Academic Integrity: A Guide for Instructors Presenters: Christy D. Moran, Ph.D. Assistant Dean of Students Tine Reimers, Director CETaL.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ACADEMIC INTEGRITY STUDENT RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES August 20, 2014 Material developed by Tim Korb, Peter Hirst, and Jeff Stefancic.
Advertisements

Setting the Stage for Graduate Education at UTSPH Fall 2014 Orientation Academic Integrity / Ethics Honor Code / HOOP.
Cheating on College Campuses 83% of students cheat in some form 60% cheat on homework and see nothing wrong with it 19% cheat on exams Most likely to cheat:
Student Discipline Guide Faculty Edition
Academic Integrity “Just do what’s right.” GTA Presentation Dan Schwab, Director of Student Conduct and Community Standards Shannon Quihuiz, Title IX Investigator.
ACADEMIC INTEGRITY University of Arkansas at Little Rock Presented by: Darryl K. McGee, M.S. Office of the Dean of Students.
ACADEMIC INTEGRITY. COMMUNITY EXPECTATIONS All members of the campus community will:  make a commitment to create a community of learners who trust one.
Student Integrity and Misconduct Training and support for decision makers and Academic Integrity Officers.
Academic Integrity Policy (AIP) Academic and Student Affairs Fall 2008.
Academic Integrity at University of Maryland A Presentation by the Office of Student Conduct Promoting Integrity, Character, and Ethics.
Honor Code Constitution. I will neither give nor receive unauthorized aid on any test, quiz, research paper, lab or any other student-generated work as.
The Division of Student Affairs University of North Carolina Wilmington.
The Case of the Keystroke Logger Presented by Michael Votava, Director of Student Conduct & Ethical Development February 21, 2014.
The Aggie Code of Honor and the Aggie Honor System Office
 Introduction › Importance of “creativity”  Intellectual Property › Why is Intellectual Property important for us? › Definition › Copyright  Academic.
Plagiarism and Cheating
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Honor System.
P OLICIES ON P LAGIARISM AND A CADEMIC I NTEGRITY.
Honesty Policy. 1. FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES 1.1. The Department enforces the general university policies on academic honesty, as described in the University's.
Dean of Students Office a part of the Division of Student Affairs University of Florida 202 Peabody Hall
Ohlone College Policy on Academic Dishonesty
Academic Integrity in Arts and Science at Queen’s Student Services Division F200 Mackintosh-Corry Hall Faculty of Arts and Science Fall 2009.
COURSE ADDITION CATALOG DESCRIPTION To include credit hours, type of course, term(s) offered, prerequisites and/or restrictions. (75 words maximum.) 4/1/091Course.
ACADEMIC INTEGRITY …HONESTLY?. YES, HONESTLY! UIS is committed to honesty, trust, and mutual respect. You have joined an academic community founded on.
Academic Integrity. What is integrity? What do you think “academic integrity” means?
Academic Honesty in the UT Arlington College of Engineering.
College of Engineering & Architecture Honor System Honesty Self- Governance Integrity Ethics.
Academic Integrity ASU 101. Academic Integrity Objectives  Differentiate between instances of academic honesty and dishonesty  List potential consequences.
Material developed by Tim Korb, Peter Hirst, and Jeff Stefancic
Academic Integrity at IU Code of Student Rights, Responsibilities and Conduct.
Academic Integrity GSAS TA Orientation Fall 2014.
Academic Integrity at Brandeis Erika Lamarre Director of Academic Integrity The policies Education and Prevention Reporting an incident.
Academic Integrity Matters: the AUC experience Aziza Ellozy Director, Center for Learning and Teaching Jayme Spencer Director, Public Services.
Academic Integrity Academic integrity means honesty and responsibility in scholarship. Students and faculty alike must obey rules of honest scholarship,
Academic Integrity and Non-Academic Student Misconduct Gabriel A. Slifka, Director Office of Student Rights & Responsibilities.
TRUELL HYDE VICE PROVOST FOR RESEARCH SINDA VANDERPOOL ASSISTANT VICE PROVOST FOR ENROLLMENT MANAGEMENT LINDA CATES DIRECTOR OF THE OFFICE OF ACADEMIC.
 Part IV of the ECU Faculty Manual  To get to the Faculty Manual 1. Go to ECU Home and click on “Faculty & Staff.” 2. Scroll down to the “Policies”
Review of University Policies and Procedures Academic Regulations.
Academic Washington State University Adam Jussel Director Office of Student Standards & Accountability.
Academic Integrity Begins Here: Evaluating Your Institution’s Academic Misconduct Policy By Lana L. Becker and Dr. Jasmine Renner East Tennessee State.
Welcome To Stat 200 Elementary Statistics Faculty: Dr. Munir Mahmud Office: A-207 Phone: (570) Office Hours: MWF 11–11:50.
Confronting and Reporting a Violation Assistance for this presentation was provided by: Camilla J. Roberts, Associate Director, Provost Office.
Academic Integrity: Processes & Expectations at the College Level Andrea Goodwin Associate Director, Office of Student Conduct University of Maryland Diane.
Plagiarism Prepared by: Betsy Regalado Student Services October 4, 2007.
ACADEMIC INTEGRITY VIOLATIONS OFFENSES, PENALTIES, AND PROCEDURES.
Ron Smelser Professor and Associate Dean Dean’s Office.
What do the members of the Dawson community value and respect? Do you know... What is the pledge of the members? Return to Menu Return to Menu What kinds.
Academic Honor Policy and Grade Appeals System Jennifer N. Buchanan, Ph.D. Assistant Vice President for Faculty Development and Advancement.
1 ACADEMIC SENATE POLICY ON ACADEMIC DISHONESTY History: Approved by the Academic Senate, 2/16/88 Approved.
The Aggie Code of Honor and the Aggie Honor System Office Timothy C. Powers Director, Aggie Honor System Office
Sources for definitions and explanations of the term plagiarism and the consequences of plagiarism: I.Class Syllabus, p. 3 “Academic Dishonesty” II. Student.
Academic Integrity Guidelines for Reporting Violations of Academic Integrity.
Academic Misonduct 1. Definition: Any act that compromises the academic integrity of the University or the educational process. 2.
Academic Honor Policy and Grade Appeals System Ann DelRossi, Academic Affairs Administrator Office of the Vice President for Faculty Development and Advancement.
Academic Honor Policy and Grade Appeals System
University of Miami Undergraduate Honor Council
IE102 A Process Outlook for Industrial Engineering
Academic Honor Policy and Grade Appeals System
Academic Integrity CSE Department Graduate Student Handbook.
Academic Integrity at UIS
College of Engineering
Academic Honesty Some Categories of Academic Dishonesty
Academic Integrity Student Guide
Academic Honesty Some Categories of Academic Dishonesty
Academic Integrity.
Academic Integrity CSE Department Graduate Student Handbook.
Chapter 4 Values, Ethics, Academic Honesty
Chapter 4 Values, Ethics, Academic Honesty
Presentation transcript:

Academic Integrity: A Guide for Instructors Presenters: Christy D. Moran, Ph.D. Assistant Dean of Students Tine Reimers, Director CETaL

“On most campuses, over 75% of students admit to some cheating. In a 1999 survey of 2,100 students on 21 campuses across the country, about 1/3 admitted to serious test cheating and 1/2 admitted to one or more instances of serious cheating on written assignments.” Source:

“Most students believe that ‘cut-and-paste’ plagiarism is not a serious issue. While 10% of students admitted to engaging in such behavior in 1999, this rose to 41% in a 2001 survey…with the majority of students (68%) suggesting this was not a serious issue.” Source:

Academic Integrity

The Fundamental Values of Academic Integrity Honesty: “intellectual and personal honesty in learning, teaching, research, and service” Trust: “a climate of mutual trust encourages the free exchange of ideas and enables all to reach their highest potential” Fairness: “clear standards, practices, and procedures; fairness is expected in the interactions of students, faculty, and administrators”

The Fundamental Values of Academic Integrity (cont.) Respect: “the participatory nature of the learning process honors and respects a wide range of opinions and ideas” Responsibility: “upholds personal accountability and depends upon action in the face of wrongdoing” Source:

Academic Dishonesty

How does UTEP define cheating? Copying from a test paper of another student Engaging in communication with another student during a test Giving aid to another student during a test Possessing or using unauthorized materials during a test Using, obtaining, or attempting to obtain any non-administered test, test key, homework solution, or computer program

Cheating (cont.): Accessing a test bank without permission Collaborating with or seeking aid from another for an assignment without having authority to do so Substituting for another person (or vice versa) to take a test Falsifying research data, laboratory reports, and/or other academic work

Plagiarism

How does UTEP define plagiarism? The appropriation, buying, receiving as a gift, or obtaining by any means another’s work and the submission of it as one’s own Using the same work for two different assignments without appropriately citing the work

“This is superior work,” wrote a professor on a student’s paper. “It was excellent when Saint Thomas Aquinas wrote it, just as it is today. Saint Thomas gets an A. You get an F.” (Alschuler & Blimling, 1995, p. 123)

How does UTEP define collusion? Collaboration with another person to commit a violation of any provision of the rules on scholastic dishonesty

Adjudication of Academic Dishonesty

UTEP Statistics June 1, 2003 to May 31, Academic Dishonesty Cases: Cheating = 115 cases Plagiarism = 115 cases Collusion = 39 cases Other = 10 cases

If you suspect students of academic dishonesty during an exam: Allow them to finish the exam After the exam, objectively explain the problem as you have perceived it Project concern for the students but communicate the seriousness of the allegation Listen to the explanation of the students Refer the case to the Dean of Students office

If you suspect students of plagiarism: Meet with the student before or after class to discuss your concerns Do not return the paper to the student; it will need to be sent to the Dean of Students office Let the student know that you will be referring the case to the Dean of Students office

The first steps in the adjudication process: Send a letter to the Dean of Students office that includes the names and ID numbers for each of the students involved Include copies of the assignments or exams in question; make sure to highlight areas that are indicative of academic dishonesty Assign an “I” (Incomplete) for the assignments or exams in question until the adjudication process is complete

The student in question meets with the Assistant Dean of Students: The Asst. Dean determines if the student should be held responsible for the alleged violation Sometimes, the Asst. Dean may need to gather more information from the instructor before making a decision If there is not enough evidence of academic dishonesty the case is dismissed, and the student is not held responsible for a policy violation

What happens if the student is found responsible for academic dishonesty? The student may choose to accept the Asst. Dean’s decision, called administrative disposition, or… The student may choose to take the case to a formal hearing

Administrative Disposition: If the student is found responsible for academic dishonesty, the Asst. Dean makes the decision about appropriate sanctions The student may either accept or deny responsibility for violating the policy in question

A student may choose to have a formal hearing instead of accepting administrative disposition: A meeting is scheduled in which the student, the Asst. Dean, a faculty hearing officer, any witnesses, and/or attorneys may be present A faculty member, trained in the process, serves as the hearing officer and makes the decision about whether or not the student is responsible for violating the policy in question If the student is responsible, the faculty hearing officer determines the sanctions

Regardless of whether or not the student chooses administrative disposition or a formal hearing, the student has the right to appeal the final outcome to the University President. Note: If the student chooses administrative disposition, only the sanctions can be changed by the University President. In these situations, the decision regarding the student being responsible for the violation cannot be changed.

What are some of the sanctions that are given to students who are found responsible for academic dishonesty? “0” on the exam or assignment in question A letter grade deduction from the final course grade “F” for the course “Avoiding Plagiarism” course Ethics course Disciplinary probation Suspension Expulsion

The final decision is communicated by the Asst. Dean to the instructor who sent the allegation. This information should only be shared with other UTEP faculty or staff on a need-to-know basis.

For more information about the academic dishonesty policy at UTEP: See the Handbook of Operating Procedures: _Page_HOP.htm _Page_HOP.htm See the University of Texas System Regents Rules and Regulations: R.htm#_Toc R.htm#_Toc

Need more information? Visit the Dean of Students office between 8:00am and 5:00pm (Union West 102) or… Call the Dean of Students office ( )