Brussels Briefing n. 31 Geography of food: reconnecting with origin in the food system 15 th May 2013 Existing global and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Madrid System for the International Registration of Marks Lilian Liu TM Dept. Lehman, Lee & Xu July 31, 2008
Advertisements

Doha's Impact on TRIPS: Balancing Geographical Indications Protection Clark W. Lackert Chair, INTA International Amicus Committee and Partner, King & Spalding.
Sui generis system for the protection of non-agricultural geographical indications – the Hungarian example András Jókúti Legal and International Department.
World Intellectual Property Organization The Protection of Geographical Indications: the Context Marie-Paule Rizo Head of the Design and Geographical Indication.
WIPO NATIONAL SEMINAR ON OMANI TRADITIONAL VALUES IN A GLOBALIZED WORLD Muscat, February 13 and 14, 2005 International Legal Framework for the Protection.
Neil WILSON Director, Functional Support Division Brands and Designs Sector Seminar on WIPO Services and Initiatves Global IP Systems The Madrid, Hague.
Lisbon System Protection of Geographical Indications - international legal framework National Roving Seminars on Geographical Indications Chennai, January.
Geographical indications and their use to promote local products Damascus, May 2007 Octavio Espinosa WIPO.
INTERNATIONAL TRADEMARK ASSOCIATION INTA GI TRIPS 23.4 Multilateral Register Proposal CLARK W. LACKERT, Chair, INTA GI Committee and Partner, King & Spalding.
International Registration of Geographical Indications and Appellations of Origin Matthijs Geuze, WIPO National Seminar on the Use of Industrial Property.
Geographical Indications Law: a new tool for Africa? All Africa House (UCT) Aug. 28, 2012 Seble Baraki Open A.I.R. Research Fellow.
Marcus Höpperger Acting Director
1 XI INT. CONGRESS AAAML A comparison of the three GI schemes in the EU A trade mark practioner’s perspective… Benjamin Fontaine Parma, March 2013.
DS 174 – Trademarks & Geographical Indications
GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS
Geographical Indications Intellectual Property & Competition Law Presentation By: Brinda Sreedharan Ravi Teja Rethu Kumari.
THE PROTECTION OF INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY AND TREATIES ADMINISTERED BY WIPO TK.
By Prof. A. Damodaran Indian Institute of Management, Bangalore
RED DE PROPIEDAD INTELLECTUAL E INDUSTRIAL EN LATINOAMÉRICA PILA-Network is a project co-funded by the European Union in the framework of the ALFA programme.
Alexander Anton Attorney-at-Law German Dairy Association (MIV), Brussels Trademarks, Geographical Indications and Generics in cheeses.
Perspectives for Geographical Indications Teresa Mera June, 2009.
Let’s Have An Other Look At The Lisbon Agreement Matthijs Geuze WIPO.
The international framework for the protection of geographical indications Damascus, May 2007 Octavio Espinosa WIPO.
1 International Legal Framework for the Protection of Geographical Indications Warsaw, 26 April 2006 Denis Croze Acting Director Advisor Economic Development.
The Lisbon System for the Notification and Registration of Appellations of Origin.
GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS AND APPELLATIONS OF ORIGIN: AN OVERVIEW
Government of Montenegro Intellectual Property Office
The need for recognition and protection of geographical indications in South Africa Prof Johann Kirsten Head of the Department of Agricultural Economics,
Brussels Briefing n. 31 Geography of food: reconnecting with origin in the food system 15 th May Overview of origin-linked.
World Intellectual Property Organization The importance of facilitating international protection Lisbon, October 31, 2008 Maria Paola Rizo Senior legal.
© 2006 Melanie Fiedlerwww.melaniefiedler.eu Seminar on Trademarks and Designs The protection of geographical indications and appellations of origin (including.
THE MADRID SYSTEM Legal Framework (I) October 2010 Diego Agustín CARRASCO PRADAS Head, Legal Section, Legal and Promotion Division, International Registries.
Czech Presidency High Level Conference on the Future of Quality Policy of Agricultural Products and Foodstuff PDOs/PGIs: The point of view of GI producers.
LECTURE XI. INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS Copyright Law and Media Law JUDr. Eva Ondřejová, LL.M. 1.
EPA Negotiations: Intellectual Property and Sustainable Development for ECOWAS Countries By Catherine Grant Director: Trade Policy Business Unity South.
World Intellectual Property Organization THE MADRID SYSTEM FOR THE INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION OF MARKS: OBJECTIVES AND BASIC FEATURES Tel Aviv, July 4,
“Legal frameworks for the protection of Geographic Indications” Carmen Bullon FAO Development Law Service.
World Intellectual Property Organization International Protection of Geographical Indications Overview and Recent Developments Tbilisi, October 28, 2009.
TAIEX Seminar on IP rights The Madrid System for the International Registration of Marks Ankara - November 7, 2005 Marie Paule Rizo, WIPO.
Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights FAO Regional Workshop on WTO Accession Damascus, October 2008 Hamish Smith Agriculture and.
History of the GI system How it all started. History of the GI system Foods have be named after their geographical origin since Antiquity: examples: 5th.
Project results legal issues... Tbilisi, 27 November 2007.
Geographical Indications and WIPO Recent Developments Marcus Höpperger, WIPO.
WTO and the TRIPS Agreement Wolf R. MEIER-EWERT WTO Secretariat A Business-oriented overview of Intellectual Property for Law Students WIPO, Geneva 20.
International Registration of GIs: Building on Existing Systems Matthijs Geuze WIPO.
1 THE NEGOTIATIONS ON GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS AT THE WTO AND THEIR EFFECTS ON AGRICULTURE NEGOTIATIONS David Vivas Eugui UNCTAD, Commercial Diplomacy.
CZECH PRESIDENCY HIGH LEVEL CONFERENCE ON THE FUTURE OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCT QUALITY POLICY Prague, 13 March 2009 DRAFT CONCLUSIONS OF WORKSHOP B: EU.
The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) and the Turkish Patent Institute Istanbul, September 13 to 15, 2011 WIPO TRAINING OF TRAINERS PROGRAM.
REVIEW OF THE LISBON AGREEMENT FOR THE PROTECTION OF APPELLATIONS OF ORIGIN AND THEIR INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION: LATEST DEVELOPMENTS Florence Rojal Legal.
World Intellectual Property Organization The Strategic Use for SME’s of the Madrid and Hague Systems Betty Berendson, Senior Information Officer Information.
National Intellectual Property Center of Georgia Sakpatenti Istanbul, Turkey May, 2011 Current Situation on Nation Branding Issues in Georgia.
Lisbon System Built-in Flexibilities of the Lisbon System Forum on Geographical Indications and Appellations of Origin Lisbon, October 30 and 31, 2008.
World Intellectual Property Organization Geographical indications: the international legal framework; latest developments Bratislava, December 1st., 2009.
Geographical indications of source Dr. Ioannis Kikkis, EPLO, Head of Intellectual Property dpt. 16 March 2015 Workshop on intellectual property protection.
1 M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 29 – Customs union Bilateral screening:
1 Giulio C. Zanetti, WIPO Alicante, April Giulio C. Zanetti, WIPO Alicante, April 2000 Recent developments in the Madrid system for the International.
The International Registration of Designs Background and Key Principles of the Hague System.
NORTH AFRICA REGIONAL UPDATE MOHAMED ELDIB. TABLE OF CONTENTS  ABOUT ELDIB & CO  NORTH AFRICA OVERVIEW  LATEST DEVELOPMENTS  IP OVERVIEW  STATISTICS.
Pierfrancesco C. Fasano Mediation Case Manager
Wolf MEIER-EWERT World Trade Organization
Recent Developments at the International Level
Geographical Indications
Existing Approaches on the National and International Levels
Geographical Indications
IP Protection under the WTO
Community protection of geographical indications :
The IP International framework Seminar on the Role of IP for SMEs Damascus, November 17 and 18, 2008 Marco Marzano de Marinis, Program Officer.
Protecting a Valuable Asset – How to Protect Your Brand With Madrid
The Lisbon System for the Notification and Registration of Appellations of Origin The Lisbon System facilitates the protection of appellations of origin.
A Business-Oriented Overview of Intellectual Property for Law Students
Presentation transcript:

Brussels Briefing n. 31 Geography of food: reconnecting with origin in the food system 15 th May Existing global and regional legal frameworks for origin-branding and protecting geographical indications and traditional products Marie-Paule Rizo, WIPO

World Intellectual Property Organization Geographical Indications as Distinctive Signs for Collective Use: Developing Brands for Origin-Products Marie-Paule Rizo Head of Industrial Design and Geographical Indication Law Section

Five multilateral treaties applicable to GIs: WIPO:Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property(1883) Madrid Agreement on the Repression of False or Deceptive Indications of Source on Goods (1891) Lisbon Agreement for the Protection of Appellations of Origin and their International Registration (1958) Madrid Agreement and Protocol for the International Registration of Marks (1891 and 1989) WTO:TRIPS Agreement (1994) International legal framework

The TRIPS Agreement « Members should provide the legal means for interested parties to prevent: the use of any means in the designation or presentation of a good that indicates or suggest that the good… originates in a geographical area other than the true place of origin in a manner which misleads the public as to the geographical origin of the good; any use which constitutes an act of unfair competition… » General standard of protection (Art. 22.2)

How to protect GIs? Legislation on unfair competition Collective or certification marks Sui generis system Administrative systems (labelling, etc.)

Different modes of protection can complement each other ROQUEFORT (PDO)

Why protect GIs at the international level Where do you market the products identified by the GI? Territoriality principle in IP law

How to protect GIs at the international level? Bilateral treaties Regionally: EU, OAPI Multilateral treaties Madrid System for the International Registration of Marks Lisbon Agreement for the International Registration of Appellations of Origin

Lisbon Union: 28 Member States (on July 4, 2013) Africa (6) Algeria Burkina Faso Congo Gabon Togo Tunisia Asia (4) Georgia Islamic Rep. of Iran Israel DPR of Korea America (6) Costa Rica Cuba Haiti Mexico Nicaragua Peru Europe (12) Bosnia and Herzegovina Bulgaria Czech Rep. France Hungary Italy Moldova Montenegro Portugal Serbia Slovakia The FYR of Macedonia The Lisbon Agreement

France 509 Czech Rep. 76 Bulgaria 51 Italy 33 Hungary 28 Georgia 20 Cuba 19 Mexico 14 Peru 8 Algeria 7 Portugal 7 Tunisia 7 DPR of Korea 6 Slovakia 6 FYR of Macedonia 4 Serbia 3 Montenegro 2 Costa Rica 1 Israel 1 Moldova registrations – 803 in force

Establishes an international register for appellations of origin and a procedure for their registration Provides a definition of appellation of origin (Art. 2(1)): “the geographical denomination of a country, region or locality which serves to designate a product originating therein, the quality/characteristics of which are due exclusively or essentially to the geographical environment, including natural and human factors.” The Lisbon Agreement Principles

Flexibility: in practice traditional appellations that have the “quality link” have been assimilated to appellations of origin: e.g. MUSCADET (Nº 279, wine, France) REBLOCHON (Nº 458, cheese, France) VINHO VERDE (Nº 564, wine, Portugal) The Lisbon Agreement Principles

Any sort of product may be designated by an AO: - natural products (e.g. mineral water, marble) Karlovarska Voda, Marble Lepenica - manufactured products (e.g. crystalware, porcelain) Joblonec, Herend - agricultural, food and handicraft products Fontina, Huile d’olive de Nyons, Bordeaux, Olinalá The Lisbon Agreement

International application INTERNATIONAL BUREAU Records in the International Register Publishes in Bulletin Appellations of origin Notifies other members OTHER MEMBERS examine 12 months REFUSAL 12 months NO REFUSAL = protection The Lisbon Agreement: General view of the procedure country of origin Appellation protected as such

States that have not refused a notified AO within 12 months from receipt of the notification must ensure protection of the appellation against usurpation or imitation, even if the true origin of the product is stated, or if the appellation is used in translated form or accompanied by a disclaimer or a delocalizer (“type”, “method”, “system”) cannot deem that the appellation has become generic as long as it remains protected as an appellation of origin in its country of origin The Lisbon Agreement Effects of international registration

Term: Protection of the appellation of origin in each member country that has not refused protection continues without renewal as long as the appellation is protected as such in its country of origin No renewal is required to maintain the international registration The Lisbon Agreement

Single instrument covering AOs and Gis: two definitions Single,high level of protection Substantive provisions applicable to both Accession Possibility for IGOs (e.g., EU) Revision of the Lisbon System

Development of the Lisbon system The work ahead: Diplomatic Conference for the adoption of a revised Lisbon Agreement in 2015?

Rule 9(4)(x) of the Common Regulation expressly provides for registration of collective or certification marks 1247 collective or certification marks registered 500 in classes 29 to 33 Madrid System

Madrid Union 1 Agreement only 34 Protocol only (including EU) 55 Agreement and Protocol 90 Members

basic registration Preconditionor basic application International application OFFICE OF ORIGIN checks correspondence with the basic application/ registration INTERNATIONAL BUREAU checks formalities records in the International Register publishes in the International Gazette notifies the designated Contracting Parties OFFICE OF DESIGNATED CP substantive examination 12/18 months prov.refusal 12/18 months no refusal = effect of a national registration General Overview of the Procedure

Madrid System NAPA VALLEY

Conclusion Collective signs indicating geographical origin: Multi-functionality Potential Readily available emotion Emotion is the basis for reputation Reputation needs stewardship Reputation = Intangible Asset = (collective) Intellectual Property Different concepts, different modes of protection

World Intellectual Property Organization THANK YOU!