Insurance Institute of London ASG 228 Professional Indemnity Insurance.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1. Parties have contractual capacity 2. Contract has legal purpose 3. Offer 4. Acceptance 5. Consideration 6. Statute of Frauds compliance.
Advertisements

Contract and Tort Law for Computer Scientists
1 Legal Principles of Insurance Contracts. Requirements of a Valid Insurance Contract 2 Legality Capacity Offer and Acceptance Consideration contracts.
Chapter 8: Insurance Contracts
Legal Liability Common law negligence Statutory obligations.
What You’ll Learn How to define negligence (p. 88)
4Chapter SECTION OPENER / CLOSER: INSERT BOOK COVER ART Negligence and Strict Liability Section 4.2.
Fundamentals of Law (BL502) Week 6 The Law of Torts Negligence Negligent Misrepresentation.
Torts True or False Torts Defined Torts Completion.
Tortious duties of care and third party rights John Redmond.
{ Chapter 10 TORTS: Negligence and Strict Liability.
Prepared by Douglas Peterson, University of Alberta 5-1 Part 2 – The Law of Torts Chapter 5 Negligence and Unintentional Torts.
Insurance Institute of London ASG 228 Professional Indemnity Insurance.
CALCULATING DAMAGES – Recent developments in English Law by CLIVE ASTON LMAA Arbitrator.
Law I Chapter 18.
Learning Objectives LO5 Explain the importance of an independence framework for auditors. LO6 Outline auditor legal responsibilities. LO7 Outline the various.
Learning Objectives LO1 List some examples of potential civil and criminal litigation facing PAs. LO2 Apply and integrate the chapter topics to analyze.
Torts LWB133 Week 7 Semester 2, 2000 Pure Economic Loss continued...
Legal Liability. Civil Liability n Need to prove: –Liability? (auditor at fault) –Causation? (failure of audit caused damage) –Damages? (amount of loss)
9-1 General Requirements - Enforceable Contract 1.Offer and acceptance 2.Consideration 3.Legal object 4.Competent parties 5.Legal form.
Professional Accountability Judicial system –Criminal justice system Criminal liability –Civil justice system Civil liability Professional self regulation.
14 The Law of Negligence and Liability for Negligent Professional Advice © Oxford University Press, All rights reserved.
Introduction to English Law of Obligations– Law of Torts (Part 1) Dr Jan Halberda Introduction to English Law of Obligations©
© 2002 by Prentice Hall, Inc. A Simon & Schuster Company Upper Saddle, NJ Instructor’s Manual with Transparency Masters to accompany Introduction.
Copyright © 2008 by West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning Chapter 9 Torts Twomey Jennings Anderson’s Business Law and the Legal.
Torts and Products Liability. What is a tort? A tort is a civil wrong resulting in injury to person or property. Torts vary according to intent –Intentional.
Insurance Law PA E TR HC 27 “If anything can go wrong, it will.” Anonymous (1950s), known as Murphy’s Law.
Copyright Guy Harley Revision. Copyright Guy Harley Types of Remedy  Termination  Rescission  Recovery of Contract Price  Damages 
Law of Contract Remedies for breach Damages & equitable remedies.
Unit 1.3 The Law of Sports Injury. The Coach The coach is typically the first person at the scene of an injury. The coach’s decisions and actions are.
Part 2 – The Law of Torts Chapter 5 – Negligence and Unintentional Torts Prepared by Michael Bozzo, Mohawk College © 2015 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited 5-1.
Unit 6 – Civil Law.
© 2007 West Legal Studies in Business, A Division of Thomson Learning Chapter 31 Professional Liability.
Fundamentals of Law (BL502) Week 5 The Law of Torts Negligence Causation.
I. Negligence A. Characteristics 1. definition 2. elements 3. defenses.
1 Unit 5 Torts ARE Definition n Civil Wrong.
LAW OF TORTS Question 1 (a)Amir, an International student at MMU went to a clinic in Bukit Ketil on Monday night to seek treatment for breathing difficulty.
Professionalism: Duty does matter Martyn Gabbitass ACII ACILA.
© 2007 West Legal Studies in Business, A Division of Thomson Learning Chapter 12 Contracts: Breach and Remedies.
Copyright © 2008 by West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning Chapter 47 Accountant’s Liability and Malpractice Twomey Jennings Anderson’s.
Chapter 20 Negligence. The failure to exercise a reasonable amount of care in either doing or not doing something resulting in harm or injury.
Chapter 09 Negligence and Strict Liability Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
PROFESSIONAL NEGLIGENCE PROFESSIONAL SUICIDE: HOW TO AVOID THIS CATASTROPHE !!
© 2004 West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning BUSINESS LAW Twomey Jennings 1 st Ed. Twomey & Jennings BUSINESS LAW Chapter 9 Torts.
Negligence by Snježana Husinec. Negligence  failure to exercise the care toward others which a reasonable or prudent person would do in the circumstances,
By Richard A. Mann & Barry S. Roberts
1 Introduction to the Law of Tort Introduction to the Law of Tort Negligence Negligence and the Duty of Care.
Law of Tort Tutorial Week 9-10 Question 3 Topic: Duty of Care Presented by Charles and David.
© 2004 West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning 1 Chapter 10 Contract Performance, Breach, and Remedies.
27-1 Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
CHAPTER 12: NEGLIGENCE THE BASICS Emond Montgomery Publications 1.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 13 Discharge and Remedies.
Published by Flat World Knowledge, Inc. © 2014 by Flat World Knowledge, Inc. All rights reserved. Your use of this work is subject to the License Agreement.
INTRODUCTION TO LAW OF TORTS. WHAT IS TORT? TORT IS A FRENCH WORD WHICH IS DERIVED FROM THE LATIN WORD “TORTUS” WHICH MEANS TO TWIST AND IMPLIES CONDUCT.
Legal Aspects DEFINITIONS –Statutory law –Common (case) law –Public law and Private law –Criminal law and Civil law.
Copyright © 2010 South-Western Legal Studies in Business, a part of South-Western Cengage Learning. and the Legal Environment, 10 th edition by Richard.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 9 Fundamental Legal Principles.
4Chapter SECTION OPENER / CLOSER: INSERT BOOK COVER ART Negligence and Strict Liability Section 4.2.
Professional Engineering Practice
Fundamental Legal Principles
Chapter 42 Liability of Accountants & Other Professionals
CHAPTER 3 CONTRACT AND AGENCY
Contract Defined A contract is a legally-enforceable agreement between two or more parties.
Chapter 9 TORTS.
Defences and shared liability
Can you recall the 'holy trinity' of negligence from yesterday?
Section Outline Unintentional Torts Negligence Strict Liability
CIVIL LAW Unintentional Torts.
CIVIL LAW Unintentional Torts.
Ewan A MacGregor Director - Griffiths & Armour Professional Risks
Presentation transcript:

Insurance Institute of London ASG 228 Professional Indemnity Insurance

Legal Background by Derek Tadiello 11 September 2001

“The one great principle of the English law is to make business for itself” (Charles Dickens: Bleak House)

Areas covered contract tort concurrent duties in contract & tort claims by non-contracting parties standard of care damages

limitation exclusion clauses contributory negligence failure to mitigate novus actus interveniens remoteness betterment Limits on recovery

Contract deeds & simple contracts 3 basic elements –offer and acceptance –an intention to be legally bound –consideration (except deeds) form - written, oral or mixture express and implied terms

Tort 4 requirements –existence of a duty of care –a breach of that duty –damage caused by the breach –foreseeability

Cases Donoghue v Stevenson 1932 Hedley Byrne v Heller 1964 Dutton v Bognor Regis UDC 1972 Anns v LB of Merton 1978 Junior Books v Veitchi 1982 Peabody v Sir Lindsay Parkinson 1985 D&F Estates v Church Commissioners 1989 Murphy v Brentwood DC 1991

Ross v Caunters 1979 White v Jones 1993 Arbuthnott v Fagan & Feltrim 1994/ Henderson v Merrett 1995

Concurrent duties in contract and tort Midland Bank v Hett Stubbs & Kemp 1979 Tai Hing Cotton Mill v Liu Chong Bank 1986 Lancashire Churches v Howard Seddon 1991 Henderson v Merrett 1994 Wessex RHA v HLM Design 1994 Holt v Payne Skillington 1995

Claims by non-contracting parties St Martins v Sir Robert McAlpine 1993 Darlington BC v Wiltshier 1995 Panatown v Alfred McAlpine 2000 Baxall Securities v Sheard Walshaw 2000

Contracts (Rights of Third Parties Act (1999) statutory exception to rule of privity of contract applies to contracts entered into after May 2000 enables a third party to enforce the terms of a contract to which it is not a party if: –contract states he may do so, or –contract purports to confer a benefit on him

Standard of care Bolam v Friern Hospital 1957 Whitehouse v Jordan 1981 Wilsher v Essex Area HA 1988 Bolitho v City & Hackney HA 1997 Gloucester HA v Torpy 1997 Matrix-Securities v Theodore Goddard 1997 Balamoan v Holden 1999 David Bond v Sun Alliance 2001

Damages Contract & tort pecuniary and non-pecuniary must be reasonable as between parties Ruxley v Forsyth 1995 inconvenience, discomfort & distress Bailey v Bullock, 1950 Perry v Sidney Phillips 1982, Watts v Morrow 1991

Hartle v Laceys 1999 Farley v Skinner 2000

Limitation periods Personal injury - 3 years contract - 6 or 12 years from breach tort –6 years from damage, or if later –3 years from discovery or reasonable discoverability –cut-off 15 years from last act of negligence

Deliberate concealment S32(1)(b) “where any fact….is deliberately concealed…by the defendant, the limitation period runs from the date the claimant discovered or could have discovered the concealment” S32(2) “a deliberate commission of a breach of professional duty in circumstances in which it is unlikely to be discovered for some time amounts to deliberate concealment of the facts involved in that breach of duty”

Brocklesby v Armitage 1999 Liverpool RC v David Goldberg QC Cave v Robinson Jarvis & Rolfe 2001

Contributory Negligence Law Reform (Contributory Negligence) Act 1945 Basildon DC v J E Lesser Properties 1985 Forsikringsaktieselskapet Vesta v Butcher 1986 Barclays Bank v Fairclough 1995

Failure to mitigate Novus Actus Interveniens Remoteness –Hadley v Baxendale 1854 –Victoria Laundry v Newnam 1949 –The Heron II 1969 –Parsons v Uttley Ingham 1978

Betterment Philips v Ward 1956 Harbutt’s Plasticene v Wayne Tank 1970 Richard Roberts v Douglas Smith Stimson 1989 Victoria University v Hugh Wilson 1985 Imperial College v Norman & Dawbarn 1986

Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978 Where two or more wrongdoers are responsible for the same damage, the Court may apportion damages between them on a just and equitable basis liability of parties may be breach of contract, statute or in tort.