JTC Project Design Subcommittee Pavement Preservation Projects At Pioneer Valley Planning Commission February 25, 2009 Prepared by MassHighway D2.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NEW PROGRAMMATIC CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION AGREEMENT A WORK IN PROGRESS… ODOT—Office of Environmental Services Environmental Update Meeting20 November 2014.
Advertisements

NEPA Environmental Procedure Pam Truitt, Grants Management Consultant  September 4, 2014.
Permitting and Design Guidelines Working with Regulators Melissa Mormilo, P.E., LEED AP DOWL Engineers.
MRWA 2013 ANNUAL CONFERENCE MAINE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) PROGRAM.
BRUCE FREEMAN RAIL TRAIL ARTICLES 22, 23, & ANNUAL TOWN MEETING.
House Bill 2 and P3 Update Aubrey Layne Secretary of Transportation December 17, 2014.
Plans, Specifications and Estimate (PS&E) Kelli Sparkman Local Agency Liaison, Region 3 January 30, 2009.
PSRC’s Project Selection Process February 6,
1 How to Succeed in Statewide and MPO Transportation Planning.
Environmental Justice (EJ) & Community-Based Transportation Planning (CBTP) Grant Programs California Department of Transportation District 3 January 25,
1 Transportation Update. 2 Overview Pre-legislative effort The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) – Highway – Transit – Discretionary.
Jan 22-24, 2007 Transportation Research Board U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington District North Carolina’s Interagency Agreements to Streamline Project.
Overview of the Federal Aid Process for Transportation Projects.
Green Light-Go Program Pennsylvania’s Municipal Signal Partnership Program April 7, 2015 Daniel Farley Chief, Traffic Signal and Arterial Management Section.
Connecticut Department of Transportation Bureau of Policy & Planning.
Minnesota Department of Transportation ARRA, Greater Minnesota Transit, Airport Program Status, & Local Bridge Bonding Update House Transportation Finance.
Safety Project Request received by TDOT Safety Project Request sent to RSAR Coordinator Safety Planning Office completes Letter of Findings for internal.
Cape Cod Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) HOW DOES A PROJECT GET ONTO THE TIP ? Priscilla Leclerc, Senior Transportation Planner Cape Cod Commission.
MassDOT P3 Project Overview. MassDOT Project Mobility.
2012 FTIP/FSTIP Workshop Project Selection Process.
Research Development Seminars Interagency Agreements, Pooled-Fund Studies, and Research in Other States.
Distribution Guided by State Law Surface Transportation Program (STP) Surface Transportation Program (STP) Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality Improvement.
1 Transportation Alternatives Program FY2015 Application Update February 19, 2014 Jennifer DeBruhl Director, Local Assistance Division.
Overview of SAFETEA-LU Sections 6001, 6002, 3005, and 3006 TRB January 13, 2008 Shari Schaftlein FHWA Project Development & Environmental Review Washington,
From Planning to Pouring: The Evolution of Safe Routes to School Julie Walcoff, Ohio DOT, Columbus, OH Alex Smith, Columbus Public Health, Columbus, OH.
REVIEW OF CMS “INITIAL APPROVAL” OF RHP PLAN AND FOLLOW-UP REQUIREMENTS May 8, 2013 REGION 10.
State of Oregon New Hydroelectric Projects Mary Grainey October 2008 Oregon Water Resources Department.
Capital Improvement Program. During the Annual Strategic Action Plan (SAP) evaluation, long-term needs and priorities are identified by City Council Capital.
VIRGINIA’S IMPLEMENTATION of the FINAL RULE on WORK ZONE SAFETY and MOBILITY Virginia Department of Transportation’s Instructional and Informational Memorandum-LD-241.
HIGHWAY/UTILITY PROGRAM OVERVIEW ROADWAY CONFERENCE APRIL 20, 2009.
Reclamation Bureau Interagency Forum Local Agency Planning Process City of Rancho Cordova December 6, 2007.
EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT MAJOR COMMUNITY ISSUES RELATED TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Board of County Commissioners/ Local Planning Agency Joint Meeting.
Transportation Enhancements Application Workshop Welcome!! October 3 & 4, 2012.
ADOT Multimodal Planning Division Planning Assistance for Rural Areas (PARA) Program Overview December 4, 2013.
Marine Spatial Planning for Wave Energy Development in Oregon Kate Sherman, M.S. Candidate Marine Resource Management College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric.
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia, Charlottesville 1 Process Development and Integration for the Six-Year Program.
Local Government Section Welcome Marty Andersen ODOT Local Government Section 355 Capitol Street NE, Rm. 326 Salem, Oregon Ph:
1 C E T A S Purpose and Need Presentation Date Project Name Project location (city, county) ODOT Key Number:
1 C E T A S Triage Presentation, Date Project Name Project location (city, county) ODOT Key Number:
Number of Copies Agency Submissions & Comments. Coordination ESRs are reviewed by OES and coordinated with resource agencies as part of the NEPA review.
Ohio Department of Transportation Steering Committee Meeting #3 Steering Committee Meeting #1May 30, 2012 Steering Committee Meeting #1 WELCOME Steering.
Mass Highway Department (MHD) Design Process Anticipate possible use of MHD funds Anticipate possible use of MHD funds New Design Guide for Project Development.
ODOT STIP Process and Funding Jerri Bohard –Planning Section Manager –Transportation Development Division Steve Leep –Program and Funding Services Manager.
Locally Administered Federal-Aid Project Initiation Workshop Prospectus Part 3 and NEPA Requirements Presenter: Howard Postovit; ODOT Region 5 Region Environmental.
Transportation Conformity Overview H-GAC Conformity Workshop May 30, 2007.
Johnson Street Bridge Replacement Project Update Governance & Priorities Committee Engineering Department July 9, 2009.
Local Agency Programs An Overview Gonzalo Puente, PE Shaun Bates, PE Development Engineer Project Manager.
1 Economic Recovery Funding Drinking Water Infrastructure Projects February 2009 California Department of Public Health Safe Drinking Water State Revolving.
TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES PROGRAM 2016 Project Scoring Update Workshop.
Developing a Purpose & Need Statement. Objectives  Understand when the P&N is developed in the PDP  Understand the importance of a well- written/well-justified.
TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES PROGRAM 2016 Project Scoring Update Workshop.
TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES PROGRAM 2016 Project Scoring Update Workshop.
Rulemaking by APHIS. What is a rule and when must APHIS conduct rulemaking? Under U.S. law, a rule is any requirement of general applicability and future.
American Recovery & Reinvestment Act Discussion February 13, 2009.
Project Delivery Performance Improvement Report to the Oregon Transportation Commission Hal Gard, Technical Services, Geo-Environmental Dee Jones, Technical.
Texas Department of Transportation Corpus Christi District U.S. 181 Harbor Bridge Project Environmental Documentation and Schematic Development Public.
Nathan Pryor Eileen Yazzie February 17, 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Working Group Meeting #2.
1% Sales Tax Commission Board Meeting June 3, 2015.
0 Freight Activities: Year in Review Dec. 12 th 2015.
Community Crossings Matching Grant Fund Program Kathy Eaton-McKalip
Texas Department of Transportation Corpus Christi District U.S. 181 Harbor Bridge Project Environmental Documentation and Schematic Development Citizens.
The Alabama Transportation Rehabilitation and Improvement Program
TITLE PAGE: Project Title
State Aid Plan Approval Process
Transportation Alternatives (TA) Set-aside
General comments: These projects are locally owned and the LPA should be involved and informed throughout the project. The project agreement is between.
Section 4(f) Categorical Exclusion Training Class – Presented by the Office of Environmental Services.
Walker Street Reconstruction Project 25% Design Public Hearing
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Early Funding (Regulations Section 6010)
Presentation transcript:

JTC Project Design Subcommittee Pavement Preservation Projects At Pioneer Valley Planning Commission February 25, 2009 Prepared by MassHighway D2

Overview  Federal Economic Stimulus Bill  Highway Investment  “Shovel Ready” Projects  Remainder of Stimulus Funds  What is a “Book Job”?  How to Get Started…  Preliminary Design – 25% Submission  Sample Early Environmental Coordination Items  Design Public Hearing  Initiate Final Design – 75% Submission  Final Design – 100% Submission  PS&E Submission  Important Resources

Federal Economic Stimulus Bill  $787B bill signed by President  President expects the bill will create/save 79,000 jobs in Massachusetts  Massachusetts will receive $6-9B in direct funding over next 2 years.  $1B for infrastructure improvements

Highway Investment  $27.5B will be allocated for highway/bridge investment across the country  Massachusetts will receive $437.9M  “Shovel ready” – Mass. must “commit” $153M within 120 days of apportionment (obligate/advertise)  Remainder of the funds must be “committed” within 1 year of apportionment; spent by 9/30/2015.  Funds are administered according to Title 23. The bill does not permit funds to be spent in a “Chapter 90” manner.

Highway Investment Breakdown of Massachusetts highway/bridge funding from the stimulus bill: Mandatory Transportation Enhancements$13,135,958 Urban areas over 200K$110,122,871 Urban areas between 5K and 200K$14,593,517 Urban areas under 5K$6,643,189 Available for use any area$293,369,720 TOTAL DISTRIBUTION$437,865,255

“Shovel Ready” Projects  Initial “Shovel Ready” projects must be advertised by early July 2009 (120 days from apportionment).  Generally speaking, projects must currently be fully designed to meet this timeline.  To be eligible, projects must be programmed on MPO TIPs. Public currently reviewing draft TIPs for 120-day “shovel ready” projects in each region.  “Use It or Lose It” – If Mass. does not advertise projects in a timely manner we risk forfeiting funds. Applies to both the 120-day and the 1- year-from-apportionment timeframes.

Remainder of Stimulus Funds  Hundreds of road and bridge projects are potential candidates for the remainder of the funds  There are far more needs than funds available. Geographic equity is one of the guiding principles of the task force  The sooner it becomes clear your project can meet the “shovel ready” definition, the greater likelihood that it may be funded through the stimulus program

Remainder of Stimulus Funds  Work with MassHighway, your MPO and your transportation advisory committee to increase likelihood that your project is included in the stimulus program.  Projects must be included on the your MPO’s TIP in order to be eligible for stimulus funds. MPOs expected to begin considering projects eligible for the remainder of stimulus funds in late spring/early summer  Projects that already have an identified funding source (ex. federal earmark, Accelerated Bridge Program) will be unlikely candidates for stimulus funding.

Remainder of Stimulus Funds  Approval as MassHighway project  Completion of Design  Right of Way Certification  Environmental Clearance:  Wetlands Act – work in state wetland resource area  Army Corps of Engineers permit – work in federal wetlands/waters  Rare Species/MESA  Historic/s. 106 – local historic commission, MHC (by MassHighway)  MEPA – Is ENF required?  Hazardous Materials  Section 4(f) – Use of park / recreation / wildlife refuge / historic asset  NEPA – Is project Categorically Exempt (CE) from preparation of major environmental document? What are critical milestones for highway projects on the way to being “Shovel Ready”?

What is a “Book Job”?  Typically Book Jobs are simple pavement preservation resurfacing projects – “curb to curb”  The main difference between a Book Job and a Standard project is the lack of full-size plans  Explanatory sketches that may be required can be included in Book Jobs, as 8.5” x 11” pages (i.e. wheelchair ramp information)  Book Jobs follow standard MassHighway procedures and approvals  Engineering Directives  Every Book Job is different – some may start out as a Book Job, then evolve into a Standard (full-size plans) project.

Project Initiation for MassHighway Advertising/TIP StepOverview of Project Development 1  Project Need Form (PNF)  Latest forms available online:   Prepared by the Municipality. Completed forms are sent to the District.  Info about the current condition and need, incl. info about pavement, ROW, env. constraints (habitats, Historic Districts, etc)  District will review PNF and will recommend: 1) Not a good TIP project – Municipality should consider other funding source (i.e., Chapter 90); 2) Advance to Project Initiation Form, no further planning required or 3) Advance Project, but additional planning such as a traffic study, corridor study or planning study is needed. 2  Project Initiation Form (PIF)  Latest forms available online:   Prepared by the Municipality. Includes locus map and final copy of planning report (if required).

Project Initiation for MassHighway/TIP Advertising StepOverview of Project Development (continued) 3  Pre-PRC Meeting (Scoring Committee)  Two weeks prior to PRC Meeting  Condition of primary/secondary assets (signal equip, pavement, etc)  Rehab Strategy (District can work with Municipality to develop)  Congestion (pre and post construction based on study)  Mobility for other users (bikes/peds)  ROW impacts  Safety Issues/Crash History  Business Effects/Econ. Development/Land Use  Environmental Effects  Neighborhood Effects  Community Support/Public Process

How to Get Started… StepOverview of Project Development (continued) 4  Project Review Committee (PRC) Review   Meetings held quarterly (next one scheduled for May 14, 2009)  Possible Outcomes:  Approve the project for Advancement  Table the project pending Additional Information  Deny the project District will notify the Municipality of PRC finding and other additional advice for advancement of the design.

Preliminary Design 25% Submission Submittal Requirements  Project Booklet:  Scope & Locus; Typical Section(s); Traffic Management Plans  Early Environmental Coordination Checklist with supporting documentation  Preliminary Pavement Design  Preliminary Cost Estimate (Participating/Non-participating)  Investigate ROW requirements (if any)  25% Highway Design Review Checklist Actions  Review by MassHighway, FHWA (if required), and Municipality  Conduct Design Public Hearing  Obtain 25% Project Approval

Sample Early Environmental Coordination Items  Send out Historical Letters to LHC (copy SHPO & MassHighway CRU)   Submit Coordination Letters with a Scope & Locus to Mass Division of Fisheries & Wildlife, Mass Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program and US Fish & Wildlife  NHESP Review – Priority/Estimated Habitats  Review Project location on-line: 

Design Public Hearing  All 25% Design Comments have been addressed by the designer to the satisfaction of the MassHighway reviewing sections and the Project Manager; and  Bridge Sketch Plans are received (if applicable) The conditions under which the 25% design public hearing is scheduled and coordinated are that: Procedures:  Coordinate a mutually convenient hearing date and time with the District Office, the responsible municipal contact and the designer; location must be ADA accessible  The date chosen should provide the Project Manager with at least 42 business days to prepare the necessary documents and materials for the hearing.

Initiate Final Design 75% Submission Submittal Requirements  Project Booklet:  Responses to 25% Comments; Typical Section(s); Traffic Management Plans; Miscellaneous Details; Special Provisions; Draft Categorical Exclusion (CE) Checklist; Wetland Protection Act permits  Develop Pavement Design – approval by Pavement Design Engineer  Update Cost Estimate (Participating/Non-participating)  Calculation Book  Progress with ROW requirements (if any)  75% Highway Design Review Checklist Actions  Review by MassHighway, FHWA (if required), and Municipality  Obtain 75% Project Approval

Final Design 100% Submission Submittal Requirements  Project Booklet:  Responses to 75% Comments; Typical Section(s); Traffic Management Plans; Miscellaneous Details; Updated Calculation Book; Updated Special Provisions  Develop Traffic Control Agreement (if required)  Update Cost Estimate (Participating/Non-participating)  Finalize ROW Requirements and paperwork  100%/PS&E Highway Design Review Checklist Actions  Review by MassHighway, FHWA (if required), and Municipality  Obtain 100% Project Approval

PS&E Submission Submittal Requirements  Project Booklet:  Responses to 100% Comments; Typical Section(s); Traffic Management Plans; Miscellaneous Details; Calculation Book  Final Cost Estimate (Participating/Non-participating)  Final Special Provisions  100%/PS&E Highway Design Review Checklist Actions  PS&E Completeness Review by MassHighway  ROW Certificate is issued (if applicable)  Environmental Clearance is issued  Submission of PS&E for Procurement  Advertisement

Important Resources  MassHighway’s website  2006 Project Development & Design Guide  Project Review Committee Information   Road Flaggers and Police Details Information   Engineering Directives   Right of Way Information 