Aftermath of the INES-3 Incident at Paks NPP on 10th April, 2003. Lajos Vöröss Hungarian Atomic Energy Authority 7th Annual Meeting of NERS IAEA, Vienna,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Proprietary and Confidential New Jersey Clean Air Council Public Hearing April 1, 2009 Jeff Halfinger Babcock & Wilcox.
Advertisements

Damaged Fuel Storage and Recovery A Case Study Natraj C. Iyer Savannah River National Laboratory June 2, 2010 May 31,- June 4, 2010, IAEA, Vienna, Austria.
11-Apr ISOE International ALARA Symposium JNES, Tokyo, JAPAN, August,2013 Presentation on: Dose Reduction and Management during Overhauling.
1 KRB-A (Grundremmingen, Germany). 2 Type:Boiling Water Reactor Power: 250 MW(e) Started in 1966, shut down in 1977 First commercial power reactor in.
Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Plant Event Summary and FPL/DAEC Actions.
New Nuclear Power Plant Project in Finland Veijo Ryhänen TVO Energy Conference Lisbon, 22 February 2006.
Presented by: Muhammad Ayub Pakistan Nuclear Regulatory Authority Safety Enhancement at Nuclear Power Plants in Pakistan Prospects of Nuclear Energy in.
Vermont Yankee Presentation to VSNAP 7/17/13 VY/Entergy Fukushima Response Update Bernard Buteau.
1 ARN Nuclear Regulatory Authority International Conference on Management of Spent Fuel from Nuclear Power Reactors 31 May - 4 June 2010, Vienna Austria.
The Harnessed Atom Lesson Seven Waste from Nuclear Power Plants.
ASME Nuclear Conformity Assessment
MODULE “PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL” EMERGENCY PLANNING SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP , Programme “Leonardo.
Overview of Incident at Fukushima Daiich Nuclear Power Station (1F) (Informal personal observations) April 2011.
Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.7 Commissioning Geoff Vaughan University of Central.
Nuclear Energy Targets: Explain how the nuclear fuel cycle relates to the true cost of nuclear energy and the disposal of nuclear waste. Describe the issues.
1 Crisis communications: Lessons from „the learning curve” How Could We Have Done It Better? Communication of an Incident by Ágota Hanti Deputy Spokesperson.
Fukushima Incident Preliminary Analysis, Consequences and Safety Status of Indian NPPs Part-1 Dr. S.K.Jain Chairman & Managing Director NPCIL & BHAVINI.
RER/9/096 Regional Planning Meeting “Strengthening National Infrastructures for the Control of Radiation Sources” (TSA-1), (Phase II) Country: Kazakhstan.
Quality Assurance Program National Enrichment Facility Warren Dorman September 19, National Energy and Environmental Conference.
INCIDENT AND EMERGENCY CENTRE Department of Nuclear Safety and Security IECIEC.
Group New Projects Related to Decommissioning. 29 th May 2008 KNPP Richard Benbow – Head of Kozloduy PMU.
MANAGEMENT OF DAMAGED SNF HANDLING OPERATIONS AT PAKS NPP Е.А. Zvir, V.P. Smirnov Research and Development Company “Sosny”, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Energy Forum 2011, Changing the Energy Paradigm and Outlook for South-Eastern EU Energy Forum 2011 Nuclear Safety Regulation in Romania Recent Developments.
MODULE “PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL” ORGANIZATION AND ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROL SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP ,
Group Presentation to 27 th - 29 th May 2009 International Nuclear Forum BULGARIAN NUCLEAR ENERGY – NATIONAL, REGIONAL AND WORLD ENERGY SAFETY.
Nuclear Disasters A Historical Look.
MODULE “PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL” SAFETY ASSESSMENT DURING DECOMMISSIONING SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP ,
Worldwide Commercial Energy Production. Nuclear Power Countries.
MODULE “PREPARING AND MANAGEMENT OF DOCUMENTATION” SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP , Programme “Leonardo da Vinci”
March 11, 2011 to Present. Presentation Overview Reactor Design and FeaturesChronology of EventsCurrent Status of Each ReactorRecovery Actions Kashiwazaki-Kariwa.
C O N T R A C T O R I N F O R M A T I O N E X C H A N G E Reister CE Presentation 1/98 1 Program Elements and Related Activities Rich Reister U.S. Department.
ROMANIAN EXPERIENCE IN TRAINING AND QUALIFICATION OF THE NPP OWNER/OPERATOR FOR UNIT 1 OF CERNAVODA NPP Dr. Ioan Rotaru TM/WS on Topical Issues on Infrastructure.
1 ESTABLISHMENT OF REQUIREMENTS Module “DECOMMISSIONING PROCESS” Project BG/04/B/F/PP , Program “Leonardo da Vinci”
Fukushima Power Plant – Japan Post March 11, 2011
Technical summary of DPRK nuclear program Siegfried S. Hecker Stanford University Center for International Security and Cooperation 2005 Carnegie International.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency IAEA Safety Standards for Research Reactors W. Kennedy Research Reactor Safety Section Division of Nuclear Installation.
Regional Meeting on Applications of the Code of Conduct on Safety of Research Reactors Lisbon, Portugal, 2-6 November 2015 Diakov Oleksii, Institute for.
Sergii Iegan Division on Safety Analysis of Nuclear Facilities
Nuclear Power Plant How A Nuclear Reactor Works.
I & C.
PS/SPS Days Roberto Losito/Oliver Aberle 13th January 2004
IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decision Making Workshop Information IAEA Workshop Safety Assessment Process. Plant Modification.
DEVELOPMENT OF THE NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE FOR NUCLEAR POWER IN VIETNAM DEVELOPMENT OF THE NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE FOR NUCLEAR POWER IN VIETNAM Vuong Huu.
Leading State Inspector Ivan Rovkach Department of Nuclear and Radiation Safety Ministry of Emergency Situations of the Republic of Belarus(GOSATOMNADZOR)
Nuclear Power Plant How A Nuclear Reactor Works. Pressurized Water Reactor - Nuclear Power Plant.
2-6 November 2015 Lisbon, Portugal Regional Meeting on Applications of the Code of Conduct on Safety of RR's 1 Some aspects of the Code of Conduct on the.
MEHB 513 Introduction on nuclear technology assignment GROUP MEMBERS:ID: SEEH CHONG CHIN ME YEE QIAN WAHME TING DING PINGME LIM JIA YINGME
By Annick Carnino (former Director of IAEA Division of Nuclear Installations Safety) PIME, February , 2012.
Workshop on Risk informed decision making on nuclear power plant safety January 2011 SNRC, Kyiv, Ukraine Practical examples of RIDM application.
State Enterprise Radioactive Waste Presented by: Momchil Kazakov – Chief Technologist SD “Decommissioning 1-4 unit”, SERAW 15–17 June 2016 Golden Sands.
Workshop on Risk informed decision making on nuclear power plant safety January 2011 SNRC, Kyiv, Ukraine Benefits and limitations of RIDM by Géza.
Post-Fukushima Severe Accident Management Update Kim, Hyeong Taek KHNP- Central Research Institute July KINS Safety Analysis Symposium.
THE NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE. The Nuclear Fuel Cycle consists of sequence of steps in which U ore is mined, milled, enriched, and fabricated into nuclear fuel.
IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decision Making Workshop Information IAEA Workshop Licensing Renewal of Operating License Periodic.
2013 ISOE International ALARA Symposium
János Krutzler Hungarian Atomic Energy Authority
Radioactive waste repositories
Project General Data Beneficiary: Rosenergoatom
Control Blade Design and Fabrication Improvements using Laser Welding
CR3 and Crystal River Energy Complex
Thomas MAZOUR IAEA, Div of Nuclear Power/NPES
Session Name: Ageing Management
Possible Transition from Operating to Decommissioning
RCF Plenary Session 21 September 2018
Session Name: Lessons Learned from Mega Projects
Summary of the Earthquake and Situation of the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa NPP
Radioactive Waste and Spent Fuel Management in Hungary
Legal and Regulatory Framework for Nuclear Installations in IRAN
NUCLEAR ENERGY What is it?
Regulatory system in Hungary
Presentation transcript:

Aftermath of the INES-3 Incident at Paks NPP on 10th April, Lajos Vöröss Hungarian Atomic Energy Authority 7th Annual Meeting of NERS IAEA, Vienna, 23-24, September 2004.

2

3 Main Tasks to Perform After having stabilised the situation inside the reactor hall there have been two main tasks to perform: 1. Recovery of service shaft No.1 of Unit 2. (SS) where the incident occurred 2. Restart of Unit 2. as soon as possible

4 - Recovery project and team established at Paks NPP - Tendering process won by Russian consortium led by TVEL; FRAMATOM had bidden as well months preparatory, 2-3 months implement phases planned, excluded licensing time - significant delay now - Special tools for manual removal of debris are to be used - Manipulation is to be carried out from a movable platform placed above the cleaning tank - Some experiments to clarify behaviour of debris for planned removal actions performed Recovery of SS

5 Recovery outline – FRA / GER crane air filter manipulator working rod suction control panel container cleaning tank 2 versions removal of the cleaning tank and fuel in one step (dismissed later – difficult, does not give final solution) removal of the cleaning tank and fuel in parts with clips, bending tools, manipulators, vacuum soakers, cutters

6 Recovery outline – RUS shell container different - water level, - boron concent- ration, - contami- nation ГИ ВНИПИЭТ ГП НИКИМТ ПО Маяк НПФ Сосны structure winner mostly manual removal moving platform

7 - Separation of SS from spent fuel pond and from other systems of Unit 2.became necessary - Autonomous cooling device and emergency boron injection system for SS have been installed - Mobile water cleaning device (NURES,Finland) was used to clean the water especially from the uranium and trans- uranium isotopes Recovery of SS (cont’d)

8 - Reliable neutron flux and boron concentration measurement in SS installed - Increased radwaste storage capacity constructed - Free positions made available for capsules/cartridges containing debris in spent fuel pool - Preparatory actions for regulatory licensing process - regulatory requirements for recovery developed - review and assessment in large number of modifications and fabrication of equipment performed

9 Restart of Unit 2. - After long-term shut-down status with intact main equipment but contaminated by uranium and trans-uranium isotopes - special cleaning was necessary (completed) - Interrupted refuelling and maintenance occurred during the incident - RPV used as temporary storage tank of spent fuel assemblies - Low enrichment fresh FE supply and rearrangement of spent fuel pool became necessary - Reuse of cleaned spent fuel assemblies is limited

10 Restart of Unit 2. (cont’d) - C onception for short term operation cycle developed - refuelling and yearly maintenance completed - suitable core for operation during the preparatory phase of the recovery is possible (about 4 months long) - regulatory requirements for restart/operation phases developed, licence given on 16. July, nearly full power operation started on 02 Sept Keen interest from media and public follows

11 International Assistance - IAEA - two international missions provided at Paks NPP - GAN (Russian Regulator) - on basis of contractual arrangement, focuses to review QA of Russian contractors - US NRC/IAEA - gives advice to review conditions of restart of Unit 2. NOTE: In spite of the incident, lifetime extension and power uprating of the units are still insisted on