Activity measurement of phosphorus-32 in the presence of pure beta-emitting impurities The CSIR Research and Innovation Conference National Metrology Laboratory.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Radioactivity. Radioactivity – Particles are emitted from an unstable nuclei. positron High Energy Photons gamma β-β- Beta αAlpha symbolName β+β+
Advertisements

Kinetics of Radioactive Decays Decay Expressions Half-Life Average Life First-Order Decays Multi- Component Decays Mixtures – Independent Decays Consecutive.
Unit 1.3 Nuclear Chemistry
Lecture 2, January 19 Conclusion of Mathematics Review with Examples Historical Timeline in Nuclear Medicine Radiation Safety Introduction Image of the.
Chapter 10 Curve Fitting and Regression Analysis
My Chapter 29 Lecture.
NUCLEAR CHEMISTRY The Basics. The Nucleus The nucleus is composed of nucleons –protons –neutrons A nucleus is characterized by two numbers –atomic mass.
1 Chapter 11 Nuclear Chemistry Use of 131 I in detecting Hyper- or hypo- thyroidism.
Nuclear Instability.
The structure of nuclei Nuclei are composed of just two types of particles: protons and neutrons. These particles are referred to collectively as nucleons.
NUCLEAR CHEMISTRY By: Stephanie Chen and Stephanie Ng.
Chapter 30 Nuclear Physics
Introduction to Nuclear Chemistry. © 2009, Prentice-Hall, Inc. The Nucleus Remember that the nucleus is comprised of the two nucleons, protons and neutrons.
LS User’s Forum 2001 Developments in LSC Andy Pearce CIRM Date: 5th September 2001.
Statistics.
Radioactivity – inverse square law, absorption, and rates presentation for Apr. 30, 2008 by Dr. Brian Davies, WIU Physics Dept.
Unit I: Physics Associated with Nuclear Medicine Instrumentation Part A: Atomic Structure and Radiation’s Interaction with Matter Lecture 2 CLRS 321 Nuclear.
Objectives To learn the types of radioactive decay
The Nucleus and Radioactivity
Topic : Nuclear Physics
Nuclear Chemistry Chemistry Ms.Piela.
R. Kass/W03P416/Lecture 7 1 Lecture 7 Some Advanced Topics using Propagation of Errors and Least Squares Fitting Error on the mean (review from Lecture.
Kinetics How fast does a reaction (event) occur? Reaction rates are controlled by: Nature of reactants Ability of reactants to meet Concentration of reactants.
Radiation Electromagnetic radiation Ionizing radiation –capable of separating molecules into cations and anions –e.g. X-rays Non-ionizing radiation –doesn’t.
Chapter 9 Nuclear Radiation
Chapter 32 Radiochemical Methods. Introduction… Radiochemical methods tend to be labor intensive and generate liquid waste due to the chemical separations.
Bacterial Production Lab State variables and processes B DOM Other compounds (e.g., EtOH) CO 2 G: Bacterial Growth Rate (gC h -1 ) Why do we want to measure.
Radioactivity Prepared by: Timothy John D. Matoy.
Chapter 2 Some Quantitative Formalities ◎ Introduction ● The scale of nuclear physics and suitable units ◎ The radioactive decay law ● Multimodal decays.
The National Standard of the Radionuclides Activity Unit in Poland R. Broda, A. Chyliński, T. Radoszewski, K. Małetka, T. Terlikowska-Droździel Radioisotope.
1.3-1 Types of Radioactivity.  By the end of this section you will be able to: ◦ Observe nuclear changes and explain how they change an element. ◦ Express.
The Theory of Radioactive Decay Nuclear Physics Lesson 7.
Unstable nuclei Some nuclei are unstable, for example Uranium 235 (it’s to do with the relative numbers of protons and neutrons) Hi! I’m uranium-235 and.
Radioactivity Manos Papadopoulos Nuclear Medicine Department
Chapter 15 Nuclear Radiation
Radioisotopes.
CHEMISTRY ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY Fall Lecture 6.
CHEM 312: Lecture 3 Radioactive Decay Kinetics
The Random Nature of Radioactive Decay
Chapter 31: Nuclear Physics and Radioactivity
© JP 1 RADIOACTIVE DECAY 2 It is impossible to say when a particular nucleus will decay. It is only possible to predict what fraction of the radioactive.
3/2003 Rev 1 II.3.4 & 13-15a – slide 1 of 31 Part IIQuantities and Measurements Module 3Principles of Radiation Detection and Measurement Session 4,Liquid.
IB Assessment Statements Topic 13.2, Nuclear Physics Explain how the radii of nuclei may be estimated from charged particle scattering experiments.
General, Organic, and Biological Chemistry Fourth Edition Karen Timberlake 4.2 Nuclear Reactions Chapter 4 Nuclear Chemistry © 2013 Pearson Education,
Nuclear Physics and Radioactivity AP Physics Chapter 30.
Mrs: Aya Ahmed Abd alrahium saeed MSC &BSC Nuclear medicine
The Atom Lab # 2. What’s Inside an Atom? An atom is made up of a team of three players: protons, neutrons, and electrons They each have a charge, mass,
3/2003 Rev 1 I.2.0 – slide 1 of 12 Session I.2.0 Part I Review of Fundamentals Module 2Introduction Session 0Part I Table of Contents IAEA Post Graduate.
Atoms and Isotopes What are atoms, isotopes, and radioactive decay?
Types of Radioactive Decay Kinetics of Decay Nuclear Transmutations
Kinetics How fast does a reaction (event) occur? Reaction rates are controlled by: Nature of reactants Ability of reactants to meet Concentration of reactants.
2/17/2016 L3-L4 1 PRINCE SATTAM BIN ABDUL AZIZ UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF PHARMACY Nuclear Pharmacy (PHT 433 ) Dr. Shahid Jamil.
1 LTR 2004 Sudbury, December 2004 Helenia Menghetti, Marco Selvi Bologna University and INFN Large Volume Detector The Large Volume Detector (LVD)
Radioactivity By the end of this chapter you should be able to: describe the properties of alpha, beta and gamma radiations; explain why some nuclei are.
5.3.3 Radioactivity.
22.2 Radioactive decay Radioactive decay and its random nature Why do radioactive substances emit nuclear radiation? This process is called radioactive.
Atom Rutherford Next Slide Rutherford’s scattering experiment Photo Atomic model Diagram Rutherford’s scattering experiment Introduction 1.
2.3.9 radioactive decay.
FRCR II - Radioactivity
CIEMAT/NIST – what is it?
Review Atomic Number (Z) – number of protons
Devil physics The baddest class on campus IB Physics
Nuclear Medicine Physics & Instrumentation I
A –Level Physics: Nuclear Decay Half Life and Background Radiation
5.4 General Linear Least-Squares
Atoms and Radioactivity
Radiochemical Methods
Transformation Kinetic
Radioactivity – inverse square law, absorption, and rates
Presentation transcript:

Activity measurement of phosphorus-32 in the presence of pure beta-emitting impurities The CSIR Research and Innovation Conference National Metrology Laboratory Dr Bruce Simpson and Freda van Wyngaardt R&D Metrologists: Radioactivity 27 February 2006

Slide 2 © CSIR Introduction Phosphorus-32 is an important radionuclide in nuclear medicine. Required dose is achieved by delivering known amounts of activity. Activity measurements are traceable to national radioactivity measurement standards. The CIPM MRA requires National Metrology Institutes to regularly check measurements for uniformity and equivalence. In 2005 the BIPM organised an international key comparison of 32 P activity measurements. Method: followed the decay, with the following variations collected double- and triple-coincidence data fresh counting sources weekly rates per unit mass analysed established the counting efficiency by two independent methods

Slide 3 © CSIR Beta decay is the process whereby the nucleus of an atom transforms spontaneously into a stable nuclide. An electron (called a beta particle) is emitted directly from the nucleus. The energy ranges from 0 to E max. So the beta particle has a continuous energy distribution. An antineutrino is also emitted to conserve energy. Background Information

Slide 4 © CSIR The activity A is the rate of decay of a radioactive source. The number of nuclei that disintegrate per second is given the unit becquerel (Bq). The decay is a random process, with all nuclei of a given nuclide having identical decay probability. The decay law (based on experimental evidence) is: A(t) = N(t), where N(t) is the number of nuclei present at an instant of time t. Solving, A(t) = A(0) exp (- t). The decay is exponential with a decay constant.

Slide 5 © CSIR Phosphorus-32 ( 32 P) is a pure beta emitter with high energy (E max = 1711 keV). Each disintegration produces one beta particle. So we need to count the number of  -particles in a time interval t to obtain the activity A. If the count rate is given by B c/s, then, where  is the counting efficiency. 32 P has a high 4  detection efficiency, but < 100 %.

Slide 6 © CSIR APPARATUS Three phototubes viewing a LS source are connected in coincidence: S ources comprise an   aliquot of the P-32   solution mixed in liquid  scintillator. Data are corrected for: - Background events - Counting deadtime (1  s) - Coincidence resolving  time (0.47  s) PM 2 3 Double and triple coincidence unit PM 1 Source activity = N o MEASURE: DOUBLE-TUBE RATE, N d = N o  d TRIPLE-TUBE RATE, N t = N o  t

Slide 7 © CSIR  Detector housing Liquid scintillation counting source

Slide 8 © CSIR COUNTING SYSTEM Electronic modules for pulse processing and the data acquisition system (CAMAC interval timer and scaler modules under computer control).

Slide 9 © CSIR P-33 and S-35 were possible impurities in the P-32 solution. All are pure beta emitters. Cannot independently determine the Phosphorus-33 and Sulphur-35 activities. For a given source comprising mass m of the master solution: 32 P count rate at time t : N 1 (t) = N 1 exp(- 1 t) 33 P count rate at time t : N 2 (t) = N 2 exp(- 2 t) 35 S count rate at time t : N 3 (t) = N 3 exp(- 3 t) All we can do is measure the total count rate N(t) : N(t) = N 1 (t) + N 2 (t) + N 3 (t) …………………………………….(1) Therefore must follow the decay over time and determine the best fit to the data using expression (1). This extracts the count rates N 1, N 2 and N 3 at the reference date chosen.

Slide 10 © CSIR Sum of three exponential functions Weighted least-squares fitting: Take difference (squared) between measured value N i at time t i and the mathematical expression, i.e. Q = ∑ (N i – N 1 exp(- 1 t i ) – N 2 exp(- 2 t i ) – N 3 exp(- 3 t i ) ) 2 Q is minimised by differentiating with respect to the coefficients N 1, N 2 and N 3 and equating to zero. This gives rise to a set of linear algebraic equations that can be expressed in matrix form. The solution is given by a matrix inversion technique. This gives the values and uncertainties for the three coefficients N 1, N 2 and N 3.

Slide 11 © CSIR Example The decay constant = / T ½, T ½ is the h alf-life. 32 P: T ½ = days, = , N 1 = c/s at time t = 0 33 P: T ½ = days, = , N 2 = 1800 c/s at time t = 0 35 S: T ½ = days, = , N 3 = 555 c/s at time t = 0 Days 32 P 33 P 35 STotal Program gives: 32 P = ± 152 c/s 33 P = 1710 ± 118 c/s 35 S = 574 ± 23 c/s

Slide 12 © CSIR This plot shows the cluster of data points collected on day one. Expressed as count rate given by the master solution. These are double-tube coincidence rates. EXPERIMENTAL DATA

Slide 13 © CSIR Extracted count rate concentrations (s -1 g -1 ) : N 1 = N 2 = 2355 N 3 = 134 A plot of the 106 data points collected over six weeks. Red line: 32 P Blue line: 33 P Black line: 32 P + 33 P + 35 S LOCAL ref. date:

Slide 14 © CSIR Double rate (s -1 g -1 ) Activity conc. (Bq/g) Triple rate (s -1 g -1 ) Activity conc. (Bq/g) Impurity as fraction of P-32 (%) P ± ± P ± ± – 2.9 S ± ± – 0.5 A quench-matched 63 Ni source was used to characterize the system in terms of the figure-of-merit P. Using P, the efficiencies  d (and  t ) were determined: 32 P = % (99.26), 33 P = 84.6 % (81.6), 35 S = 75.2 % (70.6)

Slide 15 © CSIR Alternative 32 P efficiency determination by the TDCR technique Triple and double rates corrected for 33 P and 35 S contributions. Then is solved for P. Mean efficiency = Mean activity conc. = ± 44 Bq/g

Slide 16 © CSIR weighing0.02 dead time0.01 background0.01 resolving time0.005 adsorption to vial0.10 tracer0.006 half life0.18 fit to decay data sets0.18 satellite pulses0.015 COMBINED0.28 UNCERTAINTY COMPONENTS FOR 32 P % of activity conc. (1  )

Slide 17 © CSIR Conclusions Application of the decay method successfully extracted the 32 P activity content in the presence of pure beta-emitting impurities. The two schemes adopted to convert count rates into activities produced consistent results. Participation in the key comparison has furthered the NML’s capabilities, will establish degrees of equivalence with the other participants and offer traceability to the local user community.