Searching for Relevant Studies Interactive Quiz Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic Reviews.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Study Objectives and Questions for Observational Comparative Effectiveness Research Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
Advertisements

Introducing... Reproduced and modified from a presentation produced by Zoë Debenham from the original presentation created by Kate Light, Cochrane Trainer.
Appraisal of Literature. Task 4 The task requires that you:  Obtain a piece of literature from a journal, book or internet source. The literature should.
Grading the Strength of a Body of Evidence on Diagnostic Tests Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for.
Introduction to the User’s Guide for Developing a Protocol for Observational Comparative Effectiveness Research Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research.
Scoping the literature for your research bid Unit 4.
Student Learning Development, TCD1 Systematic Approaches to Literature Reviewing Dr Tamara O’Connor Student Learning Development Trinity College Dublin.
The Bahrain Branch of the UK Cochrane Centre In Collaboration with Reyada Training & Management Consultancy, Dubai-UAE Cochrane Collaboration and Systematic.
Finding Evidence to Support Physical Therapy Clinical Practice: DPT.
How to Use the Resources of the Telelibrary Project Effectively Jane A. Pellegrino, MSLS, AHIP Department Head, Library Services Naval Medical Center Portsmouth.
Accessing Sources Of Evidence For Practice Introduction To Databases Karen Smith Department of Health Sciences University of York.
Implementation Survey Results – Systematic Review Questions Next Steps: Implementation Workshop on Standards for Systematic Reviews and Clinical Practice.
NURS 505B Library Session Rachael Clemens Spring 2007.
Michelle Henley, MLS San Francisco General Hospital Bethany Myers, MLIS UCLA Louise M. Darling Biomedical Library.
Systematic Reviews and the American Academy of Pediatrics Virginia A. Moyer, MD, MPH Professor of Pediatrics Baylor College of Medicine.
ISYS3015 Analytical Methods for Information systems professionals Week 3 Lecture 1: Finding the literature.
Chapter 7. Getting Closer: Grading the Literature and Evaluating the Strength of the Evidence.
Gut-directed hypnotherapy for functional abdominal pain or irritable bowel syndrome in children: a systematic review Journal club presentation
Assessing Quality of Individual Studies Interactive Quiz Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic.
Information Retrieval for High-Quality Systematic Reviews: The Basics 6.0.
Topic Refinement Interactive Quiz Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic Reviews Methods Guide.
Analytic Frameworks Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic Reviews Methods Guide
Systematic Review Module 1: Refining Key Questions C. Michael White, PharmD, FCP, FCCP Professor and Director University of Connecticut / Hartford Hospital.
CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE
Ethics Consultation Beyond the Basics. Module 3 Finding the Available Ethics Knowledge Relevant to an Ethics Question.
THE COCHRANE LIBRARY ON WILEY INTERSCIENCE. Presentation Agenda Brief introduction of Evidence-Based Medicine theories The Cochrane Collaboration – origins,
10 Points to Remember on the Treatment of Blood Cholesterol to Reduce Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Risk in AdultsTreatment of Blood Cholesterol to Reduce.
Searching for Relevant Studies Interactive Case Study Quiz: C. Michael White, Pharm.D., FCP, FCCP Professor and Director University of Connecticut / Hartford.
Literature review Osama A Samarkandi, PhD, RN BSc, GMD, BSN, MSN, NIAC EMS 423; EMS Research and Evidence Based Practice.
Searching beyond the RCT - looking for sibling studies on qualitative, economic and process research Faten Hamad and Christine Urquhart.
Evidence Based Medicine Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Ross Lawrenson.
Evidence-Based Public Health Nancy Allee, MLS, MPH University of Michigan November 6, 2004.
Systematic Review Module 2: Analytic Frameworks Melissa McPheeters, PhD, MPH Associate Director for Methods, Vanderbilt University EPC Assistant Professor,
Refining Key Questions: Interactive Case Study Quiz C. Michael White, PharmD, FCP, FCCP Professor and Director University of Connecticut / Hartford Hospital.
Dr Jamal Roudaki Faculty of Commerce Lincoln University New Zealand.
Reporting the Review Interactive Quiz Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic Reviews Methods.
How to source the best evidence Pat Maier, Paul Boagy and Alan Glasper How to Write Your Nursing Dissertation, First Edition. Alan Glasper and Colin Rees.
Presentation of Findings Interactive Quiz Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic Reviews Methods.
Conducting a Sound Systematic Review: Balancing Resources with Quality Control Eric B. Bass, MD, MPH Johns Hopkins University Evidence-based Practice Center.
Evidence Based Review. Introduction to Evidence Based Reviews Systematic reviews comprehensively examine the medical literature, –seeking to identify.
Copyright © 2008 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 5 Finding and Critiquing Evidence: Research Literature Reviews.
Three basic areas for consideration: 1.Searching, reading and critically evaluating your literature. 2.Managing your literature – organizing and documenting.
Objectives  Identify the key elements of a good randomised controlled study  To clarify the process of meta analysis and developing a systematic review.
When To Select Observational Studies Interactive Quiz Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic.
Analytic Frameworks Interactive Quiz Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic Reviews Methods.
How to Write Abstract How to write title? a good title (typically 10–12 words long) 6,7 will use descriptive terms and phrases that.
Searching The Internet And Evaluating Internet Information.
Quantitative Synthesis II Interactive Quiz Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic Reviews.
Systematic Review Krit Pongpirul, MD, MPH. Johns Hopkins University.
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence November-December 2012.
Chapter 3 Searching the Literature. Literature Reviews are Important conceptual literature – books and articles written by experts related research –
Monitoring Afghanistan, 2015 Food Security and Agriculture Working Group – 9 December 2015.
Internet Resources for Evidence-Based Practice Ben Skinner KnowledgeShare.
The Bahrain Branch of the UK Cochrane Centre In Collaboration with Reyada Training & Management Consultancy, Dubai-UAE Cochrane Collaboration and Systematic.
Evidence Based Practice (EBP) Riphah College of Rehabilitation Sciences(RCRS) Riphah International University Islamabad.
Assessing Applicability Interactive Quiz Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic Reviews Methods.
Sources of Clinical Effectiveness Information & Finding the Evidence Presenter Contact details.
EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE CENTER Melissa McPheeters, PhD Co-Director, Vanderbilt EPC Engaging Stakeholders in EPC Work.
Table of Contents – Part B HINARI Resources –Clinical Evidence –Cochrane Library –EBM Guidelines –BMJ Practice –HINARI EBM Journals.
CHAPTER 2 LITERATION REVIEW 1-1. LEARNING OUTCOMES 1.The reasons for a literature review being an essential part of every project. 2.The purpose of a.
Developing Smart objectives and literature review Zia-Ul-Ain Sabiha.
MEDLINE®/PubMed® PubMed for Trainers, Fall 2015 U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM) and NLM Training Center An introduction.
Elsevier Science (USA) items and derived items copyright © 2003, Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved. Reviewing the Literature Prepare by :Dr/Amira.
a review of outcome measures
Data Extraction Interactive Quiz
Guidelines International Network
Drug Information Resources
MECIR: the bits that reviewers keep getting wrong!
Study Eligibility Criteria Interactive Quiz
Evidence-Based Public Health
Presentation transcript:

Searching for Relevant Studies Interactive Quiz Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic Reviews Methods Guide

You are interested in evaluating the benefits and harms associated with the use of thrombectomy devices in acute coronary syndromes. You need to determine what literature is available to conduct your review. Overview

A comprehensive search is required. When conducting this search, what do you need to assure? A.You balance precision and recall. B.You have gotten every possible relevant citation, regardless of the workload involved. C.You limit the search so that only relevant citations are found. A Comprehensive Search

Given the need to balance precision and recall, what should you do before initiating a search on the use of thrombectomy in patients with acute coronary syndromes? A.Enter the search as “thrombectomy AND acute coronary syndromes.” B.Enter the search as “thrombectomy OR acute coronary syndromes.” C.Understand the topic, devise an analytic framework, pose clearly defined key questions, and understand the scope of the review before devising your strategy. The First Step

Your due diligence pays off. You now realize that your initial search “thrombectomy AND acute coronary syndrome” would compromise the recall. Using “((Thrombectomy OR MerciClot.mp OR “other devices names”) AND (acute coronary syndromes OR myocardial infarction OR angina, unstable))” would assure better recall without appreciably impacting precision. The Power of Due Diligence

You try to decide whether to perform one search or two searches (one for “benefits” and another for “harms”). Which of the following would cause you to perform two searches? A.Performing two searches is redundant and should be avoided. B.You decide a priori to allow only data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) when evaluating benefits but allow RCTs and observational trials for harms. C.The available literature base on the topic is small. More Than One Search May Be Needed

You need to decide which databases to use. The minimum requirement for a thorough search of the literature would include which two databases? A.MEDLINE + TOXNET B.MEDLINE + CINAHL C.MEDLINE + Cochrane Central Database Selection

Why would you decide to use hand searching of references from identified systematic reviews, studies, and abstract booklets from prominent meetings within the field of interest? A.Hand searching can capture citations that are not indexed or are improperly indexed. B.Limiting hand searching to these sources can target this time-intensive activity to areas where the yield will be the greatest. C.Both are correct. Hand Searching

You decide to search the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Web site and ClinicalTrials.gov to identify studies that might be appropriate for your systematic review. These Web sites are sources of what kind of documents? A.Black literature B.Grey literature C.SIPs Other Documents

You conduct a thorough search of MEDLINE and Cochrane Central, use two searches (one for “benefits” and another for “harms”), and employ targeted hand searching and grey literature evaluation. What is the last thing you need to remember to do that is germane to searching? A.Choose only citations that agree with your preconceived notions. B.Selectively report aspects of your search strategy. C.Provide transparent reporting of search strategies and the citations you identified. The Final Task

 Literature searching can have many pitfalls.  Readers will have confidence in the results of your systematic review if you:  demonstrate a comprehensive understanding of the topic,  use multiple searches and databases,  use hedges,  use hand searching and grey literature, and  develop a transparent reporting structure. Summary

 This quiz was prepared by C. Michael White, Pharm.D., FCP, FCCP, a member of the University of Connecticut/Hartford Hospital Evidence-based Practice Center.  This module is based on chapter 5 in version 1.0 of the Methods Reference Guide for Effectiveness and Comparative Effectiveness Reviews (available at: _10Draft MethodsGuide.pdf). Author