Impervious Surface Connectivity and Urban Stream Corridors Land Use Workgroup Meeting January 30, 2014 Steve Stewart Baltimore County.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lawyer Creek Steelhead Trout Habitat Improvement Project presented by: Lewis Soil Conservation District.
Advertisements

Phosphorus Loads from Streambank Erosion to Surface Waters in the Minnesota River Basin D. J. Mulla Professor, Dept. Soil, Water, Climate University of.
Transport of nitrogen and phosphorus from Rhode River watersheds during storm events David Correll, Thomas Jordan, and Donald Weller Water Resources Research,
Maryland Assateague Coastkeeper Baltimore Harbor Waterkeeper Chester Riverkeeper Choptank Riverkeeper Patuxent Riverkeeper Sassafras Riverkeeper Severn.
Introduction 5 Case Studies Impervious Cover (%) for Various Land Uses [2] [2] Low Density Residential 10 Medium Density Residential 30 High Density Residential.
LTHIA – Upgrades and Training Bernard A. Engel Tong Zhai Larry Theller Agricultural and Biological Department Purdue University In conjunction.
Low Impact Development Best Management Practices
Fairfax County, Virginia Watershed Management Plans.
Excess Rainfall Reading for today’s material: Sections Slides prepared by V.M. Merwade Quote for today (contributed by Tyler Jantzen) "How many.
City of Austin Water Quality Master Planning - GIS Model David Maidment Francisco Olivera Mike Barrett Christine Dartiguenave Ann Quenzer CRWR - University.
Measuring Urban Growth in New Jersey
Abstract This paper examines the relationship between urban form and impervious surface. Smart growth development (compact, mixed-use, pedestrian friendly,
S. Fork Nooksack River, WA. Reasons for Land Clearing Agriculture Lumber Mining Urban Development.
Lecture ERS 482/682 (Fall 2002) Why watersheds? ERS 482/682 Small Watershed Hydrology.
Determining the effectiveness of best management practices to reduce nutrient loading from cattle grazed pastures in Utah Nicki Devanny Utah State University,
Point Source POLLUTION: CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES
Jefferson High School Compton Creek Research Project UCLA and Los Angeles Waterkeeper Funded by the Environmental Protection Agency.
Greg Jennings, PhD, PE Professor, Biological & Agricultural Engineering North Carolina State University BAE 579: Stream Restoration Lesson.
Chesapeake Bay Program Incorporation of Lag Times into the Decision Process Gary Shenk 10/16/12 1.
Next The water that falls on the Chesapeake Bay watershed drains to local streams and rivers and then flows to the Chesapeake.
Center for Watershed Protection USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Area, State and Private Forestry How to estimate future forest cover in a watershed.
Water Quality Associated with Urban Runoff: Sources, Emerging Issues and Management Approaches Martha Sutula and Eric Stein Biogeochemistry and Biology.
Center for Watershed Protection USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Area, State and Private Forestry How to estimate future forest cover in a watershed.
Steve Harrison, Environmental Manager Bureau of Entomology and Pest Control -Mosquito Control Section.
Baltimore LTER Nutrient and Bacterial Fluxes in Urban Watersheds of the Gwynns Falls, Baltimore, MD.   Belt, K. T.1, P. M. Groffman2, L. Band3, N. Law3,
Level IB: Advanced Fundamentals Seminar
Best Management Practices and the Chesapeake Bay Program Watershed Model Jeff Sweeney University of Maryland Chesapeake Bay Program Office
Virginia Assessment Scenario Tool VAST Developed by: Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin.
Highlights A Study of Phosphorus Loading of Ballston Lake by Tributary Inflow Presentation to BLIA Annual Meeting June 16, 2014 Scott Miller, Bob Duncan,
Urban Storm Drain Design: Rainfall-Runoff relations.
Watershed Management Assessment Through Modeling: SALT and CEAP Dr. Claire Baffaut Water Quality Short Course Boone County Extension Office April 12, 2007.
Takings vs. Givings: Science and Policy in Riparian Setback Zoning Stu Schwartz Center for Urban Environmental Research and Education University of Maryland.
1 Questions Addressed What are the options for reducing pollutant inputs to Lake Tahoe? Pollutant Reduction Opportunities.
Patapsco/Back River SWMM Model Part I - Hydrology Maryland Department of the Environment.
San Pedro Creek: A Longitudinal Profile Study Andrew Georgeades Anne Jurek Mary Snow.
Sarah Giles Holly Kuestner Steven Orr Qi Zhang. 1.Impervious Surfaces’ Effects on Flow Accumulation (Holly) 2.Variable Source Area (Holly) 3.Catchment.
Patapsco/Back River SWMM Model Part II – SWMM Water Quality Calibration Maryland Department of the Environment.
Timeline Impaired for turbidity on Minnesota’s list of impaired waters (2004) MPCA must complete a study to determine the total maximum daily load (TMDL)
Introduction to Spatial Calculation Estimation of Areas Susceptible to Flood and Soil Loss.
Patapsco and Back River HSPF Watershed Model Part II – Water Quality Maryland Department of the Environment.
Presented to: Severn River Association 2008 State of the Severn Anne Arundel County Government Department of Public Works Ron Bowen, P.E. October 21, 2008.
Sediment Delivery to the Watonwan River
LEQ: How can I determine watershed patterns and their divides on a map? Lesson Key terms: watershed, drainage basin, tributary, dendritic, elevation,
National Monitoring Conference May 7-11, 2006
How do humans affect watersheds and the hydrologic cycle ?
Urbanized Stream Source Ratio October 20, 2015 Urban Stormwater Workgroup Reid Christianson, PE, PhD Neely Law, PhD Bill Stack, PE.
EPA HWI Comments on CA Assessment June 26, 2013 HSP Call 2 major categories of comments: – Report writing (we will work on this) – Content/Analysis/Discussion.
CONEWAGO CREEK GROUND WATER STUDY Base Flow and Impervious Cover November 7, 2007 Watershed Alliance of Adams County Joe McNally, P.G. GeoServices, Ltd.
Rainwater Management March 3, 2006 Richard Boase, P.Geo., CCEP North Vancouver District Single Family Properties New Direction for Watershed Health.
How do think this affects the animals in your neighborhood? Amounts greater than 250 mg/L of salt causes death in animals. ←
Virginia Smith CE397 – Spring 2009 Sediment in the Trinity River Basin 1 Virginia Smith CE 397.
Calculating Storm Water Runoff Pervious vs. Impervious Materials.
Land Use Influences on Water, Sediment and Nutrients in the Napa Valley Watershed: Conceptual Models and Examples Lester McKee (PhD) Watershed Program.
Graduate Students, CEE-6190
Creating Land Use Datasets for Storm Water Reporting
Watersheds Review Science 8 SOL.
L-THIA Online and LID in a watershed investigation
L-THIA Online and LID Larry Theller
Water, water everywhere?
Estimation of Runoff & nonpoint source pollution using GIS techniques
Projecting Buildout Conditions in the Hood Canal Watershed
Test Drive Results and Revisions of the New Stream Restoration Crediting Protocols Bill Stack & Lisa Fraley-McNeal December 2, 2013.
Physical Characteristics of streams
Paper by: Bloniarz D. , M. Matteo, T
River Flow into Chesapeake Bay
Anne Arundel County Maryland
Estimation of Loadings for Nonpoint Sources and Stormwater
Erosion Patterns in Austin Streams
Warmup 10/25/12 If family members living in the house find nitrates in their drinking water (which comes from the well), where should they look for the.
Presentation transcript:

Impervious Surface Connectivity and Urban Stream Corridors Land Use Workgroup Meeting January 30, 2014 Steve Stewart Baltimore County

Issues Phase 5 of the CBP Watershed Model had no differences in loadings between high-density and low-density urban pervious and urban impervious. The urban impervious land use had higher loading than the urban pervious land use and seemed to include stream erosion source loads as part of the impervious surface load.

Concepts Difference between Total Impervious Cover and Directly Connected Impervious Cover – Implications for per Acre Loading Urban Riparian Corridor as a Land Use – Clearly differentiate between impervious cover sources and stream corridor sources

TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA (TIA) VS. DIRECTLY CONNECTED IMPERVIOUS AREA (DCIA)

Definitions Total Impervious Area (TIA): The total amount of impervious cover expressed as a %, includes DCIA. Directly Connected Impervious Area (DCIA): That portion of the impervious area that drains directly to the storm drain system without flowing across pervious area.

Directly Connected Impervious

Disconnected Impervious

Analysis Data sources – Baltimore County Water Quality Management Plans – SWMM section (10 plans, 5 with data useable in analysis. – Baltimore County Neighborhood Source Assessments used in developing Small Watershed Action Plans. (data analysis not complete and not included in this presentation)

Relationship of TIA to DCIA Land UseTIADCIADifference Low Density Res Medium Density Res High Density Res Commercial Industrial Institutional Open Urban

Nitrogen Land UseTIADCIAAverage SWMM Model Average SWMM Model Using CBP loading rates Low Density Res ,066 Medium Density Res ,135 High Density Res ,225 Commercial ,360 Industrial ,312 Institutional Open Urban ,020

Nitrogen Loading Rates by Land Use Comparison Between SWMM and CBP Models Land UseTIADCIAAverage SWMM Model CBP Model loading rates using average TIA from SWMM CBP Model loading rates using average DCIA from SWMM Low Density Res Medium Density Res High Density Res Commercial Industrial Institutional Open Urban

Correlation Table TIADCIACBP LoadSWMM Load TIA DCIA CBP Load SWMM Load

Phosphorus Loading Rates by Land Use Comparison Between SWMM and CBP Models Land UseTIADCIAAverage SWMM Model CBP Model loading rates using average TIA from SWMM CBP Model loading rates using average DCIA from SWMM Low Density Res Medium Density Res High Density Res Commercial Industrial Institutional Open Urban

Observations The differential between models is greater for low density residential and open urban (both low impervious cover categories). The differential between SWMM results and CBP model is greater for nitrogen than phosphorus. The differential is less when using DCIA versus TIA. CBP urban loading rates are higher versus the SWMM rates.

URBAN RIPARIAN CORRIDOR AS A LAND USE

DCIA – Flow from Storm Drain

Urban Stream Channel Erosion Inadequate Buffer

Urban Stream Channel Erosion With Buffer

Justification for a Urban Riparian Corridor Land Use Many studies have demonstrated a relationship between increases in impervious cover and increased stream erosion. Maryland stream based sediment TMDLs use a calculation to determine the relative proportion of the sediment load attributable to stream erosion The Watershed Model does not include a stream layer that encompasses 1 st, 2 nd, and some 3 rd order streams that are most propone to erosion due to urbanization.

Justification for a Urban Riparian Corridor Land Use By including an urban riparian corridor land use, the impervious surface loading rates would decrease since they would no longer include the loads from stream channel erosion. By having urban stream channel erosion as a source, attention can be focused on removing the channel erosion as a source, either by upland controls or stream channel restoration, or more likely by both.

Lower North Branch Patapsco River Water Quality Management Plan Related the impervious surface coverage to stream channel enlargement through SWMM modeling. Stream channel condition verified by stream corridor assessments and stream channel measurements. Clearly a relationship between impervious cover and stream channel erosion.

Lower North Branch Patapsco River Water Quality Management Plan

Equation for Determining Proportion of Sediment Load Due to Stream Channel Erosion

Proportion of Sediment Load due to Stream Channel Erosion

Riparian Corridor as a Land Use Conclusions Methods exist to link stream channel erosion contribution to the sediment load. Methods also exist with literature summarized by Stream Restoration – Expert Panel to link nitrogen and phosphorus loads to stream channel erosion. With a little addition additional work, nitrogen and phosphorus load contributions resulting from loss of riparian corridor function could be determined.