Breaking Down An Arguments Into Propositions
History of Philosophy Lecture 5 Formalizing an argument
Chapter 4 Argument Analysis 1 Invitation to Critical Thinking First Canadian Edition Joel Rudinow Vincent E. Barry Mark.
©2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Go To Next Slide 7-1 Diagramming Arguments The aim of this tutorial is to hone your skills.
The way the scientists work Do you know the scientific method?
The Epistle of James Session 4: Chapter 4.
Slide 1 Lesson 35 Testing for Divisibility WO.17Use long division to determine if one number is divisible by another. WO.23Use divisibility rules to determine.
Recognising and re-formatting everyday arguments  LI:  To recognise the premise, conclusion and structure of everyday arguments.  To be able to re-write.
Chapter 7: Analyzing Arguments (my past papers?)
Analyzing Arguments Section 1.5. Valid arguments An argument consists of two parts: the hypotheses (premises) and the conclusion. An argument is valid.
Logic & Critical Herman J. SuhendraProduced by Herman J. Suhendra A.B. Gadjah Mada University & M.A. University of Santo Tomas, Manila MEETING.
FIVE TYPES OF REASONING
n Taking Notes and Keeping a Journal n Listening Skills n Working Together n Managing Your Time.
McGraw-Hill ©2004 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Testing Validity With Venn Diagrams The aim of this tutorial is to help you learn.
Lecture Notes © 2008 McGraw Hill Higher Education© 2008 McGraw Hill Higher Education 1 Critical Thinking Chapter 5 Logical Fallacies I Fallacies of Relevance.
Critical Thinking Lesson 2 Arguments and Conclusions – The Indicators Learning Objectives: 1.To be aware of what argument indicators are. 2.To be able.
Introduction to Logic Lecture 3 Formalizing an argument By David Kelsey.
Tutorials © 2008 McGraw Hill Higher Education Since Mary visited a realtor and her bank’s mortgage department, she must be planning on buying a home. Step.
Inductive / Deductive reasoning
Diagram this argument. Since Mary visited a realtor and her
Argumentative Essay In the “Survival Unit”, we read about why and how people are able to survive dangerous and death defying situations, and also whether.
Making Sense of Arguments
COMMUNICATION SKILLS for Officials
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 3a Evaluating an argument
II. Analyzing Arguments
From Informal Fallacies to Formal Logic
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 3 Formalizing an argument
Combining Like Terms.
Critical Thinking Lecture 3 Formalizing an argument
How to Write an Argumentative Essay: Common Core Style!
ID1050– Quantitative & Qualitative Reasoning
Effective Reading Strategies
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
Presentation transcript:

Critical Thinking: A User’s Manual Chapter 4 Diagramming Arguments

Argument Diagram  An argument diagram is a visual representation of the structure of an argument.  An argument diagram shows the relationship between the premises.

Relationships between Premises  Convergent premises provide support for the conclusion independently of one another.  If one premise is removed, the conclusion may still be supported by the other(s).  Linked premises depend on each other to provide support for the conclusion.  If one premise is removed, the conclusion is no longer supported.

How to Diagram Arguments Step 1: Underline and number each claim. Step 2: Pay attention to indicator words. Step 3: Identify the main conclusion. Step 4: Identify the premises and determine their relationship. Step 5: Diagram any subarguments. Step 6: Check your work.

Numbering Claims  Underline every claim.  Give each claim its own number.  If a claim is repeated, use the same number.  If a conclusion is unstated, write the conclusion after the passage and give it a number.  If a claim is implied, underline and number the non-claim serving as a placeholder and write the implied claim after the passage.

Using Inference Indicators  Rewrite the argument by substituting numbers for each claim.  Use the inference indicators to draw a preliminary diagram of the argument.  Remember that “and” cannot tell you whether the premises are linked or convergent.

Drawing Your Diagram  Place the conclusion at the bottom of your diagram.  Place the premises above the conclusion  Draw an arrow from each convergent premise to the conclusion.  Connect each linked premise with a “+”, underline all linked premises, and draw a single arrow to the conclusion.

Checking Your Work  Read the argument back to yourself to listen for errors.  “+” means “and”  Substitute an inference indicator for “  ”  “____ because ____” when reading the argument from the bottom up  “____ therefore ____” when reading the argument from the top down

Grace is armed, so she’s dangerous.  Grace is armed, so  she’s dangerous. , so .

Here are some reasons why you should stop smoking cigarettes: smoking is addictive, and it is bad for your health. Here are some reasons why  you should stop smoking cigarettes:  smoking is addictive, and  it is bad for your health. Here are some reasons why  : , and .

Here are some reasons why  you should stop smoking cigarettes:  smoking is addictive, and  it is bad for your health.

You are pregnant, and smoking while pregnant could hurt the fetus. Therefore, you should stop smoking cigarettes.  You are pregnant, and  smoking while pregnant could hurt the fetus. Therefore,  you should stop smoking cigarettes.  and . Therefore .

 You are pregnant, and  smoking while pregnant could hurt the fetus. Therefore,  you should stop smoking cigarettes.

Felipe ought to try out for wrestling, since he is both strong and quick. That’s what I would do if I were him.  Felipe ought to try out for wrestling, since  he is both strong and quick.  That’s what I would do if I were him. , since . .

Smoking is not allowed in this restaurant. I know this is true because I was told to put my cigarette out the last time I was here.  Smoking is not allowed in this restaurant. I know  this is true because  I was told to put my cigarette out the last time I was here.

Anyone guilty of leaking classified government documents is guilty of treason, and that is just what Julian Assange has done.  Anyone guilty of leaking classified government documents is guilty of treason, and  that is just what Julian Assange has done.  Julian Assange is guilty of treason.

 Anyone guilty of leaking classified government documents is guilty of treason, and  that is just what Julian Assange has done.  Julian Assange is guilty of treason.

You should bring your lunch to work. Doesn’t it save you money?  You should bring your lunch to work.  Doesn’t it save you money?  Bringing your lunch to work will save you money.

Diagramming Multiple Arguments  Arguments with multiple conclusions and chain arguments can be represented in a single diagram.  Pay close attention to inference indicators.

The Saints are likely to retain all of their best starters from last year’s championship team. Thus, Reggie Bush will be their premier running back, and Drew Brees will be their quarterback this year.  The Saints are likely to retain all of their best starters from last year’s championship team. Thus,  Reggie Bush will be their premier running back, and  Drew Brees will be their quarterback this year. . Thus,  and .

 The Saints are likely to retain all of their best starters from last year’s championship team. Thus,  Reggie Bush will be their premier running back, and  Drew Brees will be their quarterback this year.

Since Reggie Bush was injured last week, he won’t be able to play in the next game. This means that Chris Ivory will be the Saints’ starting running back. Since  Reggie Bush was injured last week,  he won’t be able to play in the next game. This means that  Chris Ivory will be the Saints’ starting running back. Since , . This mean that, .

Since  Reggie Bush was injured in the last week,  he won’t be able to play in the next game. This means that  Chris Ivory will be the Saints’ starting running back.

Your turn! What is wrong with the following diagram?  +    

Extended Arguments  Extended arguments contain several subarguments.  Break down the passage into small, manageable parts.  Pay close attention to inference indicators.

The Galaxy Corporation wants to build a casino in St. Louis, but we should not allow it to be built. First, gambling is immoral, since gambling is motivated by greed, and greed is an immoral desire. Second, communities with casinos have higher crime rates. This is because casinos attract people who take risks, and risk-takers are more likely to break the law. Finally, studies show that people living within 10 miles of a casino have a 90% increased risk of becoming pathological gamblers. Thus, casinos encourage psychological problems for the people that live near them. For all these reasons, the proposed casino should be opposed.

 The Galaxy Corporation wants to build a casino in St. Louis, but  we should not allow it to be built. First,  gambling is immoral, since  gambling is motivated by greed, and  greed is an immoral desire. Second,  communities with casinos have higher crime rates. This is because  casinos attract people who take risks, and  risk-takers are more likely to break the law. Finally,  studies show that people living within 10 miles of a casino have a 90% increased risk of becoming pathological gamblers. Thus,  casinos encourage psychological problems for the people that live near them. For all these reasons,  the proposed casino should be opposed.

, but . First, , since , and . Second, . This is because , and . Finally, . Thus, . For all these reasons, .

First, , since , and .

Second, . This is because , and .

Finally, . Thus, .

For all these reasons, .

First,  gambling is immoral, since  gambling is motivated by greed, and  greed is an immoral desire.

Second,  communities with casinos have higher crime rates. This is because  casinos attract people who take risks, and  risk-takers are more likely to break the law.

Finally,  studies show that people living within 10 miles of a casino have a 90% increased risk of becoming pathological gamblers. Thus,  casinos encourage psychological problems for the people that live near them.

For all these reasons,  the proposed casino should be opposed.

  +   +        

 The Galaxy Corporation wants to build a casino in St. Louis.  Gambling is immoral.  Communities with casinos have higher crime rates.  Casinos encourage psychological problems for the people that live near them.  the proposed casino should be opposed.

 The Galaxy Corporation wants to build a casino in St. Louis, but  we should not allow it to be built. First,  gambling is immoral, since  gambling is motivated by greed, and  greed is an immoral desire. Second,  communities with casinos have higher crime rates. This is because  casinos attract people who take risks, and  risk-takers are more likely to break the law. Finally,  studies show that people living within 10 miles of a casino have a 90% increased risk of becoming pathological gamblers. Thus,  casinos encourage psychological problems for the people that live near them. For all these reasons,  the proposed casino should be opposed.

Basic Analysis with Argument Diagram Step 1: Write a Basic Analysis of the passage.  Identify the passage.  Analyze the passage. Step 2: If it is an argument, diagram it.  Verify that your diagram is consistent with your Basic Analysis.

Since Reggie Bush was injured last week, he won’t be able to play in the next game. This means that Chris Ivory will be the Saints’ starting running back. Since  Reggie Bush was injured last week,  he won’t be able to play in the next game. This means that  Chris Ivory will be the Saints’s starting running back.     

Since Reggie Bush was injured last week, he won’t be able to play in the next game. This means that Chris Ivory will be the Saints’ starting running back. This passage contains an argument. The issue is whether Chris Ivory will be the Saints’ starting running back. The conclusion is that Chris Ivory will be the Saints’ starting running back. The premise is that Reggie Bush won’t be able to play in the next game. This passage contains a subargument. The intermediate conclusion is that Reggie Bush won’t be able to play in the next game. The premise is that Reggie Bush was injured last week.