Delaware River Basin SPARROW Model Mary Chepiga 609-771-3955 Susan Colarullo 609-771-3922 Jeff Fischer 609-771-3953.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Prepared in cooperation with the Johnson County Stormwater Management Program Casey J. Lee U.S.
Advertisements

SPARROW Modeling in the Mississippi and Atchafalaya River Basins (MARB) Dale Robertson, Richard Alexander, and David Saad U.S. Geological Survey USGS/USEPA.
WATERs: Demonstration and Development of a Test-bed Digital Observatory for the Susquehanna River Basin and Chesapeake Bay Michael Piasecki Drexel University.
Phosphorus Loads from Streambank Erosion to Surface Waters in the Minnesota River Basin D. J. Mulla Professor, Dept. Soil, Water, Climate University of.
SPARROW Watershed Modeling of the Entire Great Lakes Basin IAGLR Conference, McMaster University May 29, 2014 (608) By Dale.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Welcome to the USGS Webinar: New Science and Online Management Tools to Help Guide Action on Nutrients.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey The Use of Calculated Stream Metabolism in Understanding Nutrients and Algal Measures in Agricultural.
Developing Modeling Tools in Support of Nutrient Reduction Policies Randy Mentz Adam Freihoefer, Trip Hook, & Theresa Nelson Water Quality Modeling Technical.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Nutrient Loads to the Gulf of Mexico Mike Woodside U.S. Geological Survey TN.
Scenario Builder and Watershed Model Progress toward the MPA Gary Shenk, Guido Yactayo, Gopal Bhatt Modeling Workgroup 12/2/14 1.
SOURCES AND FLUX OF NUTRIENTS IN THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER BASIN: MONITORING, MODELING, & RESEARCH NEEDS Donald A. Goolsby, U.S. Geological Survey.
The Wisconsin River TMDL: Linking Monitoring and Modeling Ann Hirekatur, Pat Oldenburg, & Adam Freihoefer March 7, 2013 Wisconsin River TMDL Project Team.
Putting NHDPlus to Work 2006 ESRI User Conference San Diego, CA August 8, ESRI User Conference San Diego, CA August 8, 2006 NHD and NHDPlus Applications.
Estimating the Sources and Transport of Nitrogen in the Mississippi River Basin Using Spatially Referenced Modeling Techniques R.B. Alexander, R.A. Smith,
Chesapeake Bay Program Monitoring Activities and Monitoring Network Design Chesapeake Bay Program Monitoring Activities and Monitoring Network Design Stephen.
SPARROW Modeling in the Mississippi River Basin Iowa Science Assessment Davenport, IA Nov. 14, 2012 (608) By Dale M. Robertson*
0 The National Hydrography Dataset Plus a tool for SPARROW Watershed Modeling Richard Moore (presented by Alan Rea)
Nutrient Trading Framework in the Coosa Basin April 22, 2015.
Development of Aquatic Ecosystem Models Lizhu Wang, Shaw Lacy, Paul Seebach, Mike Wiley Institute for Fisheries Research MDNR and U of M.
Water Quality Modeling in GIS Application of Schematic Network Processing Schema Links and Nodes have unique behaviors based on their type A framework.
U.S. EPA: NCEA/Global Change Research Program Jim Pizzuto and students University of Delaware Changing Climate and Land Use in the Mid-Atlantic: Modeling.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Characterizing the Landscape for Water-Quality Analysis Methods and implementation 2006 National.
Long-term Changes in Lamprey River Chemistry William H. McDowell University of New Hampshire.
Determining the effectiveness of best management practices to reduce nutrient loading from cattle grazed pastures in Utah Nicki Devanny Utah State University,
SPARROW Water- Quality Modeling: Application of the National Hydrography Dataset What is SPARROW? Use of NHD SPARROW results By Craig Johnston and Richard.
Water Quality Monitoring and Parameter Load Estimations in Lake Conway Point Remove Watershed and L’Anguille River Watershed Presented by: Dan DeVun, Equilibrium.
Nutrient and Sediment Concentrations, Yields and Loads in Impaired Streams and Rivers in the Taunton River Basin, Massachusetts, Jeffrey R. Barbaro.
Transitory storage of N R in watersheds occurs in both surface and subsurface reservoirs. The factors pertaining to storage examined here are: precipitation,
Water Quality Associated with Urban Runoff: Sources, Emerging Issues and Management Approaches Martha Sutula and Eric Stein Biogeochemistry and Biology.
Integrating FIA with Other Research Activities The Delaware River Basin Project & The North American Carbon Program Richard Birdsey Program Manager Global.
WATERSHED PERMITTING IN NORTH CAROLINA NPDES PERMIT NCC BECAME EFFECTIVE JAN 1, 2003 NEUSE RIVER COMPLIANCE ASSOCIATION MORRIS V. BROOKHART, P.E.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Regional scale point source nutrient load estimation in support of SPARROW* modeling Gerard McMahon,
Comparison of Two Methods for Modeling Monthly Total Phosphorus (TP) Yield from a Watershed K. L. White 1, I. Chaubey 1, B. E. Haggard 2, M. D. Matlock.
Iowa Nutrient Load Estimations for Point and Non-point Sources Iowa DNR November 14, 2012.
SPARROW Surface Water Quality Workshop October 29-31, 2002 Reston, Virginia Section 5. Comparison of GIS Approaches, Data Sources and Management.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Implementation of the U.S. Geological Survey’s StreamStats Program in Kansas— A Web Application.
1 Evaluating and Estimating the Effect of Land use Changed on Water Quality at Selorejo Reservoir, Indonesia Mohammad Sholichin Faridah Othman Shatira.
Linear Regression Model In regression, x = independent (predictor) variable y= dependent (response) variable regression line (prediction line) ŷ = a +
Gulf of Mexico Hypoxia and Mississippi River Basin Nutrient Losses Herb Buxton, USGSRob Magnien, NOAA Co-Chairs, Monitoring, Modeling, and Research Workgroup,
Applications of Regression to Water Quality Analysis Unite 5: Module 18, Lecture 1.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Using Monitoring Data from Multiple Networks/Agencies to Calibrate Nutrient SPARROW* Models, Southeastern.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Charles G. Crawford and Robert J. Gilliom National Water-Quality Assessment Program Pesticide National.
Delaware River Basin SPARROW Model Mary Chepiga, , Susan Colarullo, , Jeff Fischer, ,
Landscape Analysis: 1.Determine 1993 and 2001 Land Cover of the Sougahatchee Basin Sougahatchee Basin 2. Compare 2001 Land Cover to 1993 Land Cover 3.
Vision for the National Geospatial Framework for Surface Water Robert M. Hirsch Associate Director for Water U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological.
Allen D. Roberts and Stephen D. Prince Land cover and land use (LC/LU) and its human-induced changes have large effects on water quality of streams, rivers,
Response of benthic algae communities to nutrient enrichment in agricultural streams: Implications for establishing nutrient criteria R.W. Black 1, P.W.
Gulf of Mexico Hypoxia and Nutrient Management in the Mississippi River Basin Herb Buxton, U.S. Geological Survey.
Correlation and Regression: The Need to Knows Correlation is a statistical technique: tells you if scores on variable X are related to scores on variable.
1. The Study of Excess Nitrogen in the Neuse River Basin “A Landscape Level Analysis of Potential Excess Nitrogen in East-Central North Carolina, USA”
Relating Surface Water Nutrients in the Pacific Northwest to Watershed Attributes Using the USGS SPARROW Model Daniel Wise, Hydrologist US Geological Survey.
Opportunities for Collaboration on Water- Quality Issues in the Mississippi River Basin Herb Buxton, Office of Water Quality.
Answering the Question: Why? Factors Affecting Change in Water Quality Exceptional challenge to explain “why” Poor quality of pollution source information.
Integrating the NAWQA approach to assessments in rivers and streams By Donna Myers, Bill Wilber, Anne Hoos, and Charlie Crawford U.S. Geological Survey,
NAWQA Nutrient Synthesis Past, Present, and Future USGS Workshop on Nutrient Processes in the Upper Mississippi River Basin UMESC, LaCrosse, WI March 25.
SPARROW: A Model Designed for Use With Monitoring Networks Richard A. Smith, Gregory E. Schwarz, and Richard B. Alexander US Geological Survey, Reston,
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Reston, Virginia (703) NHD Flow and Velocity Project Greg Schwarz, Reston,
Controls on Catchment-Scale Patterns of Phosphorous in Soil, Streambed Sediment, and Stream Water Marcel van der Perk, et al… Journal of Environmental.
The Future of NHDPlus 2009 NHD Stewardship Conference Denver, CO April 14-17, NHD Stewardship Conference Denver, CO April 14-17, 2009 Tommy Dewald.
NOPOLU System2 Large scale assessment of non-point nutrient sources.
Integrated Approach for Assessing and Communicating Progress toward the Chesapeake Bay Water-Quality Standards Scott Phillips USGS, STAR May 14, 2012 PSC.
Water Quality Sampling, Analysis and Annual Load Determinations for the Illinois River at Arkansas Highway 59 Bridge, 2008 Brian E. Haggard Arkansas Water.
Section 5. Chesapeake Bay Network Generation CB watershed –~ 64,000 square miles –~ 166,000 square kilometers Constructed 3 models Version I –ERF1, ~1300.
Nitrogen Budgets for the Mississippi River Basin using the linked EPIC-CMAQ-NEWS Models Michelle McCrackin, Ellen Cooter, Robin Dennis, Jana Compton, John.
Bayesian SPARROW Model Song Qian Ibrahim Alameddine The University of Toledo American University of Beirut.
Correlation and Regression
Statistics in WR: Lecture 22
Public Meeting February 19, 2009
1. The Study of Excess Nitrogen in the Neuse River Basin
Problem: Interpolation of soil properties
Presentation transcript:

Delaware River Basin SPARROW Model Mary Chepiga Susan Colarullo Jeff Fischer US Geological Survey Delaware NAWQA

Today’s Talk The SPARROW model technique The SPARROW model technique Delaware River Basin SPARROW results for Total Nitrogen (TN) and Total Phosphorus (TP) for 2000 Delaware River Basin SPARROW results for Total Nitrogen (TN) and Total Phosphorus (TP) for 2000 SPARROW and water-quality monitoring SPARROW and water-quality monitoring

SPARROW* Model Concept *SPAtially Referenced Regression On Watershed Attributes Watershed Attributes

relates measured loads at monitoring stations to stream and land attributes SPARROW relates measured loads at monitoring stations to stream and land attributes Sources Stream Network Landscape Features Monitoring Data

Model predictions are made for every reach (not just monitored reaches) Load, yield, concentration Contribution from each source In-stream and reservoir losses Incremental and delivered loads for stream reaches, basins and sub-basins Statistical measures of uncertainty for predictors and predictions Stream reach Reach basin

Monitored/Calculated Loads

2000 Total Nitrogen Yields 97 sites 97 sites 50% are less than 700 kg/km 2 50% are less than 700 kg/km 2 10 % are greater than 2,000 kg/km 2 10 % are greater than 2,000 kg/km 2 Kg/Km 2 >2000 >700 and <2000 < 700 Major Stream

TP Loads Map here Map here 2000 Total Phosphorus Yields 110 sites 110 sites 50% are less than 25 kg/km 2 50% are less than 25 kg/km 2 10 % are greater than 75 kg/km 2 10 % are greater than 75 kg/km 2 Kg/Km 2 >75 >25 and <75 < 25 Major Stream

Total Nitrogen Total Phosphorus Atmospheric deposition Population Fertilizer applied to agricultural land Animal waste Diffuse (forest, urban, non- agricultural)* Water-holding capacity Precipitation Stream size Reservoir size Sources Land-to-Water Delivery Population Fertilizer applied to agricultural land Animal waste Diffuse (urban, non- agricultural)* Stream size* Reservoir size In-Stream Transport

Delaware River Basin SPARROW Model Results

DRB SPPARROW Results DRB SPPARROW Results for entire basin Total Nitrogen (TN) 57.8 million kg Total Phosphorus (TP) 4.0 million kg Atmospheric Deposition 14.5 kg Population 11.6 kg Fertilizer 12.7 kg Waste 18.4 kg Diffuse* 0.6 kg Population 2.5 kg Fertilizer 0.5 kg Waste 0.7 kg Diffuse 0.3 kg

Total Nitrogen load, in kilograms per year Total Nitrogen 2000 Total Loads < 1,000 1, ,000 5,001 – 50,000 50,001 – 500,000 > 500,000

Total Nitrogen Incremental Load, in kilograms per year Total Nitrogen 2000 Incremental Loads < – 1,000 1,000 – 10,000 > 10,000

Total Nitrogen Incremental Yield in kg per km 2 per year Total Nitrogen 2000 Incremental Yields < 1,000 1,000 – 2,000 2,001 – 4,000 4,001 – 6,000 > 6,000

TN Major Sources TP Major Sources Major Sources Atmospheric Deposition Diffuse Fertilizer Waste Population

Total Nitrogen by Source and Basin

Total Nitrogen Delivered to Estuary (39 Mkg)

Nitrogen Incremental Yield by Source and AMNET Basin NONESEVEREMODERATE IMPAIRMENT

SPARROW and Water-Quality Monitoring

SPARROW TN Errors LowestHighest Error Evaluation Model explains ~90 to 95% of spatial variability in loads Prediction errors for stream reaches are typically +/- 5 to 60% of load Generally half of the independent variables are non-significant

Delaware River Basin SPARROW Model Points of Contact Mary Chepiga Susan Colarullo Jeff Fischer US Geological Survey Delaware NAWQA

Load Sources Land-to-water delivery Instream decay Error SPARROW Budget Equation Spatial non-linear regression Adjusts land and stream delivery factors on the basis of basin-wide statistical relationships Minimizes errors at monitoring sites

Total Phosphorus Load, in kilograms per year Total Phosphorus 2000 Total Loads < 1,000 1, ,000 10,001 – 20,000 20,001 – 400,000 > 400,000

Total Phosphorus Incremental Load, in kilograms per year Total Phosphorus 2000 Incremental Loads < – 1,000 1,001 – 10,000 > 10,000

TP Total Loads TPIncrementalLoads

Total Phosphorus Incremental Yield, in kg per km 2 per year Total Phosphorus 2000 Incremental Yields < – – 10 > 10

Data Sources

Data Sources (cont’d)