Removal of Stormwater Contaminants in Wetlands and Biofilters Amanda Jimenez Environmental Engineering UCI Kevin Tran Civil and Environmental Engineering.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
City of Edmonton Water Quality Monitoring Locations.
Advertisements

Prairie Band Potawatomi Nation Water Quality, Sustainability, and Sovereignty Heidi E. Mehl.
Wastewater Treatment.
Estrogen reduction in a coupled wetland and ground water flow-through system Laura Hanna Eric Peterson Illinois State University.
Located in Exmoor National Park, with nearby bathing beach 3800 population equivalent (summer) 1900 m 3 /d flow to full treatment Sewage feed started 12th.
ASSESSMENT OF WASTE WATER TREATMENT IN CANAANLAND, OTA, OGUN STATE, NIGERIA. Isiorho, S. A. Department of Geosciences, Indiana University – Purdue University,
Landfill Water Quality Project Paul Brooks, Lea Bullard, Leslie Harper, Amanda Strickland, Sarah van Schagen April 30, 2004 University of North Carolina.
Previously Microbial survival in environmental media –Water, land, air Small scale sanitation, composting latrines, etc Conventional wastewater treatment.
WATER DEPTH, VEGETATION, AND POLLUTANT REMOVAL IN A CONSTRUCTED WETLAND TREATING AQUACULTURE EFFLUENT Brian E. Dyson, Kim D. Jones, Ron Rosati* Department.
Herwig Goldemund, Ph.D. Geosyntec Consultants Atlanta Regional Office
Continuing Studies of Viruses in Hampton Roads and Shellfish Howard Kator, Kimberly Reece, Corinne Audemard, Wendi Ribiero, Martha Rhodes With support.
Wastewater Treatment Treatment depends on three factors: 1) Slow water down - removes larger particles 2) Aerobic decomposition of organic material 3)
Integrated urban wastewater systems: Prediction of particle settling velocity distributions Thibaud Maruéjouls, Paul Lessard and Peter A. Vanrolleghem.
Investigation Plan for the Omaha WWTP – Stage One update Dr Mark James, Aquatic Environmental Sciences Ltd.
2009 Water Quality Monitoring Report – Fish Creek Vaughn Hauser, B.Sc. Naomi Parker, B.Sc., BIT, CEPIT.
Powerpoint Templates Estimating Nutrient Concentrations in Wetlands and Biofilters Using Proxy Data Norma Galaviz, Emily Parker, and Cameron Patel August.
By: Audella Eid Advisor: Dr. R. Zurayk Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater treatment.
Ava Moussavi Jessica Satterlee Garfield Kwan.  Started in the late 1990s and lasted more than a decade Melbourne Bureau of Meteorology, 2011.
Assessing Aquatic Ecosystems & Measurement. Aquatic Ecosystem Assessment The health of an aquatic ecosystem can be determined by examining a variety of.
Aquatic Plants and the Environment (SWES, ECOL, WFSc 474/574)
L.R. Chevalier, Ph.D., P.E., D-WRE, BCEE, F-ASCE Curriculum for Sustainability at Southern Illinois University Carbondale Based on Chevalier, L.R., 2010,
CITY STREAM WATCH 2007 RIPARIAN PLANTING INITIATIVE May 2007.
Undergraduate PIRE Program
BACTERIAL CONCENTRATIONS IN BULL CREEK AUSTIN, TEXAS Patrick Sejkora.
Marilyn Murphy, David Plavcan, William Shepard, Donna Suevo, Jeff Thomas, Karen Trozzo, Timothy Woods and David Yezuita West Chester University July 2002.
Grand Haven Pond Study: An Investigation to Reduce Nutrient Loads and Evaluate Alternative Management Practices in Stormwater Ponds Mark Clark Wetlands.
Michael Tamblin, P.E., BCEE Stearns & Wheler, LLC Protecting and Enhancing the Ramapo Watershed – A Designated Sole Source Aquifer Supplying New York and.
Environmental Technology Wastewater Management Module 6.0.
Laurie Fox Virginia Tech Hampton Roads AREC Phytoremediation.
Civil Engineers: Environmental Engineering Erik R. Coats, PE, Ph.D. CE 115 November 10, 2005.
OHHI Beach Modeling Group Meeting March 23, 2006 GLERL, Ann Arbor, MI Project Summary Project Title: Predicting Pathogen Fate in the Great Lakes Coastal.
Filtration Observations in the Carver County WMO West Metro Water Alliance May 25, 2011 (Thanks to Kristen Larson, Carver County)
Water Quality Partnership Meeting LOTT Alliance Regional Service Center November 18, 2010 Rob Duff and Josh Baldi Washington State Department of Ecology.
Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for low gradient streams) for species richness, composition and pollution tolerance, as well as a composite benthic macroinvertebrate.
ACWA – RECYCLE RESEARCH Presentation to the ACWA National Convention August 2009.
Water Quality Natural & Controlled Environments. Monitoring natural environments Photo courtesy of Melissa Gutierrez.
Decentralized greywater treatment in urban areas - Klosterenga, OSLO Klosterenga Compiled by: Petter D. Jenssen, Norwegian University of Life Sciences.
Introduction to Environmental Engineering Dr. Kagan ERYURUK
Sources of Bacteria and their Variability in Urban Watersheds Robert Pitt Cudworth Professor Urban Water Systems Department of Civil, Construction, and.
Water Quality Assessment Cypress Creek Adrian L. Vogl Aquatic Resources Texas State University Jason Pinchback River System Institute Texas State University.
Phosphorus Stressor in Lake Champlain Basin Alison Nord, Anna Speed, Ashley Murphy.
Invent the Future Biological Systems Engineering VirginiaTech Invent the Future Watershed Science and Engineering Group Agricultural Drainage, Extreme.
NH International (Caribbean) Ltd Penal Rock Hindu School Presented by : Sudesh Ramroop.
Wastewater Treatment. Dangers of Not Treating Wastewater-Waterborne Disease Cholera Typhoid Fever Hepatitis Amoebic Dysentery Giardiasis E.Coli 0157:H7.
Aquaponics for Sustainability Education
Watershed Management Plan Summary of 2014 Activities/Progress Presented by: Matthew Bennett, MS December 2014.
Sources, Transport, Fate Treatment Methodologies BMP Case Studies
Removal efficiency of nitrate.
Green Stormwater Infrastructure and Park Improvements
Preventing and Reducing Pollution From MS4 Activities
Water Testing APES.
Water Testing APES.
ACWA – RECYCLE RESEARCH
Watersheds Review Science 8 SOL.
How Do Wastewater Facilities Address Contaminants in Water
Jon Risgaard, Wastewater Branch Rick Bolich, Raleigh Regional Office
Wastewater Treatment.
Case Study: Evaluating Retrofit Urban Best Management Practice Performance and Lessons Learned Nick Muenks, Marc Leisenring, Mark Willobee – Geosyntec.
Wastewater Treatment.
Mahon Creek, San Rafael.
Civil & Chemical Engineering Department Graduation Project 2
Impact of Meteorological Events and Sand Excavation on Turbidity and Total Suspended Solids Levels of Imo River by Dr. Chinedu E. Ihejirika Department.
Wetlands.
Anne Arundel County Maryland
Wastewater Treatment.
ASSESSMENT OF WASTE WATER TREATMENT IN CANAANLAND, OTA, OGUN STATE, NIGERIA. Isiorho, S. A. Department of Geosciences, Indiana University – Purdue University,
Wastewater Treatment.
Assessment of MBR for Bacteria & Nitrogen Reduction
Wastewater Treatment.
Indiana Department of Environmental Management Office of Water Quality
Presentation transcript:

Removal of Stormwater Contaminants in Wetlands and Biofilters Amanda Jimenez Environmental Engineering UCI Kevin Tran Civil and Environmental Engineering UCI Sam Zabb-Parmley Civil and Environmental Engineering UCLA

Stan Grant Principle Investigator B.S., Stanford University, Geology, 1985 M.S., California Institute of Technology, Environmental Engineering and Science, 1990 Ph.D., California Institute of Technology, Environmental Engineering and Science, 1992 Megan Rippy Research Specialist Fate and transportation modeling; pathogen removal in biofilters Sunny Jiang Pathogen Detection Team Leader Ph.D. Marine Science, University of South Florida Andrew Mehring Ecology Team Leader Post-doctoral research associate Scripps Institution of Oceanography

Outline Objectives Background Methods Results References

Objectives To better understand the effectiveness of biofilters and wetlands in filtering storm water by analyzing various water quality parameters. Compare wetland and biofilter results with the Melbourne Water Class C Standards. Propose possible explanations to observed trends

Outline Objectives Biofilters VS Wetlands Methods Results References

Biofilters VS Wetlands Design Flow Paths Application Effectiveness

Wetlands Constructed wetlands mimic the function of natural wetlands Riparian species Buffer Between Upland and aquatic High level of biodiversity Fig.1: Diagram showing horizontal flow

Biofilters Vertical flow Path Layered Media designed to filter stormwater Compact and space efficient. Effluent is treated further or stored Fig. 2: Diagram of Verical Flow

Outline Objectives Biofilters VS Wetlands Methods Results References

Methods 5 sites visited –2 biofilters (Wikes, Hereford Road) –3 wetlands (Hampton, Royal, Lynbrook) Measured 4 parameters –Total Suspended Solids –Escherichia Coli –Chlorophyll –Dissolved Oxygen

Hereford Road Biofilter Wikes Biofilter Royal Gardens Wetlands Hampton Park Wetlands Lynbrook Estates Biofilter/Wetlands

Hereford Road Biofilter Wikes Biofilter Royal Gardens Wetlands Hampton Park Wetlands Lynbrook Estates Biofilter/Wetlands

Class C Standards Standards created and used by Melbourne Water Parameters to help define the quality of water Used for non-potable purposes and irrigation

Class C Standards Standards created and used by Melbourne Water Parameters to help define the quality of water Used for non-potable purposes and irrigation

Results – Total Suspended Solids TSS Standards Biofilters VS Wetlands Fig. 3: Combusted TSS Sample

Results – Total Suspended Solids TSS Standards Biofilters VS Wetlands Fig. 3: Combusted TSS Sample

HAMPTON PARK

Results – Total Suspended Solids TSS Standards Biofilters VS Wetlands Fig. 3: Combusted TSS Sample

Results - Escherichia Coli (E. Coli) Fecal Indicator Bacteria Removal Effeciency Standards Fig 4: E. Coli cultures

Results - Escherichia Coli (E. Coli) Fecal Indicator Bacteria Removal Effeciency Standards Fig 4: E. Coli cultures

Results - Escherichia Coli (E. Coli) Fecal Indicator Bacteria Removal Effeciency Standards Fig 4: E. Coli cultures

Results - Escherichia Coli (E. Coli) Fecal Indicator Bacteria Removal Effeciency Standards Fig 4: E. Coli cultures

Results - Chlorophyll Trends Water pathways Exposure to sunlight Biofilters should be used instead of wetlands in areas where algal blooms is a concern Fig 5: Processed Chlorophyll samples

Results - Chlorophyll Trends Water pathways Exposure to sunlight Biofilters should be used instead of wetlands in areas where algal blooms is a concern Fig 5: Processed Chlorophyll samples

Results – Dissolved Oxygen Wetlands – DO higher in outlets compared to inlets – High DO levels allow ecology to thrive Biofilers – Wicks Reserve DO level low in outlet (subterranean sump) – Hereford Road Do level high in outlet (little Stringy Bark Creek) – Subterranean biofilter outlets may promote lower DO concentrations

Chlorophyll Dissolved Oxygen

Chlorophyll Dissolved Oxygen

Learning from Australia

References Eastern Treatment Plant Inputs and Discharges. (n.d.). Retrieved July 29, 2013, from Melbourne Water Murphy, S. (n.d.). general Information on Solids. Martin, R. M. (2012, February 28). Bacterial Source Tracking of E. coli in a Constructed Wetland. File:Horizontal subsurface flow consructed wetland.png. (n.d.). Example section of bioretention system. (n.d.). Retrieved from Rossouw, N. (Ed.). (2003, September 9). Chlorophyll a as indicator of Algal Abundance. Boyer, J. N. (2009, November). Ecological Indicators. Shifflett, S. D. (n.d.). Water Quality Indicators: Dissolved Oxygen. Constructed Treated Wetlands. (2004, August). Chaudhary, D. S. (n.d.). Biofilter in Water and Wastewater Treatment.

THANK YOU