Outage Cost Study Market Analysis and Design Outage Coordination Improvement Task Force 3/23/2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview of ERCOT Outage Coordination Woody Rickerson Director Grid Coordination January 2015.
Advertisements

SCED Power Balance Penalty Curve
CRR Shortfall – Revenue Equalization Part 2 (Continuation from 2/21/08 TPTF discussion) Bill Barnes TPTF 3/5/2008.
Discussion: Use of RAPs in system operations Kris Dixit 1.
Efficient Autoscaling in the Cloud using Predictive Models for Workload Forecasting Roy, N., A. Dubey, and A. Gokhale 4th IEEE International Conference.
ERCOT OCITF 3/23/ ISO Comparison – NEISO Alex Lee (ERCOT) Lee Blaede (NEISO) ERCOT OCITF 3/23/2015.
Preliminary Analysis of the SEE Future Infrastructure Development Plan and REM Benefits.
2001 South First Street Champaign, Illinois (217) Davis Power Consultants Strategic Location of Renewable Generation Based on Grid Reliability.
Seams Issues Raymond DePillo Vice-President – Power Operations and Asset Management PSEG Energy Resources & Trade LLC October 7, OPSI Annual.
1 Dead Bus Pricing Issue/CRR Performance Issue TAC 3 February, 2010.
Peak RCCo Performance Metrics Draft –November 2013.
Why Normal Matters AEIC Load Research Workshop Why Normal Matters By Tim Hennessy RLW Analytics, Inc. April 12, 2005.
Network Customer Meeting Access Metric Update November 16, 2006.
July 30, 2015 TAC Meeting Update to COPS Michelle Trenary August 12, 2015.
September 2012 Proposed CRR Auction Credit Changes: Summary of Draft NPRR.
1 18-Month Outlook October March 2005 Presented by Greg Hine IMO Long-Term Forecasts and Assessments.
Proposed Revision to the Shadow Price Cap and Power Balance Penalties in SCED Same Transmission Element.
WMS Subgroup – CRR Credit 3.Review of CRR margining methodology for PTP Obligations in Nodal Protocols 4.Potential credit margin alternatives Cheryl Yager.
April, 2008 Maximum Shadow Price. April, 2008 Protocol Requirement: Transmission Constraint Management (2)ERCOT shall establish a maximum Shadow.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Energy Management System Requirement Documents December 5, 2006 Jay Dondeti EMS Project.
John Dumas Director of Wholesale Market Operations Jeff Billo Manager of Mid Term Planning Dan Jones Director with Potomac Economics, the ERCOT IMM Board.
Day Ahead Market Working Group April 14, Agenda Discussion of SMD-style DAM review questions posed by the DAM WG and Coral regarding the SMD-
Bill Hellinghausen EDF Trading North America
NPRR385, Security Violation Analysis and Reporting and Negative Price Floor WMS Meeting February 15, 2012.
January 21, 2010 Security Constrained Economic Dispatch Resmi Surendran.
SM April Peak Week Operations Review Presentation to ISO Business Issues Committee May 22, 2002.
April 28, 2008 Constraint Competitiveness Tests, an Overview Congestion Management Working Group.
1 CRR Credit Policy Task Force Update WMS April 16, 2008.
PowerGEM Power Grid Engineering & Markets 1 LMP’s and Congestion Relief Lens, Crystal Ball, or Alice’s Looking Glass ? January 30, 2003 Jim Mitsche
ISO Comparison – CAISO Alex Lee (ERCOT)
1Texas Nodal Market Trials Update. 2Texas Nodal LFC Testing Review Review of materials presented at TAC Changes in Market Trials schedule and activities.
Slack Bus Change and Impact to Market Market Analysis, ERCOT QMWG Sep. 4, 2015.
Nodal ATF 1 Nodal Advisory Task Force Update for TAC September 2 nd, 2010.
1 Reliability Deployment Task Force (RDTF Meeting) December 20 th 2011 December 20, 2011.
IX. Transient Model Nonlinear Regression and Statistical Analysis.
IWWG Annual Conference Wind Management at MISO July 22, 2011.
Competitive Constraints/ Protocols 3.19 Presented to CMWG 10/14/2011 Steve Reedy, Manager, CRR.
FURTHER INFORMATION ON MISO FTR AUCTIONS For SPP RSC Discussion October 6, 2010.
2% Shift Factor rule and associated price discrepancies Kris Dixit 1.
SPP.org 1. Status Update for Reliability and Economic Assessments Stakeholder Meeting September 16, 2008 Austin, TX.
1 Tests for Reasonable LMPs & Price Validation Tool Overview October 27, 2009 NATF.
DAM Performance Issues with CRR Offers Steve Reedy Market Design Manager NATF 31 August 2010.
Model load frequency Discussion John Adams January 5, 2010 Nodal Advisory Task Force.
Role of Account Management at ERCOT 2006 TAC Subcommittee Review ERCOT Board February 21, 2006.
Atcllc.com Using CEMS Data to Estimate Coal-Fired Plant FORs and Scheduled Maintenance Chris Hagman
CMWG Update to WMS Report of CMWG Meeting of M. Wagner Edison Mission Marketing & Trading Thanks to ERCOT Staff for Graphics See ERCOT.
Market Operating Level Agreement (OLA) Discussion Betty Day 8 December 2009 Nodal Advisory Task Force.
CMWG Update to WMS M Wagner Edison Mission Marketing & Trading.
Resource Analysis. Objectives of Resource Assessment Discussion The subject of the second part of the analysis is to dig more deeply into some of the.
2% Shift Factor dispatchable rule discussion and alternatives for the 2% rule Kris Dixit 1.
Probabilistic Approach to Resource Adequacy Resource Adequacy Forum Technical Committee Meeting Portland, OR January 23, 2009.
DAM Performance Issues with CRR Offers Steve Reedy Market Design Manager TAC 2 September 2010.
RCWG Update to WMS March 7, Draft NPRR, Caps and Floors for Energy Storage Resources Chair of ETWG gave high level overview ERCOT had questions.
COPS JULY 2013 UPDATE TO TAC 07/02/2013 Harika Basaran, Chair Jim Lee, Vice Chair.
Day-Ahead Market Discussion/Clarification TPTF April 24, 2006.
07/27/2006 Overview of Replacement Reserve Procurement ERCOT Staff PRS RPRS Task Force.
July 15, 2011 Reliability Deployments Task Force Meeting ERCOT Studies and Proposal on Reliability Energy Pricing John Dumas Director Wholesale Market.
03/06/2008 TAC CREZ Transmission Optimization (CTO) Study Update Dan Woodfin Director, System Planning.
Proposal for Consideration Regarding Holistic Solution to Congestion Irresolvable in SCED Issue:How do you identify when constraint is irresolvable Proposal:Adopt.
Money Transfer Due to Real-Time Irresolvable Constraint Resmi Surendran ERCOT.
Congestion Management Work Group 2008 Overview CMWG Marguerite Wagner, Reliant Energy Inc.
Texas Nodal Program ERCOT Readiness & Transition (ERT) Supplemental Information TPTF January 12, 2009 Kevin Frankeny.
Market Trials Update NATF March 2,
Principal Load Profiling and Modeling
Wind Management at MISO
NPRR833 Workshop: Contingency Processing in CRR, DAM and SCED
John Dumas Director, Wholesale Market Operations
Review of Abnormal MCPEs
Further Information on MISO FTR Auctions
ISO New England System R&D Needs
Presentation transcript:

Outage Cost Study Market Analysis and Design Outage Coordination Improvement Task Force 3/23/2015

OCITF 3/23/ Study Objective Evaluate factors affecting predictability of congestion rent associated with hypothetical outages Congestion Rent: Marginal cost of the constraint times the flow across the element. – Congestion rent could be used as a metric to get relative value of transmission constraint since it is based on the marginal cost of resolving the constraint and the extent of violation – CRRs/PTPs could be purchased to hedge against congestion in DAM/RT – Congestion payout associated with outages not modeled in CRR could result in CRR payout shortfall and affect the effectiveness of the hedging in DAM and the convergence of CRR/DAM/SCED

OCITF 3/23/ Study Methodology Calculated congestion rent using modified Reliability Unit Commitment engine – Penalty costs matching SCED shadow price caps – COP and 3-Part Offers as submitted by 1400 of prior day Studied 10 outages x 4 actual OD cases representing a range of system conditions – For each outage and case, calculated difference in congestion rent with and without outage – Analyzed additional sensitivities to multiple outages (N-1-1) and generation + transmission outages (N-1, G-1)

OCITF 3/23/ Observations - Outage Type I A few outages result in congestion irrespective of the variation in overall system conditions. Congestion is mainly dependent on local generation/load.

OCITF 3/23/ Observations - Outage Type II Majority of the outages do not independently cause congestion. However the pancaking effect when other outages are taken in the area can cause significant congestion.

OCITF 3/23/ Observations - Outage Type III For some outages, the extent of congestion is highly dependent on several factors like system load level/ wind level/ forced outages

OCITF 3/23/ Observations Only few outages consistently cause congestion under all system conditions Majority of outages cause congestion only under specific scenarios – Pancaking of outages Could be addressed by approval priority based on submission timeline – Forced outage Is it worthwhile to study N-2 based on significant ODF? – Extreme load level or wind level Probabilistic analysis could capture the effects from both normal study case and conservative study case

OCITF 3/23/ Further Discussion How to effectively estimate the impact of variations of load and wind when predicting possible congestion due to an outage? – Optimism of average case vs. over conservatism of extreme case Construct a cost metric based on different possible system conditions weighted based on the possibility of materialization of that system condition Probabilistic approach – Expected Congestion Rent = Sum of (Congestion Rent in Scenario * Probability of Scenario)