Phosphorus Index Based Management Douglas Beegle Dept. of Crop and Soil Sciences Penn State University

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview – Nutrient Fate and Transport Mark B. David University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Presented at Building Science Assessments for State-Level.
Advertisements

Phosphorus Index Based Management Douglas Beegle Dept. of Crop and Soil Sciences, Penn State University SUMBER:
Phosphorus and Potassium CNMP Core Curriculum Section 5 – Nutrient Management.
Phosphorus Index for Oregon and Washington Steve Campbell USDA - Natural Resources Conservation Service Portland, Oregon Dan Sullivan Oregon State University.
Phosphorus Indices: an Understanding of Upper Mississippi Strategies John A. Lory, Ph.D. Division of Plant Sciences University of Missouri.
Daily Manure Production Per Animal We have estimates of manure production –4.5 kg/day/hd for swine (liquid manure) –45-50 kg/day/hd for dairy cow (liquid)
Spatial Modeling of Soil Heterogeneities and their Impacts on Soil-Phosphorus Losses in a Quebec Watershed By Alaba Boluwade Department of Bioresource.
©2003 Institute of Water Research, all rights reserved Water Quality Modeling for Ecological Services under Cropping and Grazing Systems Da Ouyang Jon.
2013 KY NRCS (590) Nutrient Management Standard Highlights: NRCS 590 is now only required for producers applying to receive NRCS financial or technical.
Agricultural Phosphorus and Eutrophication by Don Pitts Agricultural Engineer & Water Quality Specialist USDA, NRCS Champaign, IL.
Team Meeting #5, Great Lakes Protection Fund Grant A Phosphorus Soil Test Metric To Reduce Dissolved Phosphorus Loading to Lake Erie Heidelberg University.
REMM: Riparian Ecosystem Management Model USDA-Agricultural Research Service University of Georgia California State University – Chico USDA-Natural Resources.
Nutrient Management Natural Resources Conservation Service.
Minnesota Watershed Nitrogen Reduction Planning Tool William Lazarus Department of Applied Economics University of Minnesota David Mulla Department of.
PSWMRU Town Brook/Cannonsville Reservoir Watersheds – A CEAP-WAS contribution Bil Gburek and friends Pasture Systems and Watershed Management Research.
Iowa P-Index Relationship to Feedlots Steve Brinkman CCA Nutrient Management Specialist USDA / NRCS
Additional Questions, Resources, and Moving Forward Science questions raised in the development of a science assessment Effect of Conservation Tillage.
N surplus and handling of WFD in the Netherlands Gerard Velthof.
Modeling of Soil Nutrients – An Introduction to Logical Spreadsheeting Russell Yost Department of Tropical Plant and Soil Science, University of Hawai`i.
P Index Development and Implementation The Iowa Experience Antonio Mallarino Iowa State University.
Nutrient Management Planning Alan Sutton Department of Animal Sciences.
Using the Missouri P index John A. Lory, Ph.D. Division of Plant Sciences Commercial Agriculture Program University of Missouri.
Logo Certified Nutrient Management Planning7-1 Module 7: Manure Utilization By Hailin Zhang.
Nonpoint Source Pollution Reductions – Estimating a Tradable Commodity Allen R. Dedrick Associate Deputy Administrator Natural Resources & Sustainable.
Rao Mylavarapu Soil & Water Science Department, IFAS University of Florida.
Potential of Using Precision Agricultural Practices for P Fertilizer Management.
Designation of Nitrate Vulnerable Zones in Romania Catalin Simota Research Institute for Soil Science and Agrochemistry Bucharest - Romania.
Dairies and Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations: Environmental Concerns and Research Needs USEPA, Region 9 March 2004.
Planning Process for CNMPs Vicki S. Anderson Resource Conservationist Natural Resources Conservation Service.
United States Department of Agriculture Cooperative State, Research, Education and Extension Service Impacts of Agriculture on Water Quality: The role.
Integrating Forages into Multi-Functional Landscapes: Enhanced Soil Health and Ecosystem Service Opportunities Douglas L. Karlen USDA-ARS Presented at.
Residuals and Manure Management for Environmental and Agronomic Benefits Olawale O. Oladeji Soil and Water Science Department University of Florida.
Science Assessment to Support an Illinois Nutrient Reduction Strategy Mark David, George Czapar, Greg McIsaac, Corey Mitchell March 11,
Iowa CREP Meeting/Tour October 15, 2007 Why off-field practices/buffers? Jim Baker, IDALS (professor emeritus, Dept. Agric. and Biosystems Eng. Iowa State.
2 -1 Lesson 2 Whole Farm Nutrient Planning By Rick Koelsch, University of Nebraska.
AGRICULTURE: CHALLENGES AND PROGRESS IN THE CHESAPEAKE BAY Douglas Beegle, Distinguished Professor of Agronomy Dept. of Crop and Soil Sciences Penn State.
Soil Phosphorus Issues Miguel Cabrera and David Radcliffe Crop and Soil Sciences University of Georgia.
Watershed Management Assessment Through Modeling: SALT and CEAP Dr. Claire Baffaut Water Quality Short Course Boone County Extension Office April 12, 2007.
Waste Management Systems Objective: Analyze waste management systems used in the livestock and poultry industry.
TOTAL AND EXTRACTABLE PHOSPHORUS CONCENTRATIONS AT DIFFERENT DEPTHS IN A SOIL FERTILIZED WITH MANURE R. DA SILVA DÍAS 1, C. A. de ABREU 2, R. M. MESTAS.
Components of a Nutrient Management Plan Scott Sturgul Nutrient & Pest Management Program Soil & Water Management Farm & Industry Short Course Feb. 16,
Field Specific Decisions: N vs P CNMP Core Curriculum Section 5 – Nutrient Management.
Evaluating Field Soils In-field evaluation Routine soil tests Biological tests Comprehensive soil health evaluation (Cornell)
How Breakthroughs in Information Systems Can Impact Local Decisions Bruce Babcock Center for Agricultural and Rural Development Iowa State University.
Drainage and Nitrate Loss Matthew Helmers Dean’s Professor, College of Ag. & Life Sciences Professor, Dept. of Ag. and Biosystems Eng. Iowa State University.
pH CEC due to organic matter (me/100g soil) 3% 1% 7% Organic matter level 5%
Drainage Management for Water Quality and Crop Production Benefits Don Pitts Agricultural Engineer NRCS USDA Champaign, IL.
Conesus Lake – Agricultural Implications. Mandatory on all CAFO sized farms, over 1000 animal units Voluntary on dairy/livestock farms with
Waste Management Systems Objective: Analyze waste management systems used in the livestock and poultry industry.
Kg P per county (1000) > < 45 Figure 4 Estimated P production from confined livestock. kg N per county (1000) > 908 Figure.
The Effect of Compost Application and Plowing on Phosphorus Runoff Charles S. Wortmann Department of Agronomy and Horticulture Nutrient Management for.
Nutrient Issues Review of Nutrient Management Issues Addressed by EPA NODA for Proposed CAFO Regulations.
Invent the Future Biological Systems Engineering VirginiaTech Invent the Future Watershed Science and Engineering Group Agricultural Drainage, Extreme.
Precision Management beyond Fertilizer Application Hailin Zhang.
Nutrient Management Planning CNMP Core Curriculum Section 4 – Nutrient Management.
Nutrient Management Summary CNMP Core Curriculum Section 5 – Nutrient Management.
BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLING EXAMPLES Unit 6.2. BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLING EXAMPLES 1) Nutrient Pollution 2) Agricultural Importance 3) CZ Function and Dynamics.
An Integrated Poultry Complex Community and Regional Impact October 28, 2014.
P Index Fundamentals of Nutrient Management Training Course December 15, 2005 Isaac Wolford, West Virginia NRCS State Agronomist.
Introduction to Nutrient Management, Nutrient Cycling and Regional Nutrient Balance Issues Tom Basden Ag. and Natural Resources WVU Extension Service,
Phosphorus Cycle, Fertilizer and Organic P Sources. Fundamentals of Nutrient Management Training. August Morgantown, WV. Ed Rayburn West Virginia.
26 May, 2016 Panevėžys, Lithuania
Nutrient Management Planning for CAFO & AFO Fundamentals Nutrient Management Training Dec. 16 &17, 2009 Tom Basden WVU Extension Service.
Agriculture: Challenges and Progress in the Chesapeake Bay
Bob Woods Area Extension Agronomy Specialist
Manure Management in No-till
Manure 101 University of Wisconsin - Extension
USING GIS CROP INFORMATION TO DETERMINE SITE-SPECIFIC MANURE MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS
Iowa Agriculture Water Alliance
Nutrient Management Planning
Presentation transcript:

Phosphorus Index Based Management Douglas Beegle Dept. of Crop and Soil Sciences Penn State University

Why do we need a P Index? Why not just agronomic recommendations? NP2O5P2O5 K2OK2O Nitrogen Based Corn/Dairy Manure Regional P Balance ¼ ¾ Manure Crops Soil Animals Feed Eutrophication Nutrient flows in modern ag P Index ? Field P Balance NP2O5P2O5 K2OK2O Phosphorus Based Corn/Dairy Manure P Index

SourceTransport Critical Source Area P Index Critical Source Area Management Overlap of Source & Transport Indicators Identify and manage the critical source areas Evaluate environmental risk Target effort and resources

Critical Areas of P Export 90% of annual P export comes from 10% of land area Mahantango Creek Watershed, USDA-ARS 90% of P Loss comes from 10% of the watershed

Managing Phosphorus Pollution Subsurface flow Tile flow Leaching Sources Transport Erosion Runoff N P K Hydrology Water Body

Mehlich-3 soil P, mg/kg P loss, lb P 2 O 5 /A Soil Test vs P Loss R 2 = Sharpley, USDA-ARS Crop P Optimum P Threshold No recent P inputs

Managing Phosphorus Pollution Subsurface flow Tile flow Leaching Sources Transport Erosion Runoff Hydrology Water Body N P K

Mehlich-3 soil P, mg/kg P loss, lb P 2 O 5 /A 75 kg P/ha TSP 112 kg P/ha swine slurry 150 kg P/ha poultry manure 75 kg P/ha TSP 112 kg P/ha swine slurry 150 kg P/ha poultry manure Soil Test vs P Loss - with applied P Soil Only R 2 =0.80 For all data points R 2 = Sharpley, USDA-ARS

Phosphorus Index P Source Site Characteristics –Environmental Soil Test P Same soil test different interpretation Sampling Questions? P Saturation? –P Fertilizer Rate and Appl. Method –Organic P Rate and Appl. Method P Source Coefficient (PSC) –Direct availability of manure P to runoff –Based on WEP in manure

Managing Phosphorus Pollution Subsurface flow Tile flow Leaching Sources Transport Runoff N P K Hydrology Water Body Erosion

Phosphorus Transport by Erosion Erosion reduced 95% Conventional till wheat Converted to no-till Total P mg/L Sharpley, USDA-ARS

Managing Phosphorus Pollution Subsurface flow Tile flow Leaching Sources Transport Erosion N P K Hydrology Water Body Runoff

Zone of Interaction with Runoff Mehlich 1 P (mg/kg) Depth (cm) Data from Mozaffari and Sims, 1994 Zone of interaction with runoff Plow depth  Location of applied P  Interaction with runoff P on surface Soil test at surface High P Saturation at surface P sat = P / Al + Fe Oxalate extr. or Mehlich 3 extr.

Soluble P Transport in Runoff Conventional till wheat Algal-available P, mg/L Converted to no-till Sharpley, USDA-ARS

Managing Phosphorus Pollution Subsurface flow Tile flow Sources Transport Erosion Runoff N P K Hydrology Water Body Leaching

Soluble P Loss by Sub-surface flow Very Dependent on soil properties –Hydrology Piston flow Macro pores –Texture –Soil Chemistry (Fe, Al, Ca) –P loading/saturation –Artificial Drainage Data from: Bolton et al., 1970 Culley and Bolton, 1983

P Loss is a Complex “Landscape” Process Subsurface flow Tile flow Leaching Sources Transport Erosion Runoff N P K Hydrology Water Body

Modified Connectivity: Direct Connection Landscape Transport Modified Connectivity: Riparian Buffer Distance Runoff Return Period Hydrology

Phosphorus Index P Transport Site Characteristics –Soil Erosion –Runoff Class –Leaching Potential Sub-surface Drainage –Contributing Distance –Modified Connectivity Erosion Runoff Drainage Distance

PA Phosphorus Index v 2.0

P loss, kg/ha P index value for the site kg P/ha TSP 112 kg P/ha swine slurry 150 kg P/ha poultry manure 75 kg P/ha TSP 112 kg P/ha swine slurry 150 kg P/ha poultry manure P Index describes P loss potential Very high High MediumLow Sharpley, USDA-ARS R 2 =0.79

Phosphorus Index Low P Index –N Based Management Medium P Index –N Based Management High P Index* –P Based: Crop removal Very High P Index* –No P: Manure or Fertilizer High and Very High* –Modify Management based on P No or reduced manure Change time or method of application Conservation practices Buffers Etc.

Phosphorus Nutrient Management Plan Develop N based plan –Usually means excess P will be applied Use P Index to evaluate the N based plan –Is the risk of P loss acceptable Acceptable risk N rate, excess P Unacceptable Risk –Modify N based plan, where necessary, to address P loss risk NP2O5P2O5 K2OK2O Nitrogen Based Corn/Dairy Manure NP2O5P2O5 K2OK2O Phosphorus Based Corn/Dairy Manure or

P Index Application Eventually, all fields will have a high P index P Index is not the solution –Tool to buy time to solve problem –Minimizes negative impact of P while we come up with a sustainable solution –We need to get the system into better balance

NRCS/EPA P Index Issues Proposed change in NRCS 590 Std. –P soil test only – No more P Index Easy to regulate Very strict limits Not supported by the science - Source/Transport Unrealistic for animal agriculture to comply with in short term Better soil P balance is a good long term goal –Withdrawn, under further review

College of Agricultural Sciences Department of Crop and Soil Sciences